Monday, June 30, 2008

ICE Raid in Maryland- Employers not Fined or Detained

As long as ICE raids continue and  employers are not charged or detained - but undocumented workers are snatched away to God knows what detention center  - Department of Homeland Security will continue to show it's false mission.  These actions belie any claim that DHS and ICE are protecting the security of our country. 

As long as employers are only told "shame on you" and sent home - ICE will continue to look like the bully who terrorizes kids who can't hit back.

-----
Authorities Detain 45 in Immigration Raid at Painting Company
By William Wan
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 1, 2008; Page B02

Authorities raided the offices of an Annapolis painting company yesterday and detained 45 suspected illegal immigrants, who officials say were hired and housed by the company in private homes.

The raids, executed simultaneously at the offices of Annapolis Painting Services and 10 private homes that authorities said were owned by the company, were conducted by a force of 75 federal immigration agents and 50 Anne Arundel County police officers.

The immigrants are being held by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials in Baltimore while their status is reviewed, said Scot Rittenberg, an assistant special agent in charge in Baltimore.

No charges have been filed yet against the owner of the painting company, Robert Bontempo Jr., because the investigation has not been completed, Rittenberg said. But Police Chief James Teare Sr. said Bontempo could face federal felony charges...

for complete WP article click here

Morals and Immigration: Thinking What is Best for the World

Professor Mathias Risse from Harvard's Kennedy School of Government has presented a theory that some people are finding novel - that the U.S. is unfairly restricting immigration.  Salon.com praises Risse for being so bold as to "turn immigration policy on its head" - 
It is good that at least someone besides the pro-immigrant blog sphere is aware of the immorality of how undocumented immigrants are treated in the United States.  With all due respect to Dr. Risse - his words are not new.... what is new is that someone like Risse* - from Harvard - is saying something different - 

Philosopher Michel Foucault wrote that the transfer of information is given much more weight if the speaker is of a higher class, or education, or valued group (like WASPS or professors at Ivy League colleges).
-----

Wednesday, June 25, 2008 14:11 PDT
Salon.com
On the morality of immigration
Some statistics on population density:

... Mathias Risse, a professor of public policy and philosophy at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, concludes in "On the Morality of Immigration," published in the March issue of Ethics & International Affairs, that "the United States is severely underusing its chunk of three-dimensional, commonly owned space." From which it follows, argues Risse, that it is unfair for the U.S. to restrict immigration, legal or illegal, across its borders.

This is a perspective one is unlikely to hear espoused by presidential candidates in the U.S., no matter how liberal their views on immigration are. For one thing, it requires that one think about the world as if it was collectively owned by all of humanity, rather than divided into nasty little nation-states dedicated to protecting their most cherished NIMBY values with armed forces, fences and elaborate visa regulations. It is hopelessly utopian to imagine that national politicians would ever make decisions on topics as explosive as immigration policy on the basis of what would be best for the world.

...Risse argues that "as long as a country underuses its resources and refuses to permit more immigration in response, illegal immigration cannot be morally condemned..."


― Andrew Leonard

for link to complete Salon.com article click here


*not a person of color, the son of migrant workers, or an immigrant from a third world country.

Scholarship for BILINGUAL social work students

One of my many goals in life is to become an Social Worker for our Houston community.
This is a great time for all Bilingual individuals and those DREAMers who qualify, to go back to school.

The Hogg Foundation will enhance the opportunity for bilingual people who want to enter the field of Social Work in Texas by providing a scholarship. Remember! Everyone can go to school in Texas, a good friend of mine (DREAMer) attends the Graduate College of Social Work at UH, she received a full scholarship for being bilingual and is almost finished (Amazing reason why Obama should pay more attention to the DREAM Act).

The information below is about the scholarship the Hogg Foundation is providing for bilingual interests.

d-
~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hogg Foundation Unveils New Bilingual Scholarship Program for Accredited Social Work Graduate Programs in Texas

The Hogg Foundation for Mental Health has introduced a groundbreaking bilingual scholarship program that will offer up to $1 million to Spanish-speaking students at accredited graduate social work programs in Texas in the next three years.

The new statewide program is the first of its kind in Texas and possibly in the U.S.

"This is a bold, forward-thinking program to encourage linguistic and cultural diversity in higher education and attract more interest in social work as a profession," said Dr. Gregory J. Vincent, vice president for diversity and community engagement at The University of Texas at Austin. The foundation is part of the Division of Diversity and Community Engagement.
The demand for bilingual social workers is greater than ever. Studies have shown that populations of color are under-represented in social work and other mental health professions. As a result, these populations are far less likely to receive effective mental health services that meet their cultural and linguistic needs.

In Texas, this is especially true for Latinos, who represent the state's largest ethnic population. Spanish is the second-most common language in Texas and was the primary language spoken at home by 6.2 million people in Texas in 2006, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The bureau also reported in May that the number of Hispanics living in Texas reached 8.6 million, 36 percent of the state's population, in 2007. Texas' Hispanic population was the second largest in the U.S. in 2007 and grew at a faster rate than any other state from 2006 to 2007, with an increase of 308,000 people.

"There simply aren't enough bilingual social workers to serve the growing Spanish-speaking population in Texas," said Dr. King Davis, outgoing executive director of the foundation. "These scholarships will achieve two important goals: raise public awareness of the need to build the state's bilingual mental health workforce, and simultaneously begin to meet that need."
Scholarship recipients must be fluent in Spanish and English and commit to work in Texas after graduation providing mental health services for a period equal to the timeframe of the scholarship.

For the 2008-2009 school year, the foundation is offering up to $22,000 in scholarship funds at each of the 11 Texas graduate social work programs that are accredited or in candidacy for accreditation by the national Council on Social Work Education.
The schools must use the scholarship funds to cover full tuition and fees for recipients. Funds awarded by the foundation each year could vary, depending on the number of students receiving the scholarships at each graduate school.

Eligible schools are Abilene Christian University, Baylor University, Our Lady of the Lake University, Stephen F. Austin State University, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Texas State University, University of Houston, The University of Texas at Arlington, The University of Texas at Austin, The University of Texas-Pan American and The University of Texas at San Antonio.

Interested applicants should contact the schools of their choice directly for information about the scholarship program. Each school will manage its own application and language fluency assessment process and will submit a list of scholarship nominee finalists to the foundation. The foundation will announce the 2008 scholarship recipients in August.

The foundation worked closely with Dr. Ira Colby, professor and dean of the University of Houston Graduate College of Social Work, to develop the program. Colby began a similar bilingual scholarship program at the college four years ago. The Houston program has been highly successful in increasing the cultural and language diversity of its graduate students. In 2008, the college received 83 applicants for five scholarships.
Contact: Merrell Foote, Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, 512-471-9142, merrell.foote@austin.utexas.edu

Sunday, June 29, 2008

New Horizons in 2009?


by: Las Tres. Amanecer in Albuquerque 2008





I am just waiting for 2009 to come, if the DREAM doesn't happen by then i will be out of here!

I hear this more and more from fellow DREAMers, just waiting on 2009 to come by; we are kind of waiting for something better to come along. Students with one or two degrees are getting burnt out already. They/We are itching to learn, experience, practice... to really live! Many of us feel betrayed by the sentence: "hard work pays off" I don't know how many times I have said this to others and how many times I've heard somebody saying this to me, but it's definitely a sentence that everytime i hear it, i can't help but to grin. As positive as i really am though, i have been telling myself more that if by 2009 nothing happens nothing will ever happen... or was anything ever going to happen?

I mean, by 2009 i should be finally done with school, other things should be settled, and most importantly: new horizons are surely waiting somewhere else, no? It is very hard to describe the feelings going through me right now when i am almost reaching 24 years of age- I mean, it is like this itch to go and see the world, to learn, to hope that there are better things out there waiting to be devoured by our passion and hunger. Many DREAMers are now adults, we are in our mid-20's, we are thinking of other things like: really living our lives! (whatever that fully entails)

Will Obama or McCain bring some sort of resolution in 2009? Not just for DREAMers, what about our parents? Will they also be ‘forgiven’?

I don't know- all i know is that I am not angry anymore. I am done with the questioning of why things are the way they are. I finally understood that there are people in the world in far worse situations than I am. Sure, it takes a big toll in my life and the life of other DREAMers to be in this state of limbo. Some of us have had to drive and struggle to other states just to get an ID, or have a bachelor's and master degree but continue to work in the restaurant kitchen, we have two jobs to make rent on top of classes. Some of us are still writing papers at three in the morning and can't help but to stop and say out loud: "hold on, why am i doing this again?"

What i believe at this point is that CHOICE rests in the power of our hands. We can choose to continue fighting here, for us, our families. On the other hand, we can now look for other alternatives; this is not giving up but understanding that the world does not end in this land of the 'freedom.'

Immigrants and employee abuse: It doesn't just happen in New Orleans:

$17.54 (£8.80) a week is all that Lithuanian immigrant workers are being paid in a UK government project for a hospital. The Guardian (London) found this while doing some investigative reporting.

Alan Ritchie, general secretary of Ucatt (UK's Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians) said: "This case is the worst we have seen. These workers were virtually destitute." - The Guardian


This makes me wonder how much the construction workers building the border fence are getting paid - and if they are immigrants too...

-----

Migrant builder took home £8.80 for a week

· Union wins back pay for Lithuanians on NHS site
· MP to raise regulation issue in Commons

  • The Guardian,
  • Monday June 30, 2008
  • Eastern European migrants working on the construction of a £600m NHS hospital have been taking home as little as £8.80 for a 39-hour week, the Guardian has learned, in what has been described by union bosses as one of the worst instances of employee abuse in the building sector since EU enlargement.

    The group of around 12 men, most of whom are Lithuanian, are construction workers on the government-backed PFI project in Nottinghamshire. Though allegations of abuse of migrants' rights on construction sites are widespread across the country the scale in this instance has shocked unions and politicians.

    Michael Clapham, MP for Barnsley West and Penistone, who is due to raise the matter in parliament today, said: "This happened on a government project where there are good rules and a strong union - who knows what is happening on the hundreds of smaller sites around the UK?"

    According to industry guidelines and an agreement between unions and the building firm Skanska, which is overseeing the project, workers on the site should have been earning more than £7 an hour. But after deductions for rent, tool hire and utility bills, some of the Lithuanian employees were receiving so little observers say it left them virtually destitute.

    Payslips seen by the Guardian show that one man worked a 39-hour week and took home just £8.80 after his entire monthly rent was deducted in one week, in breach of the law. A second worker was paid £79.20 for a 63-hour week and a third worked 70 hours a week for just £66. As they were registered as self-employed they did not receive holiday or sick pay. One man had £228 taken from his pay in one week for tools. The men each had a further £76.80 deducted weekly as their payment to the "construction industry scheme", which technically registers them as self-employed, meaning their employers have no requirement to pay national insurance...

for complete Guardian article click here

ICE vs. "In the best interest of the child"

Photo from Immigrant Child Advocacy Center, for link click here


In another life I was a child welfare worker. One phrase we often heard was "in the best interest of the child" - meaning that the state was obligated to consider the needs of the child first. Apparently the Department of Homeland does not adhere to that type of consideration. Perhaps the children's best interests are not considered because they are immigrants?
-----

Sunday, June 29, 2008

San Francisco juvenile authorities have been grappling for several years with an influx of young Honduran immigrants dealing crack in the Mission District and Tenderloin. Those who are arrested routinely say they are minors, but police suspect that many are actually adults, living communally in Oakland and other cities at the behest of drug traffickers who claim to be their relatives.

San Francisco juvenile probation officials - citing the city's immigrant sanctuary status - are protecting Honduran youths caught dealing crack cocaine from possible federal deportation and have given some offenders a city-paid flight home with carte blanche to return.

The city's practices recently prompted a federal criminal investigation into whether San Francisco has been systematically circumventing U.S. immigration law, according to officials with knowledge of the matter.

...

Nonetheless, city authorities have typically accepted the suspects' stories and handled the cases in Juvenile Court, where proceedings are often shielded from public scrutiny.

Unorthodox strategy

Barred by state law from sending drug offenders to the California Youth Authority and bound by a 1989 city law defining San Francisco as a sanctuary city for immigrants - meaning officials do not cooperate with federal immigration investigations - juvenile officials settled on an unorthodox strategy.

Rather than have the drug offenders deported, they have recommended that Juvenile Court judges and commissioners approve city-paid flights home to Honduras for the offenders with the aim of reuniting them with their families.

The practice, federal authorities say, does nothing to prevent offenders from coming back, while federal deportation legally bars them from ever returning. Federal officials also say U.S. law prohibits helping an illegal immigrant to cross the border, even if it is to return home.

Federal officials recently detained a San Francisco juvenile probation officer at the Houston airport, where he was accompanying two Honduran juvenile drug offenders about to board a flight to Tegucigalpa.

They questioned him for several hours before letting him go, and seized the youths and deported them...

A recent count showed 22 of the 125 minors in custody at juvenile hall were immigrants and had no legal guardians in the United States, Siffermann said. He said his office is trying to figure out what to do with them now that flights are no longer an option....

E-mail Jaxon Van Derbeken at jvanderbeken@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

for complete SFGate article click here


Truthout.org has also published an article on child detainees, see:

Children Detainees Battle System Alone

The Roots of Xenophobia

If you are interested in learning how the process works when a group of people becomes vilified, read the linked article from the Providence Journal.

Sometimes if you look back far enough you can find links you wouldn't have imagined. The Providence Journal presents an intricate story of how a group in Rhode Island helped move xenophobia to the forefront in their state. The article is long and detailed, but well worth the time to read...

_____

Rhode Island group linked to controversial foes of illegal immigration

01:00 AM EDT on Sunday, June 29, 2008
By Karen Lee Ziner
Providence Journal
Journal Staff Writer

In early 2006, the national Federation for American Immigration Reform sent an emissary to Rhode Island as part of a national grassroots organizing effort against illegal and mass immigration.

“Region by region, FAIR is helping to build a network of grassroots groups dedicated to fighting for immigration reform in their part of the country,” the organization stated on its Web site ( www.fairus.org). New England is emerging as a highly successful battleground, with a growing network of reformers and legislative successes under their belts.”

FAIR credited Sandra Gunn, then the organization’s Eastern field representative, with helping launch a host of such groups in New England.

Gunn came to Pawtucket, one of at least four similar New England stops within a week, at the invitation of William “Terry” Gorman, a 68-year-old retired postal worker and member of FAIR since 1997. Gorman, increasingly frustrated, wanted to organize his own local campaign against illegal immigration.

Gorman and his wife were among the eight people at the organizational meeting on Feb. 28, 2006, of Rhode Islanders for Immigration Law Enforcement. Gunn provided start-up strategy, literature from FAIR and advice to the new members, Gorman said. She kept the press out.

Gorman said the Rhode Island group has grown to 450 members. Gorman’s voice has become prominent in the rancorous local debate over illegal immigration. He lent vocal support to Governor Carcieri’s executive order, issued in March, to curb illegal immigration in Rhode Island. He testified at the State House on numerous immigration-related bills that failed in the General Assembly this year. He frequently speaks on talk radio programs that RIILE deems supportive of its cause.

But Gorman’s and RIILE’s association with FAIR, a controversial national organization that critics deem extremist, has received less attention –– until recently...

for complete Providence Journal article click here

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Obama & McCain comparing their committment to immigration reform

At this point in the U.S. presidential campaign, it is hard to believe what anybody says. Obama has been going back and forth on a number of issues... moving more towards the center. McCain likewise is trying to present several faces at once. Now McCain is thinking immigration is important (again) - McCain was not present for the DREAM ACT vote in October 2007 - was he avoiding the vote or was he really unavailable?

----

US presidential rivals Barack Obama and John McCain have clashed over their commitment to immigration reform.

BBC News
Page last updated at
22:29 GMT, Saturday, 28 June 2008 23:29 UK

Addressing a conference of Hispanic officials in Washington, Mr McCain, the Republican candidate, said the US must secure its borders.

Mr Obama, the Democratic Party candidate, said he admired Mr McCain's attempt last year to get an immigration reform bill approved by Congress.

But he said that Mr McCain had since walked away from that commitment.

Mr McCain was one of the few Republican senators to back President Bush's comprehensive immigration plan which contained an amnesty for some illegal immigrants...

Mr McCain paid his respects to Hispanic-Americans.

"I know this country... would be the poorer were we deprived of the patriotism, industry and decency of those millions of Americans whose families came here from Mexico, Central and South America," he said...

Nation of immigrants'

Appearing later before the same audience, Mr Obama accused Mr McCain of walking away from comprehensive immigration reform.

"When he was running for his party's nomination, he walked away from that commitment. He said he wouldn't even support his own legislation if it came up for a vote," Mr Obama said.

"If we are going to solve the challenges we face, we can't vacillate, we can't shift depending on our politics."

"We must assert our values and reconcile our principles as a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. That is a priority I will pursue from my very first day," he [Obama] added.


for link to complete BBC article click here

The Roma Children

link to photo
at a social center for Roma children in North Bohemia



A few weeks ago a close relative lost his wallet on the Paris subway. There was hardly any money in it, and the credit cards were canceled quickly, so it turned out ok.... except for the stress involved.

While walking into the open doors of the subway car, he was blocked by four pre-teen girls. It was a strange scene since he is over 6 ft. tall -- the girls had him pinned. Neither one of us could figure out what was going on. The girls finally let go and suddenly ran out of the subway just before the doors closed. Two men sitting near us told him to check his wallet, and yes, it was gone.

After wandering around for twenty minutes with the bad directions from the subway employees, we finally found an open police station. The officer was sympathetic. He said they were Romanians - and this type of thing was very common in the Paris subway.

We talked to my step-daughter who had lived in Italy - she said, oh yes, they are Roma (Gypsy) children. Losing your wallet on the subway is an epidemic in Italy.

For a few days I thought about posting something on stereotypes and how they get started. I decided against it... my writing about little girls stealing things on the subway wasn't going to help anyone.

Then today, in the London Guardian there is an article about the Italian government wanting all Roma children to be fingerprinted...

The Roma have a very complicated existence. Their history is tragic. The Nazi's imprisoned them and exterminated many. After a thousand years of being on the outside, what can anyone say about four young girls stealing a wallet?
-----

Unicef among critics of Italian plan to fingerprint Roma children
Guardian - London
by Tom Kington

The Italian government's plan to fingerprint Gypsy children was condemned yesterday as a discriminatory "ethnic headcount" that insulted the country's Roma population.

...Silvio Berlusconi's government is introducing a series of measures aimed at reducing crime, for which immigrants are increasingly being blamed - including thousands of Romanian Gypsies who have entered Italy since Romania joined the EU last year....

Amos Luzzatto [A former head of the Union of Jewish Communities in Italy] told [the] La Repubblica. Recalling Italy's fascist past, he added: "Italy is a country that has lost its memory..."

This article appeared in the Guardian on Friday June 27 2008 on p24 of the International section. It was last updated at 00:02 on June 27 2008.


for link to complete Guardian article click here

Friday, June 27, 2008

Countering Misinformation part II

continued:

This is all really about public relations.


If we follow the NYT essay's advice regarding truth and fiction, we would say:

1. Immigrants PAY taxes.

2. Immigrants are law abiding people.

3. Immigrants contribute to the economy.

4. People usually migrate because of economic reasons.

5. Immigrants have more children because they are bringing cultural traditions from their home countries -
which often encourage large families.

6. ICE raids de-stabilize communities.

7. The immigration debate would be very different if employers were also arrested.

8. Most immigrants love the U.S. - and are very patriotic.


Now if you follow these directions, you might see things change:

Repeat these to yourself every day.
If you have a blog, post this information as often as you can (without making your blog look weird).
Tell these truths to everyone you know.
And pray to The Force, God, or any higher being that might be able to help.

Countering Misinformation part I

From the 1960s television program "To Tell the Truth"

link to photo


"by repeating a false rumor, they [you] may inadvertently make it stronger" - NYT

The essay below presents a number of interesting ideas. It reminds me of when I learned that someone I knew (fairly intelligent, white, middle class from the midwest)* still believed there really were WMD's in Iraq years after many of us knew otherwise.

The whole idea about truth, lies, and what we believe is especially pertinent to the immigration debate and the current presidential campaigns.



-----

June 27, 2008
New York Times
Op-Ed Contributor

Your Brain Lies to You

FALSE beliefs are everywhere. Eighteen percent of Americans think the sun revolves around the earth, one poll has found. Thus it seems slightly less egregious that, according to another poll, 10 percent of us think that Senator Barack Obama, a Christian, is instead a Muslim. The Obama campaign has created a Web site to dispel misinformation. But this effort may be more difficult than it seems, thanks to the quirky way in which our brains store memories — and mislead us along the way...

Journalists and campaign workers may think they are acting to counter misinformation by pointing out that it is not true. But by repeating a false rumor, they may inadvertently make it stronger. In its concerted effort to “stop the smears,” the Obama campaign may want to keep this in mind. Rather than emphasize that Mr. Obama is not a Muslim, for instance, it may be more effective to stress that he embraced Christianity as a young man...

Consumers of news, for their part, are prone to selectively accept and remember statements that reinforce beliefs they already hold. In a replication of the study of students’ impressions of evidence about the death penalty, researchers found that even when subjects were given a specific instruction to be objective, they were still inclined to reject evidence that disagreed with their beliefs..

Sam Wang, an associate professor of molecular biology and neuroscience at Princeton, and Sandra Aamodt, a former editor in chief of Nature Neuroscience, are the authors of “Welcome to Your Brain: Why You Lose Your Car Keys but Never Forget How to Drive and Other Puzzles of Everyday Life.”


for complete NYT opinion piece click here



*Being fairly intelligent, white, middle class, and from the midwest does not automatically mean you should know it all. The reason I mention this is that many Americans assume a person with these demographic qualifications would know better.

The hope of non-citizen soldiers

link to photo


Kendall Frederick from Randallstown, Maryland



How many young people have joined the U.S. Military so they could obtain U.S. citizenship? How many of these have been killed in Iraq?

The chunks of money given to recruits, plus the lure of citizenship lead many immigrants to the military. They have to be aware of the price as they see growing list of their comrades who have died.
-----

Md. mom uses son's Iraq death to help change law


By CHRISSIE THOMPSON
Washington Post
The Associated Press
Friday, June 27, 2008; 4:12 AM

RANDALLSTOWN, Md. -- U.S. Army Spc. Kendell Frederick lost his life while trying to become a citizen of the country he was fighting for. Now, his mother hopes a bill President Bush signed into law Thursday will make sure no other soldier dies the way her son did.

