Showing posts with label Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

What are people really thinking about immigration reform?

If the poll cited by today's LA Times is accurate, in California many people think its time for immigration reform that allows people who have been here a number of years to regularize their immigration status.

This could very well be true (although many say you should never believe a poll).  The people who have told me that they are against immigration reform are those that feel they paid a lot for what they have and that others should do this too.  The only thing I can say to this is that the folks who want all the undocumented people to go back to their home countries don't really know what it is to be hungry.

-------

Grass-roots immigration reform

  • Tim Rutten - Los Angeles Times
  • Tim Rutten
  • Nearly half of California's likely voters have a favorable view of immigrants, including those without papers.
"when it comes to immigration reform. As a Times/USC poll reported Sunday, nearly half of California's likely voters have a favorable view of immigrants, including those without papers. Fully 59% said that undocumented immigrants who have lived and worked here for at least two years should be allowed to remain. That's particularly significant because California is home to more immigrants than any other state."

"On Monday, during an interview with the popular Spanish-language radio personality Eddie "Piolin" Sotelo, Obama blamed Republicans for blocking comprehensive immigration reform. That's partly true. When congressional Republicans recently frustrated passage of the so-called DREAM Act, which would have provided a path to citizenship for some undocumented young people who attend college or serve in the armed forces, pollsters measured a steep increase in the enthusiasm of likely Latino voters.

It's also true, though, that this administration's enforcement of our broken immigration laws has been nothing short of draconian. This month, Obama's Homeland Security secretary,
Janet Napolitano, proudly announced that we deported a record number of people in the last fiscal year — some 1,080 men and women a day, or nearly 393,000 in all. Less than half of those people will have committed any crime other than being here without papers." more

Monday, December 14, 2009

Congress & Immigration Reform - on the 17th

Local groups are organizing to support Comprehensive Immigration Reform that will be presented by Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Illinois) on Thurs. Dec. 17.


PLEASE COME SUPPORT!!!

Tomorrow December 15th 2009 Immigration reform is being introduced by Congressman Luis Gutierrez and the Hispanic Caucus. We need to do an action this week to show that we will support and Immigration initiative and will push for comprehensive immigration reform Tor this reason:

On Thursday December 17, 2009 at 11:00a.m. community leaders and leaders of faith are calling for a mobilization at the Mickey Leland Federal Building to make the Houston's voice heard. We will say, "No more" No more raids, No more families being split, No more children without a secure future, No more time, The time for immigration reform is now!

Date:
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Time:
11:00am - 1:00pm

Location:
1919 Smith St. Houston, TX 77002

Cesar Espinosa

America Para Todos
Executive Director
6601 Hillcroft #125
Houston, TX 77081
Phone: (713)271-9703
Fax: (713)271-9704
E-mail:
americaptodos88@yahoo.com
Web:
www.americaparatodos.org

FIEL
President
PO Box 2765
Cypress, TX 77410-2765
Phone: (281)225-4037
Fax: (281)225-4037
E-mail:
fiel_houston@hotmail.com
Web:
www.myspace.com/fiel_2007

Cell and texts: (713)459-8923

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Immigration Reform in Congress in 2010?

Having waited patiently in the wings, Immigration advocates in Chicago and elsewhere are anxious to take President Barack Obama at his word when he said Immigration reform would soon follow health care on the nation's agenda.

With several initiatives gearing up to put the issue before Congress in the new year, advocates are all too aware they haven't had much cause for celebration in recent years.

Their last big push in
Washington, in 2007, failed to settle the status of the nation's estimated 11.9 million undocumented immigrants.

Deportations have continued, with nearly 370,000 immigrants detained during the fiscal year that ended in October.

That's more than twice the number in 1999, according to a report last week by Transactional Records Clearing House at Syracuse University.

In Chicago, frustration has been heightened by tougher local enforcement measures, such as a new city ordinance that, starting Jan. 1, will allow police to impound the cars of unlicensed drivers. Many of them turn out to be undocumented immigrants.

