Monday, March 31, 2008

Wearing antiwar T-shirt gets 80 year old arrested














you can purchase this T-shirt at http://www.vegethics.com/peace.cgi/peace06/queerspiritart.30945709


Democracy Now informs us that an 80 year old clergyman was arrested at a mall in Long Island wearing an antiwar T-shirt. He was asked to turn it inside out and when he refused he was arrested. That just seems so strange to me.

It's bad enough that people get ejected from events and arrested for doing this when someone from the presidential administration is speaking - but at the mall?

As long as Bush is president, maybe we all should think twice about what we wear to a protest march, on a plane, to a speech or most any other public event.

just a few more months for his administration to end - 10 to be exact- hope we make it ok.


p.s. be sure not to wear an anti-war T-shirt to the Smith Haven Mall in Long Island.
-----
Democracynow.org
March 31, 2008


80-Year-Old Deacon Arrested at Mall for Antiwar T-Shirt

In Long Island, New York, an eighty-year-old church deacon was removed from a shopping mall Saturday and arrested after he refused to remove a t-shirt protesting the Iraq war. Deacon Don Zirkel was handing out antiwar pamphlets when he was approached by security guards at the Smith Haven Mall. The guards placed him under citizen’s arrest after he refused orders to turn his t-shirt inside out. When the local police arrived they charged him with criminal trespassing and resisting arrest.


for link to DN headlines click the title of this post


photo: http://images.cafepress.com/product/30945709_240x240_Front.jpg

Yes, we do get screwed... we really do.

A Dream Deferred has officially launched its blog and initiative from Brave New Foundation. Dont forget to check out the video embedded
***

Immigrant Children Get Screwed When It Is Time to Go to College

By Leighton Woodhouse, Brave New Foundation. Posted March 29, 2008.



The video to the right is a special Brave New Foundation video that makes the case for the DREAM Act, which would enable states to grant in-state tuition to hardworking immigrant students, making higher education (and eventually citizenship) a real possibility.

This year, the presidential election will not hinge on the emotionally divisive issue of immigration.

That's good news for foreign-born residents of the United States. It's good news for everyone who believes that a moral society takes care of its most vulnerable members, forcing no one into the shadows. If the nativist wing of the Republican Party had seen its electoral goals realized, we would have witnessed a Republican primary dominated by a tragic debate about how best to expel the 12 million undocumented immigrants living in America, whether by deporting as many as possible, or by making legal conditions so inhospitable that they leave of their own volition. That debate would have trickled out into the general election, with Republican... (More)

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Returning home to Houston
















After a two week trip to Mexico I returned to Houston yesterday, landing at Bush Airport. The flight had been a little difficult, the man next to me kept shoving his elbow past the armrest. He seemed oblivious to what he was doing, but I didn't say anything - (probably should have). Maybe it was an omen for what was to come. He and his wife jumped up (they were in the seats closer to the window, I had the aisle seat) and basically shoved me back out of the way so they could rush out of the plane. I told myself to be calm, maybe different people have different definitions of body space. I thought the couple was from Mexico, because they spoke no English and had trouble with the customs form. But it turned out they were Americans - they stood in line at for U.S. Citizens and Residents just like I did.

It was an interesting day. A couple behind me who were speaking only Spanish were approached by one of the ICE employees (a woman who looked like she was in her 70s, I'm wondering if ICE if hiring retired people to work at the airport) - the man asked her if he was in the wrong place, she said well, she hadn't thought about it because she was thinking he was a diplomat. He wasn't - but they were so far out of place she let them stay in the U.S. line.

I approached the counter when called and was faced by an officer named Ramos. He was nice and didn't ask any rude questions. But he kept typing something on his keyboard. I asked him if the strip on my passport didn't work anymore and he said no. He was correcting some information - Later I wondered if it was because my passport shows me with brown hair and now it's gray.

Anyway, I then picked up my suitcase and was walking through the agricultural customs section. I have never in my life had a problem doing this when I have flown. As a teenager and college student I and my friends were regularly searched when crossing back into the U.S. in a car at the Laredo international bridge. But that was so long ago it hardly crosses my mind anymore, plus like I said, it was when we crossed in a car.

All of a sudden, after the officer standing at the counter said I was ok and could leave, a young ICE officer with an Italian sounding name that starts with an "L" came out and pointed to me. I thought it was strange since I have never seen anyone get pulled out of that line.

He was very nice and formal, even apologized for taking my time and asked if I was on a schedule, I said no, but I was worried about my husband being worried while he waited on the other side. He asked if I went to Mexico on vacation or business. I said the first week was a vacation with my husband, then he returned and I had to go to Cuernavaca to do some interviews - so the officer then said "you went on business" (I had said vacation on my customs form). He asked me how many times I had traveled internationally the last year. I couldn't remember exactly and said 4-5, but it turned out to only be 3 (guess it felt like a lot because all the trips were taken since Dec. 07)

He went through my carry-on and saw my digital SLR - he said "nice camera" and asked me if was a Canon Rebel.. I said no, it's a Nikkon, and the university purchased it - he can check the silver tag on the side - that says State of Texas property. He said he didn't need to look at it. He looked through my book bag and saw I had a Mac laptop - he said "I see you use a mac, I think they are great. Have you seen the new one?" I said yes - the Mac Book Air - that it's really cool... its the laptop that is so slim and weighs hardly anything. He said no that's not it, its so small and you can type anything on it, check your email etc, but is still a laptop.

Then he asked me if I knew what the "Brazos de Dios" was. I said sure, I just published a book on Texas that has a chapter on the Brazos River. He didn't seem to hear me and went on about how La Salle came to Texas. He started to talk about Wharton County - I said I know the place - my kid's paternal grandparents are from there - (don't think he heard this either). He said "I'm from Wharton County, my family has lived on the same land for 6 generations, since back to the Civil War."

He got to my larger suitcase, (which was also a carry one but I had checked it in) and said "this is the one." He took everything out, including the books and then put things back in, asking me to zip it up. He never checked the little box I bought in Morelia that was wrapped in tissue paper and sealed with scotch tape. I'm not really sure what he was looking for.

I told him I was a professor at UH. He asked me what I taught. He seemed to get a little more serious after that. I asked him how they chose who they would search. He said it was random, that he walked out and just picked me.

I was more relaxed for a second until I remembered the guy who was coming from Europe to teach at Notre Dame and they didn't let him in the country.

As I left I reminded him about my book on Texas and said that he might find it interesting - or - that he might not like it since it has stuff on slavery. I don't remember what he said after that, but I was finally able to leave the airport.

Regardless of his courtesy, it was a strange and tense experience. Since this had never happened to me before, I couldn't help that it had something to do with this blog or my work with DREAMERS. My phones at home click so much my family has always wondered if we are one of the millions being listened to by DHS.

In his very polite double speak I heard the young officer say that his family had been in the U.S. over a century and a half -- was that a way of saying that long term residency makes you a better American? or was he insinuating he was more American than myself because I have a Spanish surname?

In a way, the statement about the land owned since the civil war felt to me like rubbing salt in a wound. Even though I was born in Houston and am a 7th generation Texas (hey, my mother's family came in 1750 to what is now south Texas and my great great grandfather was a Spanish Speaking confederate soldier! - no kidding) - I felt he was talking to all the DREAMERS, former DREAMERS or other recent immigrants that he confronts. That 6 generation thing was important for him.

When I got home my husband asked me why didn't I tell the guy about my family being here so long. I said I didn't think he would hear me anyway. Besides, I come from one of those mixed families -- my Dad was born in Mexico.

I also didn't tell him about my chapter on the Brazos River. He called the river, "Brazos de Dios" (arms of God), I titled the chapter "River of the Demonic."

He told me "welcome home" when I was walking away.

Maybe I should wear a "Daughter of the Confederacy" sign next time I fly internationally.


photo: http://www.musicforgifts.com/ForHome/WelcomeHome2x2.jpg

We work all the time



photos by M.T. Hernandez

While in the city of Morelia, Michoacan during Easter Week I took a picture of an attractive young woman who was selling folkloric religious articles outside Morelia's Cathedral. She was standing under the bright sun, wearing a blue Superman t-shirt - holding a brightly colored umbrella.

When I asked her about taking the photo, I mentioned that if she gave me her email address I would send it to her. She replied: " I don't have an email address, we work all the time and don't do things like use computers."

A few days later in a taxi from a bus station in Mexico City to a hotel on Avenida Juarez I was speaking to the driver who was very talkative. We began a discussion on immigration, he told me he had relatives in most major U.S. cities. I told him about the movie "Under the Same Moon" (La Misma Luna), an interesting story about how a boy walked to LA to find his mother - I said maybe he could try to see it sometime. He smiled and responded: "we work seven days a week, eighteen hours a day - just to be able to survive." - he never told me he would see the movie or not, but his statement about work was another way of telling me that something like going to a movie was a luxury he didn't have.

Flying back home I thought a lot about the taxi driver and the woman at the cathedral. How different are the lives of those in the U.S. and those in Mexico. Here in America, writing on a computer or going to a movie theater are givens.

This is when I remember that 80% of Mexican citizens live below poverty level.

PWC Virginia Police Chief makes his own decisions about meeting with Mexican Consul





Police Chief Charlie T. Deane, Prince William County Virginia



The police chief of Prince William County Virginia has let everyone know that he is not in agreement with the virulent anti-immigrationists in his county.

His actions remind us that there are always a few people who are rational and reasonable about immigration policy in places like PWC Virignia.

-----
Police Chief to Brief Board on Immigrant Policy
Meeting Comes After He Declined to Follow Chairman's Request Not to Meet With Mexican Consul

By Kristen Mack
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 30, 2008; PW01

Police Chief Charlie T. Deane's appearance before the Board of County Supervisors on Tuesday could get heated, following a dust-up last week with Chairman Corey A. Stewart.

Deane is scheduled to give the board an update on the first month of police enforcement of laws directed at detaining illegal immigrants. But his briefing comes after Stewart (R-At Large) tried to prevent Deane from having an informational community meeting with Mexican Consul General Enrique Escorza.

Deane had the meeting Thursday over Stewart's objections, saying that the board had directed him to reach out to the community as police officers begin checking the citizenship status of criminal suspects they believe may be in the country illegally. He said the meeting was one of many he has had to clear up misinformation and to quell fears about the scope of the county's illegal immigration policies.

An advance copy of the chief's Tuesday presentation on the first month of enforcement was light on details. Deane was unavailable for comment Friday.

"He will have specific numbers on Tuesday," Assistant County Executive Susan L. Roltsch said. "He prefers to save that discussion for the board."

Several board members have come to Deane's defense since Stewart's questioning of the chief last week over the meeting with the Mexican consul.

Supervisor Maureen S. Caddigan (R-Dumfries) said Deane has the support of a majority of the board.

"Our chief is doing what we asked him to do. He's communicating with the people and keeping us out of a lawsuit," Caddigan said. "Stewart does not have the authority he thinks he has as chairman. He needs to concur with the board before sending out directives."

Stewart acknowledged he does not have the authority to issue a directive on his own...


for link to complete WP article click the title of this post

Saturday, March 29, 2008

On a light note.....

Friday, March 28, 2008

An open letter to the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times

It is reprehensible that you, as the most important newspaper media outlets in the country have not been informing the American people about the S.A.V.E. ACT (HB 4088) - that is currently being discussed in Congress.

There is no legitimate excuse for keeping this information a secret. Is your concern that if you publicize this, the nation will react with numerous protest marches (again)? Are you not wanting to receive the thousands of emails and phone calls from irate Americans who want all undocumented immigrants sent back to their home countries? Or are you worried about more death threats like the ones you received when you covered the congressional discussion on immigration last summer (2007)?

It is clear that one of the best ways to get an unethical bill passed is to keep it secret. You still have a chance to redeem yourself. Congress goes back into session in a few days - there is still time to send out your reporters. Just remember, if you let the S.A.V.E. ACT happen, you could get arrested for giving your babysitter a ride home.

Marie Theresa Hernandez

More on the Secret S.A.V.E. ACT

Congress goes back into session in three days -

Concerned about the lack of media coverage of the S.A.V.E. ACT - the pending immigration bill that would make U.S. citizens vulnerable to prison sentences if they gave an undocumented person a ride in their car --

I looked up the S.A.V.E. ACT and HB 4088 in Lexus Nexus* - under newspapers, blogs, newscasts and web publications - using the last month as a time-line. The small article below from a newswire service is the only thing I found. Interesting that Lexus Nexus didn't mention "The Road to Dystopia" published in the NYT on March 13, 2008. See our post from that date: "The Frightening Thought of HB 4088"

___


DRAKE FILES DISCHARGE PETITION ON S.A.V.E. ACT BIPARTISAN BILL WOULD ENHANCE BORDER SECURITY AND ENFORCEMENT


States News Service
March 12, 2008
WASHINGTON

The following information was released by the office of Virginia Rep. Thelma Drake:

U.S. Representative Thelma Drake (R-Va.) today filed a discharge petition aimed at bringing the Secure America with Verification and Enforcement (SAVE) Act to the House floor for a vote. Once 218 Members sign the discharge petition, the bill will be brought directly to the floor for a vote. The SAVE Act is a bipartisan bill that will secure America's borders by adding 8,000 new Border Patrol agents and utilizing new technology and infrastructure at the border. The SAVE Act also makes the E-Verify system mandatory for employers to ensure that new workers are compliant with U.S. immigration laws and enhances interior enforcement by increasing the investigative abilities of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Finally, the SAVE Act calls for DHS, in consultation with the heads of other Federal agencies, as well as state, local and tribal governments, to create one national strategy to secure our nation's borders. The SAVE Act has strong bipartisan support; the bill has over 140 co-sponsors, including 93 Republicans and 48 Democrats.

"I call on all of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to join me in supporting a vote on the SAVE Act," said Rep. Drake. "The SAVE Act is a bipartisan bill that offers concrete solutions to stop the flow of illegal aliens through our borders. It is time for Congress to put aside partisan politics and start addressing the national security problems posed by our porous borders."


http://www.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.uh.edu/us/lnacademic/search/homesubmitForm.do
accessed March 28, 2008

* Lexus Nexus, which focuses on media coverage is a search engine used by academics and university students.



Europe's First Immigrants?



Fossil find could be Europe's first humans

· Find fills gap in knowledge of long march out of Africa
· Possible ancestor of our species and Neanderthals


The Guardian - London
March 27, 2008
James Randerson
, science correspondent

A fossilised jawbone and teeth found in a cave in northern Spain may have belonged to one of the first human ancestors to set foot in western Europe. The hominid has been identified as Homo antecessor, or pioneer man, a possible ancestor of both our own species and Neanderthals. The fossils date from between 1.1m and 1.2m years ago.

The find helps fill another gap in our understanding of the long march early humans made out of Africa. Stone tools and animal bones found with the hominid jaw also paint a vivid picture of the life of early cave-dwelling Europeans.

"The timing of the earliest human occupation of Europe has been controversial for many years," said Professor Chris Stringer, an expert in early humans at the Natural History Museum in London, who was not involved directly in the research. "[This find] suggests that southern Europe began to be colonised from western Asia not long after humans had emerged from Africa - something which many of us would have doubted even five years ago."

The fossils were discovered in the Sima del Elefante cave in Atapuerca in north-western Spain. Along with the hominid remains the research team found 32 rock fragments that were either stone tools or flakes produced by making the tools, suggesting that the hominids used the cave as a workshop among other things. There were numerous animal bones from a variety of species including rats, ferrets, bison, foxes, bears and big cats.

José Bermúdez de Castro at the National Research Centre on Human Evolution in Burgos, a member of the team that uncovered the fossils, said the early humans occupied a lush, warm, green paradise with plentiful water and lots of prey. The animal bones found suggest that humans at the site were eating meat. "We have evidence of cut marks on bones," he said. And in one case the jaw of a cow was broken to get at the succulent marrow inside. The find is detailed in Nature.

The hominid jawbone itself is probably from a female because it is small. Although the jaw fragment is not much to go on, from previous fossils the researchers can guess that the cave people would have been around 1.7 metres high (5ft 7in), with a brain three-quarters the size of ours.

Although the same species has been found at sites close to Sima del Elefante, the team are convinced this find is considerably older. They used three dating techniques to pin-point its age. These are based on past changes in the Earth's magnetic field, the known ages of other mammal species found with the jaw fragment and a new method that uses radioactive decay in sediments.

Not everyone is sure the fossil is H antecessor. The doubt stems from the fact that other finds of the species have not included jawbones for direct comparison.

Backstory

The question of when early humans made it into Europe is controversial. A large fossil collection from Dmanisi, Georgia, is dated to around 1.7m years ago. These are probably Homo erectus, a human species found mainly further east in Asia. Previously the oldest European fossils with convincing dates were from Gran Dolina, close to the new find in Atapuerca, Spain, and from Ceprano in Italy. These are around half the age of the new find.

for link to Guardian article click the title of this post

Thursday, March 27, 2008

The Secret S.A.V.E. ACT: Why isn't the LA City Council Press Release in the LA Times?

There is continuing silence from the media on HB4088 - the S.A.V.E. ACT. There is no mention of the LA City Council's press release on March 26 announcing their resolution against the S.A.V.E. ACT.

I recently saw a headline that said immigration wasn't being mentioned in the presidential campaigns these days. Maybe its not because the media seems to think that HB4088 doesn't exist - This is very convenient - if there is little said about it in the media there will be fewer people aware of it coming... and fewer people to protest against it.

Remember when they passed the Patriot Act? That went under our noses also, and look how it has affected our lives.

From our friends in CA - No to SAVE Act

PRESS STATEMENT



Overwhelming Majority!

The Los Angeles City Council Resoundingly Votes for a Resolution Against the SAVE Act.




For Immediate Release: March 26, 2008 Contact: Anike Tourse, 213.353.1339,

310.622.3637 cell, anike@chirla.org

Los Angeles – The City Council voted on a resolution opposing the Save America through Verification and Enforcement (SAVE) Act (HR 4088) sponsored by Representatives Shuler (D-NC) and Tancredo (R-CO). Angelica Salas, Executive Director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA), issued the following statement in response:

“The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles is both proud and pleased to stand with such community organizations as AJC, MALDEF, ADL, Progressive Jewish Alliance, Catholic Charities, NAKASEC, ACLU, Southern California and Hermandad Mexicana Latin-Americana in applauding the LA City Council’s resounding opposition to the SAVE Act. Passage of the SAVE Act would continue to waste millions of tax payer dollars on enforcement, detention and deportation programs that have been tried for the last twenty years and failed to end undocumented immigration.



The city council recognizes that enactment of this legislation would likely lead to chaotic and uneven implementation and expand raids in immigrant communities. All across America, and as a result of ICE’s raids and deportations, abandoned U.S citizen children live in fear as their parents have been taken away from them. Immigrant workers who are the backbone of many sectors of our U.S. economy, including Los Angeles, are being hunted down for the act of working to feed their families. Employers have been forced to divert their attentions from increasing productivity and competing commercially, to hap-hazard contingency plans of what they will do should their business fall apart because of an ICE worksite raid or other employment verification scheme. Thank goodness that Los Angeles council members understand that the SAVE Act attempts to massively expand a broken, faulty, computer employment verification system to fix our broken immigration laws and that it just won’t work. The SAVE Act will single-handedly devastate businesses, workers, and families.



We remember that in 2006, Rep. Sensenbrenner and others tried to pass this type of legislation and these actions failed! Now in 2008 Representative Schuler and Bilbray are trying again, and they will fail as well. Thank you to the Los Angeles city council for knowing better and for moving decisively to stop this attack on immigrant families and our fragile economy.”



###

UK students discuss new immigration bill

Ain't no POWER,


like the POWER of the YOUTH,


Cause the POWER of the YOUTH won't STOP


...Say WHAT!!

