Showing posts with label Immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Immigration. Show all posts

Sunday, November 6, 2011

"All Americans should feel ashamed"

November 5, 2011

Standing in the Schoolhouse Door


Surely Alabama’s attorney general, Luther Strange, did not mean to summon the memory of Gov. George Wallace when he picked a fight with the Department of Justice last week over the state’s new immigration law.


Surely no law-enforcement official of his stature would have responded to a fact-gathering request by challenging the federal government’s “legal authority” to investigate reports of civil rights abuses. Could there be an attorney general in the South — or anywhere — who is not acutely aware, and mindful, of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?


The federal inquiry was prompted by the state’s new immigration law, which took effect in September, part of which requires schools to check the immigration status of schoolchildren and their parents. The Justice Department has already sued Alabama over the law, the nation’s cruelest collection of immigration enforcement schemes and punishments. After receiving reports that students were being harassed and bullied, and that frightened parents were keeping children out of school, the department asked 39 school superintendents for data on student absences and withdrawals since the school year began....


...Alabama has seized from the federal government the job of controlling immigration within its borders. The law’s architects and supporters proclaim that their goal is to catastrophically disrupt the lives of illegal immigrants and their families. With reports of harassment and panic, and of a mass exodus of immigrants fleeing the state, the potential for civil rights abuses is acutely obvious.

That Alabama’s attorney general would not welcome a federal inquiry, but bristle instead, with an implicit appeal to state’s rights — with all the defiant history of intolerance and minority oppression those words suggest — says volumes. All Americans should feel ashamed...MORE    

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Alabama's Sneaky Attack on Plyler V. Doe


"The eventual target...is the 1982 Supreme Court decision Plyler v. Doe. The case concerned a Texas statute that withheld funds for the education of illegal immigrants and allowed districts to bar them from enrollment, as well as one Texas school district’s plan to charge illegal immigrants tuition."


October 27, 2011 - New York Times

Critics See ‘Chilling Effect’ in Alabama Immigration Law



ALABASTER, Ala. — The champions of Alabama’s far-reaching immigration law have said that it is intended to drive illegal immigrants from the state by making every aspect of their life difficult. But they have taken a very different tone when it comes to the part of the law concerning schools.


“No child will be denied an education based on unlawful status,” the state attorney general, Luther Strange, argued in a court filing.


The man who wrote the schools provision says the same thing, that it is not meant as a deterrent — at least not yet. It is, however, a first step in a larger and long-considered strategy to topple a 29-year-old Supreme Court ruling that all children in the United States, regardless of their immigration status, are guaranteed a public education.
The provision, which is known as Section 28, requires primary and secondary schools to record the immigration status of incoming students and their parents and pass that data on to the state.


Critics say it is a simple end in itself, an attempt to circumvent settled law and to scare immigrants away from school now, not at some point in the future. Weeks of erratic school attendance figures and a spike in withdrawals show that this has worked, they argue. And indeed, a federal appeals court on Oct. 14 blocked the provision pending an appeal by the Justice Department, though the court did not rule on the merits.


Michael M. Hethmon, general counsel for the Immigration Reform Law Institute in Washington, who wrote the provision, insists that its goal is much more ambitious.


The eventual target, he said, is the 1982 Supreme Court decision Plyler v. Doe. The case concerned a Texas statute that withheld funds for the education of illegal immigrants and allowed districts to bar them from enrollment, as well as one Texas school district’s plan to charge illegal immigrants tuition.


The court ruled that this violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause, saying that the statute “imposes a lifetime hardship on a discrete class of children not accountable” for their immigration status. In the decision, the court also said that the state had not presented evidence showing it was substantially harmed by giving these children — as distinct from any other children — a free public education.


Over the ensuing decades, measures have been passed in defiance of this ruling, most notably California’s Proposition 187, but they have been repeatedly struck down in the courts. Mr. Hethmon said the problem with these challenges is that they have not taken the trouble to gather the evidence the court found missing in Plyler.
“The toughest question has been obtaining reliable — and I mean reliable for peer-reviewed research purposes — censuses of the number of illegal alien students enrolled in school districts,” he said. “That information could be compared with other sorts of performance or resource allocation issues.”


The Alabama law directs schools to ascertain the immigration status of incoming students, through a birth certificate, other official documents or an affidavit by the child’s parents (the law also directs schools to determine the immigration status of an enrolling child’s parents, but gave no mechanism by which to do so).


That information is then passed on to the State Board of Education not only to prepare an annual report with the data but also to “contract with reputable scholars and research institutions” to determine the costs, fiscal and otherwise, of educating illegal immigrants.


Because no one is actually barred from attending school and the data is not passed on to law enforcement, the provision passes constitutional muster, Mr. Hethmon said.


But it also potentially enables a fresh challenge to Plyler v. Doe, and the idea that schools are obligated to provide a free education to illegal immigrants.


Critics dismiss this as a ruse.
They say that the law instills such fear in immigrant families with schoolchildren, leading predictably to such erratic attendance figures, that it belies any claim that the state is seriously attempting an accurate measurement.
“This seems to be really a transparent attempt at a pretext to try to justify discriminatory law,” said Lucas Guttentag, a professor of immigration law at Yale Law School and senior counsel of the Immigrants’ Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union. “The idea that they’re somehow going to collect this data and show anything that’s conceivably relevant is a fantasy.”


In Plyler v. Doe, Professor Guttentag said, the court found that the state’s actions were unconstitutional on a number of grounds. The state’s failure to show the impact of illegal immigration on schools was only a part of the decision, he said, and a nuanced one at that. The likelihood that the data collected by this law would lead to that decision’s being overturned, Professor Guttentag said, was extremely low...MORE




Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Los Angeles - Protests and Violence over LAPD shooting




in Spanish from LaOpinion.com

--


LA Times

Protesters, LAPD clash as chief defends shooting




As Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck defended the fatal shooting of a day laborer and officials called for calm, protesters and officers clashed Tuesday night in Westlake near the site of the incident.

About 300 demonstrators gathered at the
LAPD's Rampart Station. Some in the crowd hurled eggs at police cars and others threw objects at the station windows, prompting officers in riot gear to push the throng along 6th Street.

Officers fired non-lethal projectiles at protesters near Union Avenue and 6th, where Manuel Jamines was fatally shot Sunday afternoon by an officer who said Jamines refused commands to drop a switchblade.

About 9:30 p.m., police declared the protest an unlawful assembly and moved in to disperse the crowd as trash cans were set on fire and rocks and bottles were thrown at officers.

As police pushed crowds on 6th, some protesters climbed atop multistory apartment buildings, where they threw objects at officers below. Officers fired non-lethal projectiles toward the rooftops as residents peeked from their windows...link

Monday, December 8, 2008

Friday, October 3, 2008

Zigzagging to Public Opinion on Immigration

The conservative magazine Economist is not my favorite, yet this section of an essay on immigration provides more information than others have...regardless of their position.
---
Blowing in the wind
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12321563

Until recently Mr McCain’s record on immigration was so liberal that the National Council of La Raza has twice given him an award for his political work. He has long fought for “comprehensive” immigration reform—code for any change that would provide a route to citizenship for illegals. This effort culminated in the Immigration Reform Act of 2007, which would have allowed virtually all illegal immigrants to remain in the country on a special “Z” visa. After paying a fine and back taxes, they could apply for permanent residency and, eventually, citizenship.