On the street, the emotions behind the issue can be seen in the growing campaign on behalf of Rigo Padilla, an undocumented college student ordered out of the country by Dec. 16.

Last week, 200 people rallied through downtown, and some demonstrators have threatened civil disobedience if Padilla isn't allowed to stay.

Groups seeking more aggressive
Immigration-law enforcement, meanwhile, see cases like Padilla's as reasons to crack down further.

His illegal status was discovered when he was arrested for drinking and driving, and he has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor DUI charge.

In hopes of finding a resolution, Congress is again talking about an
Immigration overhaul early next year.

One House bill, sponsored by U.S. Rep.
Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., is expected this month, and another Senate bill is expected in January.

Following up on Obama's vow to address the issue when he met with activists at the
White House earlier this year, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said last month the administration envisions a "three-legged stool" that includes better border enforcement, more efficient legal Immigration and "a tough and fair" pathway to legalization that will require the undocumented to learn English and pay fines, among other things. link

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Are the TEA Party People Reacting to Upcoming Immigration Reform?

Interesting that so many TEA Party anti-immigration protests are happening the same day the NYT publishes an article on upcoming Comprehensive Immigration Reform (and two days after Napolitano's speech on the upcoming policy move)
-
November 14, 2009

White House Plan on Immigration Includes Legal Status

The Obama administration will insist on measures to give legal status to an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants as it pushes early next year for legislation to overhaul the immigration system, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said on Friday.

In her first major speech on the overhaul, Ms. Napolitano dispelled any suggestion that the administration — with health care, energy and other major issues crowding its agenda — would postpone the most contentious piece of immigration legislation until after midterm elections next November.

Laying out the administration’s bottom line, Ms. Napolitano said officials would argue for a “three-legged stool” that includes tougher enforcement laws against illegal immigrants and employers who hire them and a streamlined system for legal immigration, as well as a “tough and fair pathway to earned legal status.”...link to complete NYT article

Friday, November 13, 2009

Planning Immigration Reform



Click here for link to video of Napolitano's speech

--

National Security

Napolitano forecasts immigration overhaul in 2010

Washington Post - Updated 3:08 p.m.
By Spencer S. Hsu
The Obama administration expects Congress to begin moving to overhaul the nation's immigration laws early next year, while improved border security and a drop in migration caused by the economic downturn make passage "far more attainable" than in 2007, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Friday.

"When Congress is ready to act, we will be ready to support them," said Napolitano, President Obama's "point-person" on immigration policy issues. "The first part of 2010, we will see legislation beginning to move," she said.

Napolitano's speech, delivered Friday morning at the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress, was aimed at Latino advocates who have bridled at her rhetorical emphasis on enforcement in her first 10 months in office, and expressed skepticism that Obama would fulfill a campaign pledge to push for a "comprehensive" package.

Napolitano reaffirmed Obama's support for a "tough but fair" path for legal status for an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants, and improved flows for immigrant families and workers.

"We will never have fully effective law enforcement or national security as long as so many millions remain in the shadows," Napolitano said.

At the same time, Napolitano sought to reframe the debate from past years, saying lawmakers' earlier demands that the government improve "enforcement first" have been met, and arguing that the time to work on immigration issues is when a sluggish economy is dampening illegal migration, not when rapid job growth is fueling it.

In recent years, the U.S. government has erected more than 600 miles of fencing and pedestrian barriers on the 2,000 mile border with Mexico, and more than doubled the ranks of the U.S. Border Patrol, to 20,000 officers, Napolitano said. Meanwhile, due to a shrinking job market and increased enforcement, Border Patrol arrests last year were less than half the 2005 level of 1.2 million.

"These are major differences that should change the immigration conversation ... We have gotten Congress' message," Napolitano said. "Trust me: I know a major shift when I see one, and what I have seen makes reform far more attainable this time around."

The address was coordinated with the White House as it prepares for upcoming battles after health care legislation. It contained few new specifics, although Napolitano for the first time addressed many of the principles that Senate Democrats and her predecessors in the Bush administration previously embraced, such as toughening enforcement against smugglers and unscrupulous employers, streamlining visa policies, and requiring illegal immigrants to register, pay fines, pass criminal background checks, pay taxes and learn English.