(this picture was taken by me at the "Keep the Families United March and Rally in Washington DC., 06/07 -- YOUTH CHANGING A NATION-supporting the DREAM Act)

Today will be my last post for a while. When life is coming to an end we need to take advantage of time...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


USI conference warns against new immigration Bill


By Steven Carroll


The Irish Times (Dublin), March 26, 2008

The basic human rights of non- EU citizens living in Ireland could be violated if the Government pushes ahead with the strict new legislation it has proposed on immigration, student leaders have said.
The Union of Students in Ireland (USI) annual congress yesterday heard that the proposed immigration legislation, which was published last month and is before the Oireachtas, would make it easier for the Government to detain and deport illegal immigrants.
The USI said it opposes the Bill because it 'infringes on the human rights of immigrants'. They also voted to oppose the introduction of identity cards for non-EU citizens.
Students also argued that people seeking asylum would be placed in unnecessary legal limbo for long periods while the state considered their application.
USI president Hamidreza Khodabakhshi said intercultural dialogue was a major theme for its congress because it encompassed two major concerns for students - combating racism and advancing co-operation throughout the EU.
'USI support the thrust of the Government's intercultural approach, but we will tell ministers that parts of the Immigration, Residence and Protection Bill are unjust,' Mr Khodabakhshi said.
'This Bill would allow immigration officers to detain asylum seekers indefinitely - possibly for several months or longer - while an asylum application is being prepared.
'Asylum seekers should have their cases processed and fairly adjudicated within a reasonably short space of time, fixed by law.'
Speaking on proposals for identity cards for non-EU citizens living here, USI equality officer Ryan Griffin said: 'Civil liberties which were fought for and won by Irish people over generations are seriously imperilled by this shocking proposal to increase State surveillance capacity.
'In countries where identity cards were introduced, they started as being exclusive to immigrants - only to create a society where the Government has the power to spy on law-abiding individuals.'
The annual USI conference, which continues until tomorrow in Bettystown, Co Meath, is being attended by student representatives and delegates from third-level institutions across the country.
Environmental issues, minimum wage, the Lisbon Treaty and the availability of the morning-after pill are all subjects up for discussion.
A number of political figures are due to take part, including Ruairí Quinn (Labour), Senator Déirdre de Búrca (Greens), Kieran Allen of the People Before Profit Alliance and Eoin Ó Brúin of Sinn Féin.
+++
The Press Association (U.K.), March 25, 2008
Clck on the title of the blog to view original article.

The GOP is taking a dive when it's already going under

"GOP100 - Deconstructing Dumbo" by Thomas Fuchs. This interesting digital image is from a book of illustrations that can be purchased at www.thomasfuchs.com *



The NYT story below lists so many crisis in the GOP it makes you wonder why the party is pushing so hard for the S.A.V.E. ACT. Maybe they think they can at least grab those voters that think - fraud, embezzlement - and 29 Representatives making a quick escape - is ok.

This statement I am quoting is so interesting in that it has been kept mostly a secret - just like the legislation for HB4088 --

"National Republican Congressional Committee recently discovered, during an internal audit, accounting fraud so extensive that it had to call in the F.B.I., which is now investigating embezzlement by the committee’s former treasurer."

Be sure to read the last line of the NYT quote below - If the GOP is getting letters stuffed with feces - can you imagine how many more people will hate them if they pass HB 4088?
-------
March 30, 2008
Cover Story

A Case of the Blues

This article will appear in this Sunday's Times Magazine.

The Oklahoma Congressman Tom Cole is 58 years old, but he has never been famous before, and after this year, he will most likely never be famous again. Even this kind of fame, brief and slight, is uncomfortable on him. Cole is a party man, a lifelong Republican consultant, campaign worker and politician whose career, like that of a typical European Social Democrat, has recognized only a fluid and fungible line between political operative and elected official. It sometimes seems an accident he’s in Congress at all. He is tall and slightly formal, and slightly awkward; people who meet him casually describe him as cordial or gentlemanly. The Republican Party, in its current uncertainty, might have chosen an ideologue to fill Cole’s post or, as is its habit, a money man. Its choice of Cole, an operative, was the establishment insisting that its own learned habits were enough to save itself. “Right now, with where we are,” Ken Mehlman, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, told me, “Tom Cole is the perfect leader.”

Cole is a year into his term as chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, the group charged with managing the party’s simultaneous campaigns for 435 seats in Congress, and this role has made him responsible for rebuilding the Republican Party from the ground up, and for mounting a defense of the political map...

Going into the 2008 elections, Cole faces a daunting list of challenges. To date, 29 of his party’s representatives in Congress have retired, an unusually large number, leaving open politically marginal seats that incumbents might have held but which will be more difficult for challengers to defend — Deborah Pryce’s seat in Columbus, Ohio; Mike Ferguson’s in central New Jersey; Heather Wilson’s around Albuquerque; Thomas M. Reynolds’s in Buffalo. Reynolds, Cole’s predecessor at the N.R.C.C., just narrowly held his seat in 2006. Rick Renzi, a Republican congressman from Arizona, was indicted last month on federal corruption charges, putting what was another safe Republican seat in play. These vacancies mean that in a year when, by historical standards, his party would be expected to win back seats, Cole will have to defend many more seats than he will be able to attack (only six Democratic incumbents have announced they are leaving office). His committee has approximately $5 million on hand, roughly one-eighth the amount of cash on hand as its Democratic counterpart, which at latest count had $38 million.

...the National Republican Congressional Committee recently discovered, during an internal audit, accounting fraud so extensive that it had to call in the F.B.I., which is now investigating embezzlement by the committee’s former treasurer. Many conservative activists have become so dissatisfied with the party’s heresies, particularly on immigration and government spending, that as Cole’s staff took over, the committee’s fund-raising pleas were being ignored and, on at least one occasion, returned in an envelope stuffed with feces....

for link to complete NYT article click the title of this post


* dreamacttexas is not making money from posting Fuchs' website. We don't know Jim Fuchs, but just thought we'd do a favor for a guy who makes cool images.


The Church & the Green Card Soldiers


-------
A conversation on religion with Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn

Catholic Church and Immigration

In Mexico City this past week, I've thought over and over how it seems I'm just visiting Los Angeles-adjacent, with it's shared love of mini-marts and the same soft night breeze. Because of that familiarity, I've thought more than I usually do about how vital immigration from Latin America has been to religious identity in the United States. When I read the AP story on Sunday, which described how more than 100 foreign-born U.S. soldiers were granted citizenship only after giving their lives for this country, I felt frustrated with how ridiculous this was.

What jumped out at me in the story were the words of Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, who oversaw one of these services and lobbied President Bush to change the policy, who took a stand on the issue. Mahony is the rare church leader who has agitated consistently for greater rights for illegal immigrants in the U.S.

Jose Gutierrez, who died in 2003, was killed by friendly fire in the opening hours of the invasion of Iraq. Cardinal Mahony oversaw Gutierrez's service and wrote an open letter to President Bush in April of 2003 and urged the president to grant immediate citizenship to all immigrants who sign up for military service in wartime.

"There is something terribly wrong with our immigration policies if it takes death on the battlefield in order to earn citizenship," he wrote in the letter. "They should not have to wait until they are brought home in a casket."

In the article we learn that "Gutierrez's citizenship certificate -- dated to his death on March 21, 2003 -- was presented during a memorial service in Lomita, Calif., to Nora Mosquera, who took in the orphaned teen after he had trekked through Central America, hopping freight trains through Mexico before illegally sneaking into the U.S."

And that "tens of thousands of foreign-born members in the U.S. armed forces. Many have been naturalized, but more than 20,000 are not U.S. citizens. "Green card soldiers," they are often called, and early in the war, Bush signed an executive order making them eligible to apply for citizenship as soon as they enlist. Previously, legal residents in the military had to wait three years. Since Bush's order, nearly 37,000 soldiers have been naturalized. And 109 who lost their lives have been granted posthumous citizenship."

Mahony's letter was followed by his statement in 2006 that he would organize a campaign of civil disobedience if illegal immigration became a felony. I thought Mahony's stance a brave and smart one and a larger recognition of the significant portion of immigrants from Latin America who make up the American Catholic Church and keep it alive and vital.

It is exciting to think that Mahony may be a trailblazer for both the American Catholic Church and its Anglo congregations in focusing his energy and aid on the rights of these vital parishioners. If Church leadership advocated as decisively for immigrant rights as it has in it's fight against abortion, a reasonable solution seems possible.


Virginia's Dreamy Robot




Arizonas' NPR News Station- KJZZ 91.5 presented this story on 3/25/08.




Carl Hayden High School Robotics Team shines again......

If you remember this team of four students from Arizona beat out MIT four years ago in a robotics competition, what was so special about this team was that undocumented students were part of this amazing project.

Two of those young men are now helping the all-Latina-girl competing with a new project in Los Angeles...

Also in this piece they mention future plans from Salma Hayak's Production Company of a movie about the robotics team and in dedication to a North High School student named Virginia that was recently deported.

Listen to the archives by clicking on the title of this post.
Photo Credit Marcos Najera.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Saving the U.S. from the S.A.V.E. Act - part IV

As I look at this bill more closely, I am amazed that we (as Americans) have been so complacent about it. Is this the kind of country we want?


check out the 2 following clauses from the Subtitle E - Other Border Security Initiatives:

(iii) transports or moves that individual in the United States, in furtherance of their unlawful presence;

(ii) if the offense involved the transit of the defendant's spouse, child, sibling, parent, grandparent, or niece or nephew, and the offense is not described in any of clauses (iii) through (vii), be fined under title 18, United States Code or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both;

What this means is if you give a ride to an undocumented person or their family member you can be fined and/or imprisoned for up to one year
____

HB4088

Subtitle E--Other Border Security Initiatives

SEC. 141. ALIEN SMUGGLING AND TERRORISM PREVENTION.

(a) Checks Against Terrorist Watchlist- The Department of Homeland Security shall check against all available terrorist watchlists those alien smugglers and smuggled individuals who are interdicted at the land, air, and sea borders of the United States.

(b) Strengthening Prosecution and Punishment of Alien Smugglers- Section 274(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324(a)) is amended--

(1) by amending the subsection heading to read as follows: `Smuggling of Unlawful and Terrorist Aliens- ';

(2) by redesignating clause (iv) of paragraph (1)(B) as clause (vii);

(3) in paragraph (1), by striking `(1)(A)' and all that follows through clause (iii) of subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:

`(1)(A) Whoever, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an individual is an alien who lacks lawful authority to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowingly--

`(i) brings that individual to the United States in any manner whatsoever regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;

`(ii) recruits, encourages, or induces that individual to come to, enter, or reside in the United States;

`(iii) transports or moves that individual in the United States, in furtherance of their unlawful presence; or

`(iv) harbors, conceals, or shields from detection the individual in any place in the United States, including any building or any means of transportation, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (C).

`(B) Whoever, knowing that an individual is an alien, brings that individual to the United States in any manner whatsoever at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (C).

`(C) A violator of this paragraph shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs--

`(i) unless the offense is otherwise described in another clause of this subparagraph, be fined under title 18, United States Code or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

`(ii) if the offense involved the transit of the defendant's spouse, child, sibling, parent, grandparent, or niece or nephew, and the offense is not described in any of clauses (iii) through (vii), be fined under title 18, United States Code or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both;

`(iii) if the offense is a violation of paragraphs (1)(A)(ii), (iii), or (iv), or paragraph (1)(B), and was committed for the purpose of profit, commercial advantage, or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, United States Code or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;

`(iv) if the offense is a violation of paragraph (1)(A)(i) and was committed for the purpose of profit, commercial advantage, or private financial gain, or if the offense was committed with the intent or reason to believe that the individual unlawfully brought into the United States will commit an offense against the United States or any State that is punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year, be fined under title 18, United States Code, and imprisoned, in the case of a first or second violation, not less than 3 nor more than 10 years, and for any other violation, not less than 5 nor more than 15 years; and

`(v) if the offense results in serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18, United States Code) or places in jeopardy the life of any person, be fined under title 18, United States Code or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both;

`(vi) if the offense involved an individual who the defendant knew was engaged in or intended to engage in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)), be fined under title 18, United States Code or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both; and';

(4) in the clause (vii) so redesignated by paragraph (2) of this subsection (which now becomes clause (vii) of the new subparagraph (C))--

(A) by striking `in the case' and all that follows through `(v) resulting' and inserting `if the offense results'; and

(B) by inserting `and if the offense involves kidnapping, an attempt to kidnap, the conduct required for aggravated sexual abuse (as defined in section 2241 without regard to where it takes place), or an attempt to commit such abuse, or an attempt to kill, be fined under such title or imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both' after `or both'; and

(5) by striking existing subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) (without affecting the new subparagraph (C) added by the amendments made by this Act) and all that follows through paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

`(2)(A) There is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the offenses described in paragraph (1).

`(B) In a prosecution for a violation of, or an attempt or conspiracy to violate subsection (a)(1)(A)(i), (a)(1)(A)(ii), or (a)(1)(B), that occurs on the high seas, no defense based on necessity can be raised unless the defendant--

`(i) as soon as practicable, reported to the Coast Guard the circumstances of the necessity, and if a rescue is claimed, the name, description, registry number, and location of the vessel engaging in the rescue; and

`(ii) did not bring, attempt to bring, or in any manner intentionally facilitate the entry of any alien into the land territory of the United States without lawful authority, unless exigent circumstances existed that placed the life of that alien in danger, in which case the reporting requirement set forth in clause (i) of this subparagraph is satisfied by notifying the Coast Guard as soon as practicable after delivering the alien to emergency medical or law enforcement personnel ashore.

`(C) It is a defense to a violation of, or an attempt or conspiracy to violate, clause (iii) or (iv) of subsection (a)(1)(A) for a religious denomination having a bona fide nonprofit, religious organization in the United States, or the agents or officer of such denomination or organization, to encourage, invite, call, allow, or enable an alien who is present in the United States to perform the vocation of a minister or missionary for the denomination or organization in the United States as a volunteer who is not compensated as an employee, notwithstanding the provision of room, board, travel, medical assistance, and other basic living expenses, provided the minister or missionary has been a member of the denomination for at least one year.

`(D) For purposes of this paragraph and paragraph (1)--

`(i) the term `United States' means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States; and

`(ii) the term `lawful authority' means permission, authorization, or waiver that is expressly provided for in the immigration laws of the United States or the regulations prescribed under those laws and does not include any such authority secured by fraud or otherwise obtained in violation of law or authority that has been sought but not approved.'.


for link to the Thomas Congressional Record click the title of this post

Saving the U.S. from the S.A.V.E. Act - part III

Statistics that influenced recommendations for the S.A.V.E. ACT came from the data provided by the 2006 Federal Court Management Statistics which are issued by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

As we know, after the Gonzalez debacle, the U.S. Judicial system is only semi-functional (at best) - what type of competency can we expect in these matters? There is also doubt behind the validity of the information since the Bush Administration is not known for it's accuracy.


-----
HB4088
SEC. 305. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) Findings- Based on the recommendations made by the 2007 Judicial Conference and the statistical data provided by the 2006 Federal Court Management Statistics (issued by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts), the Congress finds the following:

(1) Federal courts along the southwest border of the United States have a greater percentage of their criminal caseload affected by immigration cases than other Federal courts.

(2) The percentage of criminal immigration cases in most southwest border district courts totals more than 49 percent of the total criminal caseloads of those districts.

(3) The current number of judges authorized for those courts is inadequate to handle the current caseload.

(4) Such an increase in the caseload of criminal immigration filings requires a corresponding increase in the number of Federal judgeships.

(5) The 2007 Judicial Conference recommended the addition of judgeships to meet this growing burden.

(6) The Congress should authorize the additional district court judges necessary to carry out the 2007 recommendations of the Judicial Conference for district courts in which the criminal immigration filings represented more than 49 percent of all criminal filings for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2006.

for link to Thomas Congressional Report click the title of this post

Saving the U.S. from the S.A.V.E. Act - part II

In this section of the bill, there is a request for 8,000 additional immigration detention beds -

There is also a recommendation that ICE "contract private facilities" for efficiency and reduced liability.

The request for more detention beds is confusing since it seemed like the U.S. wanted undocumented immigrants to leave the U.S. - but having more detention facilities would keep people here.


----

SEC. 304. INCREASED DETENTION FACILITIES FOR ALIENS APPREHENDED FOR ILLEGAL ENTRY.

(a) In General- The Secretary of Homeland Security shall make arrangements for the availability of 8,000 additional beds for detaining aliens taken into custody by immigration officials.

(b) Implementation- Efforts shall be made to--

(1) contract private facilities whenever possible to promote efficient use and to limit the Federal Government's maintenance of and liability for additional infrastructure;

(2) utilize State and local facilities for the provision of additional beds; and

(3) utilize BRAC facilities or active duty facilities.

(c) Construction- The Department of Homeland Security shall construct facilities as necessary to meet the remainder of the 8,000 new beds to be provided.

(d) Family Detention Facility- To further meet the special needs of detained families, the Department of Homeland Security shall retain or construct a family detention facility, similar to the T. Don Hutto Family Residential Facility, offering no less than 500 beds.

(e) Responsibilities- The Secretary of Homeland Security shall be responsible for providing humane conditions, health care and nutrition, psychological services, and education for minors.

(f) Authorization- All funds necessary to accomplish the directives within this section are authorized to be appropriated.



for link to the Thomas Congressional Report click the title of this post

Saving the U.S. from the S.A.V.E. Act - part I

There is still very little information out on HB 4088 the impending immigration bill - As mentioned before it would be an arbitrary law - that appears draconian in every way. Today I checked the NYT, and the Washington Post - there was nothing published on the bill. In order to make HB4088 - the S.A.V.E. act less secret - I will be posting information from the Thomas Congressional Report.


from the S.A.V.E. ACT:

SEC. 307. MEDIA CAMPAIGN.

    (a) In General- The Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall develop strategies to inform the public of changes in immigration policies created by provisions in this legislation.
    (b) Notification of Changes to Employment Verification Process- The Secretary of Labor shall employ, at his or her discretion, a combination of print, television, internet, and radio media to notify employers of changes to the employment verification process. These multilingual media campaigns should be targeted toward non-citizen communities and those most likely to employ non-citizens. Announcements should encourage compliance with new legislation and should explain penalties for noncompliance with provisions within this Act.
    (c) Multilingual Media Campaign- The Secretary of Homeland Security shall also develop a multilingual media campaign explaining the extent of this legislation, the timelines therein, and the penalties for noncompliance with this Act. Announcements should be targeted toward undocumented aliens and should emphasize--
      (1) provisions in this Act that enhance border security and interior enforcement;
      (2) the benefits of voluntary removal of undocumented aliens;
      (3) punishment for apprehension and forced removal of undocumented aliens; and
      (4) legal methods of reentering the United States, including temporary work visas.
    (d) Cooperation With Other Governments- The Secretary of Homeland Security shall make all reasonable attempts to cooperate with the Governments of Mexico and the countries of Central America in implementing a media campaign that raises awareness of the issues in paragraph (2).


for link to Library of Congress/Thomas web page click the title of this post

Immigration laws split mixed-legal-status families

By CARL MANNING
OVERLAND PARK, KAN. -- When Kecia Sales and Juan Marquez were married,they were like scores of other couples: very much in love with plans tolive together for the rest of their lives.

But it wasn't to be.After their December 2004 marriage, he told her he had been livingillegally in the U.S. since 1999. After leaving Mexico, Marquez hadmade his way to her hometown of Kansas City, Kan., where they met andmarried, and she took his name.

They became one of an estimated 2 million mixed families, where atleast one member is a citizen or lawfully living in the country and theother isn't. The vast majority of those families, according to the PewHispanic Center, involve an illegal parent and legal children — yetanother shade of this country's ongoing immigration conundrum.

That he's among 12 million illegal immigrants didn't change Sales' lovefor Marquez. They lived in her hometown and both worked to make endsmeet."It didn't bother me," she said. "It doesn't make him any worse of aperson."But Marquez, 26, and his wife, 40, finally decided he should return toMexico and begin the long, uphill fight to re-enter the countrylegally.

Broad effectsMarquez's decision came as Kansas and some 40 other states try to passlegislation this year dealing with illegal immigrants because Congresshas failed to act. It's a move Hispanic advocates say affects more thanillegal immigrants."It impacts also documented immigrants because families tend to be of amixed status. Hurting one individual hurts the entire family. Itcreates an unwelcoming atmosphere to all immigrants, whether legal ornot," said David Ferreira of the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

El Centro Inc., a Hispanic advocacy group in the Kansas City area, saidits 2006 survey showed 63 percent of Hispanics questioned said theylived in some type of mixed family status.

Why Juan Marquez came to the United States is a familiar tale. Hewanted a better life for himself and his family, which includes twoyounger brothers, his mother and disabled father back in Hidalgo state.

"They have no money for food. My parents don't work," he said. "Iwanted to do whatever I have to do to put food on the table for myfamily."He said each week he sent $100 to his family back in Mexico — apractice known as "remittances," which the Inter-American DevelopmentBank says accounted for some $23 billion sent to Mexico in 2006.

The couple talked about the decision for him to return to Mexico in theoffice of their immigration attorney, Mira Mdivani, shortly beforeMarquez left last month.

"You don't feel safe in the streets. You don't feel safe anywherebecause of a lot of things going on right now," he said. "The policepull you over for no reason."I want to be free, to go wherever I want to go and not be scared. Inthe long run, it will be worth it. We can have a better life and wewon't be scared anymore," Marquez said.When he was in the U.S., he worked at construction jobs, doingeverything from picking up trash to cleaning sewers and provided abouttwo-thirds of the household income.

Kecia Marquez said she worried daily that her husband would be arrestedat work by immigration agents, so much so that she called him three orfour times a day to check on him.Her worries continue about whether he will be allowed back in theUnited States."It's stressful, very stressful, because I don't know if he's comingback. It's just that I'm sure we're doing the right thing. This is myhome, and I want it to be here with my husband," she said as bothteared up.

