Showing posts with label Racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Racism. Show all posts

Sunday, October 18, 2009

What is YOUR Last Name? - racism for real


A new study done in the UK regarding discrimination regarding people's surnames while applying for jobs should be a wake up call for those of us in denial about this sort of thing. There has been plenty of talk about this happening in France, but this time someone actually took the initiative to document the problem in the UK.

--
"A government sting operation targeting hundreds of employers across Britain has uncovered widespread racial discrimination against workers with African and Asian names.

Researchers sent nearly 3,000 job applications under false identities in an attempt to discover if employers were discriminating against jobseekers with foreign names. Using names recognisably from three different communities – Nazia Mahmood, Mariam Namagembe and Alison Taylor – false identities were created with similar experience and qualifications. Every false applicant had British education and work histories.

They found that an applicant who appeared to be white would send nine applications before receiving a positive response of either an invitation to an interview or an encouraging telephone call. Minority candidates with the same qualifications and experience had to send 16 applications before receiving a similar response." London Observer



Undercover job hunters reveal huge race bias in Britain's workplaces

Civil servants created false identities to send CVs to hundreds of employers in sting to uncover discrimination



Rajeeve Syal, investigations editor
The Observer, October 18, 2009

Friday, May 22, 2009

You are White and Want to do the Right Thing?

One of the things I have found in my classes over the years is that people generally don't want to be hateful or discriminatory or (!) racist.  Often there seems to be a problem with lack of information.

Another problem is that white people have a really hard time talking about being racist (well, maybe all of us do).  

Here is an interesting essay on being a white person in an imperfect (or excuse me, racist) society.  It focuses on people working as college professors, but we can all learn from it. Click the title for the link.

Saturday, February 28, 2009

When a Joke is not a Joke


Sigmund Freud

A few days ago, a well liked relative of mine received a text message while we were having a conversation.  She showed it to me while she was laughing.  I couldn't believe what I read.  It was a nasty joke about the Obamas and a Coon dog.  She said it came from a white friend of hers who often sent nasty jokes about Mexicans too.  I asked her if she every sent any nasty white jokes back, but she said she didn't know any.  She didn't think the jokes were racist...they were just jokes.  

I guess Dean Grose, the mayor of Los Alamitos, California felt the same way when he sent an email about a watermelon patch at the White House.  He must have not known that elected officials aren't supposed to do that.  

How many thousands of these jokes going around these days in text messages and emails?  There were just as many when Bush was president, but these were because of his incompetence.  Seems like a big difference this time.  These jokes are not about incompetence, they refer to a brutal history and ideology that apparently many people still believe in.  What a shame.

Just in case you hadn't heard about Freud's theory about jokes.  He thought that people often used jokes to say what they were really thinking - a nice way to conceal an insult.

----
By BRENT STAPLES
Published: February 27, 2009

Hitler found quite a bit to admire about this country during its apartheid period. Writing in the early 1930s, he attributed white domination of North America to the fact that the “Germanic” peoples here had resisted intermarriage with — and held themselves apart from — “inferior” peoples, including the Negroes, whom he described as “half-apes.”

He was not alone in these sentiments. The effort to dehumanize black people by characterizing them as apes is central to our national history. Thomas Jefferson made the connection in his notorious book “Notes on the State of Virginia,” in which he asserted fantastically that male orangutans were sexually drawn to Negro women.  more



See dreamacttexas post:  Race and the U.S.: New Attorney General Tells It Like It Is, February 26, 2009

---

Top Officials Expand The Dialogue on Race
Month's Celebrations Evoke a Mix of Views
By Krissah Thompson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 28, 2009; Page A01

When the country's racial chasms seemed to threaten President Obama's election, his team had to tread carefully. A month into his administration, the tone has changed. Top officials are engaging the subject of race more freely, with a boldness and confidence they once shunned.

With the federal government's annual African American History Month celebrations as a backdrop, the attorney general, the first lady and the head of the Environmental Protection Agency spoke more frankly about race recently than any of Obama's surrogates did during the hard-fought campaign. more

Monday, January 19, 2009

Racism Over? I don't think so


The hundreds of thousands that are filling up the mall in D.C. for the inauguration are not an indication of racism gone away, or diminished. It is still there. Its in the song the RNC made of Obama. That is big stuff, not a local level issue. Obama is there for many reasons. One of course, the guy is incredibly intelligent, articulate, wise and many other things. Plus he was pushed along by us having a president that was totally the opposite. But then, does that mean we are less racist?