Frederick, a native of Trinidad who moved to the U.S. in 1999, was killed in Iraq in October 2005 when his vehicle was struck by a roadside bomb. He was only in the convoy because he had to go to another base to get a duplicate set of fingerprints made for his U.S. citizenship application.

for complete article click here

More on Gabriela Pacheco: the ankle bracelet monitor

'"Ms. Gaby Pacheco's past statements had no effect on ICE's decision to begin removal proceedings against the other members of the Pacheco family, nor the decision to supervise them," ICE spokeswoman Barbara Gonzalez said in an e-mail Friday. Immigration activist says family being punished' - Fox News

-----

Immigrant Activist says family being punished

MIAMI (AP) -- An Ecuadorean college student who alleges her relatives were targeted for deportation because of her immigration activism said Friday they are again being punished by being placed into an expanded house arrest program.

Gabriela Pacheco's father and sister [who is seven months pregnant] were ordered to wear ankle bracelets to monitor their movements. Under the monitoring program, immigration authorities are alerted if individuals leave their homes for unauthorized reasons...

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials said they decided to implement the monitoring program this week for the Pachecos to ensure their compliance after a "thorough review" of the case.

"Ms. Gaby Pacheco's past statements had no effect on ICE's decision to begin removal proceedings against the other members of the Pacheco family, nor the decision to supervise them," ICE spokeswoman Barbara Gonzalez said in an e-mail Friday...

...more than 1,000 other individuals in South Florida also participate in the monitoring program....

The case is on appeal as the family awaits a judge's final order. The next hearing is set for Sept. 16.

(Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

for link to complete AP article click here

thanks to A.P. for sending this along

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Pacheco Family Under the Lens

Some more updates from Gaby Pacheco:

Although Gaby's family is still undergoing the bracelet program, her pregnant sister Erika was allowed to undergo a different type of surveillance program that is yet to be determined.

More help is needed from people out there.

This is a message that Gaby and friends sent earlier today where a sample letter and contact info is attached if you wish to help out:

Sample Letter:

Dear Congressman,

First and foremost, I would like to acknowledge and honor you for your continuous support of DREAM Act efforts in the past couple of years and especially your role as a beacon of leadership for immigrant students throughout south Florida. Thousands of us have heard of and have been anxiously following the many initiatives you have taken on behalf of our human rights and our rights as committed students to have equal access to education. I commend you and assure you that these efforts have never gone unnoticed.
But I come to you today because of a sudden and extremely urgent matter. Perhaps you are familiar with the name Gabriela Pacheco. Since the age of 15, Gaby has been a passionate advocate for the rights of immigrants and DREAM students nationwide. She was the SGA president of Miami Dade College, and the FJCCSGA (Florida Juior Community Colleges Student Government Association) President for 2005-2006. During this time, she toured the country representing 1.1 million students in the state of Florida and fighting for their rights.
It is this activism and fervor that has brought ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to target her family –specifically telling them that they would be deported because their daughter was too outspoken.
Gaby just fights for what is right and just in this world… and as one of the core leaders of the organization SWER (Students Working for Equal Rights) she has forged alliances with the Florida Immigrant Coalition and student-led coalitions nationwide that are here to support her and fight for her as she has fought for us.
Today, ICE has announced that they plan on putting Gaby’s whole family under the ISAP (Intensive Supervision Appearance Program) which would place ankle bracelets on each individual in the family and would force them to remain within a designated perimeter of their house. They would also have to check in to an ISAP office one hour away from their house 12 times a month. This is an outrageous and unnecessary burden, particularly for Gaby’s sister, Erika, who is 7 months pregnant.
At SWER, we fear for the spirit and morale of this loving family, we fear for the health and well-being of the baby, and we fear what these situations signify for the rest of us as immigrant right’s activists. I write to you on behalf of this organization of youth leaders to plea that you respond to the struggle of this family and that you contact Michael Rosos of ICE to keep them out of the ISAP program.
I appreciate the time you have taken to read this and will hope that you take my words to heart.


Juan Rodriguez
Core Leader of Students Working for Equal Rights



Contact Lincoln Diaz Balart:
http://diaz-balart.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Offices.Contact

and your local congressman as well:
http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/cgi-bin/newseek.cgi?site=ctc&state=fl


Office of Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart (FL-25th)


THE REST OF GABY'S FAMILY STILL NEEDS HELP! We have to continue pressuring the legislators from our district to contact Michael Rosos and take the rest of the family off of ISAP.

LAPD - don't ask don't tell on immigration status

In contrast to what is happening throughout the country (esp. in Virginia) a judge in California upheld a 1979 law that states officers "do not ask about immigration status while interviewing victims, witnesses and suspects, and do not arrest people based on immigration status."

-----


LAPD won't ask about immigration status

Thursday, June 26, 2008

LA Times

(06-26) 04:51 PDT LOS ANGELES (AP) --

A California judge blocked a lawsuit that sought to enlist Los Angeles police officers in weeding out illegal immigrants.

Superior Court Judge Rolf M. Treu on Wednesday rejected arguments that the city's policy — under which most suspects are not asked about their immigration status — conflicted with federal and state law.

Los Angeles police work in communities with large numbers of illegal immigrants, and generally don't inquire about immigration status because it could discourage undocumented people from helping officers and reporting crimes...

Under a 1979 order formally known as Special Order 40, LAPD officers do not ask about immigration status while interviewing victims, witnesses and suspects, and do not arrest people based on immigration status...


for complete article click here

150 ICE agents: part IV

The Big Snare



Here is a video from Fox about the Action Rag raid.

Today, the Houston Chronicle's headline on the raid used the word "snare." What do you snare? Armadillos? rabbits? mice? I have never heard of anyone "snaring" people.

80 people were present for the protest scheduled today at the Leeland Federal Building in Houston.

HB 1 Visas - throwing away talent

George Will, you might consider the thousands of DREAMERS who have majored in Engineering. They are also hitting the wall against talent.
---


Building a Wall Against Talent



By George F. Will
New York Times
Thursday, June 26, 2008; Page A19

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Fifty years ago, Jack Kilby, who grew up in Great Bend, Kan., took the electrical engineering knowledge he acquired as an undergraduate at the University of Illinois and as a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin to Dallas, to Texas Instruments, where he helped invent the modern world as we routinely experience and manipulate it. Working with improvised equipment, he created the first electronic circuit in which all the components fit on a single piece of semiconductor material half the size of a paper clip...

The semiconductor industry's problem is entangled with a subject about which the loquacious presidential candidates are reluctant to talk -- immigration, specifically that of highly educated people. Concerning whom, U.S. policy should be: A nation cannot have too many such people, so send us your PhDs yearning to be free.

Instead, U.S. policy is: As soon as U.S. institutions of higher education have awarded you a PhD, equipping you to add vast value to the economy, get out. Go home. Or to Europe, which is responding to America's folly with "blue cards" to expedite acceptance of the immigrants America is spurning...



for link to complete NYT article click here

A friends' life in FEAR...

...with all these details how can anyone live a normal life. Gaby is a great person, a leader, I met her at a conference in Kansas City early last year. I last saw her Washington, DC at a March and Rally in Defence of Family Unification and a Mock Graduation in mid-June. Unfortunately, Gaby and her family became ICE preys and are now facing unjust procedures like many other families and individuals. Her description below breaks my heart.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Immigration is Criminalizing my Family!
Yesterday at 10:46am

Friends, I need your help!

Yesterday, after leaving immigration court, the trial attorney gave an ICE official dress in civilian clothes my family's four Alien numbers. When we heard her giving the numbers to him we knew there was something wrong!

Four ICE agents came towards us and said "where is Mr. Pacheco?" I asked the ICE agent why he was asking and he said they were going to put him on the ISAP program. I asked him why and told him my family was already on supervised release they have gone to every single appointment, they have never arrived late.

Our lawyers also spoke out and the ICE agents even asked them what Supervise Release was. They took my family in for 30 minutes to a room on the second floor of the 333 South Miami Drive building and then released them with stamp sign papers (Michael Rozos) saying they had to come back to the ISAP office in North Miami on Friday June 28, 2008 at 8:00 AM)

We went to Lincoln and Mario Diaz-Ballart's office yesterday after living the immigration court building to ask for support. We are a good moral character family as the immigration court judge said yesterday. Even though my sister Erika is 7 months pregnant, she is also being put in this program. This program is extremely detrimental to her health and the health of her baby. I fear what is going to happen to the moral of my family and what is going to happen to my sister. My mother cried the entire day yesterday.

We are asking the Diaz-Ballarts to please call Michael Rozos and ask him to take my family out of this program. Please help us in asking our congressmen to make that call and put pressure on Michael Rozos for him to do the right thing.

Let me tell you a little bit about the ISAP program. Please note that everything that is in quotations comes word for word from the ISAP handbook.

ISAP stands for "Intensive Supervision Appearance Program"ISAP services are delivered by BI Incorporated.

BI stands for Behavioral Interventions.The first page of the booklet says Welcome to ISAP as if this is such a wonderful thing to be part of.It states "You have been assigned to the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP) as an alternative to detention. BI Incorporated has contracted with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to operate the ISAP program." ISAP is a community-based supervision program that will help you:

*Appear at your Immigration court hearings.
*Comply with immigration court requirements
*Follow your orders of supervision

WE HAVE APPEARED IN COURT THREE TIMES WITH NO PROBLEMS, WE HAVE COMPLIED WITH IMMIGRATION COURT REQUIREMENTS, AND WE HAVE FOLLOWED ALL THE ORDERS OF SUPERVISION!

ISAP has three phase- Intensive, Intermediate, and Regular.

Intensive Phase.
"During this time, you must meet with your Case Specialist at the ISAP office 12 times per month. Each month, your Specialist will make unscheduled visit(s) to your home, and will contact your employer (if you are allowed to work). During this time, you will be monitored with an electronic monitoring ankle bracelet and/or random phone calls. "

In this phase you also have curfews, schedules, meet employment and residence requirement.
The time spent in the phase is at least 30 days.

"Service Plan-Authorized schedule-Your Case Specialist will work with you to establish a schedule that includes Court hearing, and meetings with legal services, ISAP staff, your guarantor, and community resources, etc. Your schedule may also include work hours (if you are allowed to work and have a job), guarantors meetings, doctors appointment, etc. Your must follow this schedule. Your DHS officer may also require that your case specialist use electronic monitoring to check if you are following your schedule.

"Procedures-Home Visits- Your Case Specialist will make unscheduled visits to your home. You must allow the Case Specialist to enter your home when he or she makes these visits. You must have your D card available for scanning.

Electronic Monitoring-
If your supervision includes electronic monitoring, your case Specialist will attach a transmitter around your ankle and give you a receiver to take home.Never remove your transmitter or tamper with it. You are required to wear it all the time, even in the shower and at night in bed. When you do not have to wear it anymore, your case specialist will remove it.

Always answer your phone after two rings.
The receiver has a red light (phone indicator) that flashes when it needs to use the phone. If you see the light flashing when you are on the phone, finish your conversation immediately and hang up.When the red light stays on, the receiver is using the phone, so do not pick up the phone. Wait until ten minutes after the light has gone off before you use the telephone.

THANK YOU!

Gaby

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

150 ICE agents, part III













link to photo

Today's ICE raid happened in my backyard - well not literally, but not far from my house. When it starts getting this close, a person begins to feel uncomfortable. It doesn't matter if you have your "papers" or you are an American born citizen. It's just the whole idea of 150 (maybe as many as 200) guys with guns running around handcuffing people (including 10 pregnant women) in my neighborhood.

A Houston Chronicle update after 7 pm said that there are still a large number of ICE vehicles surrounding the plant. Supposedly they are looking for people who are hiding. One woman who hid fell down 20 feet and was seriously injured.

From the videos I have seen of ICE raids I would imagine there was lots of screaming and crying - (the ICE agents screaming, the workers crying).

There is no way to express my disgust and anger towards these raids (and the people who plan and carry them out). They are clearly reminiscent of Germany in World War II, or maybe Argentina in the 70s, or the former Soviet Union. Why in the world would a government that treasures democracy want to hunt down people who truly are the most vulnerable in it's community? There is no way to detain the millions of undocumented people in the U.S. ICE knows this. The purpose of the raids is specifically to cause terror, to make people afraid. Maybe Chertoff or Myers are thinking that if the people are sufficiently terrorized they will leave the U.S., or stop sending their kids to school, or work for even lower wages.

It is ironic that a nation that is so obsessed with the threat of terrorism - has more than 12 millions of its residents terrorized.*




*whether authorized or not, undocumented immigrants are considered residents of the U.S. A protest is scheduled at 10 am on Thursday, June 26 at the Leeland Federal Building in downtown Houston.

One Minute-Man Less












Jim Gilchrist on the right
link to photo


A couple of summers ago I went to a congressional hearing on immigration here in Houston.  The newspaper called the hearing a dog and pony show.

Sitting next to me was a man in his late 50's or early 60's.   I noticed that he kept moving towards me.  It didn't appear that he was doing this because he liked me.  Maybe I was imagining but it seems like anger and dislike emoted from his body.   By the end of the hearing I was pushed aside so much, if I would have been at the end of the bench I would have fallen off. 

Although I'm not sure, I think it could have been Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minute Man Movement.  Even if it wasn't - it was certainly on of Gilchrist's sympathizers.

Who would have ever thought that Gilchrist would actually regret what he had done with the Minute Men.  I guess this shows there is always hope.

---

Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Minutemen leader laments path of anti-illegal immigration groups
Founder of Minuteman Project said he worries about people instigating violence in connection with his group's name.
By AMY TAXIN
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER


When Jim Gilchrist headed to the U.S.-Mexico border three years ago to press for tougher immigration enforcement, he carried binoculars.

Today, Gilchrist is worried that a few self-proclaimed patriots might be carrying a gun.

After seeing online videos that encouraged border violence amid calls to crack down on illegal immigration, the 59-year-old Aliso Viejo resident said he feels responsible for what started out as a publicity campaign and has since fallen prey to internal divisions and to influence by people he believed had "Saddam Hussein mentalities."

"In retrospect, had I seen this, had I had a crystal ball to see what is going to happen… Am I happy? No," Gilchrist said in a phone conversation late last week. "Am I happy at the outcome of this whole movement? I am very, very sad, very disappointed..."

Sometimes, Gilchrist said he thinks about leaving the debate over illegal immigration and taking on a new issue like urban blight or tax reform. For now, he said he will continue to lobby for more border patrol agents but not from a perch on the border, watching for people trying to cross.

"I have found, after four years in this movement (…) I very well may have been fighting for people with less character and less integrity than the 'open border fanatics' I have been fighting against," he said. "And that is a phenomenal indictment of something I have created."


Contact the writer Amy Taxin: 714-796-7722 or ataxin@ocregister.com



for link to complete article click here
thanks to A.P. for sending this along

150 ICE agents, part I

This is Part I of a Houston Chronicle article about a raid in Houston's East End

----

June 25, 2008, 12:25PM
East Houston workers detained in ICE raid

Federal immigration agents have detained at least 170 workers at an east Houston plant as they conduct a major raid to investigate allegations that the company is employing illegal immigrants.

The raid, involving 150 to 200 agents, was launched about 7 a.m. at Action Rags U.S.A, 1225 Port Houston, just north of the Houston Ship Channel.

Officials would not specify the information that led them to plan the raid, which is at least the second major immigration enforcement action in Houston in recent months.

Federal agents swarmed the Shipley Do-Nuts headquarters in north Houston on April 16, detaining 20 workers who they said were illegal immigrants.

The sign at Action Rags includes the phrase ropa usada, Spanish for "used clothing." A number of companies in Houston buy and sell used clothing, much of which is cut up for use as industrial rags.

The agents are questioning workers to determine their immigration status, said Bob Rutt, special agent in charge of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement criminal office in Houston.

Of the detained workers, 60-70 percent are women, Rutt said.

ICE officials have released 16 employees so far. ``One was a U.S. citizen and another 15 were here in status and are legally authorized to work," Rutt said.

Ten female workers who are pregnant were detained. ``We are processing them here for humanitarian purposes and will release them here under an order to report to an immigration court,'' Rutt said.

He said that four employees were transported from the facility for medical treatrment, including a woman transported by helicopter to a local hospital after she fell 20 feet off a stack of wooden pallets in which she was hiding.

"Right now, we're still trying to secure the interior because we found several individuals trying to locate hiding spaces inside," said Greg Palmore, spokesman for ICE in Houston.

A plant supervisor who would not provide her name said the company employed 240 people at the site.

Rutt said no member of the company's management has been arrested...


for link to article click here

150 ICE agents, part II

This is Part II of a Houston Chronicle article about a raid in Houston's East End

-----

June 25, 2008, 12:25PM
East Houston workers detained in ICE raid


Scores of ICE vehicles are parked at various spots at the plant, as numerous agents in body armor can be seen talking with workers and walking around the site.

At 9:45 a.m. an ICE helicopter was flying over the plant to check if any employees were hiding on the roof.

Workers at an adjoining plant have gathered in a nearby lot and along railroad tracks to watch the events.

Houston police are providing perimeter security for the federal action.

Calls to Action Rags were not answered this morning. Action Rags U.S.A.'s Web site describes the company as a leading grader and exporter of used clothing. ``We specialize in selling used clothes to worldwide markets including Africa, South America, India and Pakistan,'' according to the Web site.

Dozens of family members gathered on the street outside the plant entrance at Port Houston near Tilgham. Many of them rushed to the facility after employees called them on their cell phones during the raid.

Bernardo Olvera came to ask about his sister, Juana Maria Olvera, who he said was working in the plant and is in this country illegally.

"She doesn't have any papers to work there," Olvera said. "I'd like to talk to her to see if she could give me the keys to her husband's car.

"This is bad, what they do," he said. "But what can you do? The people here are just working. They're not doing anything wrong. These women are hard workers; they're not criminals."

Another relative of a worker said most of the plant's employees are women.


james.pinkerton@chron.com

for link to article click here

A view of "Underground America"












---
Breaking the silence

A new project led by Dave Eggers is documenting the stories of people whose voices usually go unheard, finds Ruth Gidley

Wednesday June 25, 2008
The Guardian - London

History doesn't have to be told by the victor. Sometime the best accounts come from the mouths of ordinary people who've been at the sharp end of extraordinary events.

Like the undocumented Latino workers who did 25% of the reconstruction work after Hurricane Katrina hit the US Gulf Coast in August 2005, only to find the authorities turn their back on them afterwards.

Polo, a 23-year-old Mexican, worked seven days a week clearing up after Katrina, sleeping in a guarded air hangar, then was told at gunpoint to leave by soldiers who said his employers had left town without paying him.

"My idea was to get to Mississippi, to start working, and to earn money to send to my family," Polo says in a new collection of interviews with undocumented workers in the United States. "I couldn't imagine this kind of humiliation."

Underground America is the latest in an oral history series published by the San-Francisco-based Voice of Witness project, started by author Dave Eggers.

"(This) is not a compendium of suffering. This is a collection of voices," insists editor Peter Orner, who's an asylum lawyer and a fiction writer.

The book focuses on undocumented workers from all around the world trying to make it in the United States - most of them separated from their families for years on end. Many suffer violence and injuries or end up doing forced labour, but few complain or seek medical attention because of the constant fear of deportation...
Polo's story represents thousands of others. Some 100,000 Latino workers relocated to the Gulf Coast after Katrina, and one in three of the undocumented reconstruction workers reported trouble getting paid for their work, according to a study by the Human Rights Centre at the University of California, Berkeley.

A month after the disaster - one of the worst in American history - US Immigration and Customs Enforcement said it sent 725 officers to the Gulf to detain and remove undocumented workers...

for link to complete article click here

Narratives about Detention in the U.K.

--
Painful experiences take centre stage


by Alison Benjamin
The Guardian - London
June 25, 2008

Asfin Azizian stares at you from the screen. Standing in his kitchen in north London, the former professional footballer from Iran nervously relays his story of detention, destitution and attempted suicide. However, his 13-year ordeal was not at the hands of Tehran's secret police, but the result of the British immigration service.

Azizian's painful experience is one of many horrific tales of asylum seekers' struggle and survival on the streets of Britain that will unfold on the stage of Southwark Playhouse, London, next month in a play combining film, live action and audience participation.

Devised and directed by Topher Campbell, artistic director of theatre company Red Room, Unstated aims to expose the dehumanising treatment meted out to some of society's most vulnerable people and its impact on both them and us.

"These people become stateless," Campbell explains. "We wanted to tell their stories in the UK, where their rights have been removed. While the government is debating whether to lock up terror suspects for 42 days, asylum seekers are being locked up in detention centres for two years. Britain is home to just 3% of refugees worldwide, yet the tabloid view is that we are being overrun..."

for link to video click here

for  link to complete Guardian article click here


Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Do you know the location of the U.S. - Canadian border?

This article is already 3 years old, but it made me laugh so much I just had to post it.


---

Volunteers get cold reception in Vermont

They run into protest and walk through wild to watch Canada border

NEWPORT, Vt. -- It's hard to save the United States from illegal immigrants when you can't find the border.

At noon yesterday, some volunteers in the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps were in this bucolic town in northern Vermont, trying to do both.

Eleven members of this citizens group had come to the Vermont-Canada border to patrol for illegal immigrants. They had intended to station themselves in Derby Line, a quaint village that straddles the border.

But these Minutemen were forced out of town by a larger crowd of protesters, who denounced their opposition to illegal immigration as a front for racism.

So the volunteers set off to watch a stretch of border on a bike path that runs along Lake Memphremagog.

Only they got lost.

Some of the men stood at a break in the path, which is crossed by the Canadian border close to where they stood. But the group's leader, Bob Casimiro of Weymouth, Mass., was not sure which way to send them.

He pointed down the path toward a footbridge. The Minutemen started walking.

''Stay within sight," he told them. Within minutes, they were out of sight.

The Minutemen were formed in Arizona by ordinary citizens who believe that the federal government is not doing enough to secure the country's borders. In April, they stationed themselves along the southwest border with Mexico, armed with binoculars and cellphones.

They alerted border patrol officers whenever they saw people crossing illegally into the United States, hoping to deter others from trying.

Last month, they announced they would start patrolling the border with Canada.

Border patrol officers are careful not to criticize the Minutemen directly. But they do point out that the officers are best qualified to watch the border.

Others were more openly critical this week. Yesterday, about 40 men and women stood in the pouring rain on the village common in Derby Line to protest the arrival of the Minutemen in town.

''They are outsiders, and we don't want them here," said David Van Deusen of Moretown, Vt., who helped to organize the protest. ''We don't want their racist policies in Vermont..."

.....

Back on the bike path, the three Minutemen trudged on in the rain. Finally, they knocked on Amy Audet's door to ask directions.