Waiver request deniedMdivani said because Juan Marquez entered the country illegally andstayed more than a year, the law bars him from coming back for 10years, unless the government approves a waiver request from his wife.

She said the waiver request was denied March 13 by the U.S. Consulatein Juarez, Mexico, but it agreed to give Kecia Marquez 30 days tosubmit new evidence of hardship. Then it could take up to a year for adecision about whether he can return.

"The law is extremely unforgiving," Mdivani said. "But I think Keciahas a compelling case. She takes care of a disabled sister and uncle.She won't have the opportunity for any kind of decent job there and shewill lose the house."She also won't be getting much sympathy from those pushing tougherimmigration legislation."I have compassion for them, but I'm also concerned about Kansascitizens. I'm responsible to the citizens to protect them," saidRepublican state Sen. Peggy Palmer, who is pushing this year forstronger laws to discourage illegal immigration in Kansas.

Possible move to MexicoKecia Marquez has her own feelings about what legislators are trying todo."It's making it hard for everyone. It's like we're being punished justbecause my husband is Hispanic," she said.Not so, says Kris Kobach, state GOP chairman, who helped draft thelegislation."It's a reflection of the fact that we're a nation that respects therule of law," he said. "There are millions of people waiting patientlyin line to get in and we shouldn't forget they are playing by the ruleswhen talking about those coming here illegally."If she can't get the waiver approved, Kecia Marquez says she will moveto Mexico."That's what I'll have to do. That's my husband. I have to go where hegoes," she said. "I love him, I can't forget about him."

Brought to you by the Houston Chronicle

Family torn by immigration laws

Family torn by immigration laws
by By Deborah Young
Sunday March 23, 2008, 7:16 AM

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. -- Indika Senanayaka was alone with his infant sonBrian in his Concord townhouse -- as he is most nights -- when he gotthe call from Sri Lanka during the pre-dawn hours Wednesday.His sister's application to visit was denied for a second time by theU.S. Embassy in Colombo.The decision by the American official, apparently rendered after avery brief interview, means the only family Senanayaka has in thiscountry can fit in the crook of his elbow, searches for him when hegets hungry, and has a shock of straight black hair just like his mother. Senanayaka's wife, Tai Ling Feng, 36, a Taiwan-born American citizen,died of mysterious liver failure two and a half weeks after giving birth."I'm by myself at night time and I think about her. We did everythingtogether; every single thing," Senanayaka, 34, said, recounting theirfirst smiles at each other when she walked into the restaurant wherehe works, and detailing the sweet path of their uniquely American lovestory. His words briefly lifted the grief from his face until hereached the part about the final days with her, dying, in the hospitalbed.For now, while Senanayaka is at work managing two Subway stores inEltingville and West Brighton, an extended family of friends,co-workers and in-laws helps care for Brian -- something he had hopedhis sister could do before embassy officials rebuffed her, claimingshe might never return to her poor, war-torn country in the Indian Ocean."Last night, I was thinking I don't know what to do. My mother wascrying, saying I should go back," Senanayaka said in a quiet voice ashe played with the two wedding rings on his finger, his and hiswife's. "This is my country. I have friends here; I work; I pay taxes;I bought a house. I came here with nothing and I can be an example topeople. I am not getting angry, it's a decision I have to make."Thousands of Staten Island immigrants make such wrenching choices,weighing the intensity of the connection they feel with their adoptedcountry against the love and comforts of family they left behind.And many of them, frustrated and dispirited over ever-changingimmigration regulations, appeal to congressional representatives for help.More than 1,000 requests for immigration assistance a year come to theoffice Rep. Vito Fossella (R-Staten Island Brooklyn), which has afull-time liaison dedicated to shepherding people through the process,according to his staff.On file are hundreds of pleas from Islanders wondering if they willever have the legal right to leave and return to this country -- anadopted homeland which has also become something of a cage for them,keeping them from seeing aging mothers, fathers and other familymembers in their homelands.And there are baffling predicaments: Take the Albanian family arrestedand jailed on immigration charges last month. Their 24-year-old,Americanized daughter now faces deportation to a place where she isnot literate in the language and which she not seen since she was atoddler.In the case of Senanayaka, some longtime customers, who had grown toadmire the calm and charming store manager, were shaken by his tragedyand connected him with Fossella."We did get involved; we argued this is an extreme case. Thecircumstances are so unique and tragic," Fossella said.After Senanayaka's sister was first denied a visitor's visa,Fossella's office contacted the embassy in Colombo, urging them toreschedule the interview. He wrote a letter she used as part of herfailed appeal.The denial demonstrates the limit of his sway, Fossella said: "Wecan't wave a wand and makes things happen."A consular official with the State Department could not comment on thespecifics of the case, but said applicants for visits must prove theywill return home by showing strong work and family ties in their homecountry. Requests "are adjudicated on the merits that the applicantbrings to the interview table," he said."She's still crying," Senanayaka said about his sister, Nandee, whomhe said was crisply informed during her 5-minute interview that theydidn't believe she intended to return to Sri Lanka. "She feels so bad."There is one final chance for Nandee to beseech the Americangovernment to allow her to come here, help tend to her newborn nephewand offer some measure of consolation to her grieving brother:Humanitarian parole.Senanayaka said he has contacted his attorney to help him understandthe paperwork."It's an extraordinary measure that is sparingly used ona case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian needs, a compellingemergency or significant public benefit," said Shawn Saucier, aspokesman for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.Roughly 1,500 people annually apply for this exception. If it isgranted, the length of stay varies with the circumstances, andvisitors are always expected to return home, he said."If he does apply, we will continue to do what we can," said Fossella."Who can plan for a woman to give birth and die within a couple ofweeks? I think these are extenuating circumstances."Deborah Young is a news reporter for the Advance. She may be reachedat young@....© 2008 Staten Island Live LLC.

Over 600 illegal migrants nabbed in northern Africa - in 2008

en todos lados...
~~~~

Nador, Mar. 26 - Some 621 would-be immigrants were rounded in the northern city of Nador from January 1st through March 25, part of efforts to curb illegal migration.

According to local authorities, 536 out of these illegals come from sub-Saharan Africa, while the 85 others are from Algeria.

The would-be immigrants use Morocco as a destination, but mostly as a transit to cross to the EU either through the Gibraltar Strait, the Moroccan cities of Sebta and Melilia -occupied by Spain- or through the Canary Islands, off Morocco's southern Atlantic coasts.

PLEASE CLICK ON THE TITLE OF THIS POST TO REDIRECT YOU TO WEBSITE: MAGHRED ARABE PRESSE

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Respect for Immigrants -March and Rally in Houston


March and Rally on May 1 in Houston - Volunteers Needed

call 713 271 9703

Discharge Petition on HB 4088

C-Span's definition of "Discharge Petition:" starts a process to force a bill out of committee. A successful petition requires the signatures of 218 members, which is a majority of the House.

The bill 4088 is very similar to the bill presented by the House of Representatives in early 2006. As mentioned before on this blog - the media seems to have made a pact with the devil - they are leaving the news about 4088 under the table.

Hopefully, the people involved with 4088 are pushing the bill so that they can seem tough to their anti-immigrant constituents - they might be thinking its the only hope they have when November comes - since it is clear that the GOP will be going down the tubes (at least for a while).

The list below is that of Representatives who signed the petition on 4088 (s.a.v.e. bill)

Is your favorite Representative on this list? If so, you might want to question how they view humanity - if they are supporting (and endorsing) HB4088 they are wanting something very harsh to come down on the U.S. See dreamacttexas posts "The Gravity of HB4088" from March 19, 2008 and "Explaining the S.A.V.E. Act (HB 4088) from March 13, 2008.

Discharge Petition on HB 4088 signed by the following Members:

Thelma D. Drake, Brian P. Bilbray, Lynn A. Westmoreland, Tom Davis, Bill Shuster, Jo Bonner, Peter J. Roskam, Mike Pence, Roy Blunt, Charles W. Dent, Mac Thornberry. Jeff Miller, Terry Everett. Thomas G. Tancredo, Heath Shuler, Ginny Brown-Waite, Steve Buyer, Eric Cantor, Michael C. Burgess, Virginia Foxx, Gus M. Bilirakis, Jeb Hensarling, Joe Wilson, Jean Schmidt, Jim Gerlach, David Davis, Paul C. Broun, Gene Taylor, Tim Walberg, John Campbell, Mike Ferguson, Dean Heller, Thaddeus G. McCotter, Ted Poe, Kevin Brady, Darrell E. Issa, Charles W. Boustany, Jr., Rodney Alexander, Michael R. Turner, Todd Russell Platts, Phil English, Tom Cole, Frank R. Wolf, Edward R. Royce, Mary Fallin, Randy Neugebauer, Marilyn N. Musgrave, Candice S. Miller, Mary Bono Mack, Connie Mack, Jim Jordan, John Abney Culberson, J. Randy Forbes, John Kline, Steve King, Bob Inglis, Joe Knollenberg, Jim Saxton, Peter Hoekstra, Brad Ellsworth, F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr., Ron Lewis, Jerry Weller, Kay Granger, Patrick T. McHenry, K. Michael Conaway, Walter B. Jones, Jo Ann Emerson, Michele Bachmann, J. Gresham Barrett, Ray LaHood, John Barrow, Lee Terry, Dana Rohrabacher, Harold Rogers, John J. Duncan, Jr., John B. Shadegg, Daniel E. Lun- gren, Nick Lampson, Joseph R. Pitts, Sue Wilkins Myrick, Barbara Cubin, Geoff Davis, Robin Hayes, Christopher H. Smith, Virgil H. Goode, Jr., Henry E. Brown, Jr., Mark Steven Kirk, Lamar Smith, Ken Calvert, Bob Goodlatte, Christopher Shays, Judy Biggert, Todd Tiahrt, Nathan Deal, Michael N. Castle, Robert E. Latta, Ric Keller, David G. Reichert, Kenny Marchant, Jim McCrery, Robert J. Wittman, John Boozman, John R. Carter, Donald A. Manzullo, Sam Graves, Ander Crenshaw, Doug Lamborn, Scott Garrett, Tom Feeney, Rodney P. Frelinghuysen, Cliff Stearns, Paul Ryan, Dave Weldon, Tim Murphy, Kenny C. Hulshof, Jack Kingston, Steven C. LaTourette, Marsha Blackburn, Mike McIntyre, Dan Burton, Duncan Hunter, Nancy E. Boyda. Michael T. McCaul, Greg Walden, Jerry Lewis, David Dreier, Trent Franks, Heather Wilson, Rick Renzi, Jeff Fortenberry, Phil Gingrey, Pete Sessions, John Sullivan, W. Todd Akin, Zach Wamp, Tom Price, John Linder, Adrian Smith, Kevin McCarthy, John L. Mica, John A. Boehner, Frank D. Lucas, Jerry Moran, Ed Whitfield, Adam H. Putnam, Howard Coble, Gary G. Miller, Roscoe G. Bartlett, Louie Gohmert, Dave Camp, C. W. Bill Young, Wayne T. Gilchrest, Elton Gallegly, Ralph M. Hall, John E. Peterson, Peter T. King, Thomas E. Petri. Sam Johnson, Steve Chabot, Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon, John T. Doolittle. Stevan Pearce, Vern Buchanan, Wally Herger, Chris Cannon, Rob Bishop, John Shimkus, Mike Pence, Robert B. Aderholt, Michael K. Simpson, Ralph Regula, Jim Ramstad, Jon C. Porter. Dennis R. Rehberg, Tom Latham. Spencer Bachus, Joe Barton, Joe Donnelly, Christopher P. Carney. and Jeff Flake.

click title of this post for link to Thomas Report on 4088

ICE Raid in Manassas Area

A few questions about the PWC ICE raid that occurred today. Were the owners or administrators of the company arrested? Have the families of those detained been advised of their where abouts? Or will these men disappear for a few weeks or months until the ICE bureaucracy catches up with it's paperwork?

I have mentioned this before - if Obama or Clinton are really serious about Latino voters, they should promise to stop the raids. At the least they should offer hope that people who are arrested will be able to contact their families in addition to obtaining legal representation. Obama and Clinton have said that the U.S. needs fair immigration reform, why can't they go further and make promises that will convince Latinos they would be leaders of "all" the people?

---

Immigration Agency Arrests 34 Workers At Construction Firm

By N.C. Aizenman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 25, 2008; B05

Federal immigration authorities converged on a Prince William County construction company just before sunrise yesterday, arresting 34 Latin American nationals for being in the country illegally.

Workplace raids are rare in the Washington area, and the roundup at CMC Concrete Construction in the Manassas area appears to be the largest in the region in nearly two years, according to a review of news releases on the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Web site.

The workers -- who come from Guatemala, Mexico, Honduras, Costa Rica and El Salvador -- are being charged administratively and are in ICE custody undergoing deportation proceedings, said Ernestine Fobbs, a spokeswoman for the customs agency.

News of the arrests spread quickly through an immigrant community already on edge after a county law took effect this month allowing Prince William police to check the immigration status of people stopped for other infractions.

Fobbs said the agency had executed two search warrants in connection with the operation. Because those warrants were under seal, Fobbs said, she could not discuss how or why the company had drawn federal attention, nor confirm that CMC Concrete Construction was the agency's target.

James Rybicki, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, said no employers had been charged. But he added, "Obviously, we'll be reviewing the case for possible criminal charges."

Public records identify Felisberto J. Magalhaes as the president of CMC and Maria Brandao Magalhaes as its secretary and treasurer. A relative of the owners who entered the company's administrative suite in a Manassas office complex yesterday afternoon to meet with several ICE agents declined to comment.

A few miles away, at a large lot where CMC workers come to pick up equipment before heading out to job sites each day, about a dozen remaining workers stood in groups discussing the morning's events.

A 32-year-old Mexican man, who asked that his name not be published for fear of retaliation from his bosses or the government, said he and three others had driven off the lot in one of the company's pickup trucks when they noticed a silver van behind them flashing police lights.

"We thought maybe we had run a light or there was something wrong with the plates -- we figured at worst we were going to get a traffic ticket," he said.

Instead, the man said, an armed immigration agent leaned in the window and demanded identification.

"Everyone grew very quiet. We were horribly sad, but more than anything, resigned," the man said.

He said agents were able to retrieve records demonstrating that CMC had successfully sponsored him for legal permanent residency years ago. But he said two colleagues in the truck had no such proof to offer and were handcuffed, along with five workers riding in a pickup behind them.

Minutes after the roadside detentions, other workers said, immigration agency vehicles entered the lot and more than a dozen agents fanned out in pursuit of several fleeing workers.

When the Mexican worker finally reached the lot, he learned that his younger brother was among those taken away.

"You feel so impotent, to see someone you know, who is just trying to work, go through this and to not be able to help him," he said.

for link to WP article click the title of this post

French Police search the "intimate parts" of rights activist

The title of this post may seem vulgar, but I believe it needs to be very clear, so that everyone who reads this will understand what happened to rights activist Fatimata M'Baye at Charles De Gaulle airport in Paris.

The article mentions that these actions are part of Sarkozy's stringent anti-immigration measures. Has this happened in the U.S. but hasn't been reported?

-----

Activist says threatened, stripped by French police

Reuters
Tuesday, March 25, 2008; 4:40 PM
Washington Post

NOUAKCHOTT (Reuters) - A Mauritanian rights activist said French police threatened her, strip-searched her and detained her for 24 hours for protesting at the treatment of an illegal migrant being deported.

Fatimata M'Baye, head of the Mauritanian Human Rights Association, said around 20 police boarded her flight on March 11 and threatened to beat her and doctor Pierre-Marie Bernard after they complained about the condition of the shackled Mauritanian, who was being forcibly restrained by officers...

M'Baye, a lawyer and a Muslim, said she was subjected to an invasive strip-search and was considering legal action... "The most painful part of this affair was the body search. I was stripped completely naked and they searched my intimate parts, without any reason. It was humiliating. I consider it like a rape," M'Baye said...



for link to complete Reuters/WP article click the title of this post

The Irony of Ignorance










After 4,000 soldier deaths - the Bush administration vows to continue.  Adding this to the million+ Iraqi deaths - creates such irony, since to proceed with the war - and the heavy troop presence is said to be the "right" thing - Recalling the statement that God helps the president decide what is best - would God really want an administration that feigns ignorance to the consequences of such massive carnage?


-----
Bush Says War's Outcome 'Will Merit the Sacrifice'
President and Petraeus Discuss Strategy as the U.S. Death Toll in Iraq Rises to 4,000

By Karen DeYoung and Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, March 25, 2008; A01

As the American military death toll in Iraq reached 4,000, President Bush conferred yesterday with top U.S. officials in Washington and in Baghdad and vowed in a public statement that the outcome of the war "will merit the sacrifice."

Bush held a two-hour videoconference with Gen. David H. Petraeus and U.S. Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker. Petraeus reiterated his plan to halt U.S. troop withdrawals, begun late last fall, at the end of July. At that point, he has said, he will "evaluate" whether Iraqi forces and a reduced number of U.S. troops can maintain the lower levels of violence.

"We have every desire to continue with the withdrawal of forces" at some time after July, one military official said. "The issue will be once we remove over 25 percent of combat power plus other associated units . . . we let the dust settle . . . and look to see where we're at," he said, adding that the evaluation period would probably be at least six weeks. Petraeus has offered no guarantee that conditions will allow further withdrawals before Bush leaves office.

In congressional testimony next month, Petraeus and Crocker are expected to describe continued but slow improvement in military and political conditions, even as recent weeks have seen an increase in suicide bombings, along with Sunday's renewal of rocket attacks on Baghdad's Green Zone, where the U.S. Embassy and much of the Iraqi government are located.

Among the wounded in four separate attacks were an American military contractor and an embassy employee from Jordan, both of whom remain in serious condition, a U.S. official in Baghdad said. Military officials said the munitions were Iranian-made, fired from northeastern Baghdad by renegade Shiite militia groups.

Late Sunday night, the U.S. command in Baghdad announced that four soldiers had been killed by a makeshift bomb in southern Baghdad, bringing the total number of U.S. troops killed to 4,000 since the war began in March 2003. Dozens of Iraqis were also killed in violence around the country Sunday.

Overall attacks in Iraq have sharply declined in Iraq, but the trend has begun to plateau over the past three months -- car bombings have decreased, but suicide bombings have increased. Military officials said that Petraeus will tell Congress that the withdrawal, which has now reached about 9,000 troops, will continue with three additional brigades to be withdrawn without replacement by July 31.

Although administration officials have said that U.S. troop strength at that point should be about where it was before a "surge" in deployments began last spring -- approximately 130,000 -- the military official said the net number remaining may be larger. "They're in the process now of trying to scrub the numbers," he said of Petraeus's command in Baghdad. "Figuring out boots on the ground is difficult because . . . units come in at different sizes, people have left, people have been wounded."

There are similar difficulties, he said, in determining the "battlefield geometry" that will enable the withdrawal of entire combat brigades. Brigades are seldom deployed intact, and their battalions are often scattered. While one battalion could be withdrawn without replacement, others may have to be replaced by U.S. or Iraqi forces from elsewhere.

During his testimony on April 8 and 9, Petraeus expects to present Congress with firm numbers on how many U.S. troops will leave Iraq and how many will remain by the end of July.

Crocker, who in previous testimony has cautioned against hopes of rapid progress, is expected to describe some political and economic achievements but to say that much work remains. In a mid-March interview with The Washington Post, he described Iraqi political and economic institutions as "like everything else here, still very much under development."

Another senior U.S. diplomat offered positive indicators yesterday, saying that Iraqis are "spending increasingly more money than we are" on reconstruction and some military programs. "We're not starting any new projects and [the Iraqis] are getting incrementally better," he said. Iraq's "Arab neighbors are gradually engaging, although not enough. They're not embracing Maliki the way they ought to," he added, referring to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

After speaking with Petraeus and Crocker yesterday morning from the White House, Bush attended a briefing by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at the State Department on cooperation between military and civilian officials in Iraq and elsewhere. In a statement to reporters, he spoke of the U.S. civilians who have died in Iraq and said: "I will vow so long as I am president to make sure that those lives were not lost in vain."

Bush will attend a similar briefing by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and military leaders today at the Pentagon, but administration officials said they do not expect any new decisions or departures from current policy.

One official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that after months of friction among civilian and military leaders -- including over concerns about overall stress on the military -- there is little debate over the basic Iraq strategy for the next six months. The only real question, he said, is how long the "pause" in withdrawals after July will last.

In Turkey yesterday, Vice President Cheney told ABC News that "there's no reason now to decide what the force level is going to be in December of '08." The criterion, he said, "is how do we make certain we succeed in Iraq? It may be that we can make judgments about reductions down the road. . . . But I don't think [Bush] is likely to want to try to say now what the force level ought to be at the end of the year."


for link to WP article click the title of this post

we apologize for not having the source for the Bush photo

E-Verify statement to be published today

The Bush administration is expected to publish Tuesday [today] a second supplemental "Social Security No Match" regulation. The first rule, finalized in August 2007, has been held up in the courts. The regulation is an effort by the Department of Homeland Security to enforce immigration laws by imposing obligations on employers who receive a letter indicating that an employee's information does not match the Social Security Administration's. The Shuler-Tancredo bill contains language that would codify this controversial regulation.

Mandatory use of a federal database known as E-Verify (until recently known as Basic Pilot) to verify the employment eligibility of all workers is at the heart of a number of federal and state proposals. The Shuler-Tancredo bill (H.R. 4088) is the subject of a "discharge petition" gathering signatures in the U.S. House of Representatives, and there are other similar proposals under consideration in Washington. The state of Mississippi joined Arizona and Oklahoma in mandating the use of E-Verify by all employers while Idaho, Indiana, and Virginia recently rejected such proposals.

from Immigration Policy Center

Monday, March 24, 2008

ICE agent arrested for coercing oral sex from immigrant

This is just so sad. People can be so evil. I am sure this is not an isolated event.