--

--
Far Fewer Consider Racism Big Problem
Little Change, However, at Local Level



By Michael A. Fletcher and Jon Cohen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, January 19, 2009; Page A06

As President-elect Barack Obama prepares to take office, far fewer black and white Americans say they view racism as "a big problem" in American society than said so in mid-1996, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

With the nation poised to inaugurate its first African American president, the survey found that just over a quarter of all Americans said they see racism as a large societal problem, less than half of the 54 percent who said so about a dozen years ago. Americans also have high hopes that Obama -- who is of mixed-race parentage but refers to himself as African American -- will inspire an improvement in race relations.

But even as declining numbers of Americans see racism as a big problem for the country, there has been little change in the amount of racism people perceive in their local communities. The survey also found that there has been little change over the past six years in the proportion of African Americans who said they have experienced racial bias in housing, employment and other areas... more

Monday, October 27, 2008

Plot uncovered in Tennessee - had planned to kill Obama

Just a reminder that some white people do hate black people.


US election: Youths' plot to kill 102 black people and Obama uncovered

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/27/uselections2008-barackobama-neo-nazi-plot

* Elana Schor in Washington
* guardian.co.uk,
* Monday October 27 2008 21.25 GMT


Law enforcement officers have foiled a plot by two neo-Nazis who aimed to assassinate Barack Obama before killing 102 other black people, according to court records unsealed today.

The disrupted plot involved robbing a gun store to obtain weapons that the two skinheads would use against Obama and black students in the state of Tennessee, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF), a US law enforcement agency.

ATF agents confiscated five guns from the two perpetrators, 20-year-old Daniel Cowart of Bells, Tennessee, and 18-year-old Paul Schlesselman of West Helena, Arkansas. Both are being held without bail by authorities.

"They said that would be their last, final act, that they would attempt to kill Senator Obama," Jim Cavanaugh, the special agent in charge of the ATF's Nashville office, told the Associated Press.

"They didn't believe they would be able to do it, but that they would get killed trying."

Although the perpetrators were doubtful of their ability to carry out their grisly plans, the plot risks stoking the simmering cauldron of racial uncertainty that Obama has faced in rural areas of the US.

Even as polls show his support among white voters reaching a record high for a Democratic candidate, workers for the Obama campaign have confronted the legacy of prejudice in the south and Appalachian areas.

Obama campaign offices in several states have been defaced with racist graffiti, and door-to-door canvassers have shared reports of voters making prejudiced remarks about the candidate.

Three men were detained two months ago during the Democratic convention in Denver after discussing a plot to kill Obama, but prosecutors did not deem that incident a credible threat.

The two neo-Nazis chose 102 as the number of victims for their plot based on numerology that is significant to white supremacists. They are facing charges of unregistered firearm possession, conspiracy to steal firearms from a licensed gun dealer, and making threats to a candidate for president.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Finding your voice is not victim-hood

One of the things I have noticed the last few years is that white/anglo people seem to have very intense reactions to being called racist by a person of color. It often creates more conflict than when people start discussing religion or politics.

The scene often plays out as: one person or group states the other is mistreating them based on race or ethnicity - whether the accusations are true or not - the accused group either gets fearful or extremely angry and offended.

The controversy surrounding statements by Obama's minister have exploded the myth that many black people are "over it" and no longer have feelings about America's conflicted and violent racial past. It has also shown what is acceptable and what is not regarding what can be publicly said regarding racial attitudes.

I was struck by this while watching "This Week" on ABC - Stephanopoulos was at the round table with George Will, Donna Brazile and a few others whose names I don't remember. What seemed so odd was Will's and the other white participant's deep sense of being offended. I kept hearing that what Wright said was inappropriate. Then Donna Brazile came in and let us know (thank goodness) that Wright's pastoral comments are part and parcel of African American church sermons. I am sure they heard her, but there there was not much of a response.

This is an extremely complex situation. There is much to discuss. For one thing maybe it's a good thing that the white world knows this is still being said - and - that people can start realizing that what may be termed "inflammatory racial language" - is not dangerous, and does not scream victim-hood. It's really about people finding their voice.


more on this later.
-----
JEREMIAD
He's Preaching to A Choir I've Left
Washington Post
By Jonetta Rose Barras
Sunday, March 23, 2008; Page B01

I've known preachers like the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., former pastor to Sen. Barack Obama. Like many of them, he no doubt sees his congregation as full of victims, and thinks that his words will inspire them to rise out of their victimhood. I understand that.