The border, she told them, was in the opposite direction.

Yvonne Abraham can be reached at abraham@globe.com.

for link to complete Boston Globe article click here


thanks to M.H. for letting us know about this article

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Hatred towards immigrants is not just in the U.S.




detail of book cover from a novel by Randa Abdel-Fattah
link to photo





A few months ago I took a trip with a number of African immigrants living in Spain. We spent three days talking about everything. One conversation that came up frequently was about religion. They kept talking to me about how they were Protestant. One person told me he regularly listened to a radio show featuring by a Texas preacher. Several stated very clearly that they were not Muslim. I didn't think it through at the time. I just thought they were talking about American religions - it was not discussed with any passion.

Now I understand.

They were telling me this to be safe.

The avoidance is everywhere. Obama's campaign wants to make sure no women with head scarfs turn up in the video of his speeches. A major advertising company changes a photo shoot because the pattern on the model's scarf looks like the one Yasser Arafat used.

The west is afraid, and the fear is localized in the image of the Muslim. It would be wise for us to try to understand the complex nature of our fear - it's not about Muslims - its about our own capability for violence against fellow man (or woman). Both Europeans and Americans need to learn more about their nation's histories. Maybe this is happening because we haven't learned from out mistakes.


-----
June 22, 2008
The Way We Live Now
New York Times

The New Pariahs?

No country is wholly free of anti-immigrant prejudice, whether it is the United States, where illegal immigration was a hot-button issue in the Republican primaries, or post-apartheid South Africa, where economic migrants were recently burned to death. But in many Western European countries today, something new and insidious seems to be happening. The familiar old arguments against immigrants — that they are criminals, that their culture makes them a bad fit, that they take jobs from natives — are mutating into an anti-Islamic bias that is becoming institutionalized in the continent’s otherwise ordinary politics.

... In Belgium, the Vlaams Belang deploys a clever variation, publicly praising Jews and seeking their support against Muslims, whom it tellingly describes as “the main enemy of the moment.” Meanwhile, the Dutch politician Geert Wilders calls Islam “the ideology of a retarded culture.”

Even Britain, which has afforded Muslims a more welcoming environment, has had some worrying moments. A few years back, a Labor M.P. called for an end to “the tradition of first-cousin marriages” among Pakistanis and other South Asians in Britain. The basis for her suggestion was the claim that Pakistanis in Britain were more likely than the general population to suffer from recessive autosomal genetic disorders. Of course, so are Ashkenazi Jews, but you can hardly imagine an M.P. proposing to limit Jews’ marriage choices for this reason, especially given the historic Nazi allegation of Jewish genetic inferiority.

What is so striking about these forms of prejudice, which go beyond ordinary anti-immigrant feeling, is that they are taking root in otherwise enlightened, progressive states — states where the memory of the Holocaust has often led to the adoption of laws against anti-Semitism and racism. The reasons, therefore, must surely go beyond economic or cultural insecurity...

...Generalized anti-immigrant feeling, they suggest, has come to rest on Muslims simply because they are increasingly visible. In France, the specter of the “Polish plumber” undercutting French workmen’s wages played a role in recent votes, suggesting the possibility of an equal-opportunity bias. But hostility to Eastern European migrants, though real enough, still does not run as deep as corresponding hostility to Muslims.

...Muslim immigrants are depicted in European political rhetoric as not merely backward but also illiberal, contradicting Europe’s now-prevalent commitment to tolerance of homosexuality and sex out of wedlock. At the same time, Muslims are thought to be forcing their children to maintain practices like the head scarf, which is banned in many French schools...

for link to complete NYT Magazine article click here


Learn about death in detention

Citizen Orange has posted a video by Breakthrough that gives details about immigrants dying in ICE detention centers. For link to page with video click here

from Love America blog:

After a fellow detainee died under mysterious circumstances, which were covered up by detention facility authorities, Ahmad says he was threatened with lines like “We don’t want you to tell or speak to anyone about this” and “We have cameras and people [detainees] who are watching you, monitoring you.” Though Ahmad was released, he is still in deportation proceedings.

Saturday, June 21, 2008

ACLU questions Loudon County's agreement with ICE

-----

Washington Post

June 21, 2008

Immigration Program Scrutinized

The American Civil Liberties Union raised concerns yesterday about an agreement that the Loudoun County sheriff has made with federal authorities to check the immigration status of all people arrested in the county who are suspected of being in the United States illegally.

The ACLU's Virginia chapter said it filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the sheriff's office, asking for records pertaining to the program.

On Tuesday, Sheriff Stephen O. Simpson (I) announced that he had reached agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to participate in the program, which ultimately seeks to deport illegal immigrants convicted of serious felonies.

Simpson said his deputies will not check suspects based solely on their ethnicity.

The ICE program, also used in Prince William County, Manassas, Manassas Park and Herndon, will begin in Loudoun this summer, Simpson said.

-- Bill Brubaker

for link to WP article click here

Fairness & dignity don't depend on your citizenship


link to photo


A reminder of immigrant deaths on the job comes up again. See dreamacttexas post "And it's dangerous" from June 18, 2008.
---
June 21, 2008
NewYork Times
National Briefing | Southwest

Texas: Deal Over Worker’s Death

Five years after an immigrant worker was pulled into a food processor and killed, the Texas food company where he worked agreed to a settlement to improve safety conditions for workers across the state. The company, Michael Angelo’s Gourmet Foods Inc., a frozen food manufacturer near Austin, will create a council of concerned businesses to address workers’ safety. It will also donate $375,000 to four nonprofit organizations that educate immigrants on their rights. The family-owned company had faced possible criminal charges in the death of the worker, Daniel Romero-Cruz, 34, of Mexico. “This is a modern-day reminder of the most basic ancient constitutional principle that fairness and dignity does not depend on your citizenship,” said District Attorney Ronnie Earle of Travis County, who worked out the agreement.


for link to NYT article click here

Friday, June 20, 2008

Look at what I am wearing and tell me who I am

[A DREAMER] says "I hate living under a stereotype," ..."I'm Mexican, so I guess I have to be mowing lawns, selling drugs and beating up my wife, right? People look at that and say, 'He's going to be a nobody in America, so let's just kick him out.' And I don't want people putting that on me. Image is important, and it's important what other people think. If people are going to look at me as a criminal, I don't like that and that's one of the reasons it's important for me to go to school." - Houston Press

The Houston Press articles says that one particular DREAMER dresses so nicely you would never know he is undocumented. What does our style of clothing have to do with anything? Is this statement implying that people are judged whether they are authorized residents or not by the way they dress? Of course the writer was complimenting the DREAMER, but think of the meaning of his words.

It reminds me of the three women standing at a bus stop in Laredo - an officer drives by, stops and arrests only one of them - the one who didn't have papers. (see dreamacttexas post "Three Women at a Bus Stop" April 18, 2008)
---

The DREAM Act Might Be Dead, But These Kids' Hopes Are Not
They are American in everything but name. They can go to college in Texas and improve themselves. Doesn't matter. At the end of the day, they're just illegal immigrants without social security numbers or futures.
Houston Press
By Chris Vogel
published: June 19, 2008

The phone was already ringing when Javier walked through the front door to his parents' house.

"Hello?" said Javier, who had just returned from the University of Houston campus where he and a group of undocumented students had been passing out pro-DREAM Act fliers just days before the U.S. Senate voted on the bill in the fall of 2007.

Officially called the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, the proposed legislation would provide a path to legal residency for illegal immigrants who wish to serve in the armed forces or attend college and whose parents brought them to the United States when they were young.

"Good evening, sir," said the man on the other end of the line. "I'd like to talk to you about opening a line of credit with our new offer from Visa in conjunction with the University of Houston. All we need is your Social Security number,"

"Oh, no thanks," said Javier. "I don't need a credit card right now."

"What, don't you have a social security number?" said the voice. "Are you a wetback? Are you scared that I'm going to turn you over to the police and you'll get thrown outta my country? Why don't you just go back to Mexico."

Javier slammed down the receiver and turned away. The phone rang again.

"Hello," answered Javier.

It was the same threatening voice, so Javier hung up once more.

"I have to say, I was really scared," says Javier (not his real name).

The next day at school, Javier told his fellow DREAM Act students what had happened.

"They said that they all had the same thing happen to them all the time," says Javier.

Even though the DREAM Act itself would only affect a relatively small number of people, it is every bit a part of the larger political dogfight that is immigration reform in this country.

Supporters argue that by providing a path to citizenship, these immigrants are able to legally work and contribute to the country both economically and socially. Critics say it's akin to a tax giveaway for people who shouldn't be here and threatens to open the floodgates for other piecemeal amnesty bills, thus deepening the overall immigration problem.

Judy Lee, chairwoman of the Texas chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers of America, says that students like Javier have fallen prey to the screaming heads on television.

"In terms of immigration legislation," she says, "you'd think this would be a slam-dunk. But it's been really twisted. I think the right wing and TV and radio people have painted it as, 'Open up the borders and let them all in.' But these are people who really want to contribute and it saddens me that people are not taking a closer look at this and are falling for the radio and TV personalities. It's disheartening and I think people are not getting all the information about the relatively few number of kids affected, how much these kids have to offer, and how it's in our own self-interest to allow them to have legal status. We've already made the investment in them through the public school system. Why not recoup our investment?.."


for link to complete Houston Press article click here

World Refugee Day - June 20










Today is World Refugee Day- this includes economic refugees - people who have to leave their country because they do not have enough money to buy food.

Below are few lines from today's Democracy Now on "economic refugees-immigrant."

It is well worth your time to listen to Nevins - who says that Lou Dobbs has been the most influential in fueling the anti-immigration crowd. I'm sure Dobbs will love this. For those of you that still are not sure if the current immigration situation is bad or good for the country, just think that whether many of us want to or not, Dobbs has shaped public opinion -- we are the public - which includes those of us who write this blog and you the reader.

Are you thinking for yourself or is Dobbs in your head telling you that undocumented immigrants are taking your livelihood?

-----

Democracynow.org

June 20, 2008


Joseph Nevins on “Dying to Live: A Story of US Immigration in an Age of Global Apartheid"


We begin our World Refugee Day coverage looking at economic refugees–immigrants to countries like the United States who are forced to make often treacherous journeys from poorer countries to richer ones because of dire economic conditions.

These economic refugees, particularly those who enter other countries without legal documents, are vilified in popular culture and criminalized by government policies. On Wednesday the European Union approved draconian new laws authorizing the detention of undocumented migrants for up to 18 months in prison before deportation. The estimated half a million people, many of them of minors, who enter the EU without papers each year could also face a re entry ban of up to 5 years.

Meanwhile here in the United States immigration cases now account for more than half of all federal criminal prosecutions. Over 9,000 immigrants were prosecuted in the month of March....

click here to link with democracynow.org's program with Joseph Nevin

Trading Oil for Immigration

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez

link to photo



Guardian's article (below) mentions that Venezuela is not one of Europe's main suppliers - but withholding oil shipments because of immigration policy is a novel idea. Why would Chavez threaten the E.U. instead of the U.S.? - Ethics regarding inmmigration policy in the U.S. has sunk to an all time low. ICE raids have made havoc of immigrant communities - Maybe Chavez should look at the U.S. instead of the E.U.


could it be that he would have too much at stake to stand up to the U.S.?


-----

Chavez threatens EU with oil boycott

Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez has fuelled the growing rift between Opec oil-producing nations ahead of a major summit this weekend, by threatening to block supplies to European countries.

Meanwhile Iran, also a major oil producer, said pumping more oil would do nothing to stop the surge in prices, after Saudi Arabia revealed that it may be increasing its production again.

As angry protests broke out in China over a sharp rise in its fuel prices today, Chavez said he was enraged by new rules passed by the EU parliament on Wednesday, aimed at standardising the process by which member nations deport illegal immigrants. They contain contentious measures such as providing for long detention periods.

In a televised speech, Chavez said: "Our oil shouldn't go to those countries" in Europe who apply new rules for deporting illegal immigrants. He also threatened to block European investments in his country. Venezuela sells most of its oil to the US and is a minor supplier to Europe.

Last month Saudi Arabia promised to produce another 300,000 barrels a day, but other oil producers within Opec are split over the need to pump more oil. Venezuela and Iran have pointed the finger at the West for failing to act against financial speculators, and the weak US dollar...


for complete Guardian article click here

Drowning or Murder?

Amidst the human rights violations towards in the U.S. we often forget what is going elsewhere. The article below is dated (May 9th), however, I am so stunned that someone would deliberately sink a boat - especially one with children, I wonder how often this happens, but doesn't get reported. (See dreamacttexas post "Between Ethics and the Law" from November 17, 2007)

----

Human Rights Watch

Morocco: Investigate Migrant Deaths at Sea

Navy Sailors Accused of Deliberately Sinking Boat

(Washington, DC, May 9, 2008) – The Moroccan government should immediately investigate allegations that its naval forces sank a boat in the Mediterranean in which at least 28 migrants drowned, Human Rights Watch said today.

On April 28, 2008, a Moroccan naval patrol intercepted a nine-meter, inflatable Zodiac-type boat with 70 people on board, including children, apparently heading for the Spanish coast. The boat reportedly refused to heed an order from the patrol to return to the Moroccan coast.

According to survivors cited by the Spanish daily El País of May 7, a sailor then deliberately punctured their boat with a knife, causing it to deflate. “We begged them to look at our babies and children,” one survivor told El País. “The soldier stabbed the boat and just watched with his arms crossed.” Between 28 and 33 passengers, including four children, drowned before another Moroccan naval patrol boat came and rescued the remaining 40 passengers and transported them to the coastal town of al-Hoceima, survivors said. Morocco denies that its navy deliberately sunk the migrant boat...

An estimated 100,000 migrants cross the Mediterranean annually by boat to reach Europe and an estimated 10,000 have died at sea over the past decade...


for complete Human Rights Watch article click here
link to Washington Post Blog discussing migrants to Europe click here

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Shame on you for not being multi-lingual

Having just returned from a long trip to the E.U. my limited French and limitless Spanish and English didn't help me. I was at a bakery and asked for a strawberry tart - another customer corrected my pronunciation. There were about 7 people in line. I was really embarrassed.

A clerk at the French national library refused to take my order for a book unless I spoke to her in French. I spilled out a few mispronounced words and told her I was taking a class - but I had only been there a week, so what could she expect? She told me that she lived in the U.S. for two years and that those years were extremely difficult and stressful for her because of the language. She says she gets angry when she sees foreigners at the library who she believes refuse to speak French. I found out later that she also spoke fluent Spanish.

The announcements on the subway are broadcast in French, English, and Spanish - so are those on airplanes and buses.

Just about everybody speaks great English, especially people under 40 - you would think they all spent a few years in the states. But they didn't - they learned in as part of their regular education.

In contrast, some Americans tell me that people from every country should speak English since it is the most important language in the world. I here few people say that Americans should learn other languages.

So we think they should learn our language - and we go visit without a clue - and are given the wrong change (over charged), confronted in front of groups of people by bakers, their customers, store clerks.

If that is a very small taste of what it is like for immigrants who come to the U.S. or U.K. without speaking English - I can imagine what a nightmare it must be. Especially if you work 2 jobs, and get laughed at by your kids when you try to speak English. No time for a class, no encouragement from the family.


-----

Alan Travis, home affairs editor

The Guardian - London

June 20, 2008

Protests at pre-entry English tests for spouses coming to UK

Government plans to insist that spouses should have to learn English before they are allowed into Britain to join their husbands or wives have run into a barrage of opposition and warnings that the idea could breach human rights laws.

The responses to an official consultation on the proposal published yesterday run more than two to one against, with many warning it could break up marriages because many cannot afford or access English lessons. The anonymised responses were 68 to 31 against the pre-entry English test for spouses.

Immigration lawyers have told ministers that spouses and fiancees should not be barred from joining a partner in the UK for language reasons and that the plan could breach the human rights convention's guarantees to the right to marry and have a family life.

Other immigration organisations said the measure would discriminate against those from rural areas in south Asia, where the opportunities to learn English are limited. Others argued that as EU citizens could settle in Britain without a language test it was clearly not a prerequisite for coping with life in Britain and therefore was more symbolic than practical...

The results were published as the home secretary, Jacqui Smith, unveiled the latest immigration enforcement campaign, under which employers who take on illegal migrants are named and shamed on government websites...


for complete Guardian article click here

And it's dangerous

'Norma Rios stood a block away. She stopped on her way home from work. Her husband also works in construction.

``And it's dangerous,'' she said' - Houston Chronicle


Remember the guys who died in the mine in Utah last year? Or the people who have died in those crane accidents in New York City? Most construction workers are immigrants. -- Its the leading cause of death for immigrant men.

Today a building under construction collapsed on the Rice University campus. One man died. The Houston Chronicle made sure to let the readers know that the workers were all subcontractors, meaning the big construction company that oversees the site is not responsible if any of the workers are undocumented.

-----

June 19, 2008, 7:42PM
Worker dies during construction of Rice dorm

Storm winds toppled walls at a Rice University dorm construction site Thursday afternoon, killing one construction worker and sending four others to area hospitals, authorities said.

The collapse occurred shortly at about 4 p.m., as rain and high winds whipped through the McMurtry College construction site at Sunset and Rice boulevards, southeast of downtown Houston, said B.J. Almond, the school's spokesman.

The fallen second-story walls pinned down five men, including the one who was killed and injured three others at the work site. Houston firefighters were called at 4:06 p.m. to help rescue those trapped...

The name of the dead man was not immediately available. All involved in the incident were subcontractors for project general contractor Linbeck Construction Corp., Almond said.

Several workers bowed their heads as the Harris County Medical Examiner pulled into the area to remove the colleague's body from the site. One made the sign of the cross, holding his hard hat with his other hand.

Norma Rios stood a block away. She stopped on her way home from work. Her husband also works in construction.

``And it's dangerous,'' she said. ``I came to say a prayer for all of them and their families.''

for complete HC article click here

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Dems raise stakes on immigration

www.politico.com

Dems raise stakes on immigration

Going into November's elections, House and Senate Democrats areoutbidding the White House on spending for immigration enforcement,with a special emphasis on deporting people...

( to continue reading click on the title of the post -)

© 2008 Capitol News Company LLC

New ICE family detention centers a step in wrong direction

Barbara Hines: New ICE family detention centers a step in wrong direction

"Instead of contracting the construction of more family detention centers, ICE should seriously invest in alternatives to detention programs."
Dallas Morning News Op-Ed, June 17, 2008.
http://bibdaily.com/

=======================================================================http://www.detentionwatchnetwork.org/node/2188New ICE family detention centers, a step in wrong direction (The Dallas Morning News)Posted:

June 17, 2008
By Barbara Hines

The federal government's Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is accepting bids today for contracts to construct three new privately run detention centers across the country for children and their families awaiting immigration proceedings.

These facilities, each to be built with up to 200 beds, will expand the system of family detention made controversial in recent years at the T. Don Hutto detention center in Taylor, Texas.

The proposal for new centers is a step in the wrong direction. Congress has repeatedly called on ICE, the agency within the Department of Homeland Security responsible for immigration matters, to implement alternatives to detention programs for families, stating that detention of families should be the last alternative and not the first.

In 2006, when I first went to Hutto, I was appalled by the living conditions. Children as young as infants, along with their families, were detained in a converted medium-security prison run by the Corrections Corporation of America, a for-profit prison management corporation. Children received one hour of education a day and wore prison uniforms. They were required to be in their cells for long periods during the day to be present for multiple cell counts.

Many of the detainees at Hutto have come to the United States fleeing persecution or social turmoil ? asylum seekers fleeing civil conflict in Eastern Africa, Iraqi Christians targeted by fundamentalists and Central Americans seeking refuge from drug, gang and domestic violence. No detainee has been accused of a crime.

The psychological toll on children in detention is significant. Often already traumatized by conditions in their home countries and the process of being uprooted during migration, children and parents at Hutto reported being threatened with separation from one another as a disciplinary measure.

After widespread public advocacy against the facility, national media attention, a lawsuit and a settlement, conditions at the facility are significantly better. Children no longer wear prison scrubs, and they now receive seven hours of education a day. Also, they remain at the detention center for a significantly shorter amount of time.

Fundamentally, however, family detention remains an inappropriate response to asylum seekers and immigrant parents and children. Advocates continue to be concerned about news reports from Hutto, such as an alleged sexual assault of a detainee by a guard and the separation of a child from her mother for four days. Both incidents occurred last year.

Alternatives to detention include community-based, homelike shelters that provide access to counseling and legal services. Intensive-supervision programs also keep families together and out of detention. In fact, alternatives to detention programs have proved effective at ensuring that immigrants appear for their court hearings through a combination of telephone reporting and home visits. These programs are also substantially more cost-effective than detention.

One study by the Vera Institute found that more than 90 percent of immigrants on a supervised release program attended their immigration hearings. The average cost of a supervision program was $12 a day, compared with $61 a day to detain an immigrant. The cost savings are likely more pronounced in the context of family detention, which is more expensive than detaining adult immigrants.

Instead of contracting the construction of more family detention centers, ICE should seriously invest in alternatives to detention programs.

Barbara Hines is a clinical professor of law and director of the Immigration Clinic at The University of Texas School of Law. She was co-counsel - along with the national ACLU, the ACLU of Texas and the law firm of LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene and McRae - in the lawsuit challenging conditions at Hutto. Her e-mail address is bhines@law.utexas.edu.

http://www.detentionwatchnetwork.org/node/2188

European Union Approves Harsh Immigration Rules

Maybe it was the 60 cars that young people burned in Vitry-le-François in France on Saturday night (14th). Maybe the European Union is being influenced by the increasingly harsh immigration policies of the U.S. What ever the reason, many people will be affected.

Europe is teeming with immigrants.

The changing laws bring to mind Europe's colonial history - telling the immigrants from former colonies, and other developing nations:

Let us colonize you. Let us buy your country's cheap labor. But don't come visit.
---
EU lawmakers back controversial new immigration rules

By JAN SLIVA
The Associated Press
Wednesday, June 18, 2008; 9:42 AM

STRASBOURG, France -- The European Parliament on Wednesday approved controversial new rules for expelling illegal immigrants from the bloc, overcoming opposition from left-leaning lawmakers and ignoring protests from human rights activists.

The move comes amid a tide of anti-immigrant sentiment across the wealthy bloc, with Italy blaming foreigners for a spike in violent crime and France grappling with tensions in the immigrant-heavy suburbs ringing urban centers.