Republican critics say changing laws to allow more foreign-born workers is foolhardy at a time when U.S. unemployment is nearing 10 percent.

"It is ironic that a poor economy is their justification for amnesty," said Rep. Lamar Smith, (R-Tex.), ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee. "How can they claim that enforcement is "done" when there are more than 400 open miles of border with Mexico, hundreds of thousands of criminal and fugitive aliens and millions of illegal immigrants taking American jobs?"

Immigrant advocates said they were pleased the administration is approaching "the moment of truth" for a debate, but said they were still watching to see it and Congress commit real political capital. Congressional watchers also say the issue faces a crowded calender in the Senate, which is set to take up health care and climate legislation, before election-season politics take precedence by mid-year.

"The president and his administration need to make it clear that immigration reform is a priority and must be acted upon during this Congress," said John Wester, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and bishop of the diocese of Salt Lake City. "Hopefully this is the beginning of a campaign by the administration to get legislation moving."

Posted at 2:45 PM ET on Nov 13, 2009

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Speaking of Obama and Immigration Reform

From the Immigration Policy Center
August 21, 2009

For Immediate Release

President Obama Reaffirms Commitment to Immigration Reform

August 20, 2009

Washington, D.C. - Today, President Obama once more reaffirmed his commitment to comprehensive immigration reform, pledging that "we can get this done." The President and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Napolitano met with immigrant advocates, faith leaders, labor, business, and law enforcement officials to listen to concerns and discuss the next steps forward. Mary Giovagnoli, Director the Immigration Policy Center, attended the White House meeting and issued this statement:

"Today's White House meeting demonstrated a genuine commitment to engage in a dialogue that will lead to a smart and workable legislative package. Secretary Napolitano strongly supported the need to bring all undocumented immigrants out of the shadows, streamline naturalization procedures, improve immigration processes that allow immigrants to live and work legally in the U.S., and create smart immigration enforcement mechanisms. Both the President and Secretary Napolitano acknowledged the importance of immigration to our country as well as the need to create a sustainable legal immigration system for the 21st century. We must all remain committed to following through on the dialogue that began today."

Friday, June 5, 2009

Nice words in Egypt; Nasty Behavior in Washington


Why is Obama confusing us?  He says all (or most) of the right things.  He wants the world to come together and heal the illness that took us over during the Bush Administration.  

Yet he has not reigned in the Department of Homeland Security.  People are still getting detained, 287G is very alive, E-Verify is spreading its tentacles, and Sheriff Joe continues his pitiless task all the while smiling at the cameras.

The meetings and rallies around the country are encouraging.  But what we really need is some real sign from the White House.

"Hope and Worry on Immigration," New York Times, June 4, 2009

Friday, May 8, 2009

Friday, May 1, 2009

Video of Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on Immigration from April 30

Click HERE for the link to the April 30 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on immigration.  This video is over 3 hours long, however, it is worth watching if you want to know what the Congress is considering in relation to changing immigration policy.

Photo of Senator Charles Schumer, Chair of Senate Judiciary Subcommittee

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Senate Committee Hearing on Immigration, April 30

Important committee hearing on Comprehensive Immigration Reform to be held on Thursday at 2 p.m. Eastern Time.  

For link to live webcast at the time of the hearing, click here


Senate Judiciary Committee
Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship
View a webcast of this hearing
DATE: April 30, 2009
TIME: 02:00 PM
ROOM: Dirksen-226
OFFICIAL HEARING NOTICE / WITNESS LIST:

April 23, 2009

DATE CHANGE NOTICE
The hearing on "Comprehensive Immigration Reform in 2009, Can We Do It and How?" scheduled by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Refugees will take place on Thursday, April 30 at 2:00 p.m. rather than the previously scheduled date of Tuesday, April 28.

Chairman Schumer will preside.

By order of the Chairman

Updated Witness List

Hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee,
Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Refugees

on

"Comprehensive Immigration Reform in 2009, Can We Do It and How?"