Although the bill also contained money for border security and was supported by George Bush, many of Mr McCain’s fellow Republicans turned against a measure that opponents had successfully labelled an “amnesty”. It died in June, 2007 following an extraordinary barrage of phone calls by anti-immigration groups. The episode revealed one of the few clear lessons of the politics of immigration: the people who feel strongly about it often feel very strongly indeed.

When Mr McCain talks about the issue these days he sounds chastened. The failure of immigration reform taught him a lesson, he says—that Americans will tolerate a move to legalise illegal immigrants only if they are assured the border has been fixed. The senator plans to achieve that through a combination of walls and electronic surveillance. Only when the governors of the border states say the border is secure, will he do something about America’s 12m illegal immigrants.

Unless the governors are prepared to overlook quite a lot, it is unlikely that a President McCain would ever get around to the second stage of his plan. America’s border with Mexico is 2,000 miles (3,200km) long. It runs through cities, mountains, rivers, desert and Indian reservations. It is possible to slash crossings in a particular area by flooding it with guardsmen or building walls. It is not, however, remotely possible to seal the whole thing. Britain, an island nation with a more centralised government and a far tighter surveillance web, contains illegal immigrants from as far away as China.

Mr McCain’s move rightward on the immigration issue has given Mr Obama considerable room to manoeuvre. He has nonetheless held a fairly orthodox liberal line on illegal immigration. He supports giving illegals a route to citizenship and promises to make it a priority during his first year in office. During the primaries he expressed support for Eliot Spitzer, then the governor of New York, who was trying to grant driving licences to illegals. This is a totemic issue for liberal Hispanics, but unpopular with many others.
Unwelcome guests

Like many politicians with roots in troubled cities, Mr Obama is much less keen on increasing the number of guest workers. This was also part of the immigration bill, but, thanks in part to Senator Obama, it was severely pruned even before the measure died. He backed a measure cutting the number of guest workers from 400,000 to 200,000. He introduced another measure that would have banned companies from employing guest workers in areas of high unemployment and required them to pay prevailing wages. He also supported a move to end the programme after five years. Since the programme was about the only thing many Republicans liked about the immigration bill, this ruined its chances.

Just as a President McCain would have to soften his stance on border security in order to pass an immigration bill, so a President Obama would have to tone down his anti-business rhetoric. Without support from businesspeople it will be extremely difficult to persuade Republican politicians to go along with reform. It is especially important to get farmers onside. They often depend on illegal labour and can be a heavy counterweight to nativist sentiments in rural areas. They also have powerful lobbyists in Washington.

The differences between the candidates’ positions are less striking than the contrast in how they speak about illegal immigration. Mr Obama talks of giving hope to families living in fear of raids and deportation. Mr McCain goes no further than a general expression of sympathy for “God’s children”. But he feels the pain of ordinary Americans who fret that they are being overrun.

Mr McCain’s stance on immigration is closer to that of the average American. Yet Mr Obama appears to have the edge. He can point out, fairly, that his opponent has flip-flopped on the issue. His liberal stance impresses Latinos, who remain angry at the Republican party for caving in to nativist pressure last year. They account for more than a tenth of the electorate in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, New Mexico, New York and Texas. They may decide extremely close races even in states where they are thin on the ground, like Wisconsin.

Immigration is also one of the few areas where Mr Obama’s race helps him. Blacks are more threatened by competition from immigrants, particularly illegal ones. Many fights in schools and prisons are between blacks and Latinos. As a result, a black politician who supports immigration reform comes across as particularly brave.

Yet the issue can turn, and quickly. An effective ad campaign could dredge up submerged fears of immigrants and push the issue close to the top of people’s concerns. As the economy sours, Americans will probably become less tolerant of those who compete for their jobs. An illegal immigrant could commit a horrific, widely-publicised crime. Working-class whites are already wary of Mr Obama. If immigration suddenly rises from the swamp, they may well run straight into the arms of the newly tough Mr McCain.
.

Sunday, August 10, 2008

The Gypsies Did It - or so the Italians tell us

The War with the Gypsies in Italy could become a frightening replay of the past. Any type of "anti-group" sentiment that is sweeping a country has the potential to be dangerous.

Things escalated after a Roman woman was murdered by a Romanian immigrant who was undocumented.

Considering the anti-immigration hysteria that is going on in the west - how much of Italy's reaction is realistic and and how much is hysteria?

-----
Italians Welcome Army on Streets as Anti-Gipsy Sentiment sweeps the Country
When soldiers arrived with submachine guns to fight crime last week outside Rome's Saxa Rubra metro station, residents of the quiet commuter suburb applauded and shouted "bravo".

The London Telegraph
By Nick Meo in Rome
August 9, 2008

"It's great to see the army here," Luigi Cabras, 60, a civil servant, said with enthusiasm. "There used to be lots of petty stealing, but it's much better now. And the gipsies who were camped around here have gone, thank God."

The station is hardly crime-plagued; a littering problem, some pickpocketing, and car park break-ins, all blamed on gipsies from the squalid camp which used to be next to the station until bulldozers moved in a fortnight ago.

But everybody knows why combat veterans from Afghanistan and Iraq have been deployed, the first time the army has been on the streets of Italy since anti-Mafia operations in the 1990s.

Mr Cabras gestured towards a nearby field and shook his head sadly. "Before things change, you have to have a dead body," he said. What he pointed at was the spot where an admiral's wife was raped and beaten to death in November, in one of Rome's most shocking murders for years.

Giovanna Reggiani, 47, a housewife and religious education teacher, was walking back to her car along a badly-lit road when she was attacked by an illegal immigrant from Romania.

The gipsy community around Saxa Rubra claims that the man arrested for the crime, 24-year-old Nicolae Mailat, was not in fact a gipsy, despite his being detained on one of their camps. But the incident has provoked a nationwide backlash against Italy's 150,000-strong gipsy community, which has seen them portrayed as one of the biggest threats to the Eternal City since the Barbarian invasions.

Gipsies, also known as Roma, have been in Italy for centuries, ever since their ancestors arrived as metalworkers and merchants from India. Many live in houses rather than itinerant camps and have intermarried with Italians, sending their children to school and integrating into society.

But over the past decade, their numbers have almost doubled as poorer, uneducated gipsies arrived from Eastern Europe, some fleeing Balkan wars, others simply in search of a better life, creating additional strains with a host community that has never entirely accepted them.

Unlike many Rome intellectuals, who complain about authoritarianism, Saxa Rubra's white-collar workers are delighted to see the military fully-armed as they set off for work. Fabio Monaci, 25, who has been giving the soldiers discounts at his sandwich shop, feels much safer. "Crime is a real worry in Italy now," he said gravely as he poured an espresso. "But it won't be so bad if we get into a new era of discipline."