As economic hard times loom in many EU countries, governments are coming under increased pressure to act tough on immigration. Until now, there has been no common EU policy on expelling illegal immigrants, and detention periods varied from 32 days in France to indefinite custody in Britain, the Netherlands and five other countries...


for link to complete article click here

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

NJ Undocumented student

College access for aliens debated
At issue: What place, if any, they have for undocumented
By Abbott Koloff • Daily Record • June 15, 2008


Felipe Vargas always expected to go to college with his friends.

He said he gets good grades at Morristown High School, where he's a sophomore and the host of a student radio show. He wants to study art in college, perhaps to become a teacher.
But while he's lived in New Jersey much of his life, coming to America when he was 10, he doesn't have legal status. That means he may not be able to continue his education after high school because he doesn't qualify for any of the financial breaks he would need.

What happens to students such as Vargas has become part of a nationwide debate heating up all across the nation this year, with two competing proposals in the state legislature.
One would grant some undocumented immigrants in-state tuition to public colleges, following the lead of 10 states that have passed similar laws over the past seven years. The other, sponsored by Morris County Republican assemblymen Richard Merkt and Michael Patrick Carroll, would bar undocumented immigrants from attending any college in the state.

Merkt said he filed the bill in response to attempts to grant in-state tuition to students here illegally, but added that he doesn't expect it to get a hearing in the Democratic-controlled assembly.

"In a state such as New Jersey where we don't have enough college seats for our residents, I cannot see why we should occupy some of those seats with students who are not here legally," Merkt said.

Vargas, 16, who wore a Red Hot Chili Peppers T-shirt during a recent interview, considers himself a typical American teenager. But he doesn't qualify for in-state tuition at a state college. He can't get the federal or state financial aid he would need for private schools. And while most schools would accept him, even if he can't pay, his local community college won't consider his application.

The County College of Morris doesn't accept undocumented immigrants -- which appears to make it, along with Warren County Community College, one of just two public colleges in the state with such a policy.

To view the complete article please click on the title of the post.

Monday, June 16, 2008

A Silent March after Burning 60 Cars

link to photo












A young man dies in what is believed to be a drug related confrontation in northeast France on Saturday night (14th). Sixty police officers were dispatched as dozens of cars were burned. People connected this confrontation with the French riots in the Banlieue in 2005. Right wing Marine La Pen Marine criticized Sarkozy for having soft position on security, which Marine believes led to the riot.

On Sunday, the 15th, a group held a silent march in response to the killing. Le Figaro newspaper states that about 50 people attended, however in the photo from the march (above) it appears to have been a higher number.


----

Agence France Presse -- English
June 15, 2008 Sunday 2:54 PM GMT
French youths clash with police after shooting
LILLE, France, June 15 2008

Dozens of French youths clashed with police in a town in northeast France overnight, burning cars during a rampage triggered by the killing of a 22-year-old man, an official said Sunday.

Two police officers, two firefighters and five residents suffered minor injuries during the violence that raged until Sunday morning in Vitry-le-Francois, said Sylvaine Astic from the regional prefect's office.

Armed with baseball bats and firebombs, about 50 youths went on a rampage, torching cars and setting fire to garbage bins in the town of 17,000 people, Astic told AFP.

The violence started around 10:00 p.m. (2000 GMT) after the 22-year-old man was gunned down in Vitry-le-Francois. A suspect was arrested overnight.

About 60 police officers were dispatched to the town late Saturday and remained in Vitry-le-Francois on Sunday.

A police union issued a statement denouncing what it termed as "hysteria" in relations between French youth and police.

"This started out as a murderous settling of scores," said Nicolas Comte of the SGP-FO police union.

"But quickly this tragic event prompted a violent group to attack police with baseball bats and molotov cocktails as young bystanders watched passively, like spectactors to the 'riot show'," said Comte.

He linked the latest outbreak to the 2005 suburban riots, France's worst unrest in decades, when poor immigrant-heavy areas around Paris and other major cities exploded into three weeks of violence.

"Nothing has been resolved since. The fire is still burning under the ashes," said Comte.

About 250 people took part in a silent march in Vitry-le-Francois on Sunday, led by the victim's mother who wept as she walked holding a photograph of her son through the low-income neighbourhood of Rome-Saint-Charles.

The last time there was major rioting was in the Paris suburb of Villiers-le-Bel in November when two teenagers riding a motorbike died after they collided with a police car. The incident led to three days of riots.

More than 100 police officers were injured in Villiers-le-Bel when rioters armed with hunting rifles and pellet guns opened fire, a new, worrisome turn in the ongoing clashes with police in the suburbs.


from Lexis Nexis

---
Le Figaro

Vitry-le-François : le meurtre serait lié à la drogue

C.J. (lefigaro.fr) avec AFP et Le Monde
16/06/2008 | Mise à jour : 22:23 |

Le suspect a reconnu avoir un «différend portant sur plusieurs milliers d'euros» dans un trafic de cannabis avec le groupe qu'accompagnait le jeune homme abattu samedi.

Une confrontation sanglante liée à un trafic de cannabis. Les enquêteurs lèvent petit à petit le voile sur le meurtre, samedi, à Vitry-le-François d'un jeune homme, abattu d'une balle dans la tête par un ancien militaire, et dont la mort avait provoqué une nuit d'affrontements entre jeunes et forces de l'ordre. Le suspect, âgé de 22 ans, a reconnu avoir tiré sur la victime et expliqué avoir un différend concernant un trafic de cannabis avec le groupe de jeunes auquel appartenait la victime, a affirmé le procureur de la République. Cette querelle portait sur «plusieurs milliers d'euros».

Le meurtrier présumé, qui a été déféré au parquet lundi, « se sentait harcelé, menacé et il s'est rendu à ce rendez-vous avec une carabine 22 long rifle», a indiqué la magistrate. L'ancien soldat n'aurait toutefois pas visé la victime. Il a ainsi «répété» pendant sa garde à vue, «qu'il ne connaissait pas Mohamed». Des explications qui vont dans le sens du témoignage d'un des proches de Mohamed qui confiait au Monde, que son ami avait été fauché par «une balle perdue». «Mohamed a voulu séparer deux types qui se battaient», a-t-il assuré. Le procureur a pour sa part affirmé qu'on ignorait tout du rôle de la victime, inconnue des services de police et « appréciée de tous »...

for link to complete article click here


Obama and the Banlieue

June 17, 2008

"...the percentage of blacks in France who hold university degrees is 55, compared with 37 percent for the general population. But the number of blacks who get stuck in the working class is 45 percent, compared with 34 percent for the national average..."


-----
New York Times
June 17, 2008
For Blacks in France, Obama’s Rise Is Reason to Rejoice, and to Hope
By MICHAEL KIMMELMAN

PARIS — When Youssoupha, a black rapper here, was asked the other day what was on his mind, a grin spread across his face. “Barack Obama,” he said. “Obama tells us everything is possible.”

A new black consciousness is emerging in France, lately hastened by, of all things, the presumptive Democratic nominee for president of the United States. An article in Le Monde a few days ago described how Mr. Obama is “stirring up high hopes” among blacks here. Even seeing the word “noir” (“black”) in a French newspaper was an occasion for surprise until recently.

Meanwhile, this past weekend, 60 cars were burned and some 50 young people scuffled with police and firemen, injuring several of them, in a poor minority suburb of Vitry-le-François, in the Marne region of northeast France...

This black consciousness is reflected not just in daily conversation, but also in a dawning culture of books and music by young French blacks like Youssoupha, a cheerful, toothy 28-year-old, who was sent here from Congo by his parents to get an education at 10, raised by an aunt who worked in a school cafeteria in a poor suburb, and told by guidance counselors that he shouldn’t be too ambitious. Instead, he earned a master’s degree from the Sorbonne.

Then, like many well-educated blacks in this country, he hit a brick wall. “I found myself working in fast-food places with people who had the equivalent of a 15-year-old’s level of education,” he recalled...

The surge in popularity of Mr. Obama among French blacks partly stems from the hope that his rise “will highlight our lack of diversity and put pressure on French politicians who say they favor him to open politics up more to minorities,” Mr. [Pap] N’Diaye said. “We in France are, in terms of race, where we were in terms of gender 40 years ago...”

[N’Diaye] laid out some history: French decolonization during the 1960s pretty much pushed the original négritude movement to the back burner, at the same time that it inspired a wave of immigrants from the Caribbean to come here and fill low-ranking civil service jobs. From sub-Saharan Africa, another wave of laborers gravitated to private industry. The two populations didn’t communicate much...

for complete NYT article click here

Solidarity with Workers Who Don't Have Papers



photo by MTHdz


Since I've been writing about Resistance the past couple of days, I thought it would be a good idea to show a photo with a bit of resistance that turned up on the Champ-Elysee in Paris.

The Champ-Elysee in Paris is a lot like Times Square in New York, except the sidewalks are much wider and there are trees on each side.

This photo was taken on a Sunday at a nice restaurant - the chair was sitting next to the section with the outdoor tables, while an African group played their music.

It is not so much about the group wanting money, very few passersby were giving anything - and when they did it was less than a euro. It was the public nature of the statement:

Solidarite avec Travailleurs sans papers -

Solidarity with Workers Who Don't Have Papers

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Bicameral Helsinki Commission writes to Chertoff

Somewhat late but never useless... the Congress is making more public statements regarding DHS and the condition of detention for undocumented immigrants. It sounds like the WP articles on health care in detention got many people's attention...


No one said anything about Menendezs' speech last week except a New Jersey newspaper, but at least we are now able to see a pattern -- even if it is slow --- eventually there will be enough people interested in humane immigration reform that a good bill will be passed by Congress.


-----

Politico.com
June 13, 2008
Categories: Diplomacy

Dems: Explain detainee drugging

The bicameral Helsinki Commission, chaired by Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.) and Rep. Alcee L. Hastings (D-Fla.), asked Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff today to explain why and under what conditions U.S. authorities have drugged detainees who were not in need of medical attention.

"We write regarding the recent report in The Washington Post, "Some Detainees Are Drugged for Deportation" (by Amy Goldstein and Dana Priest, May 14, 2008). According to this article, The Washington Post has identified more than 250 cases since 2003 in which the government has, without medical reason and without consent, given psychiatric drugs to immigrant deportees," the lawmakers wrote in a letter to Chertoff. "The forced medication of detainees may violate both domestic and international law; moreover, these reports further tarnish the already badly damaged reputation of the United States."

The letter in full — which is also signed by commission members Sens. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) and Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Reps. Hilda L. Solis (D-Calif.) and G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.) — is after the jump.

The Honorable Michael Chertoff

Secretary

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC 20528



Dear Secretary Chertoff:



We write regarding the recent report in the Washington Post, "Some Detainees Are Drugged for Deportation" (by Amy Goldstein and Dana Priest, May 14, 2008). According to this article, the Washington Post has identified more than 250 cases since 2003 in which the government has, without medical reason and without consent, given psychiatric drugs to immigrant deportees. The forced medication of detainees may violate both domestic and international law; moreover, these reports further tarnish the already badly damaged reputation of the United States. We urge the Department of Homeland Security to cooperate fully with investigations of these allegations undertaken by Congress.

As members of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (the Helsinki Commission), we were particularly alarmed to read that in 2007, of the 53 deportees drugged without their consent, 50 of them were administered Haldol, a medication designed to treat schizophrenia and acute psychotic states. Due to its abuse by Soviet psychiatric prisons, Haldol has a particularly noxious reputation. The Helsinki Commission has long voiced its concern about medical treatment that may violate international norms, from Russia to Slovakia, and we urge your department to respond seriously and credibly to the issues raised by the Post article. This includes examination of the threat to detainees' health; possible violation of medical ethics by persons employed by DHS; and the policy-making process which resulted in practices that may have been both dangerous and illegal.

Art as Resistance




"A banana from my country can travel easier than me"


Conceptual artist Hatuey Ramos-Fermin puts on a banana suit to accentuate how bananas have no problem at security points.

How is this Resistance? When you see Benito Banana, it makes you laugh, and then you think about how silly it is that a banana can go everywhere, but a person cannot! Since you are a human being that can think through things, you mull over the banana situation - maybe you recently returned from a foreign country and ended up behind a grandmother who had over stayed her visa at Christmas. ICE officers make her cry. You feel bad, but maybe you still tell yourself that immigration needs to be controlled, even if grandmothers are made to cry.

You may dream about Benito Banana. Maybe a few days later you'll be at the grocery store - passing by the bananas - you chuckle to yourself about Benito's outfit - and then it dawns on you that our immigration system treats people pretty badly.

Resistance can be used when you can influence someone into thinking about things in a more humane way. Resistance can be used to reduce hate by informing people (i.e. undocumented immigrants do pay taxes, and are funding our social security deficit). Resistance can create change.

below is a video describing how Benito's banana suit was made:



NY Foundation for the Arts Fellowship for Immigrant Artists









Poster announcing lecture by 

New York Times
June 15, 2008
Guiding Hands Help Immigrant Artists Connect

By TINA KELLEY

Something about the man in the banana costume appealed to Ricardo Miranda Zúñiga. Maybe it was the sign he wore that read, “A banana from my country can travel easier than me.” Maybe it was the fruit-wearer’s free-spiritedness as he paraded in his peel through public places. Or maybe it was the Latino roots they shared.

So when Mr. Zúñiga, 37, a graphic artist from Brooklyn who also works with new media, was looking through the portfolios of immigrant artists who were seeking mentors, he picked Hatuey Ramos-Fermín, 30, a conceptual artist from the Bronx who has made videos of himself playing Benito Banana, a character he created to reflect on migration.

The two have met at least 10 times, attending lectures and museum openings and discussing their work and the common themes within, like immigration and globalization. They are part of a mentoring program run by the New York Foundation for the Arts that helps artists from abroad gain a toehold in the city’s diverse arts community.

Mr. Zúñiga’s parents are from Nicaragua, and Mr. Ramos-Fermín was born in the Dominican Republic, raised in Puerto Rico and educated in the Netherlands.

Mr. Ramos-Fermín says that being an immigrant inspires him. “I really enjoy being in a place I’ve never been to before,” he said. “I see things differently than someone who has lived here all your life.”

Michael L. Royce, the executive director of the arts foundation, said the mentoring program began in 2007. It is an offshoot of the foundation’s New York Creates program that helps folk and craft artists, many of whom are immigrants and need to connect with established artists.

“The mentors know the galleries, what’s hot, what’s wanted, what can sell,” he said. “They can help the mentees become fully immersed in what it takes to be successful.”

The mentorship program, which this year has 15 pairs of mentors and mentees, costs about $100,000 to run, and is supported with grants from the Deutsche Bank Americas Foundation and the Independence Community Foundation. Mr. Royce said his foundation was seeking financing to expand the program, which does not inquire about the immigration status of the artists seeking mentors...



for complete NYT article click here

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Ever think about Resistance?







French Resistance Poster
"Anna Marly will sing her songs of the Resistance"









In Europe the idea of the French Resistance to the Vichy government during World War II is very much alive. Walking around Paris you see many street signs that give the name of a hero (or heroine); the next line in smaller letters says "mort pour la France" -(died for France)

The United States doesn't say much about heroes - except an occasional story about the Alamo. In terms of resistance to oppression or inequality, we haven't been doing much for about 40 years. France took resistance seriously, and remembers what it's people did.

We Americans are not very resisting people, at least not since the 1960s. We have so many worries, gas is so expensive, we have little time - who has a moment to think about resistance - and the mistreatment of undocumented people, our over populated prisons, the high Latino school drop out rate - the U.S. government's denial of global warming, and those poor guys fighting a very violent make-believe war in Iraq?

Resistance is an important word. It is not about violence. It is about stopping something bad. Roget's Thesaurus gives us a few words that help describe resistance - defense, protection, guard, ward; shielding, propugnation, preservation, guardianship. area defense, site defense, self-defense and self-preservation. Maybe its time for us to begin thinking resistance.

...when the Home Office [immigration] began coming to the estate at 5am to remove them, Donnachie and the rest of the residents looked on in horror. "It was like watching the Gestapo - men with armour, going in to flats with battering rams. I've never seen people living in fear like it,"
-
The Guardian

click here for video by Stevenson and Grant

-----
Land of no return
By Rachel Stevenson and Harriet Grant
The Guardian - London, Friday June 13 2008

All across the country, communities are organising themselves to stop their friends and neighbours from being deported. From lobbying the Home Office to foiling dawn raids, the resistance will stop at nothing to keep failed asylum seekers safe in Britain.

'We had our own little code to warn them it was a dawn raid and to get out. There's more than one way of getting out of the flats - there's two staircases and two lifts, so you could play games if you knew how. If we were a thorn in their flesh, then good."

Sixty-seven-year-old Jean Donnachie flashes a mischievous smile as she describes the tactics she and her neighbours used every day to thwart immigration officers trying to arrest asylum seekers on her estate in Glasgow. A grandmother and former cashier who has lived on the Kingsway for 20 years, she makes an unlikely resistance fighter. But when she talks about how the estate took on the Home Office, there is a gleam of defiance in her eyes...


The estate became home for hundreds of families escaping persecution and torture in places such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Algeria, Uganda and Congo. Most had their request for asylum in the UK turned down, and when the Home Office began coming to the estate at 5am to remove them, Donnachie and the rest of the residents looked on in horror. "It was like watching the Gestapo - men with armour, going in to flats with battering rams. I've never seen people living in fear like it," says Donnachie. "I saw a man jump from two storeys up when they came for him and his family. I stood there and I cried, and I said to myself, 'I am not going to stand by and watch this happen again.'"

She got together with her friend Noreen and organised the residents into daily dawn patrols, looking out for immigration vans. When the vans arrived, a phone system would swing in to action, warning asylum seekers to escape.

The whole estate pitched in, gathering in large crowds in the early-morning dark to jeer at immigration officials as they entered the tower blocks. On more than one occasion, the vans left the estate empty - the people they had come for had got out in time and were hidden by the crowd. The estate kept this up for two years until forced removals stopped.

But what happened on the Kingsway is not unique. Over the past few years there has been a growing resistance to the government's attempts to deport failed asylum seekers. From Manchester, from Sheffield, from Belfast, from Bristol, the Home Office is being bombarded with requests from British people all over the country asking for asylum seekers to be given another chance.

for complete Guardian article click here

Did someone say that E-Verify is accurate?

"19,000 E-Verify queries nationwide this year erroneously resulted in a "tentative nonconfirmation" of legal eligibility for employment." - Tucson Citizen
-----
Tucson Citizen
Immigration official: U.S. database missed thousands of workers' IDs
E-Verify lacked naturalization records
SHERYL KORNMAN Published: 06.13.2008

The nation's top citizenship and immigration official said in Tucson on Thursday that the database Arizona employers must use to check a person's legal right to work did not include the names of thousands of naturalized Americans until May 5. "Are we satisfied with that? No. We will continue to improve," said Jonathan Scharfen, acting director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The naturalization data were added to the E-Verify system for the first time in May as part of ongoing changes in practices by the agency.

The move was made after about 19,000 E-Verify queries nationwide this year erroneously resulted in a "tentative nonconfirmation" of legal eligibility for employment. E-Verify's database previously consisted mostly of data from Social Security records. Of the 70,000 employers nationwide using E-Verify, 24,800 are in Arizona, he said. One-third of the 4 million E-Verify queries in 2008 originated in Arizona, he said.

Scharfen also addressed the backlog of citizenship applications at the agency's office in Tucson, estimated at 4,500 in March. He said seven full-time employees have been added to the agency's Tucson staff of 16 to improve processing time. That will help bring the number of applications processed in Tucson in fiscal 2008 to 3,500, about 1,000 more than the 2,456 applications processed here in 2007, he said. In March, the agency estimated it would take up to 16 months to process the 2007 applications.

"Those who applied (for citizenship) in 2007 will be processed by Oct. 1, in time for the November election," Scharfen said.

The voter registration deadline for the general election in Pima County is Oct. 6. Scharfen pointed out that the agency has been working with the FBI to speed its check of each applicant's name, reducing the time to 30 days.

He said the Department of Homeland Security provided $35 million to the FBI to hire 80 full-time and 220 contract workers to speed its work. "By the end of May, all (citizenship) applications pending more than three years will be completed. By the end of July, all applications pending more than two years will be completed," he said.

for link to Tucson Citizen article click here

thanks to A.P. for linking us to this article

Changes in Canadian Immigration Laws

-----

Indo-Asian News Service

June 10, 2008 Tuesday 1:58 PM EST

Canadian MPs vote on controversial immigration bill

BYLINE: Report from Indo-Asian News Service brought to you by HT Syndication.


DATELINE: Toronto

Toronto, June 10 -- The process of migrating to Canada is set for drastic changes with the House of Commons finally voting the controversial Bill C-50, which will now go to the Senate before it becomes a law.

A drama of sorts was enacted by the main opposition Liberal party, which has cried itself hoarse in opposing immigration changes, when a large number of its MPs just abstained during the voting, enabling the minority Conservative party government to get the bill okayed by 120-90 votes Monday.

The ruling party had cleverly tucked immigration changes in the budget implementation bill, whose defeat would have led to a snap poll.

Since the Liberal party does not find itself election ready, it didn't want to bring down the government on the immigration bill. However, it has promised to undo these changes once it comes to power.

When the bill gets the assent from the governor general, it will become effective retrospectively from Feb 2008.

Under the new law, the immigration minister gets sweeping powers to fast-track immigration in the skilled categories such as doctors and professionals. The changes may have impact on immigration from India, which was set to overtake China and become the number one source of immigrants for Canada this year.

However, this may not happen now as a large number of immigrants from India fall in the family reunification category which may take a back seat under the new law. Currently, it takes just a few months for an applicant to land in Canada in the family category, while it takes up to five to six years in other categories.

The immigration minister can also set limits on the number of immigrants to be allowed into Canada each year. Immigration can be denied even if an applicant meets all qualification for immigration and has been cleared by immigration officers.

Though the government said immigration changes were necessitated by the 900,000-plus backlog of application, its true motive seems to be political as immigrant communities have basically not voted for the Conservative party, except in a few pockets.

Since immigrants are concentrated in major urban areas where the party has never done well, it is eager to change equations in its favour in urban Canada.

Published by HT Syndication with permission from Indo-Asian News Service.


from Lexis Nexis

Bringing Integrity to our Immigration System

The day after Senator Robert Menendez gave his speech on immigration, ICE arrested another 42 people in Rhode Island. As the ICE spokesman stated in the press release - they are committed to restoring integrity" -- does that mean they will start using warrants instead of breaking down doors? Will they stop handcuffing pregnant mothers who are U.S. citizens? Will they stop drugging detainees - as they have been doing for transit?