Thursday, April 30, 2009
Dirksen Office Building Room 226
2:00 p.m.

Panel I

J. Thomas Manger
Chief of Police, Montgomery County, MD
Director, Major Cities Chiefs Association
Rockville, MD

Alan Greenspan
Economist
Former Chairman
Federal Reserve of the United States
Washington, DC

Dr. Joel Hunter
Senior Pastor, Northland Church
Member, President's Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships
Longwood, FL

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Dracula, the Republicans, and the DREAMers

Thank you to Vicente Duque for this interesting piece on Immigration and the Republican Party.

--
The Vampire Dracula of Transylvania and the vampiresque Republican Party - Drinking the Blood of Youth - Immigration Reform 
by Vicente Duque



The Vampire Dracula has a zombie life, he gets out of his tomb in the dungeons of the castle in order to drink blood and get some life out of it.

Dracula can not drink the blood of old people, those that are sick and in Geriatric Homes or Gerontological Asylums. Those crippled and sick of old age in wheelchairs have a blood that is useless for the purposes of Dracula.

Dracula needs the Hematocites and Leucocites of Young People, those in elementary schools, high schools, colleges and universities.

And the Republican Party is having a zombie life in its tomb, half death, half alive, and needs a "Common Enemy" and an "Enemy of America" in order to resurrect and have a "revival", a word that charms its very conservative and religious extremist base.

America has millions of Decent, Noble and Kind People, Hearts of Gold, and they are the big majority, but there are many other losers that need hate as revenge for their failed lives.

And what "Common Enemy" and "Enemy of America" can be the best for those racists, haters, losers and failed lives in the streets of America ??

The Republican Party needs the Hate against Latinos in order to revive, revitalize and reinvigorate, for a "Republican Revival". That is the Blood of Youth, because Latinos are mostly in Elementary Schools, in High Schools, and now want Higher Education in Colleges and Universities.


Latinos are "Youth Blood" and a big part of a Great Future for America. But Republicans want to drink that blood with their Racism and Hatred. Even if they expulse and evict those Youngsters out of America.

So, Mr Obama should be careful not to paralyze Government and his Administration Legislative Agenda with a "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" because that is what these Merchants of Hatred in Racist TV want in order to agitate the masses of ignorants, of fools, idiots and losers, the boxes of Inferiority Complexes.

The "Immigration Reform" would increase the profits of the Merchants of Hate, the Peddlers of Fear, in Racist TV.

When you are a failure in life, nothing is better than to choose a defenseless victim and become a bully, then you are the Superior Race, and suddenly you got a lot value and self respect, even if you are trash.

"Immigration Reform" is a "Pandora's Box" for Mr Obama, because there is too much Racism and Hatred. This needs a much more mature country, and a more mature Republican Party in times of Economic Prosperity and not of Economic Suffering.

When the Republican Party has adults in it, when it is not led by the Media Racists of Histrionic Radio, and Histrionic TV, with ridiculous gestures and grimaces and tears, while crying "God !!!, God !!!, God !!"

These TV Racists are like Hysterics and Possessed, the most Hypocrite People in the World, the masters of Hypocrisy.

Let these Hypocrites TV anchors claim in the desert while there is no "Immigration Reform" until the day that there is more resposibility in Congress and the Economy is recovered, stable and strong.

"Immigration Reform is Kryptonite for Mr Obama and the Democratic Party.

Milenials.com

Vicente Duque


Sunday, March 15, 2009

Congressmen Gutierrez pushing Immigration Reform


 March 15, 2009, Milenio.com


Congressman Luis Gutierrez says that Immigration Reform in the U.S.  In an interview with Univision, he stated that CIR should reach Congress before September 2009, and even then that would be very late.

He plans to visit 20 cities to speak to communities about immigration reform.  He has already been to 14 cities.
--
Milenio.com
15 marzo 2009
Reforma migratoria en EU es viable: legislador estadunidense

El congresista Luis Gutiérrez comentó que incluso la líder de la Cámara de Representantes, Nancy Pelosi, considera que la separación de familias es una acción inmoral y antiamericana y se deben parar las redadas.

