Showing posts with label MALDEF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MALDEF. Show all posts

Monday, September 15, 2008

Remember in 1940 Germany, certain groups had to "register"

Imagine having to get a license to rent an apartment or house to live in a certain city? Who in world ever heard of that? Of course if you are the all-American, blonde blue-eyed family and your name is Smith or Jones, I bet you could get away with living there without a license. If it were me and I was a Smith or Jones, I would move away. Who would want to live in a city like that?

Probably plenty of people, its the gated-community syndrome.

---

---
ACLU And MALDEF File Lawsuit To Stop Farmers Branch Newest Anti-Immigrant Ordinance (9/15/2008)

Ordinance Requires All Renters To "Register" And Obtain City Licenses To Reside In Farmers Branch, Texas

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org

DALLAS – Friday, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Texas filed a complaint in federal court charging that Farmers Branch Ordinance 2952 violates the U.S. Constitution and federal and state statutes. The ordinance, which requires all renters in Farmers Branch to register their presence with the City and obtain an occupancy license, is the city's third effort to restrict residency in Farmers Branch.

"Unfortunately, the City of Farmers Branch doesn't know when to quit," said Nina Perales, Southwest Regional Counsel for MALDEF. "Despite several rulings striking down predecessor ordinances, Farmers Branch continues to try to regulate immigration by violating the rights of all renters in Farmers Branch."

A federal judge has twice ruled unconstitutional the city's attempts to pass such measures. The third such effort, Ordinance 2952, was passed by the city just five days after U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay struck down an earlier version of the rental ban. The ordinance was scheduled to take effect Saturday, September 13 but was enjoined late Friday afternoon by U.S. District Judge Jane Boyle in a separate related lawsuit.

"Anyone with a sense of history should be wary of an ordinance requiring a city's residents to 'register' and obtain an 'occupancy license,'" said Lisa Graybill, Legal Director for the ACLU of Texas.

"Far from curing the defects of the previous ordinances, the new ordinance continues to violate the Constitution. Rather than ending the city's misguided meddling in people's lives, it seeks to expand its reach by subjecting everyone to this intrusive registration and licensing regime, which would expose private domestic arrangements and personal details," noted Omar Jadwat, staff attorney for the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project.

The lawsuit charges that Ordinance 2952 allows Farmers Branch to enforce immigration law, a responsibility of the federal government. The ordinance also violates the equal protection and due process provisions of the Constitution.

A copy of the complaint is available online at: www.aclu.org/immigrants/discrim/36759lgl20080912.html

Attorneys who worked on the case include Jadwat and Lucas Guttentag of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project; Graybill of the ACLU of Texas; Perales and Marisol L. Perez of MALDEF; and David Broiles.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

MALDEF Statement on DREAM ACT Vote 10 24 2007

From Mexican American Legal Defense Fund


1717 K Street, Suite 311, Washington, DC 20036 Office: 202-293-2828



PRESS RELEASE CONTACT:

FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION Estuardo Rodriguez: 202-365-0625

October 24, 2007 Peter Zamora: 202-293-2828

Bush Administration and 44 U.S. Senators Block Passage of the DREAM Act

Vote is a victory for anti-immigrant sentiment over education and national service



Washington, DC - Today, by a vote of 52-44, the United States Senate rejected the DREAM Act, which required 60 votes to move forward. The DREAM Act would offer conditional legal immigration status for many of our nation's best and brightest high school graduates who enroll in community colleges or four-year colleges or serve in the nation's military.



More troubling than the 44 Senators' votes against the DREAM Act was the Bush Administration's late opposition to the bill and inaccurate message to the U.S. Senate on the substance of the proposal. In contrast to its previous support for comprehensive immigration reform that included a path to citizenship, the Administration turned its back on the graduates of U.S. high schools who could better contribute to the economy and society if the DREAM Act became law.



"President Bush and 44 Senators have weakened America by this vote. By cowering in the face of divisive anti-immigrant sentiment, they make it harder for the nation to be equipped to be ready, both here and abroad, for the economic, societal and other challenges we face. The DREAM Act was a modest proposal to increase educational opportunities for young people to serve the nation," stated John Trasviña, MALDEF's President and General Counsel.



"Our country needs elected officials who are willing to take action to strengthen our nation," stated Peter Zamora, Washington, D.C. Regional Counsel. "44 Senators and the White House have instead chosen to use anti-immigrant fear-mongering as a political tool. This is reprehensible."