That is exactly what is promised by new prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, a Right-wing populist who has just ridden into power for the third time with his ex-fascist and xenophobic Northern League allies on a wave of popular fear about crime.

Sending 3,000 troops to guard railway stations and tourist spots has been Mr Berlusconi's boldest move yet, and judging from the mood in the suburbs, the soldiers have won the hearts and minds of the commuting classes, even if they have not struck much of a blow against crime. So far one pickpocket has been detained in the nationwide operation – the military has orders to arrest only suspects caught in the act.

British tourists, who are out in force in Rome's piazzas and trattorias, were a little surprised. "Has there been a coup?" was the bemused response of one pensioner from Scotland.

But after the murder of Mrs Reggiani, most Italians are pleased to see them. The killing was particularly shocking for Romans because their city is considered relatively safe by the standards of other European centres – there is nothing comparable to London's current knife crime epidemic, for example.

Mr Berlusconi declared a "Roma emergency", produced a disputed dossier of alleged immigrant muggings, robberies and murders, and promised to dismantle illegal gipsy camps. So far 700 have been identified. Even more controversial in a nation whose Fascist rulers helped the Nazis deport Jews and gipsies during the Second World War, fingerprinting of gipsies has started, despite the European Union saying the programme encourages xenophobia, and a Roman Catholic group describing it as racist.

On the streets of northern Rome such reservations are hard to find. "All our problems come from foreigners getting drunk, smashing windows and stealing," said Anna Maria Mercure, who at 80 is old enough to remember an earlier era of Italian discipline. "Mussolini had his positive side. The streets were safe in his day."

Whether they are genuinely more dangerous now is disputed, but even Left-wingers are as concerned as those on the Right and aware that there is no straightforward solution to a difficult and emotive social problem. And whatever the truth of the matter, gipsy encampments up and down the country are the main targets as long-simmering tensions erupt into open hostility.

The residents of the Rome suburb of Centocelle, a pleasant, tree-lined district of modest apartment blocks, finally lost patience last week with the gipsies in a local camp called Casalina 900, a miniature shanty town where rats and naked children run amid piles of half-burnt rubbish. The residents, mainly gipsies who fled the Balkans, have coexisted uncomfortably with their Italian neighbours for more than a decade.

That all came to an end last week when camp residents burnt some old tyres instead of taking them to the dump, creating clouds of acrid black smoke. In the current political climate, it became the catalyst for a near riot, with Centocelle's residents staging a demonstration in the middle of a major highway.

"I would kill them all," said Virginia Cristell, a mother in her 40s. "Send them to the country – or send them somewhere. They are dirty and there are lots of problems with burglary and thieving. They make toxic smoke."

Soon her second wish will come true. Rome's new Right-wing mayor, Gianni Alemanno, promised the middle-class troublemakers that if they gave up their road protest he would get rid of the camp.

For the inhabitants of Casalino 900, the bulldozers will be another of life's frequent disasters. Afterwards they will scavenge what possessions they can and move off to some other patch of unoccupied land.

The camp has been sealed off by police, but The Sunday Telegraph found a hole in the fence. Inside we found dislike of Italy and fear of the future. But the teenage mothers suckling infants have grown up in Rome and most speak only Italian. One camp resident, Najo Adzovic, 37, said he had deserted the Federal Yugoslav Army and fled to Italy when he was ordered to slaughter 15 Muslims during the Balkan wars. "I don't like the police outside our camp or the military presence on our streets," he said. "There is some petty crime committed by gipsies because our people are poor, but we are not all criminals."

The fingerprint policy that has them so worried – and fearful that the Government is trying to drive them out of Italy – has been drawn up by the junior party in Mr Berlusconi's coalition, Alleanza Nationale. Until it reinvented itself in the 1990s, it was a neo-fascist party.

Marco Marsilio, a member of Italy's lower house of parliament, is an amiable young politician who made an articulate case for fingerprinting. He said it was to help protect gipsy children who he insisted were bought and sold as beggars; critics claim he is nothing but a myth peddler.

"The Leftists aren't able to understand this fear of crime because they have an ideological prejudice against law and order," said Mr Marsilio. His colleague, Alessandro Cochi, laughed off a 1930s-style propaganda poster in his office of a wild-eyed man giving a stiff-arm salute; he was not a fascist, he said, nor was Italy suffering a fascist wave.

That, however, is not the view of Goffredo Bezzecchi, 69, an Italian gipsy who came close to death after Italian Fascists tried to send his family to the death camps. They escaped before they could be deported. Mr Bezzecchi, who was fingerprinted at his home near Milan last month, feels history is at risk of repeating itself. "These things were done in the Fascist days when gipsies were killed or sent to concentration camps," he said. "The politicians should remember that we are human, not garbage."

for link to article click here

Monday, August 4, 2008

Has Italy Gone Mad? 3,000 soldiers deployed for crackdown on illegal immigration and crime


detail of photo from the London Independent/Reuters, click here for link



"The mayor of
Taormina, Sicily asks "have we gone mad? ... the last murder in Taormina was committed in the 1960s." the Guardian

There are already soldiers in Rome, Milan, Palermo, and Naples, with suggestions that troops will also be sent to smaller towns in Sicily.

What justifies 3,000 soldiers patrolling the streets of Italy? The recent decision to fingerprint all the Roma (Gypsy) children in Italy is now being followed by a more forceful position of a military presence.

When has there been a time in recent western history that soldiers have patrolled the streets of a city arresting undocumented immigrants?

click here for link to Guardian video
---

Italian soldiers on the streets of Rome
The Guardian - London
August 4, 2008


Hundreds of soldiers have been patrolling the streets of Italian cities in a crackdown on street crime and illegal immigration...

In Rome, some 400 troops were deployed at underground and overland rail stations and at a centre housing immigrants.

...Soldiers were also deployed in Naples, Bologna and Palermo, while further troops were stationed at immigration centres to prevent escapes.

The defence ministry announced the further deployment of soldiers over coming days, reaching a total of 3,000.

In the most controversial part of the exercise, about 1,000 troops will be sent on patrol alongside the police in large Italian cities such as Rome, Milan, Naples and Turin. The move has prompted critics to warn of the militarisation of the cities....


for link to complete Guardian article click here



ANSA English Media Service
August 4, 2008 Monday 2:44 PM CET

TROOPS TAKE TO STREETS IN ITALIAN CITIES

Rome

The scheme has come under heavy fire from the centre-left opposition, who say the deployment is a stunt to meet an alleged crime and immigration emergency which is not borne out by statistics. They also predict it will backfire by scaring tourists off while doing little to deter criminals. But La Russa defended the plan, reiterating that only ''vandals, rapists and those who commit theft and robbery'' have anything to fear from the presence of the soldiers. ''These men have no intention of striking terror in any normal citizen - only the criminals,'' he said. ''Ask those who live in zones at risk, ask those who live near Milan's central station where there have been nine rapes in just a few weeks whether we are responding to the requests of the citizens,'' he added.