Chicago.- La reforma migratoria en Estados Unidos cuenta con casi todos los votos requeridos para su aprobación en el Congreso, pero se necesita voluntad del presidente Barack Obama para impulsar el debates, aseguró el congresista Luis Gutiérrez.

En entrevista concedida a la cadena Univisión, Gutiérrez destacó que a diferencia del Senado, donde se ha discutido sin éxito el tema dos veces, en la Cámara de Representantes nunca se ha dado el debate sobre la reforma migratoria y puede ser la puerta de acceso a la misma.

Sin embargo, expresó que se requiere que el presidente Obama aporte su liderazgo y defina su postura sobre el tema, requisito que la propia líder de la mayoría congresional, Nancy Pelosi, le ha planteado a Gutiérrez, "porque se debe dejar claro en dónde está la presidencia de Estados Unidos en este tema".

Los votos existen, enfatizó, lo que no existe es el espacio y la voluntad política para enumerar esos votos en la pantalla. "Por eso la pregunta clave es si Obama está dispuesto a parar las redadas., es lo puede hacer, no tengo duda de que lo puede hacer".

El congresista dijo que en la entrevista que prevé sostener con el presidente le pedirá que hable "claro y elocuente" sobre el tema.

"Le vamos a decir que encontramos antiamericano e inmoral que con el poder del gobierno se estén destruyendo familias. Que es una contradicción decir que quieres ayudar a las personas y por otro lado utilices los instrumentos de gobierno para negarle la legalización que dices quieres darle. El no puede estar en los dos lados", afirmó.

Para Gutiérrez, el proyecto de reforma migratoria debe abordarse antes de septiembre próximo, ya que sería demasiado tarde esa fecha para que se discuta en ambas Cámaras antes del receso legislativo, por lo que fijó el mes de junio como idóneo para iniciar el debate.

Comentó que incluso la líder de la Cámara de Representantes, Nancy Pelosi, considera que la separación de familias es una acción inmoral y antiamericana y se deben parar las redadas, lo que da una oportunidad de contar con aliados para la reforma.

Pero si todo falla, advirtió, la alternativa será tomar otras medidas, siempre legales y pacíficas.

"En ese momento, si ya hemos utilizado todos los procesos legislativos, entonces haremos como la comunidad de afromericanos, como las mujeres, vamos a tomar otras medidas para demostrarle al gobierno que esta situación es inaceptable", señaló el congresista.

Gutiérrez insistió en que la legalización de indocumentados tiene un argumento económico claro que justifica tratar el tema en un tiempo en el que resolver la crisis es el objetivo prioritario.

"Si se deportan a 12 millones de personas esta economía que está mal va a estar aún peor, porque los inmigrantes compran y contribuyen a la economía, son parte de la espina dorsal de muchas comunidades", añadió.

Además, agregó, moralmente no se puede hablar de desarrollo cuando se separan familias. "Hay cinco millones de niños ciudadanos cuyos padres no tienen documentos, ¿cómo se estimula la economía si quienes trabajan fuertemente están sufriendo el terror por esa división de familias?".

Aseguró que aún cuando la situación económica dificulta los trabajos, el gobierno no tiene ni los recursos, ni la imposición política para deportar a 12 millones de indocumentados, pero su condición de ilegal afecta al trabajador estadunidense legal.

"Están aquí, van a continuar trabajando sólo que en la oscuridad, siendo explotados, pero si se legalizan se dejará de utilizar a quien está al borde de la ley para disminuir los ingresos que recibe el trabajador estadunidense", precisó.

Luis Gutiérrez realiza una gira por el país elaborando una lista de probables candidatos a obtener la legalización, la cual tiene previsto presentársela al presidente Obama. A la fecha lleva recorridas 14 de 20 ciudades que espera visitar en este objetivo.