~~~
An Agent, a Green Card, and a Demand for Sex
NEW YORK TIMES
By NINA BERNSTEIN
Published: March 21, 2008

No problems so far, the immigration agent told the American citizenand his 22-year-old Colombian wife at her green card interview inDecember. After he stapled one of their wedding photos to herapplication for legal permanent residency, he had just one morequestion: What was her cellphone number?

Isaac R. Baichu, 46, an adjudicator for the United States Citizenshipand Immigration Services, was arrested after he met with a green cardapplicant at the Flagship Restaurant, a diner in Queens. He is chargedwith coercing oral sex from her.The calls from the agent started three days later. He hinted, shesaid, at his power to derail her life and deport her relatives,alluding to a brush she had with the law before her marriage.
He summoned her to a private meeting. And at noon on Dec. 21, in a parkedcar on Queens Boulevard, he named his price — not realizing that shewas recording everything on the cellphone in her purse."I want sex," he said on the recording. "One or two times. That's all. You get your green card. You won't have to see me anymore."She reluctantly agreed to a future meeting. But when she tried toleave his car, he demanded oral sex "now," to "know that you'reserious." And despite her protests, she said, he got his way.The 16-minute recording, which the woman first took to The New YorkTimes and then to the Queens district attorney, suggests the vastpower of low-level immigration law enforcers, and a growingdesperation on the part of immigrants seeking legal status. Theaftermath, which included the arrest of an immigration agent lastweek, underscores the difficulty and danger of making a complaint,even in the rare case when abuse of power may have been caught ontape.
No one knows how widespread sexual blackmail is, but the case echoesother instances of sexual coercion that have surfaced in recent years,including agents criminally charged in Atlanta, Miami and Santa Ana,Calif. And it raises broader questions about the system'svulnerability to corruption at a time when millions of noncitizenslive in a kind of legal no-man's land, increasingly fearful of seekingthe law's protection.
The agent arrested last week, Isaac R. Baichu, 46, himself animmigrant from Guyana, handled some 8,000 green card applicationsduring his three years as an adjudicator in the Garden City, N.Y.,office of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, part ofthe federal Department of Homeland Security. He pleaded not guilty tofelony and misdemeanor charges of coercing the young woman to performoral sex, and of promising to help her secure immigration papers inexchange for further sexual favors. If convicted, he will face up toseven years in prison.His agency has suspended him with pay, and the inspector general ofHomeland Security is reviewing his other cases, a spokesman saidWednesday. Prosecutors, who say they recorded a meeting between Mr.Baichu and the woman on March 11 at which he made similar demands forsex, urge any other victims to come forward.
Money, not sex, is the more common currency of corruption inimmigration, but according to Congressional testimony in 2006 byMichael Maxwell, former director of the agency's internalinvestigations, more than 3,000 backlogged complaints of employeemisconduct had gone uninvestigated for lack of staff, including 528involving criminal allegations.The agency says it has tripled its investigative staff since then, andcounts only 165 serious complaints pending. But it stopped posting ane-mail address and phone number for such complaints last year, saidJan Lane, chief of security and integrity, because it lacks the staffto cull the thousands of mostly irrelevant messages that resulted.
Immigrants, she advised, should report wrongdoing to any lawenforcement agency they trust.The young woman in Queens, whose name is being withheld because theauthorities consider her the victim of a sex crime, did not even tellher husband what had happened. Two weeks after the meeting in the car,finding no way to make a confidential complaint to the immigrationagency and afraid to go to the police, she and two older femalerelatives took the recording to The Times.
Reasons to WorryA slim, shy woman who looks like a teenager, she said she had spentrecent months baby-sitting for relatives in Queens, crying over thedeaths of her two brothers back in Cali, Colombia, and longing for theright stamp in her passport — one that would let her return to theUnited States if she visited her family.She came to the United States on a tourist visa in 2004 andoverstayed. When she married an American citizen a year ago, the lawallowed her to apply to "adjust" her illegal status. But unless hergreen card application was approved, she could not visit her parentsor her brothers' graves and then legally re-enter the United States.And if her application was denied, she would face deportation.
She had another reason to be fearful, and not only for herself. About15 months ago, she said, an acquaintance hired her and two femalerelatives in New York to carry $12,000 in cash to the bank. The threewomen, all living in the country illegally, were arrested on thestreet by customs officers apparently acting on a tip in amoney-laundering investigation. After determining that the women hadno useful information, the officers released them.But the closed investigation file had showed up in the computer whenshe applied for a green card, Mr. Baichu told her in December; untilhe obtained the file and dealt with it, her application would not beapproved. If she defied him, she feared, he could summon immigrationenforcement agents to take her relatives to detention.
So instead of calling the police, she turned on the video recorder inher cellphone, put the phone in her purse and walked to meet theagent. Two family members said they watched anxiously from theirparked car as she disappeared behind the tinted windows of his redLexus."We were worried that the guy would take off, take her away and dosomething to her," the woman's widowed sister-in-law said in Spanish.
As the recorder captured the agent's words and a lilting Guyaneseaccent, he laid out his terms in an easy, almost paternal style. Hewould not ask too much, he said: sex "once or twice," visits to hishome in the Bronx, perhaps a link to other Colombians who needed hishelp with their immigration problems.
In shaky English, the woman expressed reluctance, and questioned howshe could be sure he would keep his word."If I do it, it's like very hard for me, because I have my husband,and I really fall in love with him," she said.
The agent insisted that she had to trust him. "I wouldn't ask you todo something for me if I can't do something for you, right?" he said,and reasoned, "Nobody going to help you for nothing," noting that shehad no money.
He described himself as the single father of a 10-year-old daughter,telling her, "I need love, too," and predicting, "You will get to likeme because I'm a nice guy." Repeatedly, she responded "O.K.," without conviction. At one point hethanked her for showing up, saying, "I know you feel very scared."Finally, she tried to leave. "Let me go because I tell my husband Icome home," she said. His reply, the recording shows, was a blunt demand for oral sex. "Right now? No!" she protested. "No, no, right now I can't."He insisted, cajoled, even empathized. "I came from a differentcountry, too," he said. "I got my green card just like you."Then, she said, he grabbed her. During the speechless minute thatfollows on the recording, she said she yielded to his demand out offear that he would use his authority against her.How Much Corruption?The charges against Mr. Baichu, who became a United States citizen in1991 and earns roughly $50,000 a year, appear to be part of a largerpattern, according to government records and interviews.
Mr. Maxwell, the immigration agency's former chief investigator, toldCongress in 2006 that internal corruption was "rampant," and thatemployees faced constant temptations to commit crime."It is only a small step from granting a discretionary waiver of aneligibility rule to asking for a favor or taking a bribe in exchangefor granting that waiver," he contended. "Once an employee learns hecan get away with low-level corruption and still advance up the ranks,he or she becomes more brazen."
Mr. Maxwell's own deputy, Lloyd W. Miner, 49, of Hyattsville, Md.,turned out to be an example. He was sentenced March 7 to a year inprison for inducing a 21-year-old Mongolian woman to stay in thecountry illegally, and harboring her in his house.Other cases include that of a 60-year-old immigration adjudicator inSanta Ana, Calif., who was charged with demanding sexual favors from a29-year-old Vietnamese woman in exchange for approving her citizenshipapplication. The agent, Eddie Romualdo Miranda, was acquitted of afelony sexual battery charge last August, but pleaded guilty tomisdemeanor battery and was sentenced to probation.
In Atlanta, another adjudicator, Kelvin R. Owens, was convicted in2005 of sexually assaulting a 45-year-old woman during her citizenshipinterview in the federal building, and sentenced to weekends in jailfor six months. And a Miami agent of Immigration and CustomsEnforcement responsible for transporting a Haitian woman to detentionis awaiting trial on charges that he took her to his home and rapedher.
"Despite our best efforts there are always people ready to use theirposition for personal gain or personal pleasure," said Chris Bentley,a spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Services. "Ourresponsibility is to ferret them out."When the Queens woman came to The Times with her recording on Jan. 3,she was afraid of retaliation from the agent, and uncertain aboutmaking a criminal complaint, though she had an appointment the nextday at the Queens district attorney's office.She followed through, however, and Carmencita Gutierrez, an assistantdistrict attorney, began monitoring phone calls between the agent andthe young woman, a spokesman said. When Mr. Baichu arranged to meetthe woman on March 11 at the Flagship Restaurant on Queens Boulevard,investigators were ready. In the conversation recorded there, according to the criminalcomplaint, Mr. Baichu told her he expected her to do "just like thelast time," and offered to take her to a garage or the bathroom of afriend's real estate business so she would be "more comfortable doingit" there.
Mr. Baichu was arrested as he emerged from the diner and headed to hiscar, wearing much gold and diamond jewelry, prosecutors said. Laterreleased on $15,000 bail, Mr. Baichu referred calls for comment to hislawyer, Sally Attia, who said he did not have authority to grant ordeny green card petitions without his supervisor's approval.
The young woman's ordeal is not over. Her husband overheard herspeaking about it to a cousin about a month ago, and she had to tellhim the whole story, she said."He was so mad at me, he left my house," she said, near tears. "Idon't know if he's going to come back."The green card has not come through. "I'm still hoping," she said.

Angelica Medaglia contributed reporting.

ICE's game: make the immigrant disappear


















Now that immigrant detentions are getting so common - and ICE seems to have gotten very good at making people disappear for a long while - it seemed like a good idea to search for where a family could request information on a detainee.

A pro-immigrant advocate sent me a couple of web pages. I also found information from specific detention centers. I searched the main ICE website and there is no listing for a number where families can call. The site had numerous listings of arrests for child pornography. I did find a phone number to report suspicious activity.


------------------------------

"In general, ICE is typically rather uncooperative in giving out info on detained individuals. They do have a hot-line that relatives can call to inquire about their family members. However, it is not uncommon for the disappeared to be completely missing, and to be found or heard from only after deportation weeks or months later.
When contacting ICE, the family member or lawyer would need the full name of the detained, or alien # if the individual has one."*
Detention Watch Network website is http://www.detentionwatchnetwork.org/index.php
Legal Services of the region : http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/probono/freelglchtTX.htm



*thanks to S.O. for providing the above information

--------------------------------------------------------------

The following is from an ICE detention center web page:
http://www.ice.gov/pi/dro/facilities/eloy.htm

If you feel you were mistreated by an immigration employee, or wish to make a complaint of misconduct by an immigration or contract facility employee:

    Call the toll-free Joint Intake Center Hotline at 1-877-2INTAKE

    FAX the JIC at 202-927-4607

    Write to the JIC at P.O. Box 14475, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
    Washington, D.C. 20044

    Send an e-mail message to the JIC at Joint.Intake@dhs.gov or;

    Contact the DHS/OIG by calling 1-800-323-8603, write to the
    Department of Homeland Security, Washington, D.C. 20528
    Attn:Office of Inspector General, Hotline; or

    send an email to DHSoighotline@dhs.gov.

Detention: (For questions about those held in detention):

[F]or case status information. Please have the alien registration number to expedite your inquiry.

Forms:

You may call 1 (800) 870-3676 to have forms mailed to you.

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA):

All FOIA/PA requests (for detainees to obtain certain information in their immigration files) must be submitted on either Form G-639 (Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Request) or in letter format, and contain the original notarized signature of the subject in question. Please complete the Form G-639 thoroughly and if writing a letter, be sure to include your full name, any other names used, date of birth, place of birth, A-number, and your address and telephone number, so that we may contact you if we have any questions.

----------
From another ICE web page related to the Los Angeles Field Office

http://www.ice.gov/pi/sanpedro.htm
Family Information on El Salvadorian Detainees in ICE Custody

The safety and well-being of detainees at the Los Angeles Field Office for Detention and Removal Operations is of paramount importance. The need for preventative maintenance of the San Pedro Service Processing Center necessitated the immediate relocation of the detainees to various ICE approved detention facilities. Detainee's family members and/or attorneys are encouraged to call (213) 830-4925 for additional information.

For information on an El Salvadorian detainee housed at another facility, family members and/or attorneys should contact the appropriate Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) field office. ICE personnel will provide the most current information available regarding the location of the individual.”

DRO Field Office Contact Information:
http://www.ice.gov/about/dro/contact.htm


photo: southerncomfort.wordpress.com/.


Soldier death toll reaches 4,000

They are all in my prayers.
I hope that our brave soldier Yoni Leal comes home soon, he left August 07.