Once upon a time, I saw myself as a victim, too, destined to march in place. In the 1970s and '80s, as a clenched-fist-pumping black nationalist with my head wrapped in an elaborate gele, I reflected that self-concept in my speech. My words were as fiery as the Rev. Wright's. And more than a few times, I, too, damned America, loudly, for its treatment of blacks.

But I turned away from such rhetoric. Is it time that Wright and other ministers do, too?

African Americans differ on this question. "Some of these ministers are like some hip-hop artists," says E. Ethelbert Miller, an Afro-American studies expert. "Their language is not healing." Counters former civil rights leader Lawrence Guyot: "I am so proud of Rev. Wright, who speaks with unreserved passion, who accepts no quarter and gives no quarter. I'm glad the church is standing with him."

The recent furor over the incendiary rhetoric of the pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago pulled back a curtain on black America, sending many in the white commentariat into shock and outrage. But African Americans have been hearing words like Wright's in churches across the country for decades. And for many of us, the uproar over his comments only underlined the quiet culture war going on within our own community.

For a decade, tensions have been rising over questions ranging from what it means to be black, to whether there needs to be a new, post-civil rights meaning of racism, to what features of black America should be transmitted to the mainstream, to whether there even is such a thing as "black America" anymore. Many of these skirmishes have been relegated to our kitchens and living rooms. But they are increasingly being brought to the public square -- often because a white person, a Don Imus or a Michael Richards, commits some infraction or demonstrates cluelessness about African American culture and its unspoken boundaries.

Now the debate is over Wright -- instigated, as many blacks see it, by the media after the presidential campaign of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton accused news organizations of insufficiently scrutinizing Obama. Reporters went trolling for stories and found Trinity Church and its controversial pastor -- and what may have been a Sunday dinner conversation in black households exploded onto the public stage.

At the center of the storm is Wright's practice of what is called "prophetic speech," according to the Rev. Graylan Scott Hagler, pastor of Plymouth Congregational United Church of Christ in Washington. This is "provocative speech that attempts to awaken and cause people to respond."

Such speech has been the lingua franca of much of the black leadership since the days of the civil rights movement, aimed at galvanizing blacks and equipping them with an armor for the battle against segregation. Combined with instruction in the history of blacks in Africa and the diaspora, it has helped to transform the psychological landscape of many who had been crushed over time by racism and had come to feel inferior to whites.

It's also, at least in part, the tradition of Wright's denomination. In several incarnations, the United Church of Christ (UCC) has been a leader in the fight for racial equality since the 19th century. According to Hagler, "congregationals," as the church's members were then called, were involved in the case on behalf of 43 African captives who revolted against their captors aboard the Spanish ship La Amistad in 1839. In the 1970s, the UCC established a commission on racial justice; Wright was on its board of directors.

Wright's impassioned speech can be seen as a continuation of a uniquely black religious experience. "The fundamental question is how do I use a religion that has been used to oppress me to now fight against that oppression," says Maurice Jackson, a history professor at Georgetown University. "There has always been this debate about how far black ministers should go."

Some think they should go as far as they need to. "Without prophetic speech," argues Graylan, "we would not have had Martin Luther King Jr. People remember the 'I Have a Dream' speech, but they do not remember his radical critiques of capitalism and the American system. They easily forget his speech on April 4, 1967." That was the one in which King declared: "I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today -- my own government..."

rosebook1@aol.com

Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for National Public Radio affiliate WAMU-88.5.



for link to complete WP article click the title of this post

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Promoting "Black Face" is OK for ICE








ICE in a bag










Apparently the U.S. Senate thinks it is ok for ICE to have a director that approves of white people appearing in black face at company parties... It must be easy for them to forget all the times that Myers has said that ICE is performs its job with compassion - Remember the Bedford MA ICE raid? Or the prison-like atmosphere of Hutto detention center in Texas? Myers has had excuses for any number of atrocities. Each time I have seen her on television or read about absurd statements (that ICE is doing a great job) in the newspaper I just want to cringe. It's a wonder that our senators could so easily forgive this.

A shade of nepotism? Perhaps it is because Myers is so well connected.. Her uncle is the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, her husband is the U.S. Attorney in Kansas City, MO (a recent appointment, did he replace on of the U.S. attorneys that was driven away by Gonzalez' illegal directives?)