In the following statement ICE drops the names of some organizations that assisted with the Rhode Island raid. Was this information given so we could say "oh, I guess what ICE is doing is ok because all these people are helping" -

This is the list: The Rhode Island State Police, the Middletown, RI Police Department, the United States Marshals Service, the Bristol County (MA) Sheriff's Office, and the Bureau of Diplomatic Security.

"ICE is committed to restoring integrity to our nation's immigration system, and one way to do that is to ensure removal orders are carried out," said Bruce E. Chadbourne, Field Office Director for ICE's Office of Detention and Removal in Boston..."
-----
Press Release from ICE

US Fed News

June 12, 2008 Thursday 12:28 AM EST

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT FUGITIVE OPERATIONS TEAM ARREST 42 IN RHODE ISLAND

BYLINE: US Fed News


DATELINE: PROVIDENCE, R.I.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement issued the following press release:

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested 42 immigration fugitives and immigration violators during a law enforcement operation carried out by deportation officers assigned to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Rhode Island Fugitive Operations Team.

This enforcement effort focused on fugitives in the Newport, RI and Middletown, RI areas over the past 2 days.

"ICE is committed to restoring integrity to our nation's immigration system, and one way to do that is to ensure removal orders are carried out," said Bruce E. Chadbourne, Field Office Director for ICE's Office of Detention and Removal in Boston. "The United States welcomes law abiding immigrants, but foreign nationals who violate our laws and who commit crimes against those in our communities will not be allowed to stay. Rest assured ICE will use all available resources to remove from the country, those not legally allowed to be here."

Of those arrested, 21 are immigration fugitives. ICE officers also arrested 12 individuals who illegally re-entered the U.S. after having been previously removed and 9 other illegal aliens.

An immigration fugitive is someone who has ignored a final order of deportation. Those fugitives have already been ordered deported and are subject to immediate removal from the United States. The individuals who have illegally re-entered the U.S. after deportation are also subject to immediate removal from the U.S. The other immigration violators arrested during this operation who have not already been ordered removed, have been charged with immigration violations and placed into removal proceedings. They await hearings before an Immigration Judge.

During the month of May alone, ICE Fugitive Operations Teams arrested over 3,400 fugitives and immigration violators across the country. Of that number, 164 were arrested by fugitive operations teams throughout New England.

The Rhode Island Fugitive Operations Team was put in place just one year ago in June 2007. The Rhode Island team is one of four teams assigned to the Boston Field Office and has contributed to the arrests of more than 1,283 fugitives and immigration violators so far this fiscal year in New England. Of that number, 992 were fugitives and 130 were illegal criminal aliens.

The Fugitive Operations Program was established in 2003 to eliminate the nation's backlog of immigration fugitives. Today, ICE has 84 teams deployed across the country and an additional 20 teams will be added by the end of September. Last year, the fugitive operations teams nearly doubled the number of arrests from 2006 " from 15,000 to more than 30,000. Additionally, in 2007, the nation's fugitive alien population declined for the first time in history and continues to do so " in large part due to the work of the fugitive operations teams and our Fugitive Operations Support Center, which helps to clear outstanding cases. Estimates now place the number of immigration fugitives in the United States at approximately 572,000, a decrease of nearly 23,000 since October 2007.

ICE's Fugitive Operations Program is an integral part of the comprehensive multi-year plan launched by the Department of Homeland Security to secure America's borders and reduce illegal immigration. That strategy seeks to gain operational control of both the northern and southern borders, while re-engineering the detention and removal system to ensure that illegal aliens are removed from the country quickly and efficiently.

Those arrested in this enforcement operation represent the following countries: Brazil, Guatemala and Mexico.

They will be detained at various state and county facilities where ICE has contracts for ICE detention.

ICE was assisted in this enforcement operation by the Rhode Island State Police, the Middletown, RI Police Department, the United States Marshals Service, the Bristol County (MA) Sheriff's Office, and the Bureau of Diplomatic Security.

In Toronto: Keeping Secrets to Keep Kids in School

-----
The Toronto Star

June 14, 2008 Saturday

Don't ask, don't tell

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. AA04



There are an estimated 80,000 illegal immigrants in Toronto, many of them parents of children who by provincial law are entitled to go to school. But too many children are still being denied access to Toronto public and Catholic schools because their parents don't know their children are entitled to an education, concludes a report by Toronto's Community Social Planning Council.

The study was launched after four children were apprehended by immigration officials in April 2006 at two Toronto Catholic schools and subsequently deported with their families.

The council found in a survey that four of 17 children were denied enrolment in public schools because of their immigration status. Four different schools refused one parent. Fifteen parents were asked to provide proof of immigration status, and eight of them were unaware of their children's legal rights. Others were too fearful to argue.

That comes despite the public board's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, adopted with much fanfare last year. Under the policy, parents are not required to prove their status. Furthermore, if staff become aware that a student is an illegal immigrant, they are not required to share that information with law enforcement or immigration officials.

However, the public board maintains it needs information on immigration status to receive funding for ESL programs and to determine whether international tuition fees (of up to $12,000 a year) should apply. But there are other ways to gather this information.

Premier Dalton McGuinty said this week that no child should be denied access to an education. But obviously the Education Act, which guarantees that access, is not being enforced. The Catholic board even requires staff to make copies of parents' and students' passports.

The social planning council is urging the education ministry to take steps to ensure that all school boards in the province follow the law and to consider a province-wide "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

These steps should be pursued forthwith. Children of illegal immigrants are among the most vulnerable in the province and ought not to shoulder the blame for their parents' illegal status.

from Lexis Nexis 

Friday, June 13, 2008

Elvira Arellano on BO

Comments?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Information received via e-mail.

[Noe: Elvira Arellano is the immigrant who took sanctuary at the church of Rev. Walter 'Slim' Coleman in Chicago, before she was arrested and returned to Mexico. She remains active and a spokesperson for the immigrant rights and social justice movements.]

By Elvira Arellano

My son Saulito often times tells me he wants to be a great wrestler, a star on luche libre, when he grows up. That is his hope. I don't want to discourage his hopes, but I try to make him see the truth about Wrestling. O'K Saulito – but you know that that is just a show don't you? O.K. Saulito, but only a very few Mexican children will get the chance to be stars and make a lot of money, the rest will have to struggle hard all their lives.

All over Mexico – all over Latin America and all over the world – we are watching now as the first African American seems to have a real chance to be President of the United States.

We are hopeful and indeed he has sinspired a movement of hope amongst many young people in the United States.

We don't want to discourage that hope, but we must let people know the truth and build a movement of truth inside the movement of hope.

If we don't we will find that hope, without truth, will turn into despair.

The truth is that Barak Obama must appeal to the majority of voters in the U.S. to be elected President – and we are not yet the majority. That is why he has taken the side of the Israelis against the Palestinians to get the Jewish votes. That is why he has taken the position to keep on with the ridiculous and inhuman blockade against the families and children of the Cuban people. That is why he has had to denounce his own pastor, who only spoke the truth about racism in the United States, and even resign from his own faithful church. And that is why he has been less strong than he should have been on the issue of legalization for the 12 million and a renegotiation of NAFTA which is destroying our communities in Mexico.

We must support Barak Obama and the movement of hope because the alternative is the Movement of Hate which John McCain has embraced. That movement of hate means death through war and free trade and the continued persecution of the 12 million undocumented.

So we choose hope, but not blindly. We must keep the campaign for legalization alive and in the face of the democratic party and the Presidential campaign in the next six months. We must organize with energy and prepare for the first 90 days of a new administration to demand a change in the broken law.

We must Make America see that they must stop the exploitation of Latin America and the Caribbean and support development so we can feed out hungry children and will not have to leave our families and go without papers to works in the north to be exploited and treated like criminals.

We must build a strong movement of truth within the campaign of hope.

Organize for hope! Organize for Truth !

Un Movimiento de Verdad Dentrode un Movimiento de Esperanza

Cinemocracy

Get your Short Film seem at the 2008 National Democratic Convention
Submit a film up to five minutes in length answering the question "How do you define democracy?"

The top 25 videos (as determined by public online voting) will be screened publicly during the week of the 2008 Democratic National Convention.
The winning film will be screened as part of the official program of the 31st Starz Denver Film Festival. (Information from website)
Visit the website by clicking the Title of the post.

Sign the Petition for CIR in 2009

SUPPORT COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM IN 2009
Sign the petition to send a message to Congress:Our country's immigration system is broken and needs to be fixed. I support bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform that reunites families, ensures national security, protects workers, and provides a path to citizenship for immigrants who uphold and embrace American values of hard work, family, patriotism, and faith.
An enforcement-only approach will not work. It only devastates families and businesses and creates a climate of terror and uncertainty. The only viable path to a lasting and meaningful solution is comprehensive reform. We cannot wait any longer. I urge you to pass comprehensive immigration reform in 2009.
SIGN THE PETITION AT
SPREAD THE WORD!

Petition sponsored by the Immigrant Rights Consortium of San Diego County

www.immigrantsandiego.org

DREAM Act Forecast Immigration Reform

THe Daily News - NY Local
Allen Wernick

What's the chance for immigration reform with a Barack Obama or John McCain presidency? My quick answer: The post-election Congress will pass the DREAM Act for undocumented students and the AgJobs agricultural worker bill.
I see those bills passing no matter who wins the presidency, though immigrants will likely do better under Obama. Broader reform with a path to citizenship for our 12 million undocumented workers is years away.
Recent efforts to reform immigration law have been disappointing. What American author Mark Twain once said about the weather is true about immigration reform: Everyone talks about it, but no one does anything about it. A new administration in Washington may change that.
But don't expect a big "path to citizenship" bill passing in the first few years of an Obama or McCain administration. Expecting the American public to accept the legalization of 12 million undocumented workers during a major economic downturn is unreasonable.
Immigrants and U.S. natives would benefit from a broad legalization program - how else to address the fact that millions live here isolated from the mainstream of U.S. society? I just think that's impossible to achieve anytime soon.
Eventually Congress will legalize most undocumented immigrants. Outsourcing and the growth of the global economy mean that if we don't allow foreigners to work here, jobs will just move abroad. But that's a hard argument to make to workers facing lower real wages, layoffs and foreclosures.
Still, the election of Obama or McCain should bring some small improvements in immigration. To see why, let's take a brief look at the candidates' position on immigration reform.
McCain has been a visionary on immigration policy, but he has proven to be a fair-weather friend of immigrants' rights. He says now that we can't have legalization until we first seal our borders. That's the position of someone opposed to legalization who is afraid to say so.
Obama, unlike McCain, remains a supporter of comprehensive reform, but I sense that he thinks fighting for reform now will divide the country without achieving the desired result.
Despite some reluctance to support legalization for undocumented workers, a President McCain will want to do something for his agribusiness friends in the Southwest. He'll need to include the DREAM Act to get support for congressional Democrats. Obama will need to support the DREAM Act to reward his Latino supporters. He'll want to throw in the AgJobs bill to insure bipartisan support.

To view the complete article please link on the Title of the post.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Sen. Menendez Speaks the Truth About ICE part III

Second half of Senator Menendez's June 11, 2008 speech to the U.S. Senate:

Sen. Menendez Speaks the Truth About ICE part I

In a riveting speech on the senate floor on Wednesday, June 11, 2008, Senator Robert Menendez openly discussed the multiple abuses perpetrated by the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This is the first time that any senator or representative has made such detailed and public condemnation of how ICE has been continually defying the U.S. Constitution in its frantic effort to deport all the undocumented immigrants it can find.

The information he provided his fellow senators sounded like something from a bad horror movie, yet it was a federal agency that has committed these atrocities. No major U.S. newspaper has carried the story. Only the Record North Jersey thought it was important enough.

Below is the video showing the first half of Menendez's June 11th speech to the Senate on immigration.



thanks to A.P. for passing this along

Sen. Menendez Speaks the Truth About ICE part II

Francisco Castaneda could be any of our current DREAMERS. He came to the U.S. when he was 10. Here is an excerpt from Menendez's immigration speech where he speaks of Francisco Castaneda:


Take the heartbreaking story of Francisco Castaneda. Francisco entered one of our detention facilities battling cancer – although he didn’t know it.
All he knew is that he had significant lesions on his reproductive organs.

Offsite officials who never examined Francisco repeatedly denied him the biopsy he so desperately needed. After 11 long months in custody, Francisco argued for and eventually obtained a temporary release so he could pay for his own biopsy. Life-threatening cancerous tumors were found.

Despite amputation of the affected area and several rounds of chemotherapy, Francisco died of cancer at the age of 36.

A federal judge recently noted that this case appears to present, quote, “one of the most, if not the most, egregious Eighth Amendment violations [involving cruel and unusual punishment] the Court has ever encountered.”

The United States of America essentially killed Francisco Castaneda by denying him the medical care he so desperately needed. Why? Because he had entered this country without the proper documentation, at the age of 10, with his mother, fleeing civil war in El Salvador—a war the US had helped to fund, a war which sent thousands of refugees like him to our country.

He was denied care because he tried to make a better life for himself and his family. These are hardly offenses that warrant death. We cannot, in good conscience, allow these conditions to continue.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

The Meat Hook Story in Postville

“In February, Source #7 told ICE agents he or she observed a Jewish floor supervisor duct-tape the eyes of an undocumented Guatemalan worker shut and hit the Guatemalan with a meat hook.”

The following article contains much information. It is difficult to condense because everything it mentions is significant. We recommend that you read at least the text in bold print.

_____


Rush to Prosecute Leaves Immigrant Victims of Crimes Without Protection

New America Media , News Report, Wendy Feliz Sefsaf, Posted: Jun 11, 2008

Immigrants who have been trafficked or abused by employers usually enjoy the protection of the U.S. government. But if the recent immigration raids at a Postville, Iowa meat-packing plant are any indication, that might be a thing of the past. Now those workers face deportation instead.

In May, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid took place at an Iowa kosher meat-packing plant. It was the largest raid ever.Nearly 400 employees at Agriprocessors were rounded up and interrogated by immigration officials. The search warrant executed by ICE also laid out a range of workplace abuses, including physical abuse. According to the government’s own warrant: “In February, Source #7 told ICE agents he or she observed a Jewish floor supervisor duct-tape the eyes of an undocumented Guatemalan worker shut and hit the Guatemalan with a meat hook.”

Additional allegations of sexual abuse towards female worker were reported in the Des Moines Register. According to Sister Mary McCauley, a Roman Catholic nun at St. Bridget’s Catholic Church in Postville, “workers said that there was sexual abuse, that there’s propositioning. Specifically, if a worker wanted, say, a promotion or a shift change, they’d be brought into a room with three or four men and it was like, ‘Which one do you want? Which one are you going to serve?’”

If the government warrant itself outlined abuse, the workers should have been eligible for protected status. However, they were treated as criminals, not victims.

In another case in Louisiana, Indian workers were trafficked to the United States and housed in substandard conditions while their wages were held back, in order to pay back the $20,000 they were charged to come the United States to work at Signal Construction in New Orleans. After they walked out on their jobs en masse, the Department of Justice opened a trafficking investigation case acknowledging their victimization, yet refusing to protect them.

In past cases similar to Signal Construction, “continued presence” was automatically granted, allowing the workers to stay on in the United States while the case went ahead. According to Dan Werner of the Southern Poverty Law Center, “Continued presence is discretionary on the part of the Department of Justice, but people used to get processed on the spot. This delay is a new thing.” The lawyers representing the Indian workers have been told they must submit their clients for deportation hearings.

The remedies available to victims of trafficking and crimes are known as “T” and “U” Visas, and 5,000 T visas and 10,000 U visas are available annually.

Congress created these visas to protect victims, particularly those who could serve as witnesses to crimes. However, these cases show a possible change in policy to deport instead of protect these victims.

Another shift in policy was reflected in the speed and manner in which the migrant workers in Iowa were prosecuted. According to a summary provided by the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., after meeting with defense lawyers appointed by the court, the Agriprocessors workers quickly accepted guilty pleas on criminal charges including use of false identification documents to obtain employment, false use of a Social Security number or cards, and unlawful re-entry into the United States. In what U.S. attorney Matt Dummermuth called an “astonishing success,” from May 20 through 23, in an emergency makeshift court set-up approved by Chief Judge Linda R. Reade, the workers were brought in groups of 10, their hands and feet shackled, and pressured to take plea deals.

The workers accepted the five-month sentences because prosecutors threatened they would charge anyone who didn’t with felony identity theft. That carries a mandatory two-year minimum jail sentence. Most of the workers agreed to immediate deportation following completion of their sentences. The workers are also required to cooperate with any ongoing federal investigation of Agriprocessors. So why would the U.S. government move to deport workers it had just asked to serve as witnesses in a federal investigation? Perhaps it’s telling that so far there have been no charges brought against Agriprocessors.

Polk County attorney Sonia Parras Konrad reportedly interviewed over 50 detainees who told her that Agriprocessors procured false identification for its immigrant employees; withheld money from their paychecks for “immigration fees”; didn’t allow employees to use the restroom during 10-hour shifts; didn’t compensate employees for overtime; and physically abused employees. Her lawsuit argues that the workers, as victims of these alleged crimes, should be eligible for special visas and that if they are transferred from Iowa they would be deprived of their rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. “As victims they would need to participate in the investigations of the alleged crimes and may be needed to testify as to personal experiences,” the lawsuit said. It also claimed that some of the detained workers could be eligible for immigration relief because they have spouses and children who are U.S. citizens. But none of the issues were brought to light as the attorneys didn’t have sufficient
time.

Once the workers were arrested they were given criminal, rather than immigration lawyers—a clever way to complicate their cases and make them difficult to defend.

According to Josh Weir of Peck Law Firm in Iowa, in a rush to prosecute, “each attorney was assigned around 17 clients, had 7 days to build their cases and needed to involve interpreters and immigration counsel in the process.” This resulted in the quickest prosecution of immigrants in history.

Had time been given for sufficient immigration counsel, these workers could have potentially applied for U visas.

The Department of Justice maintains that an investigation into Signal Construction is ongoing. But the Indian workers trafficked by the New Orleans construction company still languish in a park across the street from the Indian Embassy in Washington D.C., in the shadow of a statue of Mahatma Gandhi. They are on hunger strike and demanding protective status, which still eludes them a year after their trafficking came to light.

Immigrants across the country are facing more aggressive enforcement tactics and it seems that victims of human trafficking and other crimes are no exception.


for complete article click here

DREAMACTTEXAS censured? Lots of people must read our posts


link for cartoon


Blocked Text?






Yesterday as I was looking up a dreamacttexas post from May 2008 I noticed that that there were a number of gray boxes covering parts of our commentaries. I looked at other months and it was the same. The boxes came up when I would click the month and year - such as April 2008.

The pattern to the boxes is curious. They covered topics such as e-verify, immigration marches, legislative advocacy for the DREAM Act.

When I go back to get the link of the particular post the gray box is gone.

Suppose someone out there (DHS?) doesn't want viewers to see certain information - how obvious can they be by picking these particular posts? It's either DHS or some really good Minute Man hacker.

The gray boxes have appeared before - several months ago. We also had additional technical problems that caused google to shut dreamacttexas ability to respond to commentaries for several weeks and then even blocked blog's authors from accessing the site to make posts.

As one of the dreamacttexas team says when DHS or the USDJ (U.S. Department of Justice) check out our website - what a privilege that we are being monitored - someone must think people are really listening to us.

Graduation and the DREAM ACT 2008

-----

Peter Schrag: Graduation ’08: A few thoughts for the season

By Peter Schrag - pschrag@sacbee.com

Published 12:00 am PDT Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Story appeared in EDITORIALS section, Page B9

Sacramento Bee

According to much conventional wisdom, the nation this spring has been graduating a lost generation – products of schools and colleges that send young men and women off who can't read or do simple math or know the basics of American history. Many, it assumes, couldn't care less about the future of their country...

...look at the list of the 40 high school seniors who were finalists in the highly regarded 2008 Intel Science Talent Search. Each is a student of multiple interests, achievements and talents: championship tennis, debating, the mathematics of origami, robotics, music composition, Carnatic music, Ukrainian cuisine, tutoring Mandarin, gold medal pianist, designer of educational logic games, fundraising for child victims of AIDS in Ghana...

Nearly half appear to be either immigrants or children of recent immigrants: Shivani Sud, Ashok Chandran, Timothy Zuchi Chang, Alexis Marie Mychajliw, Yihe Dong, Herman Gudjonson, Olivia Hu, Alexander Chi-Jan Huang, Clifford Byungho Kim, Chun-Kai Kao, Benjamin Brice Lu, Avanthi Raghavan, Vinay Venkatesh Ramasesh, Ayon Sen, Artem Serganov, Hamsa Sridhar, Xiaoyun Yin, Qiaochu Yuan, Xiaomeng Zeng...

More sad still is the story from Fresno earlier this month about 17-year-old Arthur Mkoyan, whose 4-point-plus grade-point average made him the valedictorian at Bullard High School, but who, after 15 years in this country, faces deportation to his native Armenia.

Mkoyan (whose case also is discussed in an editorial on the facing page) was brought here by his parents, who were caught on the wrong side of the Armenian independence movement as the Soviet Union was breaking up. But their pleas for asylum were rejected and this spring their time runs out. Young Mkoyan doesn't know Armenia, speaks very little of the language and has no desire to live there.

Mkoyan is one of the emblems – there are thousands of others – of a self-defeating immigration policy that prefers to deport talented young people at a time when the nation faces a desperate need of skilled workers to replace the millions of baby boomers who are about to retire.

Although Mkoyan, who was accepted to the University of California, Davis, wasn't an academic superstar like the 40 Intel finalists, he had a bright future, both for himself and for the country where he's grown up and been educated. But the stupidity of current immigration law put him into a cruel, senseless situation not of his own making.

Passage of the federal Dream Act last year, which would have put thousands of young men and women on the path to legal status, would probably have allowed him to stay here. But the act was blocked in Congress by immigration absolutists who'd rather punish children for the sins of their parents than cash in on the talent and ambition they represent.

The act, said its opponents, would have taken opportunities from Americans. But any look at the projections for the need for skilled workers in the coming decades and the shortage of able people to fill them will tell you that's baloney...


for complete Sac Bee article click here

TX: Noriega Offers Economic Ideas

TX: Noriega Offers Economic Ideas
Houston Chronicle, June 7, 2008

Rick Noriega, a state lawmaker from Houston, is the Democratic U.S. Senate nominee. He spoke at the Texas Democrats' state convention this weekend in Austin. Houston Chronicle reporter R.G. Ratcliffe asked him about his race against incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, who will be interviewed in next Sunday's Q&A.

Q: Texas so far has avoided the national economic downswing, but with interest rates dropping and gas prices rising, the state may not be far behind. What can the federal government do to stabilize the economy at this moment in time? With rising gasoline prices, should the nation adopt a gas tax holiday?