On my way home from San Antonio I was hearing KPFT 90.1fm and was listening to soldier testimonials about events Iraqi civilians were enduring, including death of women and children on a daily basis, while expressing opposition to the war...continue listening this week...(OPEN JOURNAL: Winter Soldier: Iraq Veterans Against the War : Mon. 3/24 - Mon. 3/31: Monday through Friday, 12:00 Noon to 1:00 PM)

~~~~~

Four U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, death toll 4,000
Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:44am EDT

* U.S. death toll reaches 4,000
* Impact on U.S. election unclear

By Ross Colvin

BAGHDAD, March 24
(Reuters) - The number of U.S. soldiers to die in Iraq has reached 4,000, the U.S. military said on Monday, just days after the fifth anniversary of a war that President George W. Bush says the United States is on track to win.

The U.S. military said in a statement four soldiers were killed late on Sunday when a roadside bomb, the biggest killer of American soldiers in Iraq, exploded near their vehicle in southern Baghdad. One soldier was wounded in the attack.

The deaths came on a day when the U.S.-protected "Green Zone", the government and diplomatic compound in central Baghdad, was hit by repeated rocket and mortar fire, part of an upsurge in violence in the capital and elsewhere.

The violence, in which dozens were killed, underscored the fragility of Iraq's security. There has been an increase in attacks since January, although U.S. military commanders say overall levels of violence are down 60 percent since last June.

What impact the 4,000 milestone will have on a war-weary American public and the U.S. presidential campaign will be hard to assess in the short term, but war critics are likely to seize on it to boost their case for U.S. troops to be withdrawn.

The U.S. military dismisses such tolls as arbitrary markers."It is artificial in the sense that somehow the 4,000th tragic loss somehow will be different from the first," U.S. military spokesman Rear Admiral Greg Smith told Reuters in an interview last week.

Anthony Cordesman, a respected Iraq analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said the 4,000 death could trigger another wave of polarised debate.

"Those who oppose the war will see it as further reason to end it. Those who support it, will point to military progress and say that future casualties will be much lower," he said.

Although Americans are more preoccupied with domestic economic troubles, the Iraq war is still an important issue in the presidential campaign, with Democratic hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama calling for a timetable for withdrawal.

Bush said in a speech marking the 5th anniversary of the war on March 19 that the United States was on track for victory and said withdrawing troops, who now number about 160,000, would embolden al Qaeda and neighbouring Iran.

He said he had no regrets about the war, which has pushed his approval ratings near the lowest level of his presidency, but acknowledged the "high cost in lives and treasure".

Bush launched the war in March 2003 hoping for a quick victory with minimal casualties. The Iraqi army was quickly defeated, but within months insurgent attacks had bogged down U.S. forces who struggled to develop a strategy to defeat them.

MILESTONES

The 1,000th U.S. soldier to die was in September 2004, 18 months after the invasion and in the midst of a presidential election that returned Bush to office for a second term.

The toll climbed to 2,000 in October 2005 as Sunni Arab insurgents battled to oust the Baghdad government, and 3,000 in December 2006, before Bush unveiled a plan to send 30,000 more troops to Iraq to quell violence that has killed tens of thousands of Iraqis and displaced millions more."I doubt the 4,000 milestone will have the impact that the 3,000 did. The conventional wisdom then was that things were going badly," said Stephen Biddle, a senior fellow for defence policy at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington.

"Today, by contrast, the public's general perception of Iraq is less negative, and coverage for the last six months has tended to focus on the reduction in violence and U.S. casualties. The war has also been much less visible," he said.

But the weekend barrages on the Green Zone, which houses the U.S. embassy, and the continued attacks on U.S. troops may indicate that Iraqi militants are trying to change to that.

"Al Qaeda and extreme elements of the (Mehdi Army) have every incentive to find ways to raise the U.S. casualties between now and November and will be seeking ways to use bombings to raise the rate and number," Cordesman said, speaking before the latest U.S. deaths were announced.

(Writing by Ross Colvin, additional reporting by Randy Fabi; Editing by Stephen Weeks)

© Reuters 2008 All rights reserved

CLICK ON THE TITLE OF THE POST TO BE REDIRECTED TO THE ARTICLE...

This American Life. Act Four Just One Thing Missing

So rarely do i get to go to lunch at work but today I did. As i was driving in traffic, i switched to NPR and i heard the story of fellow Dreamer Marta in California.

As i got to office depot- my last destination to pick up some things for the office, i was in tears when listening to Marta talking about dropping out in her last quarter of school.

Listen to this piece and understand more of the struggle, its quite real.

*As you are in this page, listen to Act Four. Just One Thing Missing (Minute 46)

George R. Boggs Standing up for the DREAM Act

Why Congress Should Revive the Dream Act
Chronicle of Higher Education, March 28, 2008
By George R. Boggs

In The United States we don't typically punish people, especially children,for the actions of others. But today more than 65,000 undocumented students graduate from our high schools each year with literally nowhere to go.

The Supreme Court has guaranteed those students the right to a free public education through the 12th grade, but once they doff their caps and gowns, national policies stymie their pursuit of higher education at every turn, forcing most of them to the fringes of society, where they will never fulfill their potential. Last year Congress failed again to overhaul the nation's immigration policies, getting bogged down in the thorny issues surrounding illegal immigrants, guest workers, and border security. Given the divisive atmosphere that has engulfed this debate, these complex problems are unlikely to be solved in an election year.But of all the socially, morally, and economically compelling issues in this debate, there is one that I believe Congress should, and can, do something about this year.Congress should act immediately on pending legislation to right the wrongs done to the children of many undocumented immigrants. TheDevelopment, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, or the Dream Act, which has languished in various versions in Congress for nearly seven years, would grant conditional legal residency to certain undocumented students, who would then have to complete two years of higher education or military service within six years to achieve legal residency. The legal status that the Dream Act would provide to those students would open several doors now closed to them. They would be able to enroll in colleges and universities that require legal status to matriculate, pay instate tuition in states that only provide that benefit to legal residents, and
receive some state and federal financial aid for which they are not now eligible - and without which college is financially infeasible for most. Despite what the bill's opponents claim, the Dream Act would not encourage illegal immigration. It would apply only to people brought to the United States before the age of 16 and living here five years before the law is enacted. The Dream Act would extend a lifeline to students who came to this country through no fault or agency of their own, grew up here and consider America home, and now face deportation to unfamiliar countries to which they have no connection or allegiance.

The Dream Act also would directly affect our nation's economic competitiveness. As a community-college leader, I deal every day with the challenge of meeting the economy's demand for more college-educated workers. With more than 70 million baby boomers starting to retire, this is a daunting task and one that requires us to pursue every opportunity to move more people into higher education. America's economic competitiveness depends on it. The Migration Policy Institute estimates that the Dream Act would make upward of one million undocumented high-school graduates eligible for conditional legal status, and the path to permanent legal status travels
straight through higher education or military service. Furthermore, the population that the Dream Act would affect the most - low-income Hispanic students - is one for whom college-attendance rates are historically low.

The nation's business leaders must be made to see clearly the potential of the Dream Act to help produce the skilled workers they so desperately need, and they must act on that insight. While much of the business community supports comprehensive immigration reform and increases in the numbers of highly skilled foreign workers brought into the United States, it has remained largely silent on the Dream Act. But if industry were to join the wide spectrum of interests urging Congress to pass the
Dream Act, 2008 could be the year we clear the final hurdle and enact this vital piece of legislation. I urge college administrators, faculty members, and students to educate their local business leaders about the importance of the Dream Act in their communities.

We must pass the Dream Act now, both to serve individual justice and for our collective best interest.

* George R. Boggs is president and chief executive of the American
Association of Community Colleges.

Section: Commentary
Volume 54, Issue 29, Page A37

It doesn't just happen to Latinos

A few weeks ago it was announced that Edwidge Danticat won the National Book Award


Democracynow.org:


Edwidge Danticat is an award-winning Haitian-born writer who now lives in Miami. In November 2004, Danticat’s 81-year-old uncle, Reverend Joseph Dantica, died in the custody of immigration officials. He had arrived from Haiti seeking political asyslum following threats on his life. Denied his medicines and accused of faking an illness, he died just days after his detention. Edwidge Danticat tells this devastating story in her latest book, “Brother, I’m Dying.”

Immigrant detention centers constitute one of the fastest growing forms of incarceration in the United States. Currently there are 30,000 immigrants in detention, and nearly 300,000 are detained each year. They are held in private, federal or county prisons across the country for weeks, and even months, while the government decides whether to deport them. According to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, which is a division of the Department of Homeland Security, one quarter of the people they detain suffer from chronic health conditions. ICE claims to spend $98 million a year on healthcare for detainees and to provide them with “humane and safe detention environments.”

But at least 65 people have died in ICE custody since 2004. The House Judiciary Committee organized a hearing Thursday afternoon on this subject. Tom Jawetz of the ACLU prison project called the care at the detention centers “grossly deficient, inexcusable, and immoral.”

Edwidge Danticat is an award-winning Haitian-born writer who now lives in Miami, Florida. She also testified at Thursday’s congressional hearing. In November of 2004, her 81-year-old uncle, Reverend Joseph Dantica, died in the Krome detention center in Miami. He had just fled Haiti after hiding from an armed gang that threatened to kill him because United Nations and Haitian police forces had fired shots from the roof of his church. Reverend Dantica arrived at Miami International Airport with a multiple-entry visa and said he was applying for temporary political asylum. He was immediately detained, and his medicines were taken away from him. A medic at Krome accused him of “faking his illness.” He died a few days later.

Edwidge Danticat tells this devastating story in her latest book. It’s a memoir called “Brother, I’m Dying.” She joins me now from Miami, Florida.

Edwidge Danticat. Award-winning Haitian American novelist. She is the author of several books including “Breath, Eyes, Memory”, “The Farming of the Bones”, “Krik? Krak!” and “The Dew Breaker.” Her latest book is a memoir called “Brother, I’m Dying.” It tells the story of her uncle, Joseph Dantica, dying in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security...

for link to DN audio interview click here

World Food Program Launches Emergency Appeal

Having been in Mexico for a week now, I have had a chance to talk to numerous people about immigration. What I am being told is that the stronger border enforcement, frequent raids and harsh treatment at detention are keeping people home.

Some people may think that is a good thing. But as food costs skyrocket, more and more people in Mexico will be hungry -

as it is many people barely make enough to pay their bus tickets to work.


from Democracynow.org headlines 3-24-08:


World Food Program Launches Emergency Appeal Due to Rising Food Costs


The World Food Program has launched an “extraordinary emergency appeal” to raise at least $500 million in the next four weeks. In a letter to donor nations, the UN agency said food aid would have to be rationed off if the new funds are not received by May 1. The World Food Program said its funding gap is largely caused by soaring food prices as well as record high oil prices.

for link to Democracy Now page click the title of this post

U-Va changes it's mind on admissions for U.S. children of undocumented immigrants

-----
Susan Kinzie
UPDATE: U-Va. Accepts Residency Claim
Washington Post
March 24, 2008, B5


Ever since he was a little boy in Virginia, Nelson Lopez has wanted to go to the state's flagship university. But last month he worried when University of Virginia officials followed up on his application, asking him to prove that his parents were legal residents to qualify as an in-stateapplicant. He's a U.S. citizen, born here, but his parents are illegal immigrants from El Salvador

After his story ran in The Washington Post, he got a flurry of calls from lawyers and immigrant advocates offering to help. Now, it looks like he won't need help: Last week he got a letter from U-Va. telling him he will be considered a Virginia resident for his application.

That means that he qualifies for the much lower in-state tuition, thathe won't face the steeper odds for admission for out-of-state students and that he doesn't have to worry about having the same problem at other
schools.

When Lopez saw the letter at home in Alexandria, he was scared to open it. "I just knew it was a big deal," he said. But when he read it, he was speechless for a moment. "I was soexcited. This changes everything!"

Andrea Leeds Armstrong of U-Va.'s committee on Virginia status wouldn't discuss the case but said: "The attorney general's memo shed further light on the situation. It did make it clearer."

The state attorney general's office, responding to a question from the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia this month, emphasized that there could be exceptions to the general rule. State law requires
college officials to look at parents' legal status since students are considered dependent until age 24, so parents here illegally would not be considered Virginia residents. But the law allows case-by-case
exceptions for students 18 and older, the memo explained, who can provide evidence that they are state residents and should be considered separately from their parents.

"I think in circumstances where an applicant has spent his or her life in Virginia, has been educated in Virginia schools, has gotten his or her driver's license in Virginia -- even though financially dependent on
their parents -- that individual has done all that he or she could do at that age to establish a domicile independent of their parents. I think the memo was helpful to us in pointing the way," Armstrong said.

When Lopez got the letter, "he was very, very happy. He kept saying, 'I can't believe it! I can't believe it!' " said Krishna Leyva, director of a mentoring program at T.C. Williams High School . "There are a lot of kids out there in the same situation, but they don't pursue it" because they don't want to endanger
their parents or risk problems with the admissions office. "He really, really wants to go to U-Va."

for link to article click the title of this post

thanks to M.O. for sending this to dreamacttexas

Marriage is no longer enough for U.S. residency


The running story on immigration (for many families) has long been if you are undocumented and marry an American citizen you will be able to regularize your status (see post "Hugo and his famous restaurant," December 22, 2008). It is expensive, and takes a few years, but has always been a way to become a permanent U.S. resident.

This is all changing, it has been reported that undocumented people married to U.S. citizens have been detained when they visit ICE offices for interviews regarding their applications. A couple in Kansas are finding out that the wife's citizenship isn't enough to keep her husband in the U.S. Some might say this is a good thing for all the people who only marry for immigration papers. Yet there are many, many more who marry for reasons we all do; they have children; and make permanent homes for themselves.

The one thing that is constantly being ignored is that the current problem depicted in the article below emanates from extremely harsh immigration laws passed in 1996 during the Clinton administration. Since Hillary says she was involved in so much of the administration during Bill's tenure - she should be able to take responsibility for this one too -- I wonder why hasn't come up on the campaign trail.


March 22, 2008, 10:46PM
Immigration laws split mixed-legal-status families
Husband goes back to Mexico to begin legal effort to re-enter the U.S.

By CARL MANNING
Associated Press

OVERLAND PARK, KAN. — When Kecia Sales and Juan Marquez were married, they were like scores of other couples: very much in love with plans to live together for the rest of their lives.

But it wasn't to be.

After their December 2004 marriage, he told her he had been living illegally in the U.S. since 1999. After leaving Mexico, Marquez had made his way to her hometown of Kansas City, Kan., where they met and married, and she took his name.

They became one of an estimated 2 million mixed families, where at least one member is a citizen or lawfully living in the country and the other isn't. The vast majority of those families, according to the Pew Hispanic Center, involve an illegal parent and legal children — yet another shade of this country's ongoing immigration conundrum.

That he's among 12 million illegal immigrants didn't change Sales' love for Marquez. They lived in her hometown and both worked to make ends meet.

"It didn't bother me," she said. "It doesn't make him any worse of a person."

But Marquez, 26, and his wife, 40, finally decided he should return to Mexico and begin the long, uphill fight to re-enter the country legally...


Waiver request denied

...[B]ecause Juan Marquez entered the country illegally and stayed more than a year, the law bars him from coming back for 10 years, unless the government approves a waiver request from his wife. She said the waiver request was denied March 13 by the U.S. Consulate in Juarez, Mexico, but it agreed to give Kecia Marquez 30 days to submit new evidence of hardship. Then it could take up to a year for a decision about whether he can return...




for link to complete AP/Houston Chronicle article click the title of this post

Leaving the Hungry Kids in the Donut Shop


As i help my brother with college applications and scholarships i realize how frustrating it has been for him as a DREAMER. He was brought to the states before I was; that is, he has spent all of his schooling in the United States and has not known any different. I came here when i was 13 and adjusted fine, but i came to terms with my status and limitations sooner than later. He is 18 years old now and now just realizes the misfortunes of being a dreamer and everything that comes with it.

When i say everything that comes with it, i mean: anger, depression, tears, frustration and a lot of questions. He is always asking me how come he can't get a driver's license, how come he can't work, how come there is so much opposition on the DREAM Act. You might think that it is a little naive, but he has lived a very different life than i have. He has had the opportunity to go to a school where he is one of the only Latinos in his classes, his friends are non-Latinos for the most part, and the majority of the school population is of wealthy families.

Somebody this weekend made the comparison of leaving a hungry kid in a donut shop but not allowing him to eat any. My brother has been in the donut shop for too long now and he has never been allowed to eat any; there, just staring at all the sweets with his hands tied.

I have come to beleive that i need to stop victimizing myself and enough feeling sorry for our situation as DREAMERs, we need to start doing and stop whining. Yes, this is still true in my theory and practice it everyday for the most part, but we can't all be strong and sometimes these situations of frustration and denial get the best of us. I know it has gotten the best of me at times.

I have come across many younger students, friends, family, and online forums of Dreamers that are under a lot of stress and depression. Many of them feel shame for being undocumented. How to break the news to their boyfriends, girlfriends, or friends that they are undocumented or that they cant go get a driver's license. How do they explain that it is not that they are lazy without a job at 22 years of age, but rather that nobody would hire them.

I used to not understand why many could feel ashamed of being undocumented, but now i understand this a lot better. It is not that they feel ashamed of being dreamers, but rather the pressure of being demonized from every angle. All you have to do is look at the college and scholarship applications to begin to understand this. The requirements from many scholarships are no joke; first requirement you must be a citizen. College applications (most) have the citizen category... what to do here?!

I think that this is a major topic that we don't touch a lot on. The stress and depression that dreamers go through in unbelievable. Maybe now that some of us dreamers are older we are able to assimilate the situation a lot better and we are able to deal with it better. It is our job however to help the younger students with talks, mentoring, and helping them walk through the process as we once were.

Image obtained here

Sunday, March 23, 2008

ESSAY CONTEST: “Does immigration strengthen or threaten the United States?”

The Great American Think-Off releases the 2008 question
“Does immigration strengthen or threaten the United States?”

The 2008 Great American Think-Off question asks “Does immigration strengthen or threaten the United States?” One of the most heated questions debated in all corners of America today needs more light and less heat. And so the New York Mills Regional Cultural Center asks Americans and people from around the globe to address this question in the 2008 edition of the Great American Think-Off.

We commonly note that we are a nation of immigrants, but today more Americans seem frightened of immigration and immigrants than at any time in memory. We build a fence to keep undocumented persons out. We worry about losing even more jobs to the forces of globalization. Yet we all honor the emblem of our immigrant nation: the Statue of Liberty.

The 2008 Great American Think-Off asks for the understandings of American Indian people and newly arrived immigrants; citizens whose ancestors came here on the Mayflower (or soon after) and those who were brought here on slave ships; descendents of Finnish settlers here in Minnesota, of Acadians in Louisiana, and families from places like Michoacan making new lives from California to Maine.

Entering the competition is easy. Just submit an essay of 750 words or less by April 1, 2008. You may send your essay in one of three ways,: through the mail send to New York Mills Regional Cultural Center, P.O. Box 246, New York Mills, MN 56567 or email to nymills@kulcher.org (no attachments) or submit on-line at www.think-off.org .

Click on the title of the blog to link you to the website.

A few comments on Obama's March 18, 2008 speech











Obama's speech on March 18th - has rattled American society - and has left many of us in awe of this man.

Have we ever had a U.S. President (besides Jefferson and Kennedy) who could have presented the same eloquence?

As I have mentioned before, I believe that our ability to support and listen to Obama was made possible because of the disastrous policies and actions of the current administration.

It is difficult not to idealize when you see a potential president with such gifts while you have a president that at times appears to be barely functioning as a human being.

Perhaps pro-immigrant supporters could spend some time analyzing and evaluating Obama's position (if they haven't already) and decide whether or not they think he will also support Latinos and push this country beyond the tradition of black/Latino
tension.


for link to NYT text and video of the speech click the title of this post



photo: http://brightcove.vo.llnwd.net/d2/unsecured/media/435713706/435713706_452310267_94bb7090a42262e6e788285c0730cd23207f2350.jpg

Finding your voice is not victim-hood

One of the things I have noticed the last few years is that white/anglo people seem to have very intense reactions to being called racist by a person of color. It often creates more conflict than when people start discussing religion or politics.

The scene often plays out as: one person or group states the other is mistreating them based on race or ethnicity - whether the accusations are true or not - the accused group either gets fearful or extremely angry and offended.

The controversy surrounding statements by Obama's minister have exploded the myth that many black people are "over it" and no longer have feelings about America's conflicted and violent racial past. It has also shown what is acceptable and what is not regarding what can be publicly said regarding racial attitudes.

I was struck by this while watching "This Week" on ABC - Stephanopoulos was at the round table with George Will, Donna Brazile and a few others whose names I don't remember. What seemed so odd was Will's and the other white participant's deep sense of being offended. I kept hearing that what Wright said was inappropriate. Then Donna Brazile came in and let us know (thank goodness) that Wright's pastoral comments are part and parcel of African American church sermons. I am sure they heard her, but there there was not much of a response.

This is an extremely complex situation. There is much to discuss. For one thing maybe it's a good thing that the white world knows this is still being said - and - that people can start realizing that what may be termed "inflammatory racial language" - is not dangerous, and does not scream victim-hood. It's really about people finding their voice.


more on this later.
-----
JEREMIAD
He's Preaching to A Choir I've Left
Washington Post
By Jonetta Rose Barras
Sunday, March 23, 2008; Page B01

I've known preachers like the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., former pastor to Sen. Barack Obama. Like many of them, he no doubt sees his congregation as full of victims, and thinks that his words will inspire them to rise out of their victimhood. I understand that.

Once upon a time, I saw myself as a victim, too, destined to march in place. In the 1970s and '80s, as a clenched-fist-pumping black nationalist with my head wrapped in an elaborate gele, I reflected that self-concept in my speech. My words were as fiery as the Rev. Wright's. And more than a few times, I, too, damned America, loudly, for its treatment of blacks.

But I turned away from such rhetoric. Is it time that Wright and other ministers do, too?

African Americans differ on this question. "Some of these ministers are like some hip-hop artists," says E. Ethelbert Miller, an Afro-American studies expert. "Their language is not healing." Counters former civil rights leader Lawrence Guyot: "I am so proud of Rev. Wright, who speaks with unreserved passion, who accepts no quarter and gives no quarter. I'm glad the church is standing with him."

The recent furor over the incendiary rhetoric of the pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago pulled back a curtain on black America, sending many in the white commentariat into shock and outrage. But African Americans have been hearing words like Wright's in churches across the country for decades. And for many of us, the uproar over his comments only underlined the quiet culture war going on within our own community.

For a decade, tensions have been rising over questions ranging from what it means to be black, to whether there needs to be a new, post-civil rights meaning of racism, to what features of black America should be transmitted to the mainstream, to whether there even is such a thing as "black America" anymore. Many of these skirmishes have been relegated to our kitchens and living rooms. But they are increasingly being brought to the public square -- often because a white person, a Don Imus or a Michael Richards, commits some infraction or demonstrates cluelessness about African American culture and its unspoken boundaries.

Now the debate is over Wright -- instigated, as many blacks see it, by the media after the presidential campaign of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton accused news organizations of insufficiently scrutinizing Obama. Reporters went trolling for stories and found Trinity Church and its controversial pastor -- and what may have been a Sunday dinner conversation in black households exploded onto the public stage.

At the center of the storm is Wright's practice of what is called "prophetic speech," according to the Rev. Graylan Scott Hagler, pastor of Plymouth Congregational United Church of Christ in Washington. This is "provocative speech that attempts to awaken and cause people to respond."

Such speech has been the lingua franca of much of the black leadership since the days of the civil rights movement, aimed at galvanizing blacks and equipping them with an armor for the battle against segregation. Combined with instruction in the history of blacks in Africa and the diaspora, it has helped to transform the psychological landscape of many who had been crushed over time by racism and had come to feel inferior to whites.

It's also, at least in part, the tradition of Wright's denomination. In several incarnations, the United Church of Christ (UCC) has been a leader in the fight for racial equality since the 19th century. According to Hagler, "congregationals," as the church's members were then called, were involved in the case on behalf of 43 African captives who revolted against their captors aboard the Spanish ship La Amistad in 1839. In the 1970s, the UCC established a commission on racial justice; Wright was on its board of directors.

Wright's impassioned speech can be seen as a continuation of a uniquely black religious experience. "The fundamental question is how do I use a religion that has been used to oppress me to now fight against that oppression," says Maurice Jackson, a history professor at Georgetown University. "There has always been this debate about how far black ministers should go."

Some think they should go as far as they need to. "Without prophetic speech," argues Graylan, "we would not have had Martin Luther King Jr. People remember the 'I Have a Dream' speech, but they do not remember his radical critiques of capitalism and the American system. They easily forget his speech on April 4, 1967." That was the one in which King declared: "I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today -- my own government..."

rosebook1@aol.com

Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for National Public Radio affiliate WAMU-88.5.



for link to complete WP article click the title of this post

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Learning from "The Same Moon" - La Misma Luna





Carlitos working at a tomato farm. From "Under the Same Moon"



Movies are the best teachers -

On March 20, I was walking near my hotel in Morelia, Michoacan - I passed the new multiplex movie theater that was built in the shell of a 300 year old building - and saw that "Under the Same Moon" was opening that day. The premier wasn't just for the Mexican state of Michoacan, it was for the whole country.

Having been immersed in the immigration debate (and the concerns of DREAMERS) for the past year and a half, I was glad to see a movie about the subject - something serious - not a comedy.

It was disappointing to see that the screen play was weak - The narrative was somewhat juvenile - overly nostalgic - with a good feeling ending. But then, the theater was full of teenagers and young adults. There were only a handful of those my age. Perhaps the producers were targeting the younger age group. Or - they wanted to make the story line very clear to make sure everyone got the message.

La Misma Luna has its redeeming qualities - in fact - what it teaches the viewer over-rides any mistakes in production.

The dramatic scenes in the movie are accurate representations of the real world of immigration, even though the loss, violence, despondence, and abuse were toned down. If La Misma Luna would have presented the real story (aka how bad it really is) you might have had to leave the theater wanting to throw up.

here are a few notes on what the film provides:


1. Scene: Rosario is fired and her employer does not pay her for the last days she worked -
Undocumented workers often don't get paid for their work. A striking example of this was in New Orleans when many immigrants worked in the early rebuilding of the city.

2. Scene: Rosario has immigrated to the U.S. and left Carlitos with her mother.
There are millions of children left behind in Mexico and other countries, while their parents migrate to the U.S. Even more millions are left behind with their mothers while their fathers migrate - Their fathers often forget their family - find a new wife and have children who are American born. Paco, the almost husband of Carlitos' mother is well into his thirties... did he leave a family behind in Mexico?

3. Scene: ICE agents "rough up" Enrique when they arrest him in the park in L.A.
Violence is a significant component of ICE raids. Immigrants being detained are often injured - with fractures and severe bruises. A more silent type of violence occurs even more often - when ICE officers detain people but do not give them water, or food, for hours and hours after the raid. Many of the ICE raids are themselves illegal according to the U.S. Constitution - homes are entered without warrants, U.S. citizens are detained and deported. There are numerous law suits being considered regarding the illegal actions of ICE officers.

5. Scene: worker at tomato farm screams with pain when he gets something in his eyes - Undocumented immigrants have an extremely high rate of injury on the job. They are often placed in situations that are dangerous or hazardous to their health. Whenever you hear about an accident at a job site, it is almost always someone undocumented.

6. Scene: Dona Carmen tells Rosario that her mother has died. Losing close family members and not being able to attend their funerals is absolutely devastating. Many immigrants decide to risk being caught when they are called back home to attend a funeral.

7. Scene: Rosario telling her employer that she has a second job. People really do work 2 and 3 jobs in order to make enough money to support their families and send money back home to the grandmothers.

8. Scene: Los Tigres del Norte singing a song to Carlitos about being able strong. There are lots of songs (and corridos) being recorded that explain the life of an undocumented immigrant. They would be worth listening to. The songs of Los Tigres del Norte are a good example.

9. Scenes: Carlitos shakes hands with people and says "a sus ordenes" (at your service) Mexican immigrant children are really as polite as Carlitos... no kidding.

-----

AFF Review: Under the Same Moon

Posted Oct 22nd 2007 3:09PM by Jette Kernion


Earlier this year, Under the Same Moon (originally titled La Misma Luna) was bought at Sundance by Fox Searchlight and The Weinstein Company for a surprisingly high amount of money. It's understandable because underneath the film's unsubtle messages about undocumented Mexican workers working to survive in the U.S., it's essentially an old-fashioned family melodrama. I caught the film at Austin Film Festival this year, and it's currently scheduled to hit theaters in March 2008.

Rosario (Kate del Castillo) is a young immigrant from Mexico living and working in Los Angeles to support her nine-year-old son Carlitos (Adrian Alonso), who lives with Rosario's mother in Mexico. He hasn't seen his mother in four years and misses her terribly. Meanwhile, Rosario is trying to scrape up enough money for a lawyer to help her bring Carlitos to America legally. When his grandmother dies, Carlitos decides to cross the border himself and travel to Los Angeles to find his mother, because he's scared she'll forget about him. He encounters an unlikely lot of helpers and companions during his attempt, including American college students (America Ferrera and Jesse Garcia) who want to make extra money smuggling children over the border, and Enrique (Eugenio Derbez), a migrant worker who has no desire to deal with a small child on his hands.

The movie is Patricia Riggen's feature directorial debut. It begins a little confusingly -- we don't know the characters yet, so in the opening scene where people are trying to cross the border at night, the focus is unclear. The following sequence seems to be meant to show what Rosario is doing in Los Angeles at the same time that Carlos is in Mexico, but it takes a minute to realize they're not all in the same house. Once the setup is complete, however, the plot progresses steadily and smoothly.

Under the Same Moon has an overt agenda: it wants to make you think about the plight of U.S. undocumented workers, and it's not at all subtle about it. Rosario is treated badly by a woman for whom she cleans house, who tells her, "What are you going to do, call the police? Go right ahead." The message is broadcast literally through local radio in the background, such as Spanish-language deejays making jokes about immigration law, and an amusing song about how Superman didn't enter this country legally, either. The story itself should have been able to carry this message alone, and might have been more effective without all the embellishments; as it is, it feels like overkill.

The storyline and many of the characters are stock -- change the actors in the story to Jackie Cooper and Irene Dunne, and maybe Fredric March, and the plot would work perfectly as a 1930s weepie. We've all seen movies about characters attempting a cross-country journey under difficult circumstances. It is not quite believable that a nine-year-old would be as canny -- and as lucky -- as Carlitos, but then this is not meant to be a gritty realistic film. It's a melodrama with inspirational moments, designed to make you smile through tears.

Fortunately, the performances help pull the movie out of tired melodrama and make it watchable -- especially Adrian Alonso as Carlitos. I liked this movie even though the dialogue occasionally seemed trite, even though I rolled my eyes at caricatures of "bad" people, even though it bordered on the emotionally manipulative ... even though I suspected I knew the ending because of the companies that had bought the distribution rights. The story is not innovative, it travels a very familiar road. But the main characters and a few of the minor ones, like Paco the security guard who loves Rosario and Carmen who runs a business of sneaking people over the border, were all warm and real and avoided the easy stereotypes. Despite its flaws, Under the Same Moon is an entertaining film that knows how to charm an audience.


for link to movie review click the title of this post



photo: http://www.greencine.com/central/files/u40/mismaluna.jpg

Friday, March 21, 2008

Chertoff: we are serious about immigration enforcement















Chertoff's comment sounds comical - it is very clear that DHS and ICE are not "serious" about enforcement. What they are serious about is producing fear among a significant amount of the U.S. population - while falsely announcing that enforcement will create a "safe America" for citizens.

Producing fear has always been known as a way to maintain powerful political control of a group (or groups) of people. Being afraid gets people to listen and obey.

Being afraid keeps the Other group (i.e. undocumented immigrants) quiet and subservient. It also keeps people from doing anything - they stay in their jobs, schools and neighborhood. New stories about undocumented people being detained while they are trying to return to their home countries is scaring even those who have given up.

The idea is create terror for a few - this will produce an example for the rest.


This tactic has already worked. A planned protest on May 1 in Chicago has been canceled - the reason being that protesting would make too many people on the other side angry - and might hurt negotiations on a better comprehensive immigration package.

Undocumented people in the U.S. are more vulnerable than ever. The idea of "reporting" someone to immigration was something that very rarely happened. Now it is commonplace. They live in fear - many having double lives (how many DREAMERS have kept their status a secret?)

Chertoff and his people are serious about disrupting the lives of hundreds of thousands of families, creating situations where many many children are being separated from their families or returned to a country they have no memory of.

If he were really serious he would be shipping everybody (who is undocumented) in railroad cars like Hitler did. But he isn't - because in truth - Chertoff and his supporters don't really want all the undocumented workers to leave... they just want to bother a few so they can shake up the rest.


This is all theater - a true tragedy - the acting is good - reality is on shaky ground.

Speaking of theater and tragedy, where is the chorus that should be telling Chertoff he is doing something wrong?


-----
U.S. Tweaks Proposal On Illegal Workers
Employers Could Get Warnings in June

By Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 22, 2008; A03

The Bush administration yesterday renewed its drive to crack down on U.S. companies that hire illegal immigrants by slightly altering an earlier initiative stalled by a federal judge since last September.

If the new proposal satisfies the court, the government could begin warning 140,000 employers in writing as early as June about suspect Social Security numbers used by their employees and force businesses to resolve questions about their identities or fire them within 90 days.

The result could intensify an economic and political debate over the administration's immigration policies in the months leading up to November's elections for president and Congress.

The mailings, known as "no-match" letters, were enjoined by U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer in San Francisco while he hears a lawsuit brought by a wide-ranging coalition of major American labor, business, farm and civil liberties groups.

The plaintiffs, including the AFL-CIO, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Civil Liberties Union, allege that the plan will cause major workplace disruptions and discriminate against legal workers, including native-born Americans.

A systematic effort to wean the U.S. economy off an estimated 8.7 million illegal workers has long been blocked by economic interests and civil rights concerns. But the Bush administration considers that effort the linchpin of its immigration enforcement efforts.

"We are serious about immigration enforcement," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said in a brief written statement yesterday. "The No-Match Rule is an important tool for cracking down on illegal hiring practices while providing honest employers with the guidance they need."

The 44-page proposal released yesterday makes mostly technical changes to the administration's initial proposal. It includes a statement about the regulation's impact on small businesses, as required by a 1980 law. According to DHS, compliance will cost companies with fewer than 100 workers $3,000 to $7,500 overall, while it will cost larger companies $13,000 to $34,000. But these estimates do not include the cost of firing and replacing workers who lack legal documentation.

"DHS does not believe that the direct costs incurred by employers . . . would create a significant economic impact" on most companies, the department stated.

Opponents said the proposal makes no substantive changes to a plan that Breyer in October wrote would have "severe" effects and produce irreparable harm to innocent workers and employers. Lawyers familiar with the plaintiffs' case said they expect to battle the department in the rulemaking process and the courts through the summer.

Critics have noted that the Social Security Administration's inspector general has concluded the database used to cull suspicious numbers contains erroneous records on 17.8 million people, 70 percent of whom are native-born U.S. citizens. Even if the actual error rate of no-match letters is far lower, labor leaders say that unscrupulous employers will use the rule to burden or harass anyone who looks or sounds foreign.

"It's an attempt to justify the fundamentally flawed database without actually fixing any of the problems," said Lucas Guttentag, director of the ACLU immigrants' rights project.

Angelo I. Amador, director of immigration policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the DHS glossed over the true costs. "It keeps the questions before the judge the same. I would have been more concerned if they had come up with a big study" detailing the broader impact on businesses, he said.


for link to WP article click the title of this post


cartoon: http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/CARI.Chertoff.gif

Who are the EMOs and Why are They Under Attack?


It is very common in my house for my parents to turn off the American news and switch to satellite news from Mexico and Latinamerica. Who can blame them right?

When i find time i sit down and listen and most importantly compare the type of news reported as well as the quality. I'm not going to lie, there is bias in Mexican news as well. I don't think that you can get away from that really.

Yesterday I was frozen when i saw a group of youth getting attacked in the streets of Queretaro just for being EMO's by an anti-emo movement.

Who are the EMO's you may ask yourself?
I have a mexican cousin who lives in the USA and identifies herself as EMO... she would wear a lot of dark clothing (kind of like a goth style), dark make-up, long bangs that would cover half her face. She was and is prefectly functional and lives a normal life with her own choices and tastes in clothes and music; I also have perfectly normal human conversations with her.

If you ask me, I don't know much about this social movement, but I know that they are youth just like us who are trying to express themselves through their own ways and they are being bullied by the ignorant masses.... Sound familiar?

Well, i was also surprised that the Statesman wrote about this, but i was also glad.

Although this is not directly related to the DREAM Act, I couldn't help but to understand them (the Emos's) and feel their frustration as they were marching through the streets of Guadalajara and México DF. All they were asking was respect, dignity, and a time and space to be.

**********
Emos under attack

By Jeremy Schwartz | Thursday, March 20, 2008, 02:38 PM


In the last couple of weeks, a particular subculture of Mexican youths, who dub themselves “emos,” have come under violent attack throughout the country. Two weeks ago in the otherwise quiet colonial capital of Queretaro, mobs of kids attacked the emos in an attempt to force them out of the city’s main plaza. A week later, the violence arrived in Mexico City, when emos who hang out at the Insurgentes Metro stop were attacked by gangs of punks and soccer fans. Rumors of more attacks in Mexico City and the northern state of Durango are floating around the Internet.

So who are these emos, and why so much hate? Emos here in Mexico are bound by a specific fashion style (black clothes, tight jeans, huge bangs, black eye makeup) and ideology: according to several Internet sources, a strong chord of sadness, depression and sense of being misunderstood by the larger society runs through emo thought. Bands like Good Charlotte are emo favorites. And self mutilation is apparently common among kids heavily into the emo scene.

Anger against the emos has come from many quarters: punks and goths who think emos are ripping off their culture, homophobes who don’t find emos masculine enough, and those who simply seem threatened by a group that is so different than the mainstream....(More)

Next Requirement to Become a USA Permanent Resident: You Must Give Oral Sex to ICE Employees.


This is not the first case of sexual abuse/cohersion from ICE employees... How many more times are we going to hear cases like these?

I am also sure that many people don't come forth and denounce the abuses like this woman did.

Don't forget to listen to the recording posted in the article.

********

An Agent, a Green Card, and a Demand for Sex


Article Tools Sponsored By
By NINA BERNSTEIN
Published: March 21, 2008


No problems so far, the immigration agent told the American citizen and his 22-year-old Colombian wife at her green card interview in December. After he stapled one of their wedding photos to her application for legal permanent residency, he had just one more question: What was her cellphone number?

The calls from the agent started three days later. He hinted, she said, at his power to derail her life and deport her relatives, alluding to a brush she had with the law before her marriage. He summoned her to a private meeting. And at noon on Dec. 21, in a parked car on Queens Boulevard, he named his price — not realizing that she was recording everything on the cellphone in her purse.

“I want sex,” he said on the recording. “One or two times. That’s all. You get your green card. You won’t have to see me anymore.”

She reluctantly agreed to a future meeting. But when she tried to leave his car, he demanded oral sex “now,” to “know that you’re serious.” And despite her protests, she said, he got his way.

The 16-minute recording, which the woman first took to The New York Times and then to the Queens district attorney, suggests the vast power of low-level immigration law enforcers, and a growing desperation on the part of immigrants seeking legal status. The aftermath, which included the arrest of an immigration agent last week, underscores the difficulty and danger of making a complaint, even in the rare case when abuse of power may have been caught on tape.

No one knows how widespread sexual blackmail is, but the case echoes other instances of sexual coercion that have surfaced in recent years, including agents criminally charged in Atlanta, Miami and Santa Ana, Calif. And it raises broader questions about the system’s vulnerability to corruption at a time when millions of noncitizens live in a kind of legal no-man’s land, increasingly fearful of seeking the law’s protection.

The agent arrested last week, Isaac R. Baichu, 46, himself an immigrant from Guyana, handled some 8,000 green card applications during his three years as an adjudicator in the Garden City, N.Y., office of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, part of the federal Department of Homeland Security. He pleaded not guilty to felony and misdemeanor charges of coercing the young woman to perform oral sex, and of promising to help her secure immigration papers in exchange for further sexual favors. If convicted, he will face up to seven years in prison.

His agency has suspended him with pay, and the inspector general of Homeland Security is reviewing his other cases, a spokesman said Wednesday. Prosecutors, who say they recorded a meeting between Mr. Baichu and the woman on March 11 at which he made similar demands for sex, urge any other victims to come forward.

Money, not sex, is the more common currency of corruption in immigration, but according to Congressional testimony in 2006 by Michael Maxwell, former director of the agency’s internal investigations, more than 3,000 backlogged complaints of employee misconduct had gone uninvestigated for lack of staff, including 528 involving criminal allegations.

The agency says it has tripled its investigative staff since then, and counts only 165 serious complaints pending. But it stopped posting an e-mail address and phone number for such complaints last year, said Jan Lane, chief of security and integrity, because it lacks the staff to cull the thousands of mostly irrelevant messages that resulted. Immigrants, she advised, should report wrongdoing to any law enforcement agency they trust.

The young woman in Queens, whose name is being withheld because the authorities consider her the victim of a sex crime, did not even tell her husband what had happened. Two weeks after the meeting in the car, finding no way to make a confidential complaint to the immigration agency and afraid to go to the police, she and two older female relatives took the recording to The Times.

Reasons to Worry

A slim, shy woman who looks like a teenager, she said she had spent recent months baby-sitting for relatives in Queens, crying over the deaths of her two brothers back in Cali, Colombia, and longing for the right stamp in her passport — one tha... (More)

Image obtained here

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Mega-Prison for immigrants...

Company wants to build a mega-prison in county

By Leslie Berestein
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
March 20, 2008

The private prison company that operates a detention center for U.S.Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Otay Mesa is proposing to build a nearly3,000-bed mega-prison nearby.

According to county records, Nashville, Tenn.-based Corrections Corporation ofAmerica has applied for a permit to build a "secure detention facility" in two phases on a parcel of about 40 acres northwest of Alta and Lonestar roads.

A portion of the latter road has yet to be constructed.The proposed prison would have 2,880 beds and would employ 375 people,according to an application the company filed.

It would hold more than four times the number of people that the immigration agency now holds in San Diego. The agency, known as ICE, contracts with Corrections Corporation of America to house up to 700 detainees individuals awaiting deportation or a decision in immigration cases at the company's private San Diego Correctional Facility, which sits on land leased from the county.

A spokesman for the company said the proposed prison would not be built as part of its existing contract with ICE or as a speculative venture, but as a way of ensuring it retains the immigration agency's detention business if the company loses its existing facility. The lease on the land that the San Diego Correctional Facility sits on is set to expire by the end of 2015.

"We have an existing relationship with ICE and other federal customers, and we want to be able to maintain that relationship," company spokesman StevenOwen said. "We want to take steps in a preventive kind of way, to be able toprovide capacity and retain that relationship.

According to the county, the company owns the parcel that the new facility would sit on, eliminating lease concerns. Local officials from Immigration and Customs Enforcement said they were awareof the project, but that they were not sure if ICE would be using the newprison.

The demand for immigration detention beds definitely exists in San Diego, notonly due to stepped-up immigration enforcement nationwide, but also because theagency does not have as many beds as it once did at the San Diego CorrectionalFacility.

According to Corrections Corporation of America's 2006 year-end financialreport, 200 of the detention center's beds were lost to the county in June of that year when a portion of the lease expired. The report states that the number of people being held was not reduced as a result of the expiration "because we had the ability to consolidate inmates."Less than a year later, in January 2007, the American Civil Liberties Unionsued ICE and the company, alleging overcrowding at the facility. The ACLU said two-person cells were crammed with three civil detainees, the third sleeping onthe floor in a plastic cot.Since then, the Otay Mesa facility has held a maximum of 700 detainees a day,where it once held as many as 1,000, said Lauren Mack, an ICE spokeswoman inSan Diego.

"As long as apprehensions continue to increase, we're going to continue toneed not only bed space, but to identify ways to streamline the entiredetention process," Mack said.

Owen said it has still not been determined if the prison will be built.According to county records, the company filed its initial application for aspecific plan amendment and major use permit in July 2006, a month after thefirst part of the county lease expired. Records show the company has since been working to complete various studies required before the project can go to the county's planning commission.

If built, the new facility would be enormous, with administrative space as wellas prison housing and services. The nearby state prison, the R.J. DonovanCorrectional Facility, was designed to hold 2,280, according to the statecorrections department Web site, though it now houses 4,770.

Rob Hixson, a commercial real estate broker who is chairman of the city of SanDiego's Otay Mesa Planning Committee, said he had not heard any complaintsamong those aware of the proposed prison on nearby unincorporated land.

"A lot of people say 'not in my backyard,' but this is a pretty big backyard," Hixson said. "It is a long way from any of our housing." Withupward of 30,000 immigrants now in ICE custody " up from about 18,500 three years ago " Immigration and Customs Enforcement has increasingly turned to private contractors to house detainees.

The relationship has not come without criticism. In addition to the overcrowding lawsuit, the ACLU sued both Corrections Corporation of America and ICE again last summer, alleging severely inadequate medical care at the OtayMesa facility.

A former detainee at the Otay Mesa facility filed a separate lawsuit in LosAngeles last year against the federal government, claiming that he was denied treatment for what turned out to be penile cancer. He died last month. Lastweek, a federal judge in Los Angeles ruled that his family can go forward with a lawsuit seeking damages from the federal government.

Leslie Berestein: (619) 542-4579;
leslie.berestein@uniontrib.com

To view the article click on the title of the blog.

Copyright 2007 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.

Why did Jose have to die for America in order to truly belong?

This is just another article on the endless debate over immigrants enlisting in the armed forces for US citizenship..This topic is dear to my heart and I want everyone to be educated on the conflicting feelings families face, but you make your choice as you read below..
~~~~~~~~~~~~


Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Dead Citizenship and the Latino Body

Posthumous citizenship for US Latino troops killed in Iraq brings conflicted feelings for families

By HELEN O'NEILL
AP Special Correspondent

A young, ambitious immigrant from Guatemala who dreamed of becoming anarchitect. A Nigerian medic. A soldier from China who boasted he wouldone day become an American general. An Indian native whose headstonedisplays the first Khanda, emblem of the Sikh faith, to appear inArlington National Cemetery.

These were among more than 100 foreign-born members of the U.S.military who earned American citizenship by dying in Iraq.Jose Gutierrez was one of the first to fall, killed by friendly firein the dust of Umm Qasr in the opening hours of the invasion.In death, the young Marine was showered with honors his family couldonly have dreamed of in life. His sister was flown in from Guatemalafor his memorial service, where a Roman Catholic cardinal presided andtop military officials saluted his flag-draped coffin.

And yet, his foster mother agonized as she accompanied his body backfor burial in Guatemala City: Why did Jose have to die for America inorder to truly belong?

Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, who oversaw Gutierrez's service,put it differently."There is something terribly wrong with our immigration policies if ittakes death on the battlefield in order to earn citizenship," Mahonywrote to President Bush in April 2003. He urged the president to grantimmediate citizenship to all immigrants who sign up for militaryservice in wartime."

They should not have to wait until they are brought home in acasket," Mahony said.But as the war continues, more and more immigrants are becomingcitizens in death -- and more and more families are grappling withdeeply conflicting feelings about exactly what the honor means.

Gutierrez's citizenship certificate -- dated to his death on March 21,2003, -- was presented during a memorial service in Lomita, Calif., toNora Mosquera, who took in the orphaned teen after he had trekkedthrough Central America, hopping freight trains through Mexico beforeillegally sneaking into the U.S."On the one hand I felt that citizenship was too late for him,"Mosquera said. "But I also felt grateful and very proud of him. I knew it would open doors for us as a family."

"What use is a piece of paper?" cried Fredelinda Pena after another emotional naturalization ceremony, this one in New York City where herbrother's framed citizenship certificate was handed to his distraughtmother. Next to her, the infant daughter he had never met dozed in hisfiancée's arms.

Cpl. Juan Alcantara, 22, a native of the Dominican Republic was killed Aug. 6, 2007 by an explosive in Baqouba. He was buried by a cardinaland eulogized by a congressman but to his sister, those tributesseemed as hollow as citizenship."He can't take the oath from a coffin," she sobbed.

There are tens of thousands of foreign-born members in the U.S. armed forces. Many have been naturalized, but more than 20,000 are not U.S.citizens."Green card soldiers," they are often called, and early in the war,Bush signed an executive order making them eligible to apply forcitizenship as soon as they enlist. Previously, legal residents in themilitary had to wait three years.

Since Bush's order, nearly 37,000 soldiers have been naturalized. And109 who lost their lives have been granted posthumous citizenship.

