Showing posts with label U.S. immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.S. immigration. Show all posts

Thursday, June 16, 2011

In Spanish: The Double Invisibility of Immigrants

Denuncian doble invisibilidad de inmigrantes

Una fundación señala que algunos no tienen ni acta de nacimiento de su país de origen
  • Por EFE |
  • 2011-06-16
  • | La Opinión       
  • Los Ángeles (EFE).- Los latinoamericanos a los que por diversas razones sus padres no registraron sus actas de nacimiento viven al emigrar a EEUU doblemente indocumentados, según ha puesto de manifiesto la Fundación Derecho a la Identidad...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Foundation "Derecho  a la Identidad" of Costa Rica has published a statement about the many immigrants in the United States who have a double invisibility - because their parents have not registered their births...MTHdz

Thursday, September 23, 2010

"You should have voted with your heart, spoken your mind and gone out with a bang. "

For those in Congress who are so afraid they will not be re-elected...  Unless they are people made of stone, they have to be experiencing some type of remorse, sadness, guilt... for voting against the DREAM Act and Don't Ask Don't Tell.  For the life of me can't figure out John McCain who used to be considered a "maverick" - now talks like immigrants are beings from hell.  Maybe he has developed some dementia.... because it is surely clear to everyone that he is talking from the wrong side of his mouth.  Remember, he used to be one of the supporters of the DREAM Act! As Gail Collins said in the NYT "Senator John McCain, for instance, was nearly apoplectic about the fact that Reid was attaching unrelated amendments to the defense appropriations bill" -

Sometimes doing the right thing means losing your Senate job.  For most people losing their jobs is a terrible loss.  But for Senators its not such a bad thing, since most of them make lots of money from side investments they are able to arrange because of their "high positions."  Senators are not your average Joe....

But I guess to be a politician you have to develop some type of obsession for power, especially if you get as high as the Senate.  Such a shame.

So, the question is, do the Senators have hearts?  If so, where are they?

NEW YORK
NYT

Don’t Ask, Don’t Debate
On Mexican Immigration in New York
Mexican New Yorkers Are Steady Force in Workplace

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Confused ...?



It is very interesting that some of the opinions in a town next to Houston (League City) could be so extreme. I always feel bound to hear all sides of the immigration issue- especially in Houston, since that is where I live. This is a big city where almost all people come from other states or countries, and is common to see many ethnicities gather in one place. But with all the diversity that exists in a big city, the surrounding communities are still in the dark about what ‘America’ is today.

To some the theory of ‘illegal is illegal’ is plain and simple. One has to realize that even though words are easy to read, the real circumstances of people can’t be as easy as words. Now League City is dealing with a Mayoral election- while one candidate is cut and clear about his view, stating the police department should be ordered to call ICE when an undocumented resident is arrested. The other candidate has not taken a firm stand on League City being a ‘sanctuary city’.

The mentality that all ‘immigrants’ are criminals is incredibly incorrect, makes it seem that these people are not reading the right statistics of what this country is going through. But then again the media does show the most controversial and at times wrong information. Sometimes certain people like to find a scapegoat or just be stupid and not want or care if they know the truth.

------

'Sanctuary city' issue surfaces in race for League City Mayor
Candidate wants to address how illegal immigrants are handled by police

June 2, 2008, 4:16PM

By THAYER EVANS
Houston Chronicle Correspondent

With less than two weeks remaining until League City's mayoral runoff, the focus of the race has shifted to the city's stance on illegal immigration.

When an illegal immigrant is arrested in League City for a Class B misdemeanor or above, the police department contacts U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the person is then transported to the Galveston County jail, assistant police chief Gary Ratliff said. The city also contacts immigration officials for illegal immigrants arrested on a Class C misdemeanor, but if they don't have an outstanding warrant, they are released after the charge has been resolved, he said.

The practice is standard procedure, but is not a written policy, Ratliff said.

If elected, Chris Mallios said he would push for an ordinance that establishes that League City is not a "sanctuary city." He would like it to address how the city's police department should handle the arrests of illegal immigrants.