Saturday, December 6, 2008

Napolitano, Immigration, and DREAMers: The DREAM is NOW


No longer just HOPE.  The DREAM is now. While Governor of Arizona, Napolitano, who has been named head of the Department of Homeland Security VETOED a bill that would have ended in-state tuition for DREAMers. Obama said he would pass the DREAM Act in the first hundred days. This is the time to mobilize.

-----

Democrats Should Face the Challenge
Immigration Can't be Neglected

Washington Post
December 3, 2008

...As U.S. attorney for Arizona in the 1990s, she [Janet Napolitano] prosecuted illegal immigrants. As governor of a state that has become the main entry point for illegal aliens, she has backed tough measures to tighten control of the border, including deploying the National Guard.

Faced with an inundation of unauthorized workers and the federal government's inability to act, she also signed a bill cracking down on employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers.

At the same time, she vetoed a bill that would have cut off in-state tuition aid for undocumented college students, even if they were brought to the country as children by their parents. She quashed another bill that would have forced local police to act as stand-in federal immigration agents, arresting illegal residents and, she noted, saddling the state with tens of millions of dollars in expenses.

To Republicans in the party's nativist wing, her attempts to steer a middle course smacked of coddling illegal border-crossers. But voters in conservative-leaning Arizona reelected her by a huge margin in 2006, and she remains enormously popular.

Ms. Napolitano has argued that the federal government must establish a viable system for absorbing migrant workers even as it gets serious about enforcement at the border and in the workplace. She has rolled her eyes at provisions that seem less pragmatic than punitive, such as requiring migrant workers to return home for a year after every two years of work or forcing undocumented heads of household to "touch back" in their country of origin to apply for permanent resident status in the United States.

Resistance to comprehensive reform will be intense, particularly in a lifeless economy with high unemployment. There are 40 million foreign-born people in the country today, the highest proportion in almost a century. That has caused political discomfort not just in cities but in suburban, exurban and rural areas -- the new melting pots where many immigrants, including illegal ones, have settled.

As Ms. Napolitano herself has suggested, the status quo is untenable. Local governments bear the brunt of providing for illegal immigrants and rightly resent it.

Meanwhile, millions of illegal immigrants continue to languish in the shadows of a nation that, even in a stricken economy, offers them better employment prospects than they would have at home.

Working in factories and fields, kitchens and construction sites, they form a huge pool of workers easily exploited by unscrupulous employers, who occasionally rob them of wages. They face apparently random federal raids, which have exposed chilling accounts of workplace abuses. A Republican president tried and failed to right the system. It now poses a critical test for the Democrats...


for complete editorial

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Work Place ICE Raids Ending?

Ashville Citizen Times

December 2, 2008 Tuesday
Shuler to tackle immigration again next year

by DOUG ABRAHMS

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., plans to take up more comprehensive immigration reform but still is working with the new Obama administration on timing, said Jon Summers, a Reid spokesman.

The Obama administration is likely to focus on a more comprehensive immigration plan and cut back on workplace raids, which the Bush administration increased over the past few years, said Ali Noorani, Executive Director of the National Immigration Forum. The group -- which represents attorneys, business groups, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and immigration-rights groups -- opposes Shuler's bill and favors larger reforms that include speeding up the naturalization process and increasing guest worker programs.

Illegal immigrants deported from Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina jumped from 10,996 in 2007 to 17,882 last year, according to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. This doesn't include the 57 employees at Mills Manufacturing in Woodfin who were arrested in August and face deportation for reportedly entering and working in the U.S. illegally.

"The evidence points that worksite raids are not a good resource of time and money," Noorani said. "We've not addressed the root problem here -- which is having one workforce exploited at the expense of another."

Arresting illegal immigrants rips apart families, harms communities' economies and doesn't create new job openings, he said.

Few expect immigration to be a hot topic early next year because all the attention will be focused on the economy. The E-Verify program is set to expire in March unless Congress renews it, which could set off an immigration debate...
more


Wednesday, November 26, 2008

McCain on Immigration in 2009

McCain can do more for the nation as a senator than as a president.