They are buried with purple hearts and other decorations, and theirnames are engraved on tombstones in Arlington as well as in Mexico andIndia and Guatemala.Among them:

- Marine Cpl. Armando Ariel Gonzalez, 25, who fled Cuba on a raft withhis father and brother in 1995 and dreamed of becoming an Americanfirefighter. He was crushed by a refueling tank in southern Iraq onApril 14, 2003.
- Army Spc. Justin Onwordi, a 28-year-old Nigerian medic whose heartseemed as big as his smiling 6-foot-4 frame and who left behind a wifeand baby boy. He died when his vehicle was blown up in Baghdad on Aug.2, 2004.
- Army Pfc. Ming Sun, 20, of China who loved the U.S. military so muchhe planned to make a career out of it, boasting that he would rise tothe rank of general. He was killed in a firefight in Ramadi on Jan. 9,2007.
- Army Spc. Uday Singh, 21, of India, killed when his patrol wasattacked in Habbaniyah on Dec.1, 2003. Singh was the first Sikh to diein battle as a U.S. soldier, and it is his headstone at Arlington thatdisplays the Khanda.
- Marine Lance Cpl. Patrick O'Day from Scotland, buried in theCalifornia rain as bagpipes played and his 19-year-old pregnant wifetold mourners how honored her 20-year-old husband had felt to fight for the country he loved."He left us in the most honorable way a man could," Shauna O'Day saidat the March 2003 Santa Rosa service. "I'm proud to say my husband is a Marine. I'm proud to say my husband fought for our country. I'm proud to say he is a hero, my hero."

Not all surviving family members feel so sure. Some parents blame themselves for bringing their child to the U.S. in the first place. Others face confusion and resentment when they try to bury their childback home.

At Lance Cpl. Juan Lopez's July 4, 2004, funeral in the central Mexican town of San Luis de la Paz, Mexican soldiers demanded that the U.S. Marine honor guard surrender their arms, even though the rifleswere ceremonial. Earlier, the Mexican Defense Department had deniedthe Marines' request to conduct the traditional 21-gun salute, sayingforeign troops were not permitted to bear arms on Mexican soil.

And so mourners, many deeply opposed to the war, witnessed anextraordinary 45-minute standoff that disrupted the funeral even as Lopez's weeping widow was handed his posthumous citizenship by a U.S.embassy official.

The same swirl of conflicting emotions and messages often overshadowsthe military funerals of posthumous citizens in the U.S.Smuggled across the Mexican border in his mother's arms when he was 2months old, Jose Garibay was just 21 when he died in Nasiriyah. The Costa Mesa police department made him an honorary police officer, something he had hoped one day to become. America made him a citizen.

But his mother, Simona Garibay, couldn't conceal her bewilderment and pain. It seemed, she said in interviews after the funeral, that more value was being placed on her son's death than on his life.

Immigrant advocates have similar mixed feelings about militaryservice. Non-citizens cannot become officers or serve in high-securityjobs, they note, and yet the benefits of citizenship are regularly pitched by recruiters, and some recruitment programs specificallytarget colleges and high schools with predominantly Latino students.

"Immigrants are lured into service and then used as political pawns orcannon fodder," said Dan Kesselbrenner, executive director of theNational Immigration Project, a program of the National Lawyers Guild."It is sad thing to see people so desperate to get status in thiscountry that they are prepared to die for it."Others question whether non-citizens should even be permitted toserve. Mark Krikorian of the conservative Center for ImmigrationStudies, argues that defending America should be the job of Americans,not non-citizens whose loyalty might be suspect. In granting specialbenefits, including fast-track citizenship, Krikorian says, there is a danger that soldiering will eventually become yet another job thatAmericans won't do.

And yet, immigrants have always fought -- and died -- in America's wars.During the Cvil War, the Union army recruited Irish and German immigrants off the boat. Alfred Rascon, an illegal immigrant from Mexico, received the Medal of Honor for acts of bravery during theVietnam war. In the 1990s, Gen. John Shalikashvili, born in Polandafter his family fled the occupied Republic of Georgia, becamechairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.After the Iraq invasion, the U.S. Embassy in Mexico fielded hundredsof requests from Mexicans offering to fight in exchange forcitizenship. They mistakenly believed that Bush's order also applied to nonresidents.

The right to become an American is not automatic for those who die in combat. Families must formally apply for citizenship within two yearsof the soldier's death, and not all choose to do so."He's Italian, better to leave it like that," Saveria Romeo says ofher 23-year-old son, Army Staff Sgt. Vincenzo Romeo who was born in Calabria, died in Iraq and is buried in New Jersey. A miniature Italian flag marks his grave, next to an American one."What good would it do?" she says. "It won't bring back my son."But it would allow her to apply for citizenship for herself, a benefitonly recently offered to surviving parents and spouses. Until 2003 posthumous citizenship was granted only through an act of Congress and was purely symbolic. There were no benefits for next of kin. Romeo says she has no desire to apply. She couldn't bear to benefit in any way from her son's death, she says. And besides, she feels Italian, not American.

Fernando Suarez del Solar just feels angry -- angry at what he considers the futility of a war that claimed his only son, angry atthe military recruiters he says courted young Jesus relentlessly even when the family still lived in Tijuana. His son was just 13, Suarez del Solar said, when he was first dazzled by Marine recruiters in a California mall. For the next two years Jesus begged the family to emigrate and eventually they did, settlingin Escondido, Calif., where the teen signed up for the Marines before he left high school.

Lance Cpl. Jesus Suarez Del Solar was 20 when he was killed by a bomb in the first week of the war. He left behind a wife and baby and parents so bitter about his death that they eventually divorced.

Today, his 52-year-old father has become an outspoken peace activist who travels the country organizing anti-war marches, giving speeches and working with counter-recruitment groups to dissuade young Latinos from joining the U.S. military."There is nothing in my life now but saving these young people," he says. "It is just something I feel have to do."But first he had to journey to Iraq. He had to see for himself the dusty stretch of wasteland where his son became an American. In tears, he planted a small wooden cross. And he prayed for his son -- and for all the other immigrants who became citizens in death.

Posted by Lázaro Lima at 9:33 PM
http://academicink.blogspot.com/2008/03/dead-citizenship-and-latino-body.html

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Military provision, an OPTION, a CHOICE, a DREAM


I would be the person with the differing opinion from La Raza Educators and those opposing the provision...and I'm glad debating is an option...


1. Europe is the same, they HATE "undocumented"..NOT assuming that that's what anyone would do..I'm not sure how fast and easy Mexico deals with visas to move/work/travel in Europe...and i also do not know the process but, will definitely call my contacts to figure it out and inform others...this article gives you more insight...Illegal Immigrants Become Focus of the Election Campaign in Italy (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/28/international/europe/28italy.html)

2. Over 4,000 soldiers have received their citizenship within the last 5 years of the "war empty of reason"...no matter what, if that is their will, then they will serve no matter what...Had there not been present WAR activity would you feel the same? What if it were a different cause? -not that loosing lives is GOOD, and for the record I disapprove of the WAR - WAR IS A WEAPON Of MASS DESTRUCTION...check out more debate here: Outlook: Short on Soldiers? Not if They'd Take Non-Citizens (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/06/01/DI2007060101622.html)

3. If my friends desire to serve our country and be part of the military, I will not stop his or her CHOICE/DREAM...It is there OPTION, DESIRE AND GOAL...I'm sure many would like to have a professional career from the armed forces...and to say "Some of them don't mind [going into the military]," Victor Contrers said. "They did that stuff in Mexico, and they wouldn't mind doing it here to get their legal paperwork" from the article and below blog: Should we give citizenship to those who serve? - Now that is just plain ignorant...we are talking about students who have lived in this country for over 5 years, who for the most part have learned the English language, are looking forward to graduating from HS and college, and have never done any type of military service, who exactly did he think we were talking about, my 53 year-old tio JOSE, Comandante de las Fuerzas Armadas Mexicanas, who just recently arrived from Mexico?(I'm being sarcastic)

4. I truly do not feel that all this was planned...The military department can make a proposal/law at any time for recruiting purpose to obtain a path toward citizenship if you enlist... and then what? the likelihood that students join would be higher than if they had the OPTION/CHOICE to fulfill 1 of the three... Receive 2-year degree-associates or complete 2-years of a 4 year degree or serve in the military for 2-years within a 6-year period.

5. Contrers says.. "You're going to prey on the weakest members of society," said Sheppard, who said he thinks the war was poorly handled. "They are trying to look for some sort of cheap way of filling the ranks."............... Are DREAMERs really the WEAKEST members of society, if they have succeeded a lifetime of education, becoming overachieving, talented youth?... for the most part most stories of undocumented students shared from across the country state that they were brought as a "CHILD..." they are as American as I am and have been educated in the same environment, probably in a richer environment, but it is hard to say well educated DREAMERS will overflow the recruiting offices if they have choices. I can't say that all DREAMERS are education-driven, but I can say that those around me never speak about joining the military if the DREAM Act passed.

I am opened-minded, and I read lots of stories of US citizens who disagree with the mission and direction the WAR has taken and in many ways this problem has influenced the way we feel about DREAMERS opting for the military provision. It breaks my heart on a daily basis to hear that innocent Iraqis are also paying the consequences. Nobody is right or wrong, I respect everyones opinion, but my opinion, beliefs and values will not influences someone Else's DREAM.

I wish that ALL IMMIGRANTES be allowed a path toward citizenship...

We need COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM NOW!!!

A Miracle for the DREAMERS: Madre Chole


Mexico City
Panteon del Tepeyac

In this old cemetery next to the Guadalupe Basilica there are many graves dating back to the early 1800s. The place is where many important people are buried.

In the middle of the cemetery is a small building/mausoleum - it looks fairly new, the only grave in the cemetery with graffiti on it- they were not drawings or gang symbols. They were notes from students asking Madre Chole for her help.

Around the time of the Cristero Rebellion (mid to late 1920s) a Capuchin nun named Sor Soledad became known as a caring and empathic teacher. After she died, a custom began where students would go to her grave and leave something of theirs that they used in the classroom - word is that many miracles have occurred - helping students that asked Madre Chole for assistance with their studies.

I saw Madre Chole's grave yesterday. It was a sort of rectangle concrete room, very small - with two photographs of her and one painting. I looked through the metal bars and saw hundreds of little strips of paper on the floor of the room. I thought of the DREAMERS, who are students and REALLY need Madre Chole's help - not so much for making good grades (they do that so well on their own), but for being able to study, graduate and work in their professions as residents and citizens of the U.S.

I thought of a few DREAMERS I know well and decided that I would be their intermediary and ask Madre Chole for help getting the DREAM ACT passed. I took out a piece of paper and wrote her a note with the names of the DREAMERS I have come to know at the University of Houston. There were so many, and our tour guide was waiting for me. So at the bottom of the paper I just wrote - For All DREAMERS - PLEASE HELP.

A couple of young people next to me asked for some paper so they could write their own notes. They smiled at me and seemed kind of embarrassed. I looked inside the little room again at the images of Madre Chole and I started getting choked up. It seemed so important to try and see if she could do something - especially since she is said to have performed miracles for students during the past 80 years. I am not necessarily a religious person. But as I told Madre Chole in the note, this is a desperate situation.

p.s. This post has no photo of Madre Chole because the cemetery administration does not allow photographs.

The gravity of HR 4088

A Dream Deferred had this clip on HR 4088. It explains in a nutshell the gravity of this bill if it were to be passed.

Wasted Talent and Broken Dreams

A report from Roberto G. Gonzalez that was published on October of last year.:

Read this doc on Scribd: WastedTalent

The Double Edged Sword that Nobody Talks About


I have had many discussions with different people regarding the issue of the DREAM Act and the provision that talks about military service if you did not make it to college.
Now, i know that even some DREAM advocates that i know and are my friends will disagree with me on this issue, but i completely disagree with this provision and believe that if it was my only option to join the military in order to be eligible for the DREAM Act- I would choose another option like going to Europe or something else besides joining the ranks.

This is the double edge sword that few people talked about during the last attempted passage of the DREAM. I am not agreeing fully with La Raza Educators, but i am simply asking you to think if this wasn't a whole planned game? Some people say that we, DREAM kids should be proud to serve this war because we have been given an education. I also know some DREAM kids that would be proud to go about this avenue. I say that nothing is free, nothing has been free. More importantly still, i would refuse to be part of a war that is so empty of reasons.

I would refuse to be part of something so dirty... giving someone their papers in exchange for blood.

I dont know what the next version of the DREAM Act will look like if there is to be another one, but i do urge you to really think about this and realize the high number of DREAMERs that would choose the military rather than a college education.


Should we give citizenship to those who serve?
by Indra Ekmanis
published on Wednesday, March 19, 2008



Instead of risking deportations to their home countries, many illegal immigrants may instead opt for deployment to Iraq if a proposed federal legislation is passed.

The Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors, or DREAM, Act — variations of which have been introduced but not yet passed in Congress several times — would allow illegal immigrant students to regulate their status and gain citizenship or legal residence through participation in higher education or enlistment in the military.

In order to be eligible for the DREAM Act, immigrants must meet requirements including high school graduation and possession of "good moral character." They must also have entered the U.S. before age 16.

The act was re-introduced last year, but no major action has yet been taken, according to the Library of Congress' Web site. Further action on the act may be postponed until 2009.

Manuel Hernandez, associate professor of Spanish and Chicano literature, said the DREAM Act is about giving illegal immigrant students "a fair deal."....(More)

Image obtained here

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

A Saint for Migrants



Santo Toribio Romo - Patron de los Migrantes


This article is already five years old, but I have gone back to it time and time again.


Un Santo Pollero
Jornada Mexico
4 8 2002

¿Deseas pasar el río?– dijo un desconocido a uno de los cientos de migrantes que

desean cruzar la frontera norte de México.

–Claro, ¿me puedes ayudar?– contestó el interpelado.

–Sí, puedo pasarte y conseguirte un trabajo.

Y así fue. El extraño pasó del otro lado y rápidamente encontró trabajo. No pudo agradecer en persona al generoso hombre que lo ayudó. En cuanto regresó a México, fue a Santa Ana de Guadalupe a buscar a su bienhechor, quien le había entregado una imagen suya y le había dicho su pueblo de origen. Cuando llegó a Santa Ana, todas las descripciones lo llevaron a la pequeña capilla donde estaban los restos de su benefactor: Santo Toribio Romo.

Los habitantes de Santa Ana de Guadalupe, Jalisco, cuentan éste y muchos milagros; han sabido conservar el testimonio de su hijo predilecto.

“Santo Toribio Romo, el patrono de los migrantes”. Semanario arquidiocesano de Guadalajara. Edición especial con motivo del Aniversario de la Canonización de los Santos Mártires Mexicanos.


for link to complete article click the title of this post

Monday, March 17, 2008

Georgia Teen, a Plaintiff in SPLC Suit, Tells House Subcommittee About Terrifying Immigration Raid


Georgia high school student Marie Justeen Mancha testifies before the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security and International Law. Lisa Nipp photo.


Feb. 13, 2008 – It was supposed to be the start of another school day for 15-year-old Marie Justeen Mancha as she sat in her bedroom, waiting for her mother to return from an errand in town.

But on this morning in September 2006, Mancha, a U.S. citizen, found herself in a situation she never expected to encounter in her own home.

"I started to hear the words, 'Police! Illegals!'" she said. "It seems as if those words still ring in my head today giving me that fear of them busting into my home. I walked around the corner from the hallway and saw a tall man reach toward his gun and look straight at me."

She was caught in the middle of a botched immigration raid in southeast Georgia. Federal agents barged into homes without showing warrants and targeted U.S. citizens of Mexican descent, like Mancha, solely because of their skin color.

Mancha, now 17, recounted the experience today before the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security and International Law. Her congressional testimony was part of a hearing about problems with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) procedures.

Mancha, her mother and three other U.S. citizens of Mexican descent are plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center against ICE in 2006.

The lawsuit charges that ICE agents illegally detained, searched and harassed Latinos solely because of their appearance — a violation of their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights — during an extensive campaign to drive them out of the area. A sixth plaintiff is a landlord who suffered damage to his rental properties when agents broke into trailers rented by Latinos.

Mancha told subcommittee members about the fear she felt that morning.

"I saw a group of law enforcement agents standing in the living room blocking the front door," she said. "My heart just dropped. I didn't know what was about to happen. … When the tall man reached for his gun I just stood there, feeling so scared."

Mancha, who speaks with a gentle Southern accent, said the agents asked if her mother was in the U.S. legally. Her mother was born in Florida.

"I started to feel closed in, like I couldn't say no or not answer them because they were blocking the front door," she said of the agents, who never showed a search warrant.

"At times, I didn't want to be Mexican because of what we go through and how people look at us different and treat us and assume we're all illegal," she told the subcommittee.

The raids began on Sept. 1, 2006, and lasted for several weeks. They were intended to locate unauthorized immigrants who worked at a poultry plant in Stillmore, a town of about 1,000 people in Emanuel County. But rather than conduct a raid only at the plant, dozens of agents fanned out across residential areas in three counties — stopping motorists, breaking into homes and threatening people with tear gas and guns. Hundreds were terrorized. Many fled into the woods.

For Mancha, the agents left her home after she answered their questions, telling them that she and her mother are U.S. citizens. Her mother arrived as the agents left.

"I ran to her and started crying — telling her what just happened," Mancha said. "I was so scared. I still am. I carry that fear with me every day — wondering when they'll come back."

To view the article click on the title of this blog.

The Year in Hate

When I think of hate groups, I only had a of handful in my mind...after reading this article it opened up a can of REALITY...
~~~~~~~~~~~




Active U.S. Hate Groups Rise to 888 in 2007
By David Holthouse and Mark Potok


Sheriff's deputies gunned down by "Aryan" gangsters in Bastrop, La. Tax protesters with bombs arrested in New Hampshire. Gun-toting white supremacists marching in Jena, La. A police officer murdered in Salt Lake City. Nativist leaders demanding sniper teams and mines along the Mexican border. Calls for assassinating politicians, immigrants and Jews. Rapidly spreading racist conspiracy theories.

The end of 2007 brought to a close another year marked by staggering levels of racist hate in America. Even as several major hate groups struggled to survive, other new groups appeared, and the radical right as a whole appeared to grow.

The latest annual count by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) found that the number of hate groups operating in America rose to 888 last year, up 5% from 844 groups in 2006. That capped an increase of 48% since 2000 — a hike from 602 groups attributable to the exploitation by hate groups of the continuing debate about immigration. And it comes on top of some 300 other anti-immigration groups, about half listed by SPLC as "nativist extremist," formed in the last three years.

At the same time, FBI statistics suggested that there was a 35% rise in hate crimes against Latinos between 2003 and 2006. Experts believe that such crimes are typically carried out by people who think they are attacking immigrants.

Although there were some signs that nativist hatred may be starting to abate, you wouldn't know that by listening to the furious rants of many groups. "America is being destroyed from within by a modern version of Genghis Khan's army," the Emigration Party of Nevada, listed by the SPLC as a hate group, said. The group's leader, Don Pauly, wants to send government "sniper teams" to the border and forcibly sterilize Mexican women after a first child.

To view the complete article click on the title of this blog.


According to the report Texas has 67 hate groups, 10 of which are located in Houston.(http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp).

Picture from SPLC website: The Year in Hate report

Families Separated and Immigrants Harmed by United States

This just a report from July 2007 from the Human Rights Watch Organization. The report its a little outdated but nonetheless informative.

Families Separated and Immigrants Harmed by United States

Read this doc on Scribd: us0707web

LOVE Vs. IMMIGRATION LAWS

Not long ago, I felt that LOVE was betraying me, and it did...Being in lOVE with someone is the greatest feeling one can have. To know that you have found your soul mate and create a family is for many their ultimate goal, being that you have control over the outcome. But when the government becomes involved in destroying families and ripping apart couples were LOVE is embedded, that's to show that American "values" are being destroyed by anti-immigrant laws. This story depicts what is happening to many families in a nation of "values" : Family Values. I encourage you to read the entire article as it motivated me more to continue advocating for comprehensive immigration reform...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Love story crosses borders
By MIKE KILEN • REGISTER STAFF WRITER • March 14, 2008

Linda met Aaron over the fryer at Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers in Des Moines in 1999. She was the boss, he the employee.

She didn't speak Spanish; he didn't speak English.

They communicated with their eyes, their voices, their smiles, as she showed him the ropes.

"I liked the way she was," Aaron said., "She was different from other people. She was more humble."

Linda was divorced with two children, and had worked her way up to general manager at Wendy's. Aaron was an undocumented immigrant, seeking a better life and more money for his family near Veracruz, Mexico.


They fell in love, which requires no words or green cards.

The two were married at her parent's house on Jan. 26, 2002, and became Aaron and Linda Ramirez. They had two boys, Tyler and Alex, in the next two years....

To view the complete story click on the title of the blog.


Reporter Mike Kilen can be reached at (515) 284-8361 or mkilen@dmreg.com

What a waste of money and time...

Anti-immigrant sentiment is all over the southeast region, with exception of North Carolina. South Carolina has been known for anti-immigrant laws and anti-immigrant proposals...this is exactly another reason why I left the EASTCOAST and why hundreds are also leaving...

Instead of building schools, libraries, community centers, hospitals, senior citizen centers...but wait that is not an investment to the Sheriff, right?