Lastly, for all the African Americans that are developing a hate for immigrants... they should take note of Myer's actions. She is no friend of immigrants or blacks. You might want to check out this article that appeared in the December 19, 2007 edition of the Huffington Post: "The Racist Roots of the Anti-Immigration Movement." http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=475&Itemid=1

-----

Senate OKs Myers for Immigration Job
By EILEEN SULLIVAN
The Associated Press
Thursday, December 20, 2007; 12:01 AM

WASHINGTON -- The Senate on Wednesday confirmed Julie L. Myers as director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, two years after President Bush appointed her to the position amid questions about her qualifications to lead the government's second-largest law enforcement agency.

Myers was among more than 30 people whose appointments were approved by a voice vote of the Senate as it concluded its session.

Bush had used a recess appointment in 2005 to put Myers, then 36, in charge of ICE, the branch of the Homeland Security Department that enforces immigration laws, when the Senate appeared unlikely to confirm her. Although she was a former Treasury official and assistant U.S. attorney, lawmakers debated whether she had enough experience to lead the agency.

Critics also noted her personal connections within the Bush administration. She was engaged _ and is now married _ to John F. Wood, who was chief of staff to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and is now the U.S. attorney in Kansas City, Mo. Ret. Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is her uncle.

Myers herself was Chertoff's chief of staff when he led the Justice Department's criminal division. However, her appointment in 2005 came after Hurricane Katrina, which brought criticism over the experience of those handling the federal response to the disaster.

Her appointment ran into trouble again this fall when she gave the "most original" costume award to a white employee who came to the agency's Halloween party dressed as an escaped prisoner with dreadlocks and darkened skin. The incident drew complaints of racial insensitivity and elicited an apology from Myers.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., the Senate's most vocal opponent of Myers' permanent appointment as head of ICE, placed a hold on her nomination after the Halloween incident. The senator's spokeswoman, Adrianne Marsh, said McCaskill "still believes Julie Myers isn't focused enough on employer enforcement and she's not the right pick, but there simply were not enough votes to oppose her nomination."

Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke said the Senate's approval validates Myers' hard work and accomplishments.

ICE was formed after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks when parts of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and Customs agencies were merged.

___

Associated Press writer Sam Hananel contributed to this report.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/20/AR2007122002805.html
photo: http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/783/470544.JPG

Monday, October 22, 2007

In Switzerland the Black Sheep Lost



Photo: Switzerland - criticism of the People's party in 2003.



A previous article in the London Independent called Switzerland "the Heart of Darkness." The country who has gained fame for being neutral has fallen off the map of ethics. Hopefully the rest of Europe won't be so blind to follow.



-----
Racist' campaign pays off in Swiss poll
By Tony Paterson in Berlin
London Independent
Published: 22 October 2007

The right-wing Swiss People's Party won its best-ever showing in general elections yesterday after a virulent anti-foreigner campaign that was widely denounced as racist, but failed to obtain the landslide victory it had been hoping for.

The SVP, led by the controversial billionaire and Swiss Justice Minister Christoph Blocher secured almost 29 per cent of the vote and an extra six seats in parliament, the first exit polls suggested last night.

Mr Blocher's campaign was dominated by the single issue of immigration. His party's election posters featured three white sheep standing on a red and white Swiss national flag kicking a black sheep out of the country. Alongside ran the slogan "more security!"

The notorious posters, which were part of the party's campaign to deport foreign criminal offenders and their families, were denounced as "openly racist" by the United Nations.

However the campaign appeared to have appealed to voters. Yesterday's elections saw the SVP consolidate its position as the largest party in the Swiss parliament, but its share of the vote increased by just two percentage points.


article: http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article3084302.ece
photo: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/capt.sge.qlk65.191003195834.photo01.default-384x256.jpg

Thursday, October 18, 2007

He Says There is No One to Hire

Nobel Prize winner is ' recruiting minorities at the lab and, he tells me, has just accepted a black girl “but,” he comments, “there’s no one to recruit.”'

If you push this idea a little further, you arrive at the idea that in general, people of color "are just not there to recruit."
He also says that people of African descent are less intelligent than whites. His comments have caused a furor in the U.K. and one of his major talks has been cancelled.

You may be asking, why does she bring this up ? - he is talking about blacks? Because he is talking about dark skinned people from Third World countries. The U.S. is currently in contortions over immigration of "dark skinned people from Third World countries."

What would he think of those DREAM ACT students who have 4.0's? Just a genetic fluke?