A: I disagree that Texas has avoided an economic downswing as people continually share their financial troubles with me as I travel across the state. We can start to revive our economy by bringing our troops home from Iraq. The war in Iraq is costing this country $12 billion per month, and that is too high a price to pay as we police a civil war. We need to pull that money out of the mire that is Iraq and spend that money at home.The skyrocketing cost of crude oil is being driven by growing demand in the emerging markets of India and China, the free market activities of speculators, and, most importantly, by instability in the largest oil-producing regions of the world, which the current leadership has contributed to by its bungling of foreign policy.The gas tax holiday is a gimmick that would solve few significant pricing problems, and, like the war, is based on a pay-later strategy. The best long-term solution to the gas crisis is to invest in renewable energy.

Q: Should there be a windfall-profits tax on U.S. energy companies? And should we explore for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge and on the outer continental shelf?

A: The five biggest oil companies in the world made $36 billion in profits in the first three months of this year. If they continue at this rate, they are set to make $144 billion in profits by the end of the year.These companies were set to make profits when oil was at $65 per barrel, but with the price of crude breaking $130 per barrel, they are now enjoying record-breaking windfall profits.For years, renewable energy has remained a fringe option because this administration and incumbents in Congress remain beholden to the lobbying power of the oil companies. We need investment in renewable energy technology to make it viable on a large scale, and to make it a more stable and potent source of energy. We need an environment in which investing in renewable energy is incentivized.We cannot drill our way out of our energy problems. We cannot solely rely on piecemeal transitional measures like drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. We need to make a commitment to renewable energy now for the energy independence for future generations. Our national security depends on it.

Q: Should funding for the war in Iraq be restricted until a deadline for withdrawal of troops is set? Should we maintain permanent military bases in Iraq? Please, explain your answer.

A: Funding should not be restricted. I would never cut off soldiers, but I think we need to put timetables on withdrawal from Iraq. We need to give our troops the resources they need to do their job, something the current administration has not done in the past. The real problem is not with funding but with the lack of leadership.Efforts to establish permanent bases in Iraq would make U.S. interests in Iraq and throughout the Middle East less secure.

Q: A recent FBI inspector general's report said agents at one time kept a "war crimes" file on military personnel and CIA agents who used tactics that could be described as torture on suspects. Would you favor a U.S. war crimes tribunal that would investigate allegations of torture and prosecute violators?

A: No. If any laws were broken, they should be handled by the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice in line with current procedures and prosecuted accordingly. Torture and similar tactics are unacceptable.

Q: As a Texas legislator you sponsored a bill to give in-state tuition to the children of illegal immigrants. Why is this a good policy, and doesn't it encourage continued illegal immigration? And should the Constitution be amended to deny automatic citizenship status to children born in this country of illegal immigrants?

A: No. To suggest that this policy would encourage continued illegal immigration, considering all the economic pressures driving this problem, is ludicrous. The best investment we can make is in our children's education. I favor tax breaks for middle-class families burdened with rising tuition costs and increased financial aid opportunities for all Texans.And no, we should not be amending our most important founding document.

Q: Should illegal immigrants be required to leave the country to apply for re-entry as a condition of gaining citizenship status?

A: The immigration problem in this country deserves comprehensive reform. The incumbent junior senator has filed legislation to impose a "touchback" provision, sending 12 million people underground. This is not a viable solution.We need a comprehensive plan that devotes more resources to recruiting border patrol agents and local law enforcement.This country needs workers, and we need a process that recognizes who they are, why they're here, what they are doing and that allows them to pay taxes. Any bad actors should not be allowed to stay in the country.

Q: A variety of tax cuts enacted under President Bush are set to expire in coming years. Which would you vote to extend, and which would you allow to expire?

A: The Bush tax cuts have been about rewarding a select few. This reliance on trickle-down economics continues to hurt the middle class. The Bush tax cuts have coincided with massive federal spending. While the incumbent has been in office, the national debt has climbed to $9.4 trillion.We have to get back to fiscal responsibility and balancing our budget.

California bucks immigration enforcement trend

North County Times
Last modified Saturday, June 7, 2008 4:36 PM PDT
REGION: California bucks immigration enforcement trend
By EDWARD SIFUENTES - Staff Writer

While other states move away from giving illegal immigrant college students state benefits, the California Legislature appears to be pushing to give them more access to colleges and universities.Last month, North Carolina's community college system said it would no longer admit illegal immigrants.But in California, where illegal immigrants are allowed to enroll in state colleges, some lawmakers are backing a bill that would allow illegal immigrants to qualify for state financial aid and fee waivers.An estimated 65,000 illegal immigrants graduate from U.S. high schools each year and could potentially attend college, according to a study by the Urban Institute, a Washington-based economic and social policy research organization.Those students often are at the forefront of the nation's debate over immigration reform.Some see the students as a burden on the state's strained resources.Others see them as victims of the nation's broken immigration system."These students are being severely impacted by inhumane immigration laws, and I think our educational laws need to change to ensure that all our students have equal access to education," said Arcela Nunez-Alvarez, who heads the National Latino Research Institute at Cal State San Marcos.Under a 2001 law, illegal immigrant students are given the same tuition discount as other state residents who attend UC, CSU and community college schools.Late last month, the state Assembly approved Assembly Bill 2083 by Assemblyman Fabian Nunez, D-Los Angeles. The bill would give illegal immigrant students access to state grants, scholarships, work-study and loan programs, which are now denied to them.A similar bill ---- known as the California Dream Act, named after a federal bill that would give illegal immigrant students legal status ---- was passed by the Legislature last year and was vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.This year's bill, which is now in the state Senate, was approved in the Assembly largely along party lines, on a 46-31 vote.

TO VIEW THE COMPLETE ARTICLE PLEASE CLICK ON THE TITLE OF THE POST.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Contact staff writer Edward Sifuentes at (760) 740-3511 or esifuentes@nctimes.com.

Laws for Mexicans only

link to photo

If Emiliano were a DREAMER, would you give him a chance?



You have to wonder who becomes illegal and when. Seems to me that in college government class they never told us that we would become criminals for running a red light, which is the equivalent charge to being undocumented in the U.S.

Navarette writes about nativists in the U.S. being afraid of some type of colonization by Mexico. Its not colonization they are fighting - it's about who gets the privilege.


I can promise you if 12 million British showed up people might have some concerns, but they would probably welcome that our children would now have a British accent (this has lots of cultural capital).

As for fighting about this "official language" thing. If French were competing with English in the U.S. you know there wouldn't be a fight... how sheek! our children would now speak French!

It's all about the hierarchy of identity. The Brits and the French are way up there- if they are white. Mexicans and Latin Americans are much further down the list. This is not about being paranoid about prejudice - all you have to do is read a little to see this pattern (East Indians, East Asians, Africans are similarly seen in western Europe)

How many white British and French DREAMERS have you heard about?

Reminds me of a class in college where I almost got a "C" on a research paper." A fellow student (attractive male) also had problems with his paper but the female professor gave him an "I" (incomplete) which gave him a chance to fix it. I however, got the C for the same type of problem. When the other student and I confronted the professor she changed my grade to an "I."

Too bad we can't complain about Mexican, Columbian, Ecuadorian, and Vietnamese DREAMERS not getting fair treatment. While there is some chatter about improving the immigration system - it doesn't look like much is happening, except that ICE is detaining and deporting more people.

-----

Deport this illegal immigrant, too
Ruben Navarrette Jr., San Diego Union-Tribune
Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Let me say a few words in defense of deporting illegal immigrants. I wouldn't have thought such a defense would be necessary, because being in the United States without proper documents is a crime and the penalty is deportation.

But try telling that to the folks in Central California who are experiencing warm and fuzzy feelings for 17-year-old Arthur Mkoyan. The high school valedictorian in my hometown of Fresno, Calif., should be thinking about the same things that other graduating seniors think about this time of year - planning to go to college, going to parties and all the rest.

Arthur has certainly earned it. He studied hard to earn a perfect grade-point average. And, for his hard work, he was admitted to UC Davis, where he planned to study chemistry.

And yet, Arthur will probably never make it to freshman orientation. That's because, on June 20, the extension of his deportation order will expire and federal immigration authorities will likely apprehend the young man and his mother and send them to Armenia. His father is being held in a detention facility in Arizona until he can be deported. There is also Arthur's 12-year-old brother, a U.S.-born citizen who the family plans to take with them.

According to the Fresno Bee, Arthur's father came to the United States from the former Soviet Union in December 1991, and sought political asylum. Arthur and his mother joined him a few years later. No one came with the proper documents. And so, when their asylum application was rejected, and their appeals were denied, they were targeted for deportation.

That is as it should be. The law is the law.

Still, it's a heartbreaking story. Here you have an all-American kid who hasn't seen Armenia since he was a toddler, and who is now headed to a country where the people, language and customs are foreign to him. Besides, this is precisely the kind of young person we should want to keep in this country.

Say, maybe we can work out a trade. Armenia lets us keep Arthur, and we send a dozen of our lazier, less-productive U.S.-born teenagers who think themselves entitled to the good life but don't want to do the work to make it happen.

Many people are going to bat for Mkoyan - from Armenian advocacy groups to Republican Rep. George Radanovich, who represents part of the Central Valley and has many Armenian constituents. The family has also approached Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein in the hopes that she'll introduce a rare measure to grant legal status to a specific individual. There's also plenty of support for the young man on the Internet and on talk radio.

Not that it is likely to do any good. Arthur, and his parents, will probably be deported. And they should be.

I said the same thing six years ago when a similar story surfaced. In August 2002, the Denver Post ran a front-page story about Jesus Apodaca, a recent high school graduate with a 3.93 grade-point average who wanted to go to the University of Colorado but couldn't afford the tuition - because he was an illegal immigrant. In Colorado, the undocumented have to pay out-of-state tuition rates, which are higher than those for residents. A member of Congress involved himself in that case as well, albeit in a different capacity. Anti-illegal immigration crusader Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., called what was then the Immigration and Naturalization Service and asked them what they were planning to do about Apodaca. The young man and his family were apprehended and, last we heard, were slated for deportation. That won applause from many immigration hard-liners.

But here's the part that bothers me: I wonder why more of them - including Tancredo - aren't making a fuss over Arthur Mkoyan. The fact is, Apodaca didn't get nearly the amount of public sympathy that Mkoyan has received up to now.

Why the double standard? I believe it's because, while Mkoyan may not have a leg to stand on legally, he at least has the benefit of not being Mexican. Much of the immigration debate is fueled by a fear of a changing culture, competing languages, an altered landscape, and what loopy Minuteman Project founder Jim Gilchrist calls the "colonization" of the United States by Mexican immigrants.

Arthur Mkoyan isn't considered a party to any of that. For some people, that makes all the difference. And, in some respects, that's the saddest thing about this story.

To comment, e-mail Ruben Navarrette Jr. at ruben.navarrette@uniontrib.com.

This article appeared on page B - 9 of the San Francisco Chronicle

for link to this article click here

Bush Administration's Latest on Immigration Policy

-----
SECRETARY OF COMMERCE CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ REMARKS AT STATE OF IMMIGRATION PRESS CONFERENCE, WASHINGTON, D.C.

States News Service
June 9, 2008

The following information was released by the U.S. Department of Commerce:

SECRETARY GUTIERREZ

As you can see, immigration reform remains a top priority for this Administration. In the absence of legislation from Congress, we've been proactively tackling this issue head on.

The American people want and deserve a thoughtful, broad-based approach to immigration that focuses on the security and economic prosperity of our country.

Last August, Secretary Chertoff and I announced a package of administrative reforms that sharpen existing tools to protect our citizens and make our immigration system more workable.

We have made great strides in securing our borders and enforcing existing immigration laws. But we cannot neglect our economic security. At a time when we are facing tough economic challenges-our actions must boost our economy-not hamper it.

The reality is that we simply do not have enough workers at both ends of the spectrum-from low skilled field laborers to high skilled tech workers.

For example, for the fifth straight year, our H-1B cap was filled at or before the start of the fiscal year. This year, the cap was reached in one week.

That's why, as Secretary Chertoff mentioned, we are proposing administrative reforms to our high-skill programs and to the H-2B non-agriculture temporary worker program.

In addition, we have proposed changes to the H-2A agricultural seasonal worker program. The changes will make the H-2A system more efficient and ensure an orderly and timely flow of legal foreign workers.

They will also protect the rights of all agricultural workers-American and foreign. Make no mistake, we need both. We don't have enough domestic workers to keep America fed.

The New York Times ran an article with the headline "Shortage of Labor to Cut Food Supply: Farmers, handicapped by lack of help, reduce their crop acreage."

That article ran in 1920. Coincidentally, that was amidst one of the worst anti-immigration waves we have ever had.

Nearly a century later we face similar challenges-but this time, rather than reduce consumption, we'll have to turn to foreign producers-or move our farms overseas-to feed our families.

In fact, it is already happening-a survey by the U.S. farm group Western Growers indicated American companies now farm more than 45,000 acres of land in Mexico employing 11,000 people.

At a time when we are looking to further secure our food supply and tighten our import safety-we should not encourage the outsourcing of American agriculture.

We know there are employers who have not been able to fill many jobs with American workers. We simply can't ignore the problem and hope this issue will go away.

A comprehensive solution remains the best and most long-term option-without it we're getting a piecemeal approach to a national issue. For example:

In 2007, states enacted 240 immigration laws-up from 84 the year before.

Immigration is being debated in every capitol in the country.

A total of 1,562 immigration bills were introduced last year.

This patchwork of laws is untenable in the long-term. But until Congress acts, we will take steps for our nation's security and our economic stability.

We will continue to look at ways to improve existing programs and address all aspects of immigration. Other major economies have realized the need for immigration policy to help them grow their economies.

Our country has a long history of making immigration work. We have more experience than any other nation, and it has been to our great advantage. We can make immigration an advantage that will last for a century

This issue is not going away. Regardless of who is president, and regardless of which party is in power, immigration will remain both a tough challenge, and a great opportunity for our nation. Thank you. Now, we are happy to take your questions.


from Lexus-Nexis Academic

NYT and Immigrant Detainee Medical Care

The New York Times has published an editorial calling DHS on it's inhumane treatment of undocumented immigrants. It reminds me of the McClellan book on the Bush Administration, why did the NYT take so long?



Below are previous dreamacttexas posts on this issue:

June 5, 2008 "You Are Not Supposed to Kill People in Custody"
May 12, 2008 "Immigrants and Medical Neglect, Part II"
May 11, 2008 "Immigrants and Medical Neglect, Part I"
May 5, 2008 "People Dying While in ICE Custody"
March 24, 2008 "It Doesn't Just Happen to Latinos"
December 24, 2007 "ICE Incompetence"
-----
June 11, 2008
Editorial
New York Times

Dying in Detention

The government has a duty to provide decent, effective, timely medical care to people in its custody. That should be beyond debate, but not when the government in question is the Bush administration and the people in custody are illegal immigrants.

Recent news reports from The Times, The Washington Post and CBS News have shone a harsh light on the immigration detention system, finding alarming evidence of shoddy care, inadequate staffing, lax standards, secrecy and chronic ineptitude.

Not many Americans know the names of detained immigrants like Boubacar Bah of Guinea and Francisco Castaneda of El Salvador. Mr. Bah died after falling and fracturing his skull; his injuries went untreated for more than 14 hours. Mr. Castaneda died because the diagnosis and treatment of his cancer was tragically delayed. They, and dozens of others, should be memorialized as victims of a system scarred by malign neglect.

The government should be rushing to improve the oversight and care in its sprawling detention system to protect all detainees. Instead, the official reaction has been slow and defensive, promised improvements are piecemeal, and criticism of the system is making immigration hard-liners indignant.

At a House subcommittee hearing last week, Representative Peter King, the committee’s ranking Republican, complained: “Why should the American people be responsible for paying for Rolls-Royce medical care for illegal aliens?” Representative Zoe Lofgren, the subcommittee’s chairwoman, is valiantly pushing back. She realizes that with the administration busily expanding immigration detention and failing far too often to meet its own minimal standards for medical care, it is up to Congress to insist on better.

She and Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey have sponsored the Detainee Basic Medical Care Act, which would go far to provide the basic protections that failed Mr. Bah and Mr. Castaneda. The bill would impose more rigorous standards on the network of more than 300 publicly and privately run prisons that make up the federal system — current rules are voluntary, not legally enforceable and not uniformly followed. And it would require that all deaths be reported to the Justice Department and Congress.

Congress should swiftly pass the bill, putting aside the poisoned debate over illegal immigration, which has no relevance here. Whether immigrants are legal or illegal has nothing to do with their right to humane care. As Ms. Lofgren bluntly put it: “You are not supposed to kill people who are in custody.”



for link to NYT editorial click here

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

ICE is doing well in Austin


click for photo


-Austin has changed. People from ICE are always looking around, hoping someone picked up by the Travis County Sheriff or some other law enforcement officer - will turn out to be undocumented.
Interesting how Texas' most liberal city has turned into a police state.

----

IMMIGRATION

More illegal immigrants are being charged criminally in Austin

Prison time comes before deportation for some.


AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Wednesday, May 28, 2008

His mother had suffered a stroke, and his family needed money. So even though he had been deported once from the United States last year, Edgar Rodriguez-Sarmiento left his home in a rural Honduran village, paid a smuggler $2,000 to get him across the border and sought work while living in an Austin apartment off East Riverside Drive in January, according to court documents and his lawyer.

Six weeks later, Rodriguez was arrested on public intoxication charges and brought to the Travis County Jail. He was tagged by immigration agents and became enmeshed in a federal effort to charge even those with minor or no criminal history with the crime of re-entering the U.S. after deportation, a felony.

The effort, part of a nationwide crackdown on illegal immigration, has led to a surge in the number of undocumented immigrants in Austin who are being hit with a felony conviction, and sometimes sent to prison, before being deported.

The practice has been criticized by immigrant advocates and defense lawyers, who call it a waste of resources...

A recent report by Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse said the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency had filed 8,064 cases nationwide in February, a 43.8 percent increase compared with February 2007.

"There's a strong push to enforce the immigration laws and to be more aggressive," Sutton said. "Criminal illegal aliens are being prosecuted where maybe sometimes in the past they weren't."

Until two years ago, Sutton's office had a long-standing practice of prosecuting for illegal re-entry only immigrants who had previously committed an aggravated felony, such as rape, burglary or drug trafficking, or who had been deported and re-entered the country numerous times. The 2006 increase in cases against some immigrants with minor or no criminal histories appeared to be part of a national crackdown. But Sutton said at the time that there wouldn't be a sustained increase in those cases. There wasn't, until this year.

Adrian Ramirez, a San Antonio-based assistant field director for ICE's detention and removal division, said things changed in December or January after agency officials met with federal prosecutors in Washington. After that meeting, Ramirez said, agents were told to bring the cases of any immigrant who had been previously deported, even if they had no significant criminal history, to the U.S. attorney's office, which had agreed to prosecute them.

"They wanted a big push on that," Ramirez said. "Prosecution is a deterrent, especially for people who have already had an opportunity to be here, were deported and came back."

Ramirez oversees immigration agents who look for undocumented immigrants in prison and jails, including the Travis County Jail, where the increased presence of immigration agents this year has drawn protests in Austin.

ICE officials have said that from January 1 through March 31, the agency placed 763 immigration holds on inmates at the Travis County Jail — an almost 400 percent increase from the same period last year. That means that after the cases of those inmates are adjudicated, ICE is contacted to take possession of the person. Most are deported immediately, Ramirez said. The ones who have previously been deported are referred to the U.S. attorney's office, which prosecutes them in federal court...



for complete Statesman article click here

"Why did you leave us behind?"

The NY Times published an article about immigration in Spain. There have been numerous legalizations of undocumented immigrants in Spain and other countries in Europe. For the most part this has helped the Spanish economy, although as usual, there are people that say it will be the end of their country.

The article speaks of problems legalizing, dishonest lawyers, and spiteful employers. However most significant is the story of Mrs. Delgado and her youngest son Allan.

----
Spain Grappling with Illegal Immigrants Tried Forgiveness
June 10, 2008

MADRID — With the United States riven by calls to legalize millions of illegal immigrants, Americans might consider the possible effects by looking at southern Europe, where illegal immigration has abounded and so have forgiveness plans...

In the last two decades, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece have run at least 15 legalization programs, including a Spanish effort three years ago that was among the Continent’s largest. With little domestic opposition, Spain legalized nearly 600,000 of the African, Latin American and eastern European workers who helped power its economy and brought this once insular land the strengths and strains of diversity...

Among the beneficiaries of the legalization policy are Ignacio Cantos and Sandra Delgado, a husband and wife from Ecuador who left four children and an economic crisis in search of Spanish jobs. Legalization has raised their pay and ended their fear of the police, who once jailed Mr. Cantos for lacking work papers.

It has also ended their separation from their youngest child, Allan, a gap-toothed 8-year-old sent with his siblings to live with their grandparents when he was 3. Since arriving in Madrid in March, he has been twirling his mother’s earrings and stroking her hair as if worried that she is a mirage.

“I would never leave my children a second time,” said Ms. Delgado, 38, a nanny who has been raising others’ children while aching for her own. “I’m sorry I did it...”

...[A] visit to Ecuador reminded her of how much she had missed of her children’s lives. “You go back and you don’t find them the way you left them,” she said.

Their income allowed the couple to bring just one child to Spain, and they brought their youngest, Allan. Arriving in March, he found the weather cold, the food strange. Puzzled by his parents’ fourth-floor walk-up, he said, “The houses are high.”

Fearful of losing his mother again, he grows jealous when his father hugs her. He exploded one night when he heard his parents laughing in the next room.

“He ran out of the bathroom and said, ‘You two are happier without me!’ ” Ms. Delgado said. “He still asks us to this day, ‘Why did you leave us behind?’ ”

With another willed smile, she added, “We’re so happy to have at least one of them back.”


for complete NYT article click here

Monday, June 9, 2008

Except it is not JUST Latinos.

Prioritize education and pass Dream Act

A recent poll found that Latino parents are significantly more likely than white or black parents to see college preparation as the main purpose of pre-kindergarten through grade-12 learning. In addition, history documents that schools have been a main vehicle to assimilate immigrants into what it means to be an American.

However, a majority of Iowa Latino students are denied the dream of becoming educated citizens because they did not stop their parents or guardians from having them enter the United States illegally. This is our great social shame, and why the passage of the Dream Act and true immigration reform is critical.

