Prince William County's Segregationist History

Image from Princeton University Press

Prince William County Virginia has been in a "racial stalemate"* for a long time, before Clinton, before the two Bushes, before Vietnam - back to 1959. That year PWC shut down its public schools in order to avoid the Supreme Court's rule on school desegregation. The shut down lasted for five years. The white kids went to private academies, but where did the black kids go to school?

Now that I have read Sara Fritz' op-ed piece I wonder why anyone in the world would want to move to PWC - I don't think that even South Africa schools have separate cheer leading squads anymore, but sure enough they still exist in Prince William County Virginia.

For all the Latinos in PWC, please consider moving to Houston. Our city is not perfect, but at least our public high school cheer leading squads are integrated.

In Virginia, a Small Town's Racial Lessons

Sunday, May 4, 2008; B08
Washington Post

Amid the controversy last week over the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's latest comments and his relationship with Sen. Barack Obama ["Obama Calls Minister's Comments 'Outrageous,' " front page, April 30], it might be useful to take a look at some of the racial politics we've had in our region. The tiny town of Farmville in Southside Virginia offers a rich case study in what Obama has called "the racial stalemate," the failure of black and white people to openly discuss their mutual resentments.

In 1959, Prince Edward County shut down its public schools for five years to resist the racial integration ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court. The white children went to a hastily organized private academy that was subsidized by the state government; the black kids were left to fend for themselves.

Today, blacks and whites in Prince Edward County still live racially isolated lives. The children of well-off white residents attend the private school established in 1959, leaving the predominantly black public schools starved for resources. The high school even has two cheerleading squads: one black, one white.

There has been precious little racial healing in Prince Edward County because white and black folks avoid discussing what happened there. None of the town fathers ever admitted the school shutdown was wrong. African Americans deprived of an adequate education continue to seethe with anger, passing it on to their children and grandchildren.

Obama, in his Philadelphia speech on race, called on Americans to participate in a genuine dialogue about racial attitudes. Conservatives dismissed his suggestion, comparing it to President Bill Clinton's now largely forgotten "national conversation on race" in the 1990s. Others saw it only as an effort to rescue Obama's presidential bid.

Yet even in Farmville, there is evidence that Obama's proposed remedy can work. For more than a year, members of the Prince Edward Dialogue for Reconciliation -- both black and white -- have been meeting monthly to openly discuss their prejudices with each other. It is the first time that any of them have talked about these issues in a biracial setting.

The results are remarkable. Despite some bitter exchanges, members of the group have developed strong personal bonds. Their most healing conversation came the night they were asked to recall a time of suffering in their lives. While the black men and woman mourned the loss of their life's potential for lack of education, whites acknowledged the town's tragic history had left them with feelings of loss and guilt. In such moments, blacks and whites recognize their common humanity.

Two weeks ago, the process expanded when the community's black and white pastors came together for the first time to discuss how they can assist racial reconciliation. When they meet again on May 17, they will discuss new ways to bring their congregations together.

Social science supports this approach. Two Smith College professors, Joshua Miller and Susan Donner, published a study showing that well-run small group racial dialogues offer perhaps the best alternative for improving race relations. They concluded: "If the talk is genuine talk, informed talk and persistent talk, it will identify the waste, cost, evil and tragedy of institutional racism."

Building racial trust does not require an expensive national program. It can be accomplished in small, voluntary gatherings hosted by local churches, schools and civic groups. But we must encourage open conversations about race. As we have seen recently in Farmville and in the presidential campaign, we can and we must try to end "the racial stalemate."

-- Sara Fritz

Washington

The writer, a Washington journalist, is working on a book about the racial history of Prince Edward County.

*racial stalemate, a term used by Barack Obama

Benedict and Those Red Shoes

photo from Prada web page











The Pope wears red shoes


Somewhere in my little girl memory I must have seen a Pope wear red shoes. I was very aware of the Pope when John XXIII had the job. Everybody was crazy about him. His idea of Vatican II - for many - was saving the Church from irrelevance. The only thing I was disappointed about was that in our religion classes at Catholic school, we no longer would be learning the mass in Latin. Believe or not I can still remember one phrase - Et in terra pax homínibus bonae voluntátis -

Back when I was in the primary grades I found the whole idea of the church very confusing. At the time, in my town, the churches were segregated - there were black protestant churches, Mexican churches, white protestant churches, ethnic Catholic churches, and Catholic churches for white people. (My father always said - with much irony- that many people did not consider Czech people white).

Of course, people now say that the church, of any denomination, is still the most segregated place in America. But in the 1930s southeast Texas it was a nightmare. While doing research for my book Cemeteries of Ambivalent Desire I found some church records that said when Mexican people would go to the door of the rectory of a church in Richmond (Texas) - the priest would see them, call the Sheriff in terror - and a few minutes later, the Mexican faithful finding themselves greeted with a gun.


I do have to say one thing for the clergy at my school and the Mexican church I attended -- they were never weird with us... Maybe the small town societal controls kept them in line - but either way - we actually felt safe among the priests.

The ones we were really afraid of were the nuns. Not for anything sordid like sexual abuse... more like emotional abuse. A few really did make us feel really bad. There was a continuous edge to what they told us. They would diminish major losses we were experiencing (like the loss of a parent), tell us there was no hope for us academically, and naturally favored those with the best cursive handwriting.

As for those red shoes in Church history, for me they represent the nobility of the Church (I mean nobility as in privilege). Over the years I have read many books on the history of the church in Europe and the Americas and have found it to be an institution that is immersed in regal rituals (and clothing) but generally has not been very sensitive to real people (real people being lay people who don't give a lot of money to the church).

There have been a few orders that were different. Mostly I can say the Basilian priests have been more aware and empathic than any other I have ever run into. But even then, decades ago, when they first came to Texas they were saying they were going to bring "civilization" to the Mexicans.

Lastly the red shoes remind me of hubris. In Houston, the hubris has been exhibited by the building of a new (and gorgeous) Co-Cathedral for the Diocese. It costs so many millions of dollars I don't even want to know.

The red shoes don't help anyone except make people talk about the Pope's feet (they are humorous I must admit) - and the expensive new cathedral tells the community that 1)the church has lots of money and 2) and spending money on a building is a higher priority than doing something for its huge immigrant population. Can you imagine how many lobbyists the Church could hire with that money! With that kind of change they might even have influence on the more xenophobic members of the U.S. Congress.

---------

Pope Benedict XVI Visits the U.S.
Why Does the Pope Wear Red Shoes?
All Things Considered, April 17, 2008

Pope Benedict XVI's ruby red shoes are drawing plenty of attention as he visits Washington, D.C. The handmade loafers, crafted for Benedict by an Italian shoemaker, are seen as a statement of his desire to demonstrate continuity with the symbols and history of the church.

Although Pope John Paul II often wore brown shoes, other pontiffs have also worn red shoes. Benedict's shoes, which stand out against his spotless white robes, also serve as a reminder of the many years he wore the red cloth of a cardinal.

For entire article and link to audio click here