In Rome, which with over 1,000 troops will have the largest contingent of armed forces, around 400 soldiers went on duty on Monday at suburban metro stations and sensitive sites. ''As you can see, there are no soldiers patrolling the historic centre, but only at sites such as embassies, at stations and at the immigration holding centre on the outskirts of the city - in other words, in places where they will not influence the daily life of residents,'' said Rome Mayor Gianni Alemanno, who has pledged to make sure the capital will not look like a city under siege. Alemanno said last week that he would not allow mixed street patrols of troops and police in the historic centre in a bid to keep the city's tourist-friendly image.

Meanwhile, a mixed patrol at the suburban metro station of Anagnina on Monday nabbed a Romanian pickpocket just a few hours after going on duty after an elderly woman had her wallet stolen.

TROOPS SPREAD ACROSS THE COUNTRY. The troops who will guard embassies, government buildings, immigration holding centres and other sensitive sites have been placed at the disposal of 16 mayors in cities ranging from Agrigento, Siracusa, Bari and Naples in the south to Turin and Milan in the north. This will free up police for regular crime fighting. The remaining 1,000 troops will patrol the streets of Bari, Catania, Milan, Naples, Padua, Palermo, Padua, Rome, Turin and Verona. Patrol troops are dressed in fatigues and will carry only small arms while those guarding sensitive sites have body armour and machine guns. City prefects will set rules of engagement at regular meetings on public order. Rome has the most soldiers on the streets, 195, followed by Milan with 170 and Naples with 150. The troops will be deployed for six months, but the government has said it may extend the scheme for a further six months if it proves successful. Troops from the army, navy, air force and paramilitary police are being deployed under the scheme.

from Lexis Nexis

for article on troops in Italy in the London Independent click here

Friday, May 2, 2008

Immigration, Fascism, and Berlusconi, Part I

Mussolini & Berlusconi. Image from berlusconite.blog.excite.it

A few years ago, a colleague of mine from Brazil told me about her theory regarding the rise of the new right. It seemed like a novel idea, and as time has passed I agree with her more and more. She said that globalization, technology and the diminishing boundaries between countries, ethnic and racial groups were making people really anxious - and the result was a resurgence of right wing ideology. The article below from the Guardian of London spells it out in scary detail -

-----

The triumph of the right?

Silvio Berlusconi has swept back into the presidential palace, the far right have won Rome's mayoral election - no wonder many Italians are worried their country is slipping back into its dark past. But are comparisons between the new right and Mussolini's fascists accurate, wonders Tobias Jones

The images of voters celebrating the recent election results in Italy were as eloquent as they were alarming: amid the sea of tricolour flags were hundreds of people raising their right arms to the skies, their fingers tense and straight. Everywhere you could see the old fascist salute. It is back in fashion and many are now wondering if the boot-boys themselves are back in power.

It is never easy to understand what is happening in Italian politics, but the past fortnight has been uncharacteristically clear. Silvio Berlusconi, the media magnate, has been swept back to power, winning convincing majorities in both upper and lower houses. This week there have been regional and mayoral elections. The story has been the same almost everywhere: overwhelming victories for the right. They even won the mayoral contest in Rome, where the left had assumed it had a divine right to rule.

Many in Italy are deeply worried by the results. Berlusconi's coalition, they say, wasn't an ordinary rightwing movement, but instead an assortment of far-right extremists and dangerous, deluded rabble-rousers. The Popolo della Libertà coalition, for example, includes Alessandra Mussolini, granddaughter of you-know-who. It includes the rump of the so-called post-fascist party, the National Alliance. Its leader, Gianfranco Fini, once said that Mussolini was the greatest statesman of the 20th century.

Fini has just been elected speaker of the lower house. One of his colleagues, Ignazio La Russa, grandly kissed Alessandra Mussolini as the election results came in, saying loudly, "I love you and I love your grandfather."

Perhaps most worrying of all is that the Northern League, led by Umberto Bossi, won 8% of the national vote. For a party that only wins votes in the north, it was an astonishing result. The Northern League is renowned for its inflammatory language. Its politicians frequently try to out-do their colleagues by displaying their xenophobic instincts: one recently suggested that foreigners should be forced to use separate train carriages; Bossi himself has, in the past, urged the Italian navy to use live rounds against the thousands of immigrants arriving on Italian shores.

The Northern League likes fighting talk. Its symbol, after all, is the Carroccio, the wheel of the war-chariot used in the middle ages. Bossi's comments since the election have not exactly reassured those worried that Italy is sliding back towards political extremism: he has said the rifles are still warm and that he has 300,000 martyrs ready if the leftwing tries to get in his way.

It may all be hot air, something never in short supply in Italian politics. It may be just bluster or qualunquismo ("whateverism" or meandering populism). But some of Europe's most authoritative voices have been warning of this trend for years. Serious academics and commentators such as Alexander Stille, Paul Ginsborg and David Lane have all written at length about the worrying trend towards a post-democratic world in which a sort of Italian Rupert Murdoch presides over a cabinet of far-right footsoldiers. The Nobel prize-winning playwright Dario Fo warned in Le Monde in 2002 that a new kind of fascism was on its way, and two years ago Martin Jacques wrote in these pages that Berlusconi "represents an incipient fascism, a fascism born of the conditions of our age rather than the interwar period. I choose my words carefully, without hyperbole."

In many ways, of course, talk of a return of fascism sounds precisely that: hyperbolic. Italy is a democratic country at the heart of the European Union. Leaders such as Fini have visited Israel and made great shows of renouncing any vestiges of antisemitism. Indeed, in his acceptance speech this week, he spoke of April 25, the day that marks Italy's liberation from fascism, as a date which "should be honoured, and a value which should be shared".

If you talk to many rightwing commentators in Italy, they are amused by the hysteria surrounding the rightwing election victory. Comparing 2008 to 1922 is, they say, "pathetic", "completely alarmist", "ridiculous". "Every time the left loses an election they say it's because the other side is undemocratic", laughed one rightwing journalist I spoke to.

But what has changed in recent years is the cultural backdrop to Italian politics. Rather than being demonised, Mussolini has been reconsidered and rehabilitated. The motivations behind that are many and some are even noble. In an attempt to heal the deep scars of Italy's subterranean civil war between right and left, many Italian historians have recognised that Italian fascists were fighting for their country just as much as the antifascists were, and they have recognised that both sides committed atrocities in the dirty warfare of 1943-45.

That subtle shift in the historiography (still hotly debated) allowed a sort of equivalenza to emerge: partisans and fascists were both legitimate combatants. Both sides came to be seen as Italian patriots caught up in a national tragedy. It was against that backdrop that Berlusconi was able to ally himself firmly with the descendants of the fascist tradition. The last time he was prime minister he pointedly avoided any April 25 celebrations, and in an infamous interview with the Spectator opined that Mussolini's habit of sending political prisoners to the border was like accompanying them to a holiday camp.

According to Richard Bosworth, author of Mussolini's Italy, "quite a cunning job has been done on the past. Fini has admitted that the era of fascism is over, he has apologised for antisemitism in 1938, apologised for wicked German bits of fascism, but there has been no apology for entering aggressive wars, for the killing of hundreds of thousands of Ethiopians."