McCain will run again - and push immigration


...McCain said that he remains "honored" to have served Arizona and that he plans to run for reelection in 2010. He dismissed ideas that he might run for president again, saying that if he wins in 2010, he will pledge to serve a full six-year term.
ad_icon

He said he will continue pressing for immigration reform in the Senate, despite the issue's political pitfalls.

"Running for reelection has never been a concern of mine as far as issues like that are concerned. I intend to discuss that with the president-elect," he said of immigration.

Friday, November 23, 2007

An Honest Discussion on Immigration with a Consideration of Ethics

It has been over a month since this article was published in the Financial Times. I think it is worth reading. It is one of the few articles on immigration that takes a pragmatic approach.

The author of this piece should talk to some of our Senators. His last comment made me pause. I have not heard talk like this in the U.S. Congress.


"So let us try to have an honest discussion, based on the best possible analysis and consideration of the ethics. If immigration is to continue at a substantial (if reduced) rate, all these issues must be confronted. If not, the debate is certain to become ever more unpleasantly xenophobic. This is not an area for stealth, but for policies that are far more open, transparent and better justified than hitherto."

_____


Why immigration is hard to tackle
By Martin Wolf
Published: November 2 2007 02:00 | Last updated: November 2 2007 02:00
London Financial Times


Does a country have the right to determine the composition of its population? If so, how should it do so? These questions are hard to answer. That is presumably why the government has run what amounts to a "stealth" immigration policy. But that approach is now unworkable. The time has come for a debate. That debate should focus on whether restricting immigration is legitimate, desirable and feasible. Only then can one decide what policy to pursue.

The government is in difficulties on this topic, for three reasons. First, the inflow has been substantial. Between 1997 and 2006, gross immigration was 4.8m and net immigration 1.6m, or 7.8 per cent and 2.6 per cent of the 2006 population, respectively. The latest projections suggest that the population might rise by 4.4m between 2006 and 2016, with immigration generating close to half of this increase.

The second reason is that the government seems to have little idea how many immigrants are in the country. It has just had to admit that the number of foreign-born workers who had arrived since 1997 was 1.5m. Foreigners also seem to have filled more than half of the additional jobs created since 1997. Aware of the potential political risks, the government has announced the continuation of controls on workers from Romania and Bulgaria, and introduced a point system to manage immigration of workers from outside the European Union. A panic-stricken Gordon Brown, prime minister, has even proclaimed "British jobs for British workers".

The third and most fundamental reason is that the government never made a case for such levels of immigration. So how should one go about having such a debate?

A good starting point is whether a country is morally entitled to restrict migration. Philippe Legrain, a notable economist and author, takes a strong position on this, most recently in a robust contribution on migration to a report from CentreForum, a liberal, London-based think-tank*. His argument is that freedom of movement is a human right. The implication is that a country should be defined as a set of institutions that controls a given territory. Its people have no right to determine the composition of its population. I understand the argument, but do not agree with it. A country is not just a set of institutions, but also a home. People do have a right to decide who enters their (collective) home.

Yet even if one agrees that a country has a right to restrict immigration, it does not follow that it ought to do so. Mr Legrain argues that it is not just in the global interest to have free migration, but also in that of recipient countries. A standard "gains from trade" analysis would suggest that this should be true. But if one is to argue for free movement of labour on economic grounds one needs a sense of the likely consequences. Analyses of free migration in the presence of huge real wage differentials suggest that we would end up with vast informal sectors and shanty towns. That is what happens within poor countries. Why should it not happen across the globe? I cannot see how one would persuade a host population that this outcome would be in their interests.

So the debate has to be over what are still controlled levels of migration. What is most striking here is the poor standard of the government's analysis. The Home Office's recent contribution to a House of Lords economic affairs committee inquiry discusses the impact on the size of the economy. For those of us who are not seduced by the "lump of labour" fallacy, there is no doubt that a bigger labour force would make the economy larger. So what? If one is trying to persuade people that immigration is in their interests, one has to analyse its impact on the gross domestic product and its distribution, after subtracting the incomes earned by migrants. So far as I can see, the Home Office does not even attempt to assess this.