_____

The Sunday Times
October 14, 2007
The elementary DNA of Dr Watson
by Charlotte Hunt-Grubbe

History will remember James Watson for the discovery of the double helix. But his pronouncements are often highly controversial. His former protegee examines the complex legacy of a Nobel laureat

"...Back in 1990, the journal Science commented: “To many in the scientific community, Watson has long been something of a wild man, and his colleagues tend to hold their collective breath whenever he veers from the script.” When, in 2000, he left an audience reeling by suggesting a link between skin colour and sex drive – hypothesising that dark-skinned people have stronger libidos – some journalists suggested he had “opened a transatlantic rift”. American scientists accused him of “trading on past successes to promote opinions that have little scientific basis”. British academics countered that subjects should not be off limits because they are politically incorrect. Susan Greenfield, director of the Royal Institution, said that “nothing should stop you ascertaining the scientific truth; science must be free of concerns about gender and race”.

He says that he is “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”, and I know that this “hot potato” is going to be difficult to address. His hope is that everyone is equal, but he counters that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”. He says that you should not discriminate on the basis of colour, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented, but don’t promote them when they haven’t succeeded at the lower level”. He writes that “there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so”.

When asked how long it might take for the key genes in affecting differences in human intelligence to be found, his “back-of-the-envelope answer” is 15 years. However, he wonders if even 10 years will pass. In his mission to make children more DNA-literate, the geneticist explains that he has opened a DNA learning centre on the borders of Harlem in New York. He is also recruiting minorities at the lab and, he tells me, has just accepted a black girl “but,” he comments, “there’s no one to recruit...”


for link to original article click title to this post
thanks to Dr. Frank Hall for passing on this information

Monday, September 24, 2007

Defending Fortress America







Paul Krugman's opinion piece on Race and the GOP reminds me of the recent trip I took through the South with nine Hispanic college students. It started when we got to Tennessee, and only got worse. People would look at us strangely. We were severely mistreated by Budget Rental Car when our rental had mechanical problems, and were called names at a convenience store in rural Virginia.

Before then, I thought that these things didn't happen anymore; if people still had hateful feelings, at least in Texas, they didn't show it. I grew up in a Jim Crow town and I can tell you, to be a child and hear these things about you, your family and community can be very painful.

Romney and Guiliani's spectacle (as Krugman calls it) shows they must not have much of a conscience if getting votes is worth such barbaric rhetoric against undocumented immigrants. But what they and their team, the GOP are doing, as Krugman says, is trying to defend Fortress America.

This makes me wonder if the students and I passed the gates of Fortress America once we entered Tennessee (we didn't stop in Louisiana except to get gas, so I can't say what would have happened there). We were in dangerous territory, where whiteness is supreme; where there is a deep seated investment in staying white...

Being college educated and erudite didn't help us while inside the fortress. We couldn't pass for white, so we were unwelcome. Perhaps the best thing is to stay away from those who guard the fortress so jealously.

If you are interested in the whiteness of Fortress America, you might want to read "The Possessive Investment in Whiteness," by George Lipzitz.

As mentioned in one of our earlier posts, it was the experience we had on the trip through the South that propelled the beginning of this blog.



---
Politics in Black and White
By PAUL KRUGMAN
New York Times
Published: September 24, 2007

Last Thursday there was a huge march in Jena, La., to protest the harsh and unequal treatment of six black students arrested in the beating of a white classmate. Students who hung nooses to warn blacks not to sit under a “white” tree were suspended for three days; on the other hand, the students accused in the beating were initially charged with second-degree attempted murder.

.. the reality is that things haven’t changed nearly as much as people think. Racial tension, especially in the South, has never gone away, and has never stopped being important. And race remains one of the defining factors in modern American politics.

...And yes, Southern white exceptionalism is about race, much more than it is about moral values, religion, support for the military or other explanations sometimes offered. There’s a large statistical literature on the subject, whose conclusion is summed up by the political scientist Thomas F. Schaller in his book “Whistling Past Dixie”: “Despite the best efforts of Republican spinmeisters to depict American conservatism as a nonracial phenomenon, the partisan impact of racial attitudes in the South is stronger today than in the past.”

...Republican politicians, who understand quite well that the G.O.P.’s national success since the 1970s owes everything to the partisan switch of Southern whites, have tacitly acknowledged this reality. Since the days of Gerald Ford, just about every Republican presidential campaign has included some symbolic gesture of approval for good old-fashioned racism.

...But to get the Republican nomination, a candidate must appeal to the base — and the base consists, in large part, of Southern whites who carry over to immigrants the same racial attitudes that brought them into the Republican fold to begin with. As a result, you have the spectacle of Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney, pragmatists on immigration issues when they actually had to govern in diverse states, trying to reinvent themselves as defenders of Fortress America.

for complete article click title to this post