In part, the rehabilitation was possible because the mainstream representations of fascism during the First Republic were so superficial. The archetypal images of a fascist in the postwar period were created by Bertolucci and Pasolini (in their films 1900 and Salò respectively). Fascists were perverted, murderous pederasts with Germanic names and overlords. Because antifascists used such caricatures, post-fascists had a very easy time reinventing themselves. But once the genie was out of the bottle, it became apparent just how many people had been rubbing the lamp. People who felt they had been politically neutered by the postwar alliance between Christian Democracy and communism "came out" and found there was a national resurgence of nostalgici. In the early 1990s, the MSI, the flame-carrier of fascism, renamed itself the National Alliance and suddenly found itself a party of government.

Now, 15 years after the rehabilitation began, it is very obvious that Mussolini's mystique still survives. You can buy endless magazines about him in the little newsagent-boutiques. In Predappio, his home town, there is a cottage industry selling Mussolini busts and fascist paraphernalia. The mausoleum there is a place of pilgrimage and there is always a queue of pilgrims. The graffiti adorning the walls of many Italian cities will be a Celtic (encircled) cross, the contemporary equivalent of the swastika. The new mayor of Rome allegedly wears one around his neck...

continued

for complete Guardian article click here

Immigration, Fascism, and Berlusconi, Part II


The Triumph of the Right?


continued

Sometimes, as you travel the country, you sense that many have itchy right arms that are just dying to go up unashamedly and hail il Duce. Paolo Di Canio, the former West Ham footballer, did just that while playing for Lazio a few years ago. In front of fans who are known for their rightwing sympathies, Di Canio gave the Roman salute. The crowd went wild, a scandal ensued, and Di Canio sort of excused himself by saying, "It's something that's stronger than I am."

If you travel an hour north of Rome you will come to a mountain called Monte Giano, near Antrodoco. There, at the summit, is a forest planted in the late 1930s. It is just reaching maturity and has recently been tidied up with public money. From the road below you can see the familiar DVX logo, the Latin name for Duce. The forest is an eloquent symbol of the country's enduring fascination with its long-lost leader.

A story that perfectly illustrates the continuum between Mussolini and the present emerged in Bari this month. For the 30th anniversary of the murder of Aldo Moro, the former prime minister who was killed by the Red Brigades, the rector of the university decided to rename it in his honour. But that would have meant cancelling the official name of the university which was still, on paper, Università Benito Mussolini. You might have thought that the academics would have preferred association with a devout Christian Democrat to the Fascist leader, but no, the Law Department voted against the change.

It remains, at time of writing, Università Benito Mussolini.

Beyond the rehabilitation of Mussolini, the other cultural shift which began in the 1990s was immigration. Unlike Britain, Italy had witnessed negligible immigration prior to 1990. It had almost no colonies and thus the new arrivals were almost entirely unfamiliar with the language and culture of the "mother country". Italy has found the unprecedented levels of immigration traumatic and bewildering, particularly because any kidnap, theft or murder by foreigners receives much more press coverage than a boring one by the locals. There is no doubt that many millions of Italians feel besieged in their own homeland and turn to the National Alliance and the Northern League as a bulwark against immigration. The electoral poster for the Northern League might be crude, but it touched a nerve. Using an image of a melancholic native American, the slogan went: "He let in the immigrants and now he lives on a reservation."

Even those who are sceptical about drawing a comparison with Mussolini recognise that Italy is now likely to see more authoritarian calls against immigrants and a greater flirtation with emblems of nationalism. The Rage and Pride, by the late Oriana Fallaci, is the sacred text of the anti-immigration movement, and the rhetoric against foreigners (or, more specifically, against extracomunitari, those outside the EU) is now relentless.

In that sense, Italy is no different to the Netherlands or Austria, where large swathes of the electorate have voted for parties which promise to put natives first. Where Italy is different is in having Berlusconi, who, like Mussolini, is a barrel-chested demagogue who enjoys boasting from balconies. And it is true that the last time Berlusconi was in power, there was an isolated outbreak of police brutality at the G8 at Genoa that turned many stomachs. It is telling that one of Berlusconi's former newspaper editors, Indro Montanelli, accused Berlusconi of using the manganello, the truncheon.

But while Berlusconi himself enjoys being compared to il Duce, in truth he is completely different. Mussolini's Italy was a bit like 1984; Berlusconi's is more Brave New World. He does not use a truncheon; he is more like a dispenser, through his TV channels and publishing empire, of ceaseless titillation and trivia. The ancient Romans used to say that the masses would be content as long as they had panem et circenses, bread and circuses. Berlusconi guarantees them the second. He provides the entertainment, he is the ringmaster of the teatrino, the "little theatre" that is Italian politics.

Against that backdrop, any weighty, considered political debate becomes impossible. Bosworth maintains that the superficial revisionism of fascism has happened because history has been reduced "to infotainment instead of a critical discipline". It has allowed "the more troubling side of the tyranny to be forgotten, meaning that only the fun bits, the dressage, remains". Dressage, of course, is one of Italy's favourite pastimes and is something fascism was rather good at.

In his 1946 preface to Brave New World, Huxley wrote: "A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned ... to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors, and schoolteachers." That is the sense that one gets in Italy today: a feeling that Berlusconi's television is a sort of electronic babysitter that keeps the populace quiet while he goes off to cut a deal in another room. Ominously, one of the favourite topics for his politicians is the rewriting of certain history books and syllabuses.

That is why Roger Griffin, author of Modernism and Fascism, believes Berlusconi to be in some ways the opposite of Mussolini. "Berlusconi," he says, "is an illiberal manipulator of democracy, but he needs a democracy to manipulate, whereas true fascism wants to replace liberal democracy with a new order. Berlusconi struts around like a spider in the middle of a gargantuan web of power networks. His is a sort of crypto-government, and historically has more parallels with the corruption of state power under [Giovanni] Giolitti between 1900 and 1922 than with Mussolini's regime."

There are, at least, reasons to hope that the resurgence of the far right in Italy is not as worrying as it might appear. One resides in the Italian national character. Just as Italian communism was light years away from the gulags and Stalinism, so Italian fascism was - say its defenders - light years away from the Nazism with which it is so often confused. Mussolini had been in power for 16 years before, under German pressure, he passed the Race Laws. Italians are so humane, say the sanguine, that they present any -ism with a human face.

There are, paradoxically, also political reasons for optimism. Berlusconi's government is very far from a one-party state. Funnily enough, the rightwingers he has gathered around him are mutually self-contradictory. The National Alliance is a nationalistic party draped in the tricolour. The Northern League, the other major force in Berlusconi's coalition, abhors the very notion of the Italian state. It constantly invokes, instead, the country of Padania and its green and white flag (Padus was the Latin name for the river Po and so Padania implies the north of the country from Turin to Venice, the very top of the Italian boot). Add to that the fact that, in the south, Berlusconi relied on the support of the Movement for Autonomies, a sort of coalition of devolutionists. It is all a far cry from the fatherland as symbolised by a fascis, a bundle of birch rods and an axe wrapped in a ribbon. If anything, Bossi is desperately trying to undo the ribbon and chuck the sticks asunder.