Mr Legrain has little doubt. His position is that immigrants are almost always complementary to domestic workers and so raise their productivity and incomes. A particular benefit, he argues, is diversity. These points have force. But he also assumes, less credibly, that there are few negative consequences of diversity or a denser population.

Yet what is most striking in this debate is how little we know. The case for an analysis similar to Sir Nicholas Stern's on climate change policy is overwhelming. Of course, a review would be pointless if it were impossible to control immigration. While the extent to which this is possible is limited, it is not utterly infeasible. But we should certainly move to market-compatible systems, such as auctions of work permits, rather than arbitrary point systems.

So let us try to have an honest discussion, based on the best possible analysis and consideration of the ethics. If immigration is to continue at a substantial (if reduced) rate, all these issues must be confronted. If not, the debate is certain to become ever more unpleasantly xenophobic. This is not an area for stealth, but for policies that are far more open, transparent and better justified than hitherto. Let the debate begin.

*Globalisation: a Liberal Response, www.centreforum.org

martin.wolf@ft.com

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Americanos - Los Brutos/Americans as Brutes









The present generation that is running the country grew up watching Daniel Boone, Davy Crockett, Gunsmoke, and Bonanza. While many call them Baby Boomers, I would call them closeted Marlboro Men (and women).

Our current President is the quintessential Marlboro Man. If you recall that great photo-op on the naval air carrier, with President Bush dressed like he just came out of a movie set - leather jacket and all.

Now the Marlboro Man has taken over immigration policy. What a better place to show your testosterone than an ICE raid?

The raids make clear to everyone in the world that we would rather behave like brutes- (separate families, ignore due process, and incarcerate people without charges), than sit down and negotiate some reasonable legislation regarding immigration.


-----
GLOBE EDITORIAL
Raids are beside the point
November 22, 2007
Boston Globe


FEDERAL IMMIGRATION officials have crafted guidelines on how to conduct more humane workplace raids to round up undocumented workers. It sounds oxymoronic: Enforcement actions aren't supposed to be tea parties. But what the country really needs is comprehensive immigration reform that gives immigrants more ways to work here legally.

Lacking such reforms, immigration officials should not rely too heavily on dramatic "show raids," but instead beef up incentives and penalties for employers. After all, it's the ready availability of jobs in the United States that attracts undocumented workers.

Massachusetts witnessed the human toll of raids in March when immigration officials raided the Michael Bianco leather company in New Bedford. Children of detained parents faced emotional and financial hardships, according to a report from the Urban Institute, a nonprofit Washington think tank that studied the New Bedford raid and similar actions in Colorado and Nebraska.

Worried about how arrests and possible deportations affect pregnant women, nursing mothers, and single parents - not to mention their children - Senator Edward Kennedy and congressman William Delahunt helped devise the new raid guidelines, which show compassion and common sense - but also limitations.

The guidelines call on federal officials to staff raids with personnel from the Division of Immigration Health Services, a federal entity that provides healthcare for detained undocumented immigrants. These staffers would identify detainees with family, health, and humanitarian concerns. Immigration officials are also being asked to work with state social services and community groups.

Still, these are only suggestions. And even when they are followed, fear will inevitably prevent some detainees from talking to government officials, even if the officials are human service workers.

Whether raids are genteel or jarring, their effectiveness is dubious. They grab headlines and generate fear, but they fail to slow the great waves of illegal immigration.

That's why other tools should be used. Employers need a 21st-century verification system, so that they can quickly establish who can legally work. Once that system is in place, penalties should be stiffened for employers who hire and abuse undocumented workers. Add presidential candidate Bill Richardson's advice to talk to Mexico about job creation, so its citizens aren't as desperate to cross the border, and that would be a move toward comprehensive reform.

Protecting children during raids is important, especially since an estimated two-thirds of undocumented workers' children are American citizens. But the country also needs a modern immigration system that relies far less on raids and more on genuine reform.


article: http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2007/11/22/raids_are_beside_the_point?mode=PF

photo: http://www.hot-cigs.com/images/MarlboroMan.jpg