As Bishop Richard Pates expressed during his installation mass, "[W]e clothe ourselves with the mantle of social justice... . We insist that all are guaranteed the basic human rights of food, education, health care, security, work, freedom of religious practice. We not only accept but welcome the enriching presence of newcomers among us."

Therefore, if we as a nation truly believe in and live by our democratic principles, we must get serious now about the care of human life and happiness before we disengage generations of Latino youth who want to live the American dream.

- Jason Follett, Ankeny

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Without a Title

You see, it’s about those nine digits they say.

So what happened to intellectual growth I say?

When all I want, is to get an education
so that one day we can all grow in this nation,
but the lack of documentation impedes this crecimiento.

What do we, DREAM kids do with these obstructed dreams?
When something as basic as an ID is being denied to me?

You see, college was never an option for me,
but now it's and I’m holding a degree.

Where do we go with a college degree?
When a NO is all we hear?

Que hago? A dónde voy?
Cuando el lugar donde yo nací, lo ví
Y ahora lo siento huir cada vez más de mi.

Pues todo mundo dice que de este lado
la vida merece la pena
y sin darme cuenta, esta pena
tan solo me da mas fuerza.

How many times have I felt like giving up?
To tell you the truth, many times before.

But what drives me?
What’s my inspiration?

It’s the many others in my situation

You see, my friend just got her master’s degree
But still works as a waitress and can’t use her degrees.

It’s because of our DREAMS that I ask you to pass
the DREAM.

-J.R.

Saturday, June 7, 2008

The 23rd Day

Video of Paul Konar on the 23rd day of his hunger strike


-----

June 7, 2008
New York Times

Workers on Hunger Strike Say They Were Misled on Visas

WASHINGTON — About a dozen metalworkers from India staged the fourth week of a hunger strike here this week, camped under a shade tree on Embassy Row.

The workers, who walked off jobs in Gulf Coast shipyards in early March, say they were victims of human trafficking when they were brought to the United States under a temporary guest worker program. The hunger strike is meant to pressure federal officials, and comes as Congress is debating an expansion of the guest worker program, known as H-2B for the type of temporary visa the workers receive.

The Indian workers say they were deceived by Signal International and labor recruiters when they paid as much as $20,000 for visas they believed would allow them to work and live permanently with their families in the United States. In fact, the H-2B visas are for short-term contracts.

“Everyone has a dream,” said one of the protesters, Paul Konar, a 54-year-old worker from the Indian state of Kerala, speaking in Hindi through a translator. “If we could come here legally to live with our families, that was my dream.”

Signal International, a marine oil rig construction company based in Pascagoula, Miss., insists it also was misled about the visas and has filed a lawsuit against the labor recruiters on the Gulf Coast and in India who obtained them for the workers.

“This whole thing got started because of bad recruiting practices,” Richard Marler, the chief executive of Signal, said in an interview. “I wanted these workers to be happy employees. Why would I bring someone in and make them unhappy so they would be less productive in their work?”

Most of the workers, who are metal fitters and welders, lost their legal immigration status when they left their jobs. They adopted the risky strategy of a public hunger strike, they said, to step up pressure on the Justice Department, which has the power to allow the workers to remain in the United States during an investigation of their case.

In a letter this week, three top Democrats in the House of Representatives — George Miller and Zoe Lofgren of California, and John Conyers Jr. of Michigan — asked the Justice Department and immigration officials to investigate the workers’ fraud accusations and offer them protection as victims. The Justice Department this week confirmed it had opened an investigation...

for link to complete NYT article click here

Friday, June 6, 2008

No Need to Hate

This tide of meanness needs to stop

MARY SCHULKEN

“I don't see no Americans, I see trespassers, Irish harps doing a job for a nickel a nigger does for a dime and the white man used to get a quarter for.”

William “Bill the Butcher” Cutting, a hardcore nativist who had a bald eagle in his fake eye, ranks among the most vicious film villains of all time.

His character, portrayed stunningly by Daniel Day Lewis in the 2003 movie “Gangs of New York,” led the city's white gangs in battle in the early 19th century against their Irish counterparts.

The Butcher (http://www. youtube.com/watch?v=djU2b_E WuDE& feature=related) was skilled with sharp knives. He hated immigrants – especially the Irish – like cockroaches, and lived to smash them.

He made the “I don't see no Americans” comment to New York City's Boss Tweed as the two watched a shipload disembark on the city's busy waterfront.

Those words are made-up, of course. They were scripted for a character who was a man of his time – an era when the rule of law had not yet taken root in a young nation.

In its place, fear, bigotry and violence had melded in a lethal mixture.

“If only I had the guns, Mr. Tweed, I'd shoot every one of them before they set foot on American soil.”

Today's subtle bigotry

Such blunt menace would seem outrageous today.

Or would it?

Listen closely. The scapegoating aimed at illegal Hispanic immigrants in North Carolina right now may be more subtle, but it's no less fervent than the bigotry of Bill the Butcher. And it's just as dangerous and self-defeating.

“We have a destructive human tsunami headed our way,” said William Gheen of Americans for Legal Immigration, a political action committee based in Raleigh that pushes anti-immigrant legislation. “N.C. lawmakers must act now to protect American jobs, tax resources and lives. Our state must … batten down the hatches immediately.”

In Beaufort County, some 80 miles east of Raleigh, county commissioners asked the health and social services departments to count Spanish surnames to determine illegal immigrant clients. Commissioners want to cut off water service to households of illegal immigrants and scrap state and federally funded programs that cannot be closed to immigrants, such as health clinics and prenatal care for the poor.

“When you're a pregnant lady sitting there, that's a personal problem,” said commissioner Hood Richardson. “That's not a public problem.”

This tide of meanness needs to stop.

Don't let fear lead the way

An estimated 380,000 illegal immigrants live in North Carolina. It's true they broke the law to come here. It's true they put pressure on our publicly funded law enforcement, public schools and health care resources.

But they also perform jobs that are vital to our economy – and our communities. Most of those jobs are hard, dirty, repetitive and dangerous. That's why most of us don't want to do them.

Honestly? This change in our demographics is here, whether we want it or not. We need to take a deep breath and stop letting fear lead the way we respond politically and culturally.

“You can't fight forever,” Boss Tweed told Bill the Butcher.

“I can go down doing it,” the Butcher said.

“And you will,” Tweed replied.

And he did.

for link to article click here

thanks to PMBS for telling us about this article

Obama winning 62% of nation's Latino registered voters

OK Obama, you now have the attention of Latino voters in the U.S. Show Latinos you are not just using them to get elected. Push the DREAM ACT like you pushed Senator Lieberman this week.
----
From the LA Times

"A new Gallup Poll summary of surveys taken in May shows Obama winning 62% of Latino registered voters nationwide, compared with just 29% for McCain. Others have found a wide gap as well. The pro-Democratic group Democracy Corps compiled surveys from March through May that showed Obama with a 19-point lead among Latinos. And a Times poll published last month showed Obama leading McCain among California Latinos by 14 points."

for complete article click here

link to photo

One person always ruins it for everyone else...

Tipping Point For Outrage
In Hampton Roads Area, '07 Deaths of Teens Fuel Policies on Immigrants

By Karin Brulliard
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 5, 2008; Page B01
VIRGINIA BEACH

There have been no major flaps over day-labor sites here, or boiling controversies over immigrant boardinghouses or schools crowded with children who don't speak English.
But a group has formed to fight illegal immigration. Calls about the issue to the area's congresswoman have swelled. And Ray and Colette Tranchant want to sue the government over what they call its failure to enforce immigration laws.

The catalyst was a tragedy that roiled the Hampton Roads area and triggered stiffer local policies on illegal immigrants. In March 2007, the Tranchants' daughter Tessa, 16, and her best friend, Alison Kunhardt, 17, were killed in a car crash caused by a drunk driver who had a police record and was in the country illegally.

Click on the TITLE of the post to view th complete article.

IA: Raid mars future for 3 graduating today from Postville

Des Moines Register,
May 25, 2008
By Ken Funson
kfuson@dmreg.com

•Postville, Ia. - His name is Santiago Cordero.He shouldn't be here.For some people, perhaps most, judging by the comments posted on blogs and newspaper Web sites, no other information is necessary: He is an illegal alien. He shouldn't be here.But he is, and at 2:30 p.m. today, Santiago Cordero, 18, is expected to join the 33 other members of his senior class at Postville High School's commencement. He and two young women who also shouldn't be here will receive their diplomas.

The three Hispanic graduates were going to celebrate together afterward, invite friends and family members to a big party. Those plans evaporated on May 12, when federal agents stormed the Agriprocessors Inc. meat-processing plant here, conducting the largest single-site workplace raid in U.S. history. Santiago's mother and many other friends were among the 389 detained and arrested. Most face deportation.Santiago wonders if the agents will come next for him. He wonders what he did wrong. He knows what people say: He shouldn't be here."If they met one of us, they might be surprised," he says.

They still talk about the kick.Santiago was one of the first Hispanic students to start on Postville's varsity football team. Last fall he was a co-captain, the kicker and a defensive lineman.During one game, Postville lined up for an extra point. The holder bobbled the snap, just as Santiago was getting ready to kick. So he stopped, his foot in midair, like in a freeze-frame, while the holder recovered the ball. Then he swung his foot down, completed the kick and made the extra point.

"The place went silent," Superintendent David Strudthoff says. "I'd never seen anything like that in my life."After games, Santiago stayed behind to visit with the young Hispanic children. Of the school district's 600 students, about 200 are Hispanic, and the great majority of them are in kindergarten through eighth grade."He understood the concept of what it meant to be a role model," Strudthoff says. "No one sat him down and explained it to him. He understood it."The Hispanic youngsters were instantly drawn to Santiago. He's 5-foot-9, with broad shoulders and an even wider grin. His senior classmates voted him most likely to model for a fashion magazine.

During those postgame visits, Santiago told the youngsters that they, too, should go out for sports."I think if I talk them into going out for sports, it will keep them out of trouble," he says. "If they go out, they're more likely to stay in school."He also volunteered to serve as an interpreter for parent-teacher conferences, and when the younger students needed to have their hearing tested. It wasn't a big deal, he says. He thought he could help.

On the morning of the raid, Santiago and another Hispanic student, Wendy Razam, 18, were with other seniors at a government class field trip in Waukon.At lunch, some of the students turned on their cell phones."Everyone had the same text message," he says.

Agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had detained hundreds of Agriprocessors workers, including Santiago's mother and both of Wendy's parents."It was terrifying," Santiago says. His mother and Wendy's mother were eventually allowed to return to Postville; each wears a monitoring device on an ankle. Santiago expects his mother to be deported to Mexico, and Wendy expects her parents to be sent back to Guatemala. Wendy will probably join them.

"My dreams are broke," she says.Santiago says he will look for work. He doesn't know what he will do, or where. He is the oldest of seven children. Most of the children will return to Mexico with his mother, he figures. A brother might stay in Postville with his father, who has the necessary paperwork to work legally as a school district custodian.Santiago says an uncle escorted him to the United States, a year after his father came here. His mother then brought the rest of the family."I didn't have a choice to come," Santiago says.

He learned English. He went out for football and two school plays, one of the first Hispanics to do so. He studied hard, and will graduate today in the top 10 of his class, with a grade-point average better than 3.0 (out of 4.0).When the senior awards were distributed recently, Santiago received two scholarships and was a "Dollars for Scholars" recipient. He also won a senior volunteer award.

Does any of that matter? Of course not, say the people who write to the school superintendent, including the person who said, "Take your head out of your rectum and look up the definition of 'illegal.' " That was one of the kinder messages. Santiago and the students like him shouldn't be here, they say. Case closed.

"These children didn't have a choice to come to America," Strudthoff says, "but they did have the choice to attend school on a regular basis, they did have a choice to do their homework, they did have a choice to follow the law, they did have a choice to join choir and band, and they did have a choice to be on the student council and go out for sports, and they did have a choice to graduate with honors."They did have that choice. So whenever they were given the choice, they always made the correct choice, but yet they will be subjected to the same punishment for the crimes that their parents committed.

"The morning of the raid, Strudthoff asked a federal official a question he asks often these days: Should children pay for the sins of their parents?The official, he says, replied that it's the parents' fault, not the government's, for putting their children in this situation."If that's such a wise idea, then why don't we apply it to the war on drugs?" Strudthoff says. "If you have a raid in a crack house, if you have a raid in a methamphetamine house, and children are in the house, then shouldn't the children also be arrested? And shouldn't the children be given the same sentence as their parents?"Strudthoff, 51, has been Postville's superintendent for nine years.

He says school officials don't know how many undocumented students there are because he doesn't consider it their job to ask. It's their job to educate them."This is an adult war, not a child's war," he says. "No school I've ever heard of turns 5-year-old children away."His frustration has turned to anger. He wants Congress to pass the DREAM Act, which would give the children of illegal immigrants the opportunity to earn permanent resident status if they attend college or join the military. The U.S. Senate voted against the bill last year; the House has never considered it."If you don't have the courage to stand up and protect the weakest and most vulnerable in our society, then how are you going to tackle something as large and complex as comprehensive immigration reform?" Strudthoff asks. "You can't."A year ago, Santiago approached school officials. Postville, he said, needed a soccer team.Recruit some players, he was told. So he did.

This year, for the first time, Postville fielded a junior varsity soccer team. Twenty-eight students representing five nationalities participated. The team's only loss came to a group of varsity reserves from Cedar Falls.As for next year, "we don't know if we'll even have a team," Strudthoff says.School officials have identified 70 Hispanic children who won't return to Postville next year; some have already fled with their families. Strudthoff doesn't know where they went."When they say the immigration system is broken, that's not really accurate," he says. "It's shattered."Postville's seniors gathered Friday morning to rehearse today's commencement ceremony. A teacher set the parameters for what will be permissible during the actual event:"You can celebrate, you can cheer, but no Silly String."Santiago joked with the boy next to him. He says his classmates have been supportive of him, Wendy Razam and Gaby Campos, 17, a senior who came to the United States from Mexico.Senior Barbara McMullan, 17, says students believe the raid was unfair.

"It's hard to explain, because it's not anyone's fault," she says. "At the same time, it's everyone's fault."Superintendent Strudthoff says the three Hispanic seniors face arrest the instant they graduate."The minute they graduate and I hand them that diploma, they're no different from their parents," he says. "They're a criminal, period."

Tim Counts, an ICE spokesman, says anyone who is in the country illegally can be arrested and removed at any time, regardless of age or academic status."Having said that, we conduct our enforcement actions at the appropriate time and place," he says. "We're certainly sensitive about law enforcement actions in and around schools."This will be Strudthoff's last Postville graduation.

He is leaving for a similar job in Wisconsin. Although the timing with this month's events is coincidental, "health-wise, I think I need to get away from it."Santiago reads the blogs, sees the anonymous comments of those who say he shouldn't be here."Not all people are the same," he says. "There's people who don't have a heart, and there's people who are understanding."He doesn't understand why he's looked at differently than other immigrants in America's past.

"I feel like I did something good," he says. "I haven't gotten into trouble. If I want to stay here and do something good for me and the people around me, I think it should be fine for me to stay."He thinks he would be a good citizen."I have been," he says.A month ago, the three Hispanic seniors thought they would be attending college. None does now.Santiago had hoped to become a police officer. He thinks he could help people.

But that's in the future, if it happens at all. Today, he will walk across the stage, collect his diploma, and either try to find a job in a country where he's not supposed to be, or return to a country that no longer feels like home.Strudthoff will shake his hand and wish him well."It's harder than hell to hate people when you get to know them," he says.

CA: Bullard High valedictorian to be deported

The Fresno Bee,
June 1, 2008
By Vanessa Colón

Arthur Mkoyan's 4.0 grade-point average has made him a valedictorian at Bullard High School in Fresno and qualified him to enter one of the state's top universities.But while his classmates look forward to dorm food and college courses this fall, Arthur Mkoyan may not make it.

He is being deported.

Arthur, 17, and his mother have been ordered out of the country. By late June, they may be headed to Armenia.Arthur hasn't seen Armenia since he was 2, and he doesn't want to return. The thin, rather shy teenager doesn't speak Armenian and barely understands the language when it's spoken to him."Hopefully, I can somehow stay here and continue my studies here," he said. "It would be hard if I go back."

The family fled from the old Soviet Union and has been seeking asylum since 1992. The appeals ran out this year.He and his mother, who did not want to be identified for fear of losing her job and income she needs, were given an extension to June 20 so Arthur could join his class at the ceremony, said Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

"Our goal is to enforce these court orders for deportations," Kice said. But "if they come to us and they fully intend to respect the court order, we will work with them."Mark Silverman, director of immigration policy at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center in San Francisco, said Arthur Mkoyan's case illustrates why Congress should have passed the Dream Act. The act would have allowed students who excelled in school and stayed out of trouble to become permanent residents and attend college or enlist in the military.

"There's something very wrong with the immigration laws when our government is deporting our best students," Silverman said.

Rick Oltman, national media director of the Santa Barbara-based Californians for Population Stabilization, sees it differently. The Dream Act "would take away seats from American students, legal immigrants and foreign students legally here on visas," said Oltman, whose group favors limiting immigration. "There always seem to be some excuse why the law should not be enforced. Everybody should obey the law."

Arthur's father, Ruben Mkoian, ran a general store and worked as a police officer in the then-Soviet Republic of Armenia, where he was threatened by independence supporters as the Soviet Union was breaking up, Arthur's mother said. His store was broken into and the family home was burned down, she said.

Seeking a safer life, Mkoian left for Fresno in December 1991 and soon applied for political asylum. Mkoian, who spells his name differently from his son, chose Fresno because he had a close friend here.

Arthur and his mother spent three years in Russia before joining Mkoian in Fresno in 1995. Mkoian worked for a carpet business and later as a truck driver. But winning asylum turned out to be difficult. Asylum seekers must prove they would suffer severe persecution if they return to their country.

Mkoian's asylum application, which included his family, ultimately was rejected. He appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, which ruled against him in January.

Immigration officers picked up Mkoian, now 46, in April at his Fresno home, according to his family. He is now in a detention center in Arizona.

The officers left behind Arthur, his 12-year-old brother, who is a U.S.-born citizen, and their mother. Arthur and his mother now face deportation; the family plans to take the younger brother as well if forced to leave the country.

Arthur said he thinks it's unfair that he has to return to a country he hasn't seen since he was 2.

He already has been accepted to the University of California at Davis, where he planned to major in chemistry. He would like to become a dentist or a pharmacist.

Bullard High School Principal Glenn Starkweather said he wasn't aware of Arthur's situation but said he had a good academic record. Arthur has just over a 4.0 grade-point average, making him a valedictorian."He's obviously a very strong student. I'm proud of him," Starkweather said.

With deportation on the horizon, Silverman said, Arthur has limited options.Once he is back in Armenia, Arthur could return to the United States on a student visa. Or he could ask a member of Congress to introduce a private bill on his behalf to grant him legal residency, Silverman said.

Arthur contacted Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein for help weeks ago. Feinstein has introduced private bills in the past in an effort to grant legal status to individuals.Feinstein's office is looking into Arthur's case, said Claire Bowyer, Feinstein's deputy press secretary.

Private bills are rarely introduced and often don't pass, according to Feinstein's office. Once a bill is introduced, deportation is halted. If it passes, the applicant receives a green card. In some cases, the bill allows a parent to obtain legal residency along with the child.

"Arthur Mkoyan represents another reason why Congress needs to pass the Dream Act," Feinstein said in a prepared statement. "It is in our nation's interest to provide talented students the incentive to take this path toward being responsible and law-abiding members of our society."Arthur hasn't told any of his classmates that he must leave the country. He hopes that somehow he will be able to stay. But the deportation order has added stress to his final weeks of high school."I can't really concentrate on my studies. It's hard to focus, [but] I'm still keeping my grade-point average high," Arthur said.

The reporter can be reached at vcolon@fresnobee.com or (559) 441-6313.


last update view at: CNNs June 5th
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/05/armenian.valedictorian/?iref=mpstoryview

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He is requesting letters of support to be sent to his email (artmkoyan@gmail.com) so he can forward them to Feinstein. That's the least we can do ...

The Saga of Jose Jesus Vieyra - Part III

continued:


The case against Jose Jesus Vieyra dropped after the traffic victim was found to be intoxicated at the time of the accident. What the following article doesn't say what happened to Vieyra otherwise - there was much screaming about his residency status - He was a Mexican citizen who had overstayed his visa. Vieyra had lived in Houston for years - had a family here and a home.


Officials said he would certainly be deported - but was he deported after all?


click for link to previous March 15, 2008 DREAM ACT Texas post on Vieyra Part I and Part II

----


June 5, 2008, 11:04PM
Deputy's DUI may derail prosecution against truck driver

In accident reconstruction expert for the Harris County Sheriff's Office predicts prosecutors will have a difficult time indicting or convicting the truck driver involved in a crash that killed a sheriff's deputy earlier this year.

Because Harris County sheriff's deputy Craig Miller was intoxicated and is believed to have been speeding, the case against truck driver Jose Jesus Vieyra is not a strong one, said David Pearson, a Sheriff's Office accident investigator who has reconstructed more than 700 crashes during his career.

"I think it will be a difficult case to not only get an indictment on, but also secure a conviction," Pearson said Thursday.

Vieyra, 57, is charged with criminally negligent homicide because he drove his commercial box truck into the path of Miller's car just before the Feb. 21 crash.

Vieyra is now free from the Harris County Jail on a $30,000 bond. Neither he nor his attorney, Yalila "Lee" Guerrero, could be reached for comment Thursday.

The Harris County District Attorney's Office is waiting on additional investigation and information before taking the case to a grand jury for review, said spokeswoman and prosecutor Donna Hawkins.

The accident report has not yet been released by the Sheriff's Office because it is waiting for Pearson's conclusions to be reviewed by another accident reconstruction expert who is not part of the law enforcement agency.

Pearson, an accident reconstructionist for 18 years, concluded both drivers contributed to the crash, which happened on the Katy Freeway feeder road near Mason Road.

Toxicology tests revealed that Miller, 43, had a blood alcohol level three to four times the legal limit, ranging from 0.27 to 0.32, even though he was on duty and driving to an undercover surveillance assignment after being called back to work.

Miller is also believed to have been speeding. Two witnesses estimated he was driving 60 mph — 10 mph over the posted speed limit on the feeder road.

But Pearson believes Miller could not have avoided the truck that pulled into his path even if he had been sober — though he might have lessened the severity of the impact by taking evasive action.

"They still would have had a crash, but probably less severe injuries than what we ended up with," Pearson said. Miller was not wearing a seat belt.

"Because of the alcohol in his system, slower responses, (Miller) did not do any steering or braking to avoid the wreck. If he had, it's possible he would have survived the crash," Pearson said.