Many Italians think that foreigners getting uppity about a return of fascism are missing the point. Mussolini, they say, has been Disneyfied. It might not be very tasteful, but the cottage industry surrounding the il mascellone (Big Jaw) is just that. It is small fry. To equate the survival of the DVX Duce forest north of Rome with living fascism is as absurd as a foreigner seeing the club-wielding Cerne Abbas giant and assuming that all Brits were cavemen. Architecture from the Ventennio, Mussolini's two-decade rule, is everywhere. It is simply a part of the topography, nothing more.

There was a rather beautiful cartoon published in the leftwing Liberazione newspaper a few days ago. It showed a woman draped in a tricolour walking around a ring. "Italy goes right" said the punchline, implying that Italy goes right so regularly that it actually just goes round in circles. It is not very optimistic, but it might be the best image of what is happening today in Italy.

· Tobias Jones is the author of The Dark Heart of Italy and of Utopian Dreams, both published by Faber & Faber.

for complete Guardian article click here

Friday, April 4, 2008

Portable Professions

Did you know they need acupuncturists in Australia?

-----
Trade winds
Andrea Wren
The Guardian - London
Saturday April 5 2008

You want to make a change and build a new life abroad - but do you have the skills demanded by your chosen country? Andrea Wren looks into the careers that travel well.
What do piano tuners, glass blowers and acupuncturists have in common? They're all jobs that feature on the list of "in-demand" professions in Australia, whose points-based immigration system the UK is about to adopt. Yes, the biochemists, engineers and other more conventional professions you'd expect are there too. But among the 200,000 Britons who emigrate each year are many who have won their visas and permits in unusual occupations.

Like private investigator Dave Turner, managing director of legal agency The Parklane Partnership. In the UK, the firm's office is managed by his son, Colin, but Turner himself works in Bulgaria, where he has recently bought a house with his wife. Turner's work is definitely not run-of-the-mill, as his normal duties may include undertaking commercial investigations, tracking down absconding debtors, and seeking missing heirs to hefty inheritance cheques.

"A lot of our work involves tracing assets and checking whether people have what cash they say they have, or whether they have more stashed away in the country. Bulgaria is a cheap country to come to and hide money, and we investigate what people have or haven't got under instruction from solicitors, often in pre-sue situations."

Turner hadn't realised when embarking upon his search for pastures new that Bulgaria was going to be the place he settled on - it was, he says, last on his list- but after visiting, he saw the country's potential.

"Bulgaria is not only open for good investment, but for people who want to live and work here. The country is one in which we find UK money getting 'lost' by people who say they don't have any. As a business, we can offer a full European investigation service from here, which few other agents can do."

Now to Honduras and Cornwall College horticultural student Dan Kerins. If he is successful with a proposal he has made to Operation Wallacea - an organisation leading scientific conservation expeditions - Kerins will soon be helping the Hondurans grow fairtrade orchids and earning a new living.

"I had applied for a three-month job as habitat surveyor in Honduras with Operation Wallacea and while I was working on that, I got to know more about the lives of the locals," Kerins says. "Currently, they earn their income through growing vegetables, which involves destruction of the forest, so I came up with the concept of raising fairtrade orchids, which can be grown in sustainable ways."

If successful, the project Kerins has proposed will involve researching ways of helping the Honduran people to manage a sustainable economy through the orchid growth. He has received some positive feedback from Operation Wallacea, but now he just has to wait for approval and the "green light" on his proposal. If it goes ahead, though, he will only be able to work in the country for three months at a time, due to the visa. But he says he will be able to leave the country at the end of each stay to re-enter a few days later on a new visa.

Even if the fit between your job and your preferred destination is not an easy one, determined people can find a way. Music producer John Brough had initially been told there was little point in attempting a visa application to Australia, but he and his wife have just lodged an emigration application through Visa Unit, a migration service that supports and advises people through the application process.

"I went to a lot of agents and some didn't even consider me, but I have worked with the likes of U2, Jamie Cullum and Queen, so I found an agent willing to look around the problem," says Brough. "I have applied specifically for a Distinguished Skills Visa, which is aimed at people whose skills or qualifications are not on the primary occupation list but who could still contribute something to the country."

It may be 18 months before Brough finds out whether he and his wife are being granted the visa, and then admission is subject to passing medical examination. If all goes well, the visa will be valid for five years at a time.

However, even if your occupation is "on the list", other more formal qualifications may be needed too. In Australia, for example, the law has recently changed on this, explains John Mumford, managing director of Visa Unit.

"Last year the Australian government changed the points system for entry and Trades Recognition Australia changed the skills assessment process for trades people wishing to migrate into the country," says Mumford. "A new 'trade skills assessment' requires certain trade occupations to have a technical interview and practical assessment."

Nick Clayton, author of the Guardian Guide to Working Abroad, says there are other considerations. "Before you pack your bags, make sure that you have all the paperwork necessary to take up employment. In countries that have a federal system of government you may find that there is another set of local hoops to go through before you can actually take up a job, even after you've passed through national immigration.

"Australia, for example, is notorious for allowing skilled workers in, then not allowing them to work until they have completed onerous state tests and sometimes spent months in a local college to prove their qualifications."

· nextstepaustralia.com, expo-canada.com, working-abroad.net



for link to Guardian article click the title of this post

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Polleros in Puebla, Mexico

----

Puebla: aseguran a 18 indocumentados que viajaban en camión de redilas

El grupo estaba conformado por 15 hombres y tres mujeres provenientes de El Salvador y Guatemala.

Notimex / La Jornada On Line
Publicado: 06/03/2008 15:20

Puebla, Pue. La Procuraduría General de Justicia de Puebla dio a conocer que en un operativo realizado esta madrugada fueron detenidos 18 indocumentados de origen centroamericano, así como dos presuntos polleros.

Los detenidos viajaban a bordo de un camión de redilas que supuestamente trasladaba mercancía consistente en sarapes y cobertores.

El grupo estaba conformado por 15 hombres y tres mujeres, cuyas edades oscilan entre 18 y 45 años, y provienen de El Salvador y Guatemala.

Los indocumentados fueron encontrados en el fondo del camión de redilas marca Ford, color blanco, con placas de circulación WE-92907 del estado de Tamaulipas, el cual fue revisado en el cruce de la avenida Fidel Velásquez y el bulevar Cadete Vicente Suárez.

Ahí, el conductor de la unidad, Arturo León Cano, de 33 años, y su acompañante, José Rubén Canto Morales, de 28 años, manifestaron que ayer miércoles recogieron a los indocumentados en la población de Atlacomulco.

La dependencia explicó que, de acuerdo con las declaraciones de los detenidos, un sujeto apodado El Chucho les pagó para que trasladaran al grupo a la ciudad de Guadalajara, Jalisco, en su ruta hacia Estados Unidos.