"There is not any clear path right now," said Mallios, 48, a retired Galveston County employee. "That's why I want to establish an ordinance so that we have guidelines."

Although there is no universal definition for "sanctuary city," most cities considered to be such have adopted "a don't ask-don't tell" policy that doesn't require their employees, such as police officers, to report illegal immigrants to federal officials, according to a report by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

During the city's June 14 runoff, voters will decide between Mallios and Toni Randall, 45, owner of a Kemah hardware store, for a three-year term.

Randall received 533 more votes than Mallios in the city's May 10 election, but did not receive the majority of votes cast, which is required to win.

Current first-term Mayor Jerry Shults failed to make the runoff after finishing last in the three-candidate race.

Randall declined to say whether the city should take an official stance on the "sanctuary city" debate.

"I'm not going to feel comfortable answering that, because I feel 'sanctuary city' is a term that is used lightly," she said. "I think a lot of the citizens don't know what 'sanctuary city' means. That's where my concern comes in."

Mallios said he believes that all illegal immigrants who are arrested in League City should be deported.

"If they are not here legally, then they need to go through the process to be expelled or deported or tried and then deported or whatever that process would be," he said.

Mallios said the city's police department, however, shouldn't specifically target illegal immigrants.

"I'm not for wholesale rounding people up just because they look like they could be illegal," he said.

Randall said the "sanctuary city" debate is "a federal issue."

"Illegal immigrants are here," she said. "They're not just from Mexico. They're from all over the world and the federal government is having a hard time dealing with this."

If all of the illegal immigrants that are arrested in League City were deported, the city's crime rate would decrease, Mallios said.

It also would help reduce employers' hiring of illegal immigrants, he said.

"It affords the teenager who wants to cut grass to be able to cut grass," Mallios said. "It helps the community all the way around."

Randall said she does not condone employers' hiring of illegal immigrants.

"They ought to have proper documentation definitely," she said. "It's just the right thing to do."

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

The destructive nature of blaming

























from web page - http://winbatlop.stumbleupon.com/tag/drawing/




OR













Photo by Armando Franca, AP

Aragonés who writes for Mexico City's slightly left wing JORNADA writes of population disasters because of anti-immigration laws. It is interesting that she presents this today. While La Jornada talks about an immigration crisis from not having "enough people" the NYT publishes one on having "too many people." Yesterday the NYT (paper copy) had an article in its Science Times "Who is to blame when societies fall?" Accompanying the article is a photo of scores of human skulls. The text next to the photo reads: "Jared Diamond says a factor in the 1994 Rwanda genocide was that the country had let its population outstrip its food supplies." Now don't you think that people will take seriously what Diamond is saying - didn't he win the Pulitzer Prize? Doesn't he have a PhD... If Diamond says that a country "let its population outstrip its food supplies." that is enough to get the Minute Men really moving... its the perfect excuse to get rid of undocumented (and documented) immigrants... may even intensify the anti-immigration hysteria.

The On-Line NYT has hidden the photo in the 2nd page of the article. Maybe the editors realized what they did. A couple of journalism lessons (if you really want to be ethical): 1. Remember that sound bite statements are generally taken seriously by most people. 2. These same people usually do not read the rest of the article that will provide a context for the statement. I'm sure the NYT already knows this, but it doesn't hurt to remind them

NYT "Who is to blame when societies fall?"
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/25/science/25diam.html?_r=1&oref=slogin


Ana María Aragonés
amaragones@gmail.com

Estados Unidos en peligro
La Jornada -UNAM
Mexico City


Estados Unidos, líder en la economía mundial y uno de los principales países en el desarrollo de la economía del conocimiento, se encuentra en peligro. No porque estén cerca nuevos ataques terroristas, no porque Irán, Venezuela y Cuba, parte del “eje del mal”, estén yendo por caminos inaceptables sin que pueda detenerlos, no por Osama Bin Laden, sino porque algunas regiones estadunidenses se están quedando sin trabajadores, debido a que su población está envejeciendo a consecuencia de la falta de remplazo poblacional por las bajas tasas de natalidad. Ésta es una de las gravísimas realidades que vive el país vecino, y si no acepta flexibilizar sus políticas migratorias y otorgar amnistía a los indocumentados, esas comunidades van a desaparecer. El propio secretario de Comercio de Estados Unidos afirmó que “sin migrantes, simplemente no tenemos suficientes trabajadores, punto”.