Vieyra, however, was wrong to pull out of an auto dealership's parking lot into the path of Miller's car and was criminally negligent by continuing across four lanes of traffic in an effort to reach an entrance ramp to the Katy Freeway, Pearson concluded.

"I do feel that exiting the driveway as Vieyra did in this case does constitute criminal negligence," Pearson said.

Investigators believed the case against Vieyra was quite strong before they learned that Miller was intoxicated at the time of the incident. But Miller's drinking weakened the case, Pearson said.

"I would say because of the alcohol involved in this crash, it makes it a very difficult case," Pearson said.

peggy.ohare@chron.com


for link to HC article click here

A Tryst Between John and Hillary



















link to photo

In an article about a meeting between Obama and Clinton, the Washington Post throws in a very brief mention of how John McCain visited with Hillary Clinton a few weeks ago. The WP didn't say much, just:

[McCain's] unexpected visit with Clinton did raise a few eyebrows.

Seems like an odd occurrence. Does this happen between candidates of opposing parties? What could they have talked about? Why hasn't it been mentioned anywhere else, or with more emphasis in the WP if, as the reporter says the meeting did "raise a few eyebrows?"

If "raising eyebrows" means that someone is questioning the appropriateness of an event, then why weren't there more questions published?


----
In D.C., Obama Meets With Clinton
Nominee Apparent Also Sets Fundraising Curbs

By Jonathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, June 6, 2008; A04

Sen. Barack Obama moved quickly yesterday to unite his party around his candidacy, paying an unexpected visit to his soon-to-be-former Democratic rival, while dispatching one of his top field operatives to help run the Democratic National Committee.

After a day spent campaigning across Virginia, Obama delayed a trip home to Chicago last night to visit Clinton at the Washington home of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a senior Democratic source said. A joint statement issued by the campaign said: "Senator Clinton and Senator Obama met tonight and had a productive discussion about the important work that needs to be done to succeed in November." Coming just before Clinton's expected departure from the race, it was seen as a reconciliation gesture to the senator from New York and her millions of disappointed supporters.

In addition to DNC staff changes, Obama extended his campaign's prohibition on raising funds from lobbyists and political action committees on the party's fundraising operations. Paul Tewes, one of the architects of Obama's primary strategy and the field general of his critical victory in the Iowa caucuses, will serve as Obama's point man at DNC.

The party chairman, Howard Dean, has been pursuing a "50-state" strategy since 2005, an effort many Democrats have criticized because it has been an enormous drain on the party's resources. The DNC has trailed its Republican counterpart badly this election cycle and had just $4.4 million in the bank at the end of April, compared with the Republican National Committee's $40.6 million.

Obama said his special-interest money ban is "not a perfect solution" but is an important symbolic move. "It does at least signal that we are going to make an effort to reverse a culture in Washington that has come to be dominated by the wealthy and the powerful," he said in a news conference aboard his campaign plane en route from Bristol in the state's southwest corner to the Nissan Pavilion in Northern Virginia, where he held a rally to kick off his general-election campaign...

Clinton, meanwhile, tried to quiet a campaign by her allies to force her onto the Democratic ticket. "While Senator Clinton has made clear throughout this process that she will do whatever she can to elect a Democrat to the White House, she is not seeking the vice presidency, and no one speaks for her but her," her campaign said in a news release. "The choice here is Senator Obama's and his alone."

Obama said he "appreciated very much" the statement, and he instructed reporters to dismiss all speculation about possible running mates. He said he will neither discuss the selection process nor parade prospects in public, as the GOP candidate, Sen. John McCain, appeared to do last month when Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and former opponent Mitt Romney visited his Arizona ranch -- although his unexpected visit with Clinton did raise a few eyebrows...

for complete WP article click here

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Being Somali in the UK

-
---
Adrift in the UK
Thousands of Somalis have come to Britain to seek a better life. The government is doing too little to help them integrate



Jeremy Sare
guardian.co.uk
Thursday June 5 2008

What does it feel like to lose your country? We read almost daily of the mayhem and spiralling violence in Somalia. But what of Somalis living in Britain? There are perhaps 250,000 British Somalis and asylum seekers living in London, Liverpool, Cardiff and Bristol and elsewhere, but they are almost an invisible minority. Despite the immense harm caused by this continuing social dislocation, little is being done by government to overcome it.

The social exclusion of British Somalis is unparalleled and mirrors the isolation of Somalia itself. Unemployment is high and educational attainment is the lowest among ethnic minority groups. Culturally the Somalis are barely noticeable; there are very few festivals, little radio and only a handful of Somali restaurants.

The reasons for the lack of culture and social participation of Somalis in 21st century Britain is, at least in part, subliminal. When any group emigrates in adversity, it holds on to cheering images of the old country. However, such is the extreme physical and structural devastation of Somalia, that the memories and longing are for a place which, effectively, no longer exists. This underlying psychological sense of loss, compounded by the traumatic experiences of war, has resulted in a collective withdrawal from active society.

Ministers have referred ad nauseam to making a priority of social cohesion and countering any emerging extremism in Muslim communities. However, the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) admits it ran "no specific programmes for the Somali community". It is not surprising there is no coherent policy or national strategy when responsibility is spread across the Cabinet Office, Home Office, Foreign Office and DCLG.

It was hardly helpful to social cohesion for the government to announce last year the introduction of charges for asylum seekers who take English classes - a decision the Refugee Council described as "astonishing".

for complete Guardian article click here

Your are not supposed to kill people in custody














link to photo
House Judiciary Subcommittee

Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee's immigration subcommittee. was interviewed in relation to a committee hearing on conditions of detention for immigrants told a Washington Post reporter that: "ICE was defending the indefensible...Whatever you think about the overall debate on immigration...you are not supposed to kill people who are in custody."


During the hearing, Congressman King actually compared not dying while in custody with being given a Rolls Royce. Perhaps he thinks that the bar for the treatment of immigrants in custody is different than the rest of American society?

It reminds me of Barbara Bush's statement about the Katrina Refugees she saw at the Astrodome. "The former first lady toured the Astrodome Monday, and along the way she opined that many of the refugees from New Orleans were so poor to begin with that they ought to be pretty happy with their temporary digs in Houston" (from Salon.com).

Should we tell incarcerated immigrants that they are lucky to be in detention where they are fed and given a bed? I would bet that Barbara Bush and Peter King would think so.

----
Immigration Agency to Reveal Some Death Data
DHS Bureau Will Report the Number of People Who Die Awaiting Deportation

By Amy Goldstein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 5, 2008; A02

The top U.S. immigration enforcement official told a congressional subcommittee yesterday that the Bush administration will disclose more information about foreigners who die in the sprawling network of federal detention centers around the country...

Yesterday's hearing was partisan and testy. Myers said ICE has been working to improve the health-care system. But detainees, their lawyers and relatives, and advocates for immigrants offered graphic testimony about misdiagnoses, medical neglect and secrecy.

ICE officials "are defending the indefensible," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee's immigration subcommittee. "Whatever you think about the overall debate on immigration," Lofgren said in an interview, "you are not supposed to kill people who are in custody."

Rep. Peter T. King (R-N.Y.) countered, "Why should the American people be responsible for paying for Rolls-Royce medical care for illegal aliens?"

Myers and committee Republicans said that ICE figures show that the rate of deaths among detainees has fallen in recent years, and that fewer people die in immigration detention than in prison.

But one witness, who works in detention centers with foreigners seeking asylum in the United States, disputed ICE's claims, saying that health care in detention centers "is getting worse, not better." Homer Venters, a physician at the Bellevue-New York University Program for Survivors of Torture, said ICE's assertion that deaths among detainees fell by 49 percent between 2006 and 2007 is misleading...

for complete WP article click here

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Does the DREAM Act really have a chance with OBAMA?

Are Dreamers really optimistic that OBAMA will have some type of impact on the DREAM Act?

Over 8,000 people have signed a petition wanting the president to PASS the DREAM act in his first 100 days. I feel that even though none of the presidential candidates don't speak about Immigration, much will be done. How much and how fast will it be done? I don't know, but they must be accountable within the first 100 days. Immigration has to compete with the Economy, the WAR, Healthcare, and the Environment. All are very important -- bring our troops home!

Will the government give us the DREAM Act Vs. CIR? or vice versa?

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Bataan, Guantanamo, & the Geneva Convention

When I told a Japanese friend that my Dad was stationed in the Philippines during World War II she responded by telling me that the Pacific Theater was the bloodiest and most brutal of all the fronts. That's what my Dad had told me about the Battle of Luzon (he calls it the "liberation of Luzon" - sound familiar?). Only thirteen of the three hundred in his group came back without serious injuries, many died. He always tells us how he survived his hell. During boot camp, a senior officer told him that if he became a specialist with the bazooka he would be safer, because when they marched through the jungle the bazooka guy always marched at the end of the line. The soldiers in the front were often killed.

The Death March from Bataan occurred in April 1942. About 70,000 American and Filipino Prisoners of War were forced to march without food and water for over 300 kilometers. It is estimated that 21,000 Allied soldiers died during the march.

The Bataan Death March is such a big deal that memorials have been built all over the world for the soldiers who participated in the march. There have even been a few movies about it. The word "Bataan" is not one to joke with. It is serious. It represents honor, courage, and patriotism. Japan was charged with War Crimes because of its treatment of the P.O.W.'s.

The highest honor paid the men in Bataan was the naming of a ship. The U.S.S. Bataan was commissioned in 1997. It is part of a fleet of amphibious ships that can also be used for assault purposes.

It is now a floating prison, holding hundreds of incarcerated men whom the U.S. Government believes are terrorists, even though most have not had formal charges placed against them, and only a handful have been given a trial.

Our post on the floating prisons quotes The Guardian of London - which surmises there have been 17 U.S. ships involved in this program.

It is disrespectful to the soldiers of Bataan and to the ship itself to have it used as a prison ship. How ironic that a ship named after a war incident that did not honor the Geneva Convention is now being used as a prison that also does not honor the Geneva Convention.

Confused ...?



It is very interesting that some of the opinions in a town next to Houston (League City) could be so extreme. I always feel bound to hear all sides of the immigration issue- especially in Houston, since that is where I live. This is a big city where almost all people come from other states or countries, and is common to see many ethnicities gather in one place. But with all the diversity that exists in a big city, the surrounding communities are still in the dark about what ‘America’ is today.

To some the theory of ‘illegal is illegal’ is plain and simple. One has to realize that even though words are easy to read, the real circumstances of people can’t be as easy as words. Now League City is dealing with a Mayoral election- while one candidate is cut and clear about his view, stating the police department should be ordered to call ICE when an undocumented resident is arrested. The other candidate has not taken a firm stand on League City being a ‘sanctuary city’.

The mentality that all ‘immigrants’ are criminals is incredibly incorrect, makes it seem that these people are not reading the right statistics of what this country is going through. But then again the media does show the most controversial and at times wrong information. Sometimes certain people like to find a scapegoat or just be stupid and not want or care if they know the truth.

------

'Sanctuary city' issue surfaces in race for League City Mayor
Candidate wants to address how illegal immigrants are handled by police

June 2, 2008, 4:16PM

By THAYER EVANS
Houston Chronicle Correspondent

With less than two weeks remaining until League City's mayoral runoff, the focus of the race has shifted to the city's stance on illegal immigration.

When an illegal immigrant is arrested in League City for a Class B misdemeanor or above, the police department contacts U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the person is then transported to the Galveston County jail, assistant police chief Gary Ratliff said. The city also contacts immigration officials for illegal immigrants arrested on a Class C misdemeanor, but if they don't have an outstanding warrant, they are released after the charge has been resolved, he said.

The practice is standard procedure, but is not a written policy, Ratliff said.

If elected, Chris Mallios said he would push for an ordinance that establishes that League City is not a "sanctuary city." He would like it to address how the city's police department should handle the arrests of illegal immigrants.

"There is not any clear path right now," said Mallios, 48, a retired Galveston County employee. "That's why I want to establish an ordinance so that we have guidelines."

Although there is no universal definition for "sanctuary city," most cities considered to be such have adopted "a don't ask-don't tell" policy that doesn't require their employees, such as police officers, to report illegal immigrants to federal officials, according to a report by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

During the city's June 14 runoff, voters will decide between Mallios and Toni Randall, 45, owner of a Kemah hardware store, for a three-year term.

Randall received 533 more votes than Mallios in the city's May 10 election, but did not receive the majority of votes cast, which is required to win.

Current first-term Mayor Jerry Shults failed to make the runoff after finishing last in the three-candidate race.

Randall declined to say whether the city should take an official stance on the "sanctuary city" debate.

"I'm not going to feel comfortable answering that, because I feel 'sanctuary city' is a term that is used lightly," she said. "I think a lot of the citizens don't know what 'sanctuary city' means. That's where my concern comes in."

Mallios said he believes that all illegal immigrants who are arrested in League City should be deported.

"If they are not here legally, then they need to go through the process to be expelled or deported or tried and then deported or whatever that process would be," he said.

Mallios said the city's police department, however, shouldn't specifically target illegal immigrants.

"I'm not for wholesale rounding people up just because they look like they could be illegal," he said.

Randall said the "sanctuary city" debate is "a federal issue."

"Illegal immigrants are here," she said. "They're not just from Mexico. They're from all over the world and the federal government is having a hard time dealing with this."

If all of the illegal immigrants that are arrested in League City were deported, the city's crime rate would decrease, Mallios said.

It also would help reduce employers' hiring of illegal immigrants, he said.

"It affords the teenager who wants to cut grass to be able to cut grass," Mallios said. "It helps the community all the way around."

Randall said she does not condone employers' hiring of illegal immigrants.

"They ought to have proper documentation definitely," she said. "It's just the right thing to do."

Panicking for what?

A DREAM ACT Texas article on the current anti-immigrant sentiment in the U.S. from May 29, 2008 titled "About Immigration: From the Words of the Wall Street Journal," stated that the Republican Party had spent a great deal of money on a public relations campaign against immigrants. If this is true then much of the panic could be coming from a planned attack meant to stir things up so people would want more stringent immigration laws -- which means voting Republican.

According to the WSJ article: The GOP spent tens of millions of dollars on television ads that portrayed Latino immigrants as dangerous criminals...

I ran across a movie a few months ago on Emile Zola. Zola was receiving much criticism for his supposed radical publications. In one scene he is walking through a square; nearby is a man standing on a small platform screaming to everyone that Zola is ruining the city. There is a large crowd surrounding the man speaking. After a few minutes the crowd sees Zola nearby and comes after him; they start beating him, but miraculously he is able to escape.

-----
June 3, 2008

The Great Immigration Panic

Someday, the country will recognize the true cost of its war on illegal immigration. We don’t mean dollars, though those are being squandered by the billions. The true cost is to the national identity: the sense of who we are and what we value. It will hit us once the enforcement fever breaks, when we look at what has been done and no longer recognize the country that did it.

A nation of immigrants is holding another nation of immigrants in bondage, exploiting its labor while ignoring its suffering, condemning its lawlessness while sealing off a path to living lawfully. The evidence is all around that something pragmatic and welcoming at the American core has been eclipsed, or is slipping away.

An escalating campaign of raids in homes and workplaces has spread indiscriminate terror among millions of people who pose no threat. After the largest raid ever last month — at a meatpacking plant in Iowa — hundreds were swiftly force-fed through the legal system and sent to prison. Civil-rights lawyers complained, futilely, that workers had been steamrolled into giving up their rights, treated more as a presumptive criminal gang than as potentially exploited workers who deserved a fair hearing. The company that harnessed their desperation, like so many others, has faced no charges.

Immigrants in detention languish without lawyers and decent medical care even when they are mortally ill. Lawmakers are struggling to impose standards and oversight on a system deficient in both. Counties and towns with spare jail cells are lining up for federal contracts as prosecutions fill the system to bursting. Unbothered by the sight of blameless children in prison scrubs, the government plans to build up to three new family detention centers. Police all over are checking papers, empowered by politicians itching to enlist in the federal crusade.

This is not about forcing people to go home and come back the right way. Ellis Island is closed. Legal paths are clogged or do not exist. Some backlogs are so long that they are measured in decades or generations. A bill to fix the system died a year ago this month. The current strategy, dreamed up by restrictionists and embraced by Republicans and some Democrats, is to force millions into fear and poverty.

There are few national figures standing firm against restrictionism. Senator Edward Kennedy has bravely done so for four decades, but his Senate colleagues who are running for president seem by comparison to be in hiding. John McCain supported sensible reform, but whenever he mentions it, his party starts braying and he leaves the room. Hillary Rodham Clinton has lost her voice on this issue more than once. Barack Obama, gliding above the ugliness, might someday test his vision of a new politics against restrictionist hatred, but he has not yet done so. The American public’s moderation on immigration reform, confirmed in poll after poll, begs the candidates to confront the issue with courage and a plan. But they have been vague and discreet when they should be forceful and unflinching.

The restrictionist message is brutally simple — that illegal immigrants deserve no rights, mercy or hope. It refuses to recognize that illegality is not an identity; it is a status that can be mended by making reparations and resuming a lawful life. Unless the nation contains its enforcement compulsion, illegal immigrants will remain forever Them and never Us, subject to whatever abusive regimes the powers of the moment may devise.

Every time this country has singled out a group of newly arrived immigrants for unjust punishment, the shame has echoed through history. Think of the Chinese and Irish, Catholics and Americans of Japanese ancestry. Children someday will study the Great Immigration Panic of the early 2000s, which harmed countless lives, wasted billions of dollars and mocked the nation’s most deeply held values.

Monday, June 2, 2008

A Floating Guantanamo





link to photo

The USS Bataan was not being used very much until the U.S. decided to mark it as a prison ship for "extraodinary rendition" -- a floating Guantanamo (click here for article link regarding use of the USS Bataan).


"One of my fellow prisoners in Guantánamo was at sea on an American ship with about 50 others before coming to Guantánamo ... he was in the cage next to me. He told me that there were about 50 other people on the ship. They were all closed off in the bottom of the ship. The prisoner commented to me that it was like something you see on TV. The people held on the ship were beaten even more severely than in Guantánamo." f
rom The Guardian - London
-----


Duncan Campbell and Richard Norton-Taylor
The Guardian, Monday June 2 2008

The United States is operating "floating prisons" to house those arrested in its war on terror, according to human rights lawyers, who claim there has been an attempt to conceal the numbers and whereabouts of detainees.

Details of ships where detainees have been held and sites allegedly being used in countries across the world have been compiled as the debate over detention without trial intensifies on both sides of the Atlantic. The US government was yesterday urged to list the names and whereabouts of all those detained.

Information about the operation of prison ships has emerged through a number of sources, including statements from the US military, the Council of Europe and related parliamentary bodies, and the testimonies of prisoners.

The analysis, due to be published this year by the human rights organisation Reprieve, also claims there have been more than 200 new cases of rendition since 2006, when President George Bush declared that the practice had stopped.

It is the use of ships to detain prisoners, however, that is raising fresh concern and demands for inquiries in Britain and the US.

According to research carried out by Reprieve, the US may have used as many as 17 ships as "floating prisons" since 2001. Detainees are interrogated aboard the vessels and then rendered to other, often undisclosed, locations, it is claimed.

Ships that are understood to have held prisoners include the USS Bataan and USS Peleliu. A further 15 ships are suspected of having operated around the British territory of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, which has been used as a military base by the UK and the Americans.

Reprieve will raise particular concerns over the activities of the USS Ashland and the time it spent off Somalia in early 2007 conducting maritime security operations in an effort to capture al-Qaida terrorists.

At this time many people were abducted by Somali, Kenyan and Ethiopian forces in a systematic operation involving regular interrogations by individuals believed to be members of the FBI and CIA. Ultimately more than 100 individuals were "disappeared" to prisons in locations including Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia, Djibouti and Guantánamo Bay.

Reprieve believes prisoners may have also been held for interrogation on the USS Ashland and other ships in the Gulf of Aden during this time.

The Reprieve study includes the account of a prisoner released from Guantánamo Bay, who described a fellow inmate's story of detention on an amphibious assault ship. "One of my fellow prisoners in Guantánamo was at sea on an American ship with about 50 others before coming to Guantánamo ... he was in the cage next to me. He told me that there were about 50 other people on the ship. They were all closed off in the bottom of the ship. The prisoner commented to me that it was like something you see on TV. The people held on the ship were beaten even more severely than in Guantánamo."


for link to complete Guardian article click here.

Creating lawbreakers so ICE can arrest them






ICE officers listening to instructions for their next raid.





link to photo

Federal law enforcement agencies have increased criminal prosecutions of immigration violators to record levels, in part by filing minor charges against virtually every person caught illegally crossing some stretches of the U.S.-Mexico border - WP

This is an interesting (and lucrative) move for DHS. There is always so much talk about undocumented people with criminal records - well since there are not very many undocumented criminals - ICE is creating some for itself. On some parts of the border they are filing charges against every person -

-----

Immigration Prosecutions Hit New High

Critics Say Increased Use of Criminal Charges Strains System

By Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, June 2, 2008; A01

Federal law enforcement agencies have increased criminal prosecutions of immigration violators to record levels, in part by filing minor charges against virtually every person caught illegally crossing some stretches of the U.S.-Mexico border, according to new U.S. data.

Officials say the threat of prison and a criminal record is a powerful deterrent, one that is helping drive down illegal immigration along the nearly 2,000-mile frontier between the United States and Mexico. Skeptics say that the government lacks the resources to sustain the strategy on the border and that the effort is diverting resources from more serious crimes such as drug and human smuggling.

Before Operation Streamline, as the program is known, most Mexican nationals caught at the border were fingerprinted and returned to Mexico without criminal charges. Since 2005, people other than Mexicans are generally held until removed.

In testimony to Congress this spring, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said that Operation Streamline "is a very good program, and we are working to get it expanded across other parts of the border" because "it has a great deterrent effect." The program is now in place in parts of Texas and Arizona.

But Melissa Wagoner, a spokeswoman for Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), said there is a shortage of jail beds and public defenders in areas where the program is operating. "Operation Streamline in its current form already strains the capabilities of the law enforcement system past the breaking point," she said.

Others note that, historically, immigration violations have been processed by U.S. administrative courts. Criminalizing illegal immigration while turning a blind eye to employers who provide the jobs that lure migrants makes for good election-year politics but poor policy, said T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council.

"This strategy pretty much has it backwards," he said. "It's going after desperate people who are crossing the border in search of a better way of life, instead of going after employers who are hiring people who have no right to work in this country..."

for complete WP article click here

UC DAVIS DREAMERS Speak Out



thanks to M.O. and O.S. for telling us about this great video

A DREAM ACT film