Por su parte, los centroamericanos manifestaron que desde hace 10 días salieron de su respectivo lugar de origen, con rumbo a territorio mexicano, para ser llevados de manera ilegal a Estados Unidos y que iban a pagar entre seis mil y seis mil 500 dólares


for link to Jornada article, click the title of this post

Confidential Study Suggests Tougher Words For Dems On Immigration



BIO
Confidential Study Suggests Tougher Words For Dems On Immigration

HuffingtonPost.com | Sam Stein | February 29, 2008 10:10 AM



Democrats may soon be taking a tougher public position on immigration, according to a confidential study put together by key think tanks close to the party leadership.

The study urges Democrats to adopt more rigid rhetoric when discussing immigration by encouraging office-holders to emphasize "requiring immigrants to become legal" rather than stressing border enforcement and the opening of a path to legalization for the undocumented already here.

Implicit in the report is the notion that Democrats can win wider public support for immigration reform by framing the issue in harsher-sound verbiage and, perhaps, policy.

This message places the focus where voters want it, on what's best for the United States, not what we can/should do for illegal immigrants.

Titled "Winning The Immigration Debate," the study was put together by the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform and the Center for American Progress. Its findings, which have been sent to Capitol Hill and have been part of briefing sessions in both the House and the Senate, are based off of polling conducted by Peter Hart Research Associates.

Taken as a whole, the report presents a new prism through which the Democrats should approach the immigration debate. "It is unacceptable to have 12 million people in our country who are outside the system," it reads. "We must require illegal immigrants to become legal, and reform the laws so this can happen."

Polling for the study revealed that a larger swath of the public was supportive of "requiring" undocumented immigrants already in the country to normalize their status than there was for only offering them legalization as an option. In addition, the report pushes Democrats to argue that immigrants should be required to pay taxes, learn English, and pass criminal background checks to remain in the country. Those who have a criminal record should be deported. All of these policies were included in last year's immigration reform compromise legislation, which ultimately failed.

"Our view is that this argument threads the needle in favor of comprehensive reform in the most effective way," Jen Palmieri, communications chief for the Center for American Progress, told the Huffington Post.

Added Cecilia Muñoz, senior vice president of policy at the National Council of La Raza and chair of the board at CCIR: "We are not asking people to be for legalization out of altruism. It is perfectly okay for them to be for legalization because that is what fixes the problem... Rather than educate [the public], you can convince them to do the right thing if you call it a requirement as opposed to an effort."

And yet, for some, the new frame represents exactly the wrong direction that the Democrats should be taking, reinforcing the notion that immigrants were problematic and "the offenders." (.....More)

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Steve Anderson's Real Immigration Story

Right Wing Hypocrosy - Illegal Immigration
Huffington Post
by Steve Anderson
Posted January 13, 2008
| 10:49 PM (EST)

There, I've said it. But it's not quite the problem some make it out to be:

According to a New York Times article on April 5, 2005, "...the estimated seven million or so illegal immigrant workers in the United States are now providing the system with a subsidy of as much as $7 billion a year....Moreover, the money paid by illegal immigrants and their employers is factored into all the Social Security Administration's projections."

However, since illegal immigrant workers are here illegally, and ostensibly presented fake ID to the US employer, they will never collect Social Security benefits. "For illegal immigrants, Social Security numbers are simply a tool needed to work on this side of the border. Retirement does not enter the picture," reports the New York Times.

The Social Security Administration remains solvent in large part due to deductions taken from the paychecks of illegal immigrant workers, yet Social Security will never pay benefits to those workers. The workers pay in, but they never receive back.

Wouldn't the federal government detect fake Social Security numbers? According to that April 6, 2005 New York Times article, "Starting in the late 1980s, the social Security Administration received a flood of W-2 earnings reports with incorrect---sometimes simply fictitious---Social Security numbers. It stashed them in what it calls the 'earnings suspense file' in the hope that someday it would figure out whom they belonged to.

The file has been mushrooming ever since: $189 billion worth of wages ended up recorded in the suspense file over the 1990s, two and a half times the amount of the 1980s.


But that's not important right now. Look, a government run solely by business interests will never, ever, do anything to control immigration. Want proof of this, as well as proof of Republican hypocrisy? Here it is:
Some conservatives are labeling U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison a traitor after she slipped an amendment into the federal budget bill passed last month that some say effectively kills the border fence.
The conservative radio world and blogosphere has been buzzing with outcry that the amendment -- which removed the requirement under the Secure Fence Act for a double-layered fence and gave Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff flexibility in its placement -- did just that.

Nationally syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin decried the "incredible shrinking border fence." Others called Hutchison "Benedict Arnold" and said the Texas Republican used the "cover of Christmas" to ram the measure through.


Hutchison
, while a real conservative, isn't completely insane. She is, however, solidly in the pocket of business, especially oil companies. She responds:
"Border patrol agents reported that coyotes and drug-runners were altering their routes as fencing was deployed, so the amendment gives our agents discretion to locate the fence where necessary to achieve operational control of our border," she said.

Customs and Border Protection said it is committed to building the fence and this week announced plans to take legal action against 102 border landowners, including 71 in Texas who were not letting federal workers on their land to survey the areas.


Wait a minute. Who are the 71 landowners who refuse to let surveyors onto their land? Are they bleeding-hear libs, who welcome illegals with open arms?
Unlike other border states, much of the land on the Texas border is privately owned.

Local business leaders and politicians were incensed to learn in May that a map was already circulating showing a fence that could cut farmers from water, wildlife from habitat and cities from the river.

Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Laredo, said Hutchison wrote a good amendment that will allow environmental and property right concerns in border communities to be considered.

"It gives flexibility to the secretary to look at alternative means," he said.

Texas landowners just see themselves in the middle.

In Granjeno, residents say they have not gotten any threatening letters and are hopeful the government has decided not to cut through their town.

Landowner Eloisa Garcia Tamez, a professor at the University of Texas at Brownsville, said she'll fight to the end to keep the government off the last of her ancestors' 1767 land grant.


No, it's folks, some of whom might be truly conservative, who think, somewhat foolishly, that they actually have control over their own land. And that according to the Constitution's 5th Amendment:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Probably communists or something. After all, a true conservative would gladly give up all their rights to support Fearless Leader's Global War on Whoever He Says We're Fighting Today.

Seriously, unless the fence is the equal to China's Great Wall, it's stopping no one. If someone is willing to hike hundreds of miles to the border, they'll likely hike 10 or 20 miles around the small piece of fence blocking their path:

Fence supporters, meanwhile, feel the Department of Homeland Security has gradually been reneging on the plan, with initial plans for 854 miles of double-layered fencing in five locations whittled to 370 miles of what may be single-layered fencing, Kasper said.

Almost two years after the bill passed, only 5.2 miles more of double-layer fence has been built, in Arizona, with 70 more miles single-layered, he said.


Indeed. And the silliness of the whole fence movement is like trying to stop kids from grabbing candy from a burst piñata; as long as it's there, they'll dive and grab for it:
According to Catholic priest Dr. Daniel Groody, Associate Professor at University of Notre Dame and a director of the university's Center for Latino Studies, "If they make it across the border, most immigrants will work at low-paying jobs that no one except the most desperate wants. They will de-bone chicken in poultry plants, pick crops in fields and build houses in construction.

