I know a number of people that stopped voting after the Supreme Court gave George Bush the election in 2000. Below is a comment by retired Supreme Court Judge John Paul Stevens....
MTH
-----------------------------------------------
John Paul Stevens: Bush Appeal To Supreme Court Was 'Frivolous'
The Huffington Post
Luke Johnson
First Posted: 10/10/11 04:08 PM ET Updated: 10/10/11 04:08 PM ET
He recalls bumping into Justice Stephen Breyer at a Christmas party and the two having a brief conversation about the Bush application to halt the recount by issuing a stay. "We agreed that the application was frivolous," he writes. "To secure a stay, a litigant must show that one is necessary to prevent a legally cognizable irreparable injury. Bush's attorneys had failed to make any such showing."
By a five-to-four vote, the court granted the stay. "What I still regard as a frivolous stay application kept the court extremely busy for four days," he writes. He adds that no justice has ever cited the opinions that provided the basis for their ruling.
Indeed, the court -- unusually -- limited its decision "to the present circumstances," meaning that it did not want it to become a precedent.
HuffPost's Mike Sacks recently interviewed the 91-year-old former justice on his views on the death penalty and the Citizens United ruling just before the memoir was published.