Un ejemplo de esto es la situación que se vive en Dakota del Norte, estado conocido por su importantísima producción agrícola y ganadera, y sobre todo en lo que se refiere a la producción de cerdos, que ha sido reseñada en forma muy interesante en un artículo aparecido el 26 de noviembre en USA Today.

De acuerdo con el demógrafo Richard Rathge, en este estado se vive una de las más severas crisis demográficas que azotan al país. Entre 1990 y 2000 la población sólo creció en seis de los 53 condados. El problema es que mientras los granjeros se han reducido, la dimensión de las granjas ha crecido. Es decir, el promedio en 1940 era de 250 hectáreas y en la actualidad de 650 hectáreas. La consecuencia ha sido que todos los servicios que sostenían la vida de esas comunidades, iglesias, escuelas, hospitales, supermercados, restaurantes, etcétera, están desapareciendo por falta de población.

Según el Censo, el porcentaje de población de Dakota del Norte en edad de trabajar (25 a 54 años) está por debajo del promedio nacional y se situó en 40.5 por ciento para el año 2000 y la proyección para 2020 es que descenderá a 33.4 por ciento.

La alternativa para evitar que estas comunidades queden finalmente abandonadas es crear industrias y diversos proyectos productivos que generen trabajos bien pagados para atraer a la mano de obra nativa. El problema es que se trata de un estado cuyo promedio de ingreso por familias está por debajo de la media nacional, esto es, 39 mil 233 dólares al año, lo que es un obstáculo para atraer a trabajadores nativos. Por lo tanto, los pobladores temen que de llevarse a cabo esos proyectos productivos sería un imán para los migrantes hispanos, sobre todo indocumentados. Y ante esa eventualidad, que es posible, los pobladores prefieren irse muriendo poco a poco antes de “romper una barrera cultural” que podría salvarlos de desaparecer.

No hay duda de que todo el mundo sabe que los trabajos mal pagados los realizan los indocumentados, y además que resultan fundamentales para la economía de algunos estados, sobre todo ante el envejecimiento de las poblaciones. Simplemente en Dakota del Norte hay 10 mil trabajos esperando contratar mano de obra. No obstante, se ha desatado una fobia antinmigrante pocas veces vista en Estados Unidos.

Lo que habría que preguntarse es: ¿quién tiene la culpa de que se haya extendido una verdadera sicosis y una falsa percepción de los trabajadores indocumentados? En primer lugar, los propios patrones para los cuales estos trabajadores suponen enormes beneficios, y mientras más difícil les hagan la llegada, serán más vulnerables y precarios, lo que repercutirá favorablemente sobre sus ganancias invirtiendo muy poco. Por otro lado, los congresistas, quienes se deben a esos mismos empresarios, granjeros y patrones, y si quieren ser relegidos tendrán que continuar con la misma estrategia. Y por supuesto los medios hacen su trabajo apoyándolos, lamentablemente.

Que los candidatos a la Presidencia de Estados Unidos pongan en el centro del debate a la migración es simplemente buscar un chivo expiatorio sobre el cual se vayan todas las miradas y así evitar debatir en el contexto del propio sistema, mismo que ha perdido toda legalidad y por lo que ha sido severamente cuestionado por la comunidad internacional ante los últimos acontecimientos.

Se atreven a señalar a esos trabajadores indocumentados como un problema de seguridad nacional, cuando justamente la amenaza no son éstos, sino la falta de ellos. Y esto sí puede convertirse en un problema de seguridad nacional al tener que enfrentar la muerte de las comunidades.

http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2007/12/26/index.php?section=opinion&article=028a1mun

image of deserted city: http://www.geocities.jp/artofdaisuke/images/Planet_A.jpg

photo of skulls: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/25/science/25diam.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1