As one person in Arizona noted, 'It looks like entering the US through the desert as undocumented immigrants is some kind of employment screening test administered by the US government for the hospitality, construction and recreation industries.'

Willing to work at the most dangerous jobs, an immigrant a day will also die in the work place, even while for others the work place has become safer over the last decade."

And undocumented workers, grateful for any job, will work for lower wages and minimal or no benefits, therefore enabling employers to make higher business profits.

Cheaper labor costs and lesser working conditions equal greater profits for business owners.


How has the GWBush administration taken Big Business on regarding illegal hiring?
In 1999, under President Bill Clinton, the US government collected $3.69 million in fines from 890 companies for employing undocumented workers. In 2004, under President George Bush, the federal government collected $188,500 from 64 companies for such illegal employment practices. And in 2004, the Bush Administration levied NO fines for US companies employing undocumented workers.

And this:
The Bush administration, which is vowing to crack down on U.S. companies that hire illegal workers, virtually abandoned such employer sanctions before it began pushing to overhaul U.S. immigration laws last year, government statistics show.

Between 1999 and 2003, work-site enforcement operations were scaled back 95 percent by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, which subsequently was merged into the Homeland Security Department. The number of employers prosecuted for unlawfully employing immigrants dropped from 182 in 1999 to four in 2003, and fines collected declined from $3.6 million to $212,000, according to federal statistics.

In 1999, the United States initiated fines against 417 companies. In 2004, it issued fine notices to three.


In other words, total and complete hypocrisy, and capitulation to the wishes of big business. Perhaps those in the investor class who feel immigration is a problem should take a look at their portfolios:
In March 2005, Wal-Mart, a company with $285 billion in annual sales. was fined $11 million for having untold hundreds of illegal immigrants nationwide clean its stores.

"The federal government boasts it's the largest of its kind. But for Wal-Mart, it amounts to a rounding error---and no admittance of wrongdoing since it claims it didn't know its contractors hired the illegals" wrote the Christian Science Monitor on March 28, 2005.


Who is invested in Wal-mart? Lots of people:


And inside the Republican Party, are they really true believers?

Major work-site crackdowns have run into trouble in the past. A spring 1998 sweep that targeted the Vidalia onion harvest in Georgia, and Operation Vanguard, a 1999 clampdown on meatpacking plants in Nebraska, Iowa and South Dakota, provide case studies of how the government fared when confronted by a coalition that included low-wage immigrant workers and the industries that hire them, analysts said.

The Georgia raids netted 4,034 illegal immigrants, prompting other unauthorized workers to stay home. As the $90 million onion crop sat in the field, farmers "started screaming to their local representatives," said Bart Szafnicki, INS assistant district director for investigations in Atlanta from 1991 to 2001.

Georgia's two senators and three of its House members, led by then-Sen. Paul Coverdell (R) and Rep. Jack Kingston (R), complained in a letter to Washington that the INS did not understand the needs of America's farmers. The raids stopped.


Right. Not in my back yard.


http://search.huffingtonpost.com/search/?sp_a=sp100395aa&sp_k=&sp_p=all&sp_f=ISO-8859-1&sp_q=arlo+guthrie

Friday, December 28, 2007

Stomping on the DREAM ACT: Power by Temper Tantrum


The Houston Chronicle blog "Texas on the Potomac" has a post about people's attitude towards immigration. Even though the issue is plastered all over CNN and other major news outlets, a new George Washington University Battleground Poll found:

"no surge in public concern about immigration. Indeed, the number of people concerned about immigration remained statistically unchanged -- rising from 10 percent to 11 percent -- from July to December [2007]."

If you listen to Romney and certain other candidates you would think this poll is all wrong. However, George Washington University is not Berkeley and is not anywhere close to the most liberal place in the U.S. - Poll results from GWU should be more credible to your average Republican.

If the GWU poll is correct - and I have every confidence that it is - only 11% of the U.S. voters believe immigration is the #1 problem in this country. What a surprise. Listening to Lou Dobbs you would think that immigration is everybody's obsession. If it is only 11% that means a small percentage of voters were those who inundated the Senate during the Comprehensive Immigration Reform debate. Unfortunately, Senators tallied up the number of calls, not how many people were calling... During the debate (which I watched and taped) a number of senators stated that the public had spoken - the fax machines and phones were burning up from so many Americans showing their anti-immigration opinions. I guess they were wrong.

It is sad to think that only a few people who can scream very loud kept the DREAM ACT from being passed. Of course it took a number of senators who lacked courage to accomplish this.

-----
Texas on the Potomac
Houston Chronicle
December 28 2007

Immigration has been the hottest issue on the presidential campaign trail in frigid Iowa, as Republicans try to outmuscle each other in their attempts to portray themselves as the toughest foes of illegal immigration.

Do voters share the candidates' passion for the issue?

The answer, according to a new George Washington University Battleground Poll, the answer is not exactly. But public attitudes are far more complex than the simplistic campaign rhetoric about sealing the borders or deporting people illegally in the U.S.

When voters are asked to identify the number one problem facing this country, 11 percent named immigration, according to a poll of 1,013 likely voters surveyed by Lake Research Partners and the Tarrance Group. Immigration placed third behind the economy and the Iraq war.

The poll finds no surge in public concern about immigration. Indeed, the number of people concerned about immigration remained statistically unchanged -- rising from 10 percent to 11 percent -- from July to December.

While immigration remained a major issue to one-tenth of the electorate, the economy and taxes doubled in importance as the Iraq war dropped as top issue from 23 percent to 13 percent.

So why all the talk in the GOP primary?

The answer: angry men. Twenty-two percent of Republican men consider immigration their top national issue. And since men are more likely than women to attend GOP primaries and caucuses, the top issue of Republican men must remain on the radar screen of would-be Republican nominees.

Democratic pollster Celinda Lake said that in an "anxiety economy," immigration could become an important issue to Americans who fear losing their jobs to foreign competition. "You do see some blue-collar voters expressing more concern about immigration," she said.

However, other voting blocs are far less interested in immigration. Only 5 percent of Democrats, 9 percent of independents and 12 percent of Republican women show concern about immigration.

Republicans also must weigh the political cost of alienating Hispanic voters, the fastest-growing demographic group in the country.

In 2006, GOP candidates across the U.S. tried to capitalize on illegal immigration but saw their share of the Latino vote cut in half. "We did poorly in handling the immigration in an effective way and that hurt us among Hispanic voters," said Republican pollster Brian Nienaber of the Tarrance Group.

If his party doesn't change its tone, there could be "angry recriminations" in 2008, Nienaber added. "I don't know if that's going to be the best thing for us in courting the Hispanic vote this fall."

Posted by Richard Dunham at December 28, 2007 12:01 AM


http://blogs.chron.com/txpotomac/2007/12/vox_populi_not_everybody_is_fi.html
cartoon: http://www.clipartof.com/images/clipart/thumbnail2/2651_angry_person_stomping_up_and_down_on_a_package.jpg