~~~~~~~

Sheriffs propose jails for illegals
By Noah Haglund (Contact)
The Post and Courier
Monday, March 17, 2008

South Carolina's sheriffs want to do their part to stem illegal immigration by flagging local inmates for deportation.

But they can't, largely because the federal government doesn't have the resources.

Some sheriffs feel the only way around this is to build special jails just for immigrants. A recent proposal calls for three regional facilities to warehouse the state's convicted criminals awaiting a one-way trip home.

"We're between a rock and a hard place," said Beaufort County Sheriff P.J. Tanner, who drafted the proposal for the South Carolina Sheriff's Association. "This is the only thing that we can do."

If successful, the arrangement would be the first of its kind in the country. But it would cost an estimated $12 million to $15 million and take several years to complete. State officials hope to secure federal money to pay for it.

The proposed jails would be minimum security and would house nonviolent offenders. Each would have about 400 beds. In theory, they would free up space at county jails and state prisons.

To view the the complete article click on the title of this blog.

According to the article......During a recent count, the agency had 349 prisoners with detainers, or holds, from ICE out of a total population of about 23,900.


Are facilities really needed or is there money to be made from undocumented immigrants?

LATINOS BREAK ATTENDANCE RECORD ON "GO TEJANO DAY"...

THIS IS TO SHOW THAT LATINOS WILL NOT BE DIVIDED....and those who wanted-to should realize that Go Tejano Day is not only for "tejano-music lovers" its for all the Hispanic community including Central and South Americans and immigrants that do not benefit from the scholarship opportunities yet they do break the attendance record and consume thousands of dollars into the "Go Tejano Day"....with or without Tejano bands!!! Stop living in the past, new genres rise and die all the time...don't be surprised if they change the name to make it a more INCLUSIVE event!!! Change is great!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Demonstrators organized by VIVE Tejano-Houston protest against the rodeo's Go Tejano Day in front of Reliant Center on Sunday. Local Hispanic leaders are upset that RodeoHouston didn't book a Tejano act.
SHARÓN STEINMANN: CHRONICLE



March 16, 2008, 11:36PM
Go Tejano Day thrives amid protest
Crowds flock to rodeo despite some Hispanics' dismay at representation


By ALEXIS GRANT
Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle

TOOLS
Email Get section feed
Print Subscribe NOW
Comments (97) Recommend (2)

RESOURCES
Duelo, Horoscopos shine for Go Tejano Day Protesters rallied near the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo on Sunday, voicing discontent over what they say is under-representation of Hispanics at the event. But that didn't stop rodeo visitors from flooding through the gates of Reliant Park, setting an attendance record for Go Tejano Day.

The group, VIVE Tejano-Houston, three weeks ago urged would-be rodeo visitors to stay away this year, saying RodeoHouston should have hired a Tejano band to play on its main stage and needs to give more leadership positions and scholarships to Hispanics.

On Sunday, during the rodeo's Hispanic heritage celebration, more than 100 protesters in bright yellow shirts lined Kirby near Loop 610, next to one of the show's main entrances.

"The bands that are inside are representing Mexico," said one protester, Steve Rodriguez, 54. "That's not representing Tejanos."

But some of the sellout crowd of 71,165 people who packed Reliant Stadium to hear Duelo, a norteño band from Roma, and Los Horoscopos de Durango, an act from Chicago, did not agree with the group's mission.

"It's silly," said Amy Samaripa, a 30-year-old teacher who drives from her home in El Campo every year to visit the show. "I think they (rodeo organizers) should change the name from Go Tejano Day to Hispanic Heritage Day."

Several black lawmakers, including State Rep. Garnet Coleman, D-Houston, joined the Tejano cause this weekend, saying blacks, too, should play a bigger role in the show.

The boycott has not had a noticeable effect on attendance. Going into the show's third and final week, ticket sales for the rodeo competition and concerts are up 6 percent compared with the same period last year.

General attendance, which includes visitors who buy concert tickets and those who only visit the livestock show and carnival, was low during the show's first week, likely because of rainy weather, but has since picked up.

Saturday's general attendance, which included a nearly sold-out crowd for country singer Brad Paisley, hit 130,000 — more than any day in the past few years.

Tejano bands, which are a Texas product influenced by Mexican sounds and incorporate rock, blues, jazz and country, played on smaller stages Sunday. RodeoHouston officials did not schedule a Tejano band for the main venue because of its waning popularity and because other genres of Hispanic music sell more tickets, said Leroy Shafer, RodeoHouston's chief operating officer.

"The very vast majority of the Hispanic community knows that this is a subterfuge to try to keep a dying music industry alive," he said of the protest. "They're not buying into it."

VIVE Tejano-Houston, made up of Tejano musicians, local politicians and Hispanic organizations, has called on rodeo officials to grant more scholarships to local Hispanic youth and to diversify the rodeo's 17-member executive committee.

Rodeo officials counter that about one-third of scholarships already go to Hispanic students. And while there are no blacks or Hispanics on the rodeo's highest volunteer committee, that's because membership is based on years of service and financial contributions.

alexis.grant@chron.com

CLICK ON THE TITLE TO VIEW THE ACTUAL ARTICLE ON THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE WEBSITE...

Sunday, March 16, 2008

The American side of the story on the Mexican Drug Cartels?



If you want to send the drug dealers to the gates of hell, don't forget they wouldn't deal if they didn't have consumers.

The following article tells the unfortunate (and tragic) true story of the drug cartels in Mexico and how narcotraficante violence is terrorizing the country. I can say, yes this is true. Many people who used to drive to Mexico now avoid Nuevo Laredo (where the violence has been the most intense).

However, there is another very important aspect to the story.

capital and the market

If the drug cartels are making lots of money and fighting over turf then business must be pretty good. Why would business be good? From what I understand, narcotraficantes are often too smart to use the drugs they sell. So who is buying them? Us - as in the U.S.

There wouldn't be many narcotraficantes if we as Americans didn't create such a great market for illegal drugs... Common stories: fashion models stay thin by using cocaine. cocaine use rampant in the "better" high schools. Movie star overdoses almost always related to cocaine.

This is saying nothing about the marijuana market - which is on the boundary between OK and immoral - (I guess it depends on who you are talking to). Regardless of any morals involved, it is a HUGE market - and guess where Americans get their product? Mexico and other Latin American countries.

Imagine how the drug wars in Columbia would have gone if Americans didn't provide such a good consumer base for cocaine and marijuana?

Therefore I just want readers to keep in mind that whenever they hear anything about narcotraficantes, that our own people (Americans) are also players in all this violence.

As usual, we are very good at pointing the finger at someone else - and ignore our own contribution to this disaster. Just as in immigration - so many people hate undocumented immigrants, but the story is so much more complicated - and Americans are (OF COURSE) very complicit. The "market" for undocumented people comes from the U.S.'s desire for lower priced goods and services -- their presence helps us maintain our "style of living." Yet, we blame them and forget that we had any part in it.

The WP article is very long, so I have only included the first page - for the entire article click the title of this post.

-----



Drug Trade Tyranny on the Border
by Manuel Roig-Franzia
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, March 16, 2008; A01

TIJUANA, Mexico

The killers prowled through Loma Bonita in the pre-dawn chill.

In silence, they navigated a labyrinth of wood shacks at the crest of a dirt lane in the blighted Tijuana neighborhood, police say. They were looking for Margarito Saldaña, an easygoing 43-year-old district police commander. They found a house full of sleeping people.

Neighbors quivered at the crack of AK-47 assault rifles blasting inside Saldaña's tiny home. Rafael García, an unemployed laborer who lives nearby, recalled thinking it was "a fireworks show," then sliding under his bed in fear.

In murdering not only Saldaña, but also his wife, Sandra, and their 12-year-old daughter, Valeria, the Loma Bonita killers violated a rarely broken rule of Mexico's drug cartel underworld: Family should remain free from harm. The slayings capped five harrowing hours during which the assassins methodically hunted down and murdered two other police officers and mistakenly killed a 3-year-old boy and his mother.

The brutality of what unfolded here in the overnight hours of Jan. 14 and early Jan. 15 is a grim hallmark of a crisis that has cast a pall over the United States' southern neighbor. Events in three border cities over the past three months illustrate the military and financial power of Mexico's cartels and the extent of their reach into a society shaken by fear.

More than 20,000 Mexican troops and federal police are engaged in a multi-front war with the private armies of rival drug lords, a conflict that is being waged most fiercely along the 2,000-mile length of the U.S.-Mexico border. The proximity of the violence has drawn in the Bush administration, which has proposed a $500 million annual aid package to help President Felipe Calder¿n combat what a Government Accountability Office report estimates is Mexico's $23 billion a year drug trade.

A total of more than 4,800 Mexicans were slain in 2006 and 2007, making the murder rate in each of those years twice that of 2005. Law enforcement officials and journalists, politicians and peasants have been gunned down in the wave of violence, which includes mass executions, such as the killings of five people whose bodies were found on a ranch outside Tijuana this month.

Like the increasing number of Mexicans heading over the border in fear, the violence itself is spilling into the United States, where a Border Patrol agent was recently killed while trying to stop suspected traffickers.

Drawing on firepower, savage intimidation and cash, the cartels have come to control key parts of the border, securing smuggling routes for 90 percent of the cocaine flowing into the United States, according to the State Department. At the same time, Mexican soldiers roam streets in armored personnel carriers, attack helicopters patrol the skies, and boats ply the coastal waters.

"The situation is deteriorating," Victor Clark, a Tijuana human rights activist and drug expert, said in an interview. "Drug traffickers are waging a terror campaign. The security of the nation is at stake...."


for complete WP article click here


image: 15timez.blogspot.com/2007_04_01_archive.html

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Human Rights Violations against Migrants in Mexico

A United Nations report is stating that Mexico has one of the worst human rights records for migrants. This includes the growing number of kidnappings by police in northern and southern Mexico.

----

México es uno de los países que peor trata a migrantes: ONU

En violaciones a derechos de los migrantes está entre los más altos del mundo: relator.
La Jornada - Mexico

AFP
Publicado: 15/03/2008 13:44

México, DF. México está en los primeros lugares en la lista de países que violan los derechos de los migrantes, y su expresión más dramática es el creciente nivel de secuestros en las fronteras norte y sur por parte de policías, informó el relator especial de la ONU.

"En términos de violaciones a los derechos de los migrantes México compite con los primeros lugares del mundo", dijo Jorge Bustamante, relator especial de ONU sobre los derechos humanos de los migrantes, en conferencia de prensa.

Las violaciones a los derechos de los centroamericanos registradas en México "son iguales o peores" a las que sufren los mexicanos en Estados Unidos, dijo, al término de una visita del 9 al 15 de marzo.

"Las manifestaciones más dramáticas que encontré es que los secuestros están creciendo tanto en Tijuana (noroeste) como en Tapachula (sureste), específicamente los secuestros hechos por autoridades policiales tanto Federales como estatales y municipales", apuntó.

Elementos policiacos secuestran a inmigrantes centroamericanos, y les piden el número telefónico de sus familiares para extorsionarlos, explicó.

El relator descartó dar cifras al respecto, pero en Tijuana, frontera con Estados Unidos, tuvo el testimonio de un salvadoreño que había sido secuestrado por policías locales junto a su esposa, que seguía desaparecida a 11 días del hecho.

El funcionario rechazó la posibilidad de que Estados Unidos y México lleguen a un acuerdo migratorio, y alertó sobre la deportación de unas 100 mil familias mexicanas al año, entre las que hay miles de niños nacidos estadunidenses que sufren desajustes culturales y emocionales.

El diplomático aseguró que "fracasó" la intención del gobierno de Estados Unidos de sellar la frontera con un "muro virtual" que impediría el paso de inmigrantes indocumentados porque la tecnología que se instaló no funcionará por lo menos en tres años.


for link to Jornada article click the title of this post

1/3 of all prosecutions In LA County for returning migrants

LA Times:

"Federal authorities are cracking down on immigrants who were previously deported and then reentered the country illegally -- a crime that now makes up more than one-third of all prosecutions in Los Angeles and surrounding counties, a Times review of U.S. attorney's statistics shows."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-crackdown16mar16,0,611750.story

From the Los Angeles Times
U.S. tries to shut revolving door of illegal reentry
The effort includes combing California prisons and jails for illegal immigrants who have previously been deported.
By Anna Gorman and Scott Glover
Los Angeles Times Staff Writers

5:06 PM PDT, March 15, 2008

Federal authorities are cracking down on immigrants who were previously deported and then reentered the country illegally -- a crime that now makes up more than one-third of all prosecutions in Los Angeles and surrounding counties, a Times review of U.S. attorney's statistics shows.

The surge in prosecutions reflects the federal government's push in recent years to detect illegal immigrants with criminal records in what may seem the most obvious of places: the state's jails and prisons.

Immigration authorities have long combed inmate populations for illegal immigrants, but additional money and cooperation with local law enforcement has fueled an increase in such cases by the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles. The illegal reentry charge is the single most prosecuted crime in the office.

Prosecutors filed 539 such cases in fiscal year 2007, making up 35% of the total caseload, compared to 207 in 2006 -- 17% of all cases. Statistics for the first four months of this fiscal year show the trend continuing.

Federal authorities touted the recent effort, saying the prosecutions serve as a deterrent for those who see the border as a turnstile. They said they were targeting violent gang members, career criminals and drug dealers who have returned to the country after being deported -- many of them repeatedly.

"They are some of the worst of the worst," said Julie L. Myers, assistant secretary of Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Washington, D.C. "They are people that citizens of any community would want off the streets."

"I just wish that were true," said Jerry Salseda, a deputy federal public defender who has represented scores of illegal immigrants charged with reentering the country after having been deported. He and other critics say people who committed minor crimes years ago have been caught up in the wave of prosecutions.

Bruce J. Einhorn, a former immigration court judge, said the U.S. attorney's office should spend more resources going after smugglers rather than illegal crossers.

"That would do more to stop dangerous illegal immigration than by prosecuting a few more undocumented people who have reentered illegally," he said.

Einhorn also questioned the efficacy of the cases, because people's motivations to return -- reuniting with small children and escaping poverty -- often outweigh time behind bars.

In years past, many of those now being prosecuted for illegally reentering the country would have simply been deported. Now they are being sent to prison first. Sentences can be as long as 20 years, but most defendants receive three to five years, prosecutors said.

Immigration officials in Los Angeles are largely responsible for the recent spike in prosecutions. In 2006, they created a nine-person team to scrutinize inmate populations for potential prosecution. The agency also placed an officer in the U.S. attorney's office to serve as a liaison with immigration officials on these cases. Agents also look for possible defendants -- primarily gang members -- in communities around Southern California.

Prosecutions are likely to continue increasing nationwide as the immigration agency expands its work in jails. Congress recently appropriated $200 million for the agency, which Myers said would be used to develop technology and work with local and state officials to identify more illegal immigrants behind bars.

The effort in Los Angeles was recently cited by U.S. Atty. Gen. Michael Mukasey, who said Justice Department officials were reviewing it "with an eye toward expanding it to the Southwest border districts" and elsewhere.

Thom Mrozek, spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles, said the cases make up a large percentage of the overall number prosecuted by the office, but they do not represent an undue drain on resources or hinder other types of prosecutions. That's because the reentry cases are easy to prove, he said, rarely go to trial and don't require much time.

To win a conviction, prosecutors need to prove three things: that the defendant is in the United States, that he or she is not legally permitted to be in the U.S., and that the person had been formally deported in the past.

A side benefit of such easy-to-prove cases is that they can be made when there isn't enough evidence to convict illegal immigrants on other charges, said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates tighter enforcement of immigration laws.

It's the same idea as when "you send Al Capone to jail for not paying his taxes," he said.

Curtis Kin, chief of the Domestic Security and Immigration Crimes Section of the U.S. attorney's office, which was created in 2006 in part to prosecute illegal reentry cases, chafed at the notion that most defendants are sympathetic.

"The people we go after are demonstrated threats," he said. "The No. 1 reason to do this is to protect the community," he said.

As evidence, he pointed to the cases of two gang members charged after a jail sweep in December dubbed "Operation Winter Warning."

One of them -- Julio Cesar Mata-Sosa, a member of the Radford Street gang in North Hollywood -- had been deported seven times between 1998 and 2006, authorities said. His criminal resume included convictions for burglary, robbery, vehicle theft, cocaine possession and sales, and presenting false identification to a police officer.

The other, Ascension Hernandez-Perez, a Valerio Street gang member, was deported seven times between 1999 and 2004 and had previously been convicted of burglary, assault, battery, cruelty to a child, spousal battery and making terrorist threats, authorities said. Both men have pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the country after having been deported and are awaiting sentencing.

Defense attorney Yolanda Barrera, who handles several of these cases each year, says not every illegal reentry case features hard-core criminals with multiple deportations.

"They could be a priest, they could be a nun; it doesn't matter," she said. "If they are here illegally, they have previously been deported and they have an aggravated felony, they are going to be prosecuted."

She recently defended a woman named Leticia Esparza, a former gang member who was sentenced to five years in prison on a 1997 drug sales conviction before being deported. Esparza was deported in 2000 and returned to the U.S. the same day because her two U.S.-born daughters were still here.

After returning, Esparza, now 37, left the gang, got her tattoos removed and started working selling cosmetics and had four more children.

Esparza was rearrested last June after police said she tried to cash a stolen check. Barrera said she was able to prove that the check was not stolen, but Esparza was still prosecuted for illegal reentry after deportation and sentenced to one year in federal prison. The prosecutors had pushed for a 37-month sentence, Barrera said.

"I can understand the law is the law," Barrera said, "but to send her to prison for what they wanted -- I think that's outrageous."

Even within the U.S. attorney's office, some prosecutors -- particularly veteran lawyers who have risen to supervisory levels -- have regarded the cases as distractions that take time away from more meaningful work.

William Carter, who was chief of the environmental section when he resigned in 2006, said he recalled some illegal re-entry cases that were triggered by relatively minor crimes such as DUIs, traffic offenses and even jaywalking.

"With some of these cases, why are we bothering?" he said. "You need to do something about the border. You don't do it by throwing people in jail."

anna.gorman@latimes.comscott.glover@latimes.com

The "put them in prison" immigration bill

Here is one of the first articles that came out after the Republican Senators proposed the new immigration bill that would requiring mandatory prison sentences for immigrants.

Since the bill was introduced by Sen. Sessions of Alabama, I am wondering if he has been reading a few history books and wants to fill U.S. prisons with even more inmates so they can all be leased out at $10.00 per month like there were in 1900.
-----
Federal bill would jail illegal immigrants

By Doug Abrahms
March 6, 2008
Montgomery Advertiser
dabrahms@gannett.com




WASHINGTON -- Sen. Jeff Sessions introduced a bill Wednesday that would require mandatory prison sentences for immigrants convicted of illegally entering the country, one of several pieces of legislation offered by a group of Republican senators to draw attention to the issue.

"Doing so will discourage future attempts at illegal entry," said Sessions, R-Mobile. "It is important that we send the message to the world that America is enforcing the rule of law."

Sessions' measure was one of 15 bills unveiled Wednesday. Others included provisions for:

# Requiring 700 miles of fence along the Mexico border to be completed by the end of 2010.

# Expanding the law to allow governors to use the National Guard to build fences, conduct missions and help the Department of Homeland Security patrol the border.

# Making English the official language and clarifying that federal documents aren't required to be written in other languages unless required by statute.

But the bills face difficulty in the Senate, which is controlled by Democrats who set the agenda. Many immigration bills are pending, but few expect major legislation to pass in an election year.

No one seriously believes the U.S. can round up and deport 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S., much less put them all in prison, said Lynn Tramonte, deputy director for legislative affairs at the National Immigration Forum, which supports comprehensive immigration reform.

These bills also don't address the needs by employers that rely on immigrant labor, she said.

"These proposals are designed to look tough but don't have the meat behind them," Tramonte said. "They're just not a serious solution."


for link to MA click the title of this post

The Saga of Jose Jesus Vieyra - part I















It started on the evening of February 22, 2008. Jose Vieyra was driving out of a Toyota dealership onto the eastbound feeder of Houston's IH10 when he hit a fast moving SUV.

Vierya had come to the U.S. on a visa in 2006. He had a driver's license. But everything turned upside down for him after the accident. He made the mistake of running in to the wrong person, a Harris County Sheriff's Deputy.

Vieyra couldn't have been going very fast if he had just driven out of a parking lot. But at first, all that was said was that Vierya was probably undocumented, that the deceased Deputy had 20 years on the force and that he was "working undercover."

The community was outraged. The media repeatedly published photos of Miller's smashed up SUV. He (Miller) had a wife and children. The newspaper reported that there was "no sign of drinking or drugs"

There was no mention of Vierya's family. What was emphasized was the terrible loss of Officer Miller and a number of details on how people are able to get immigrant visas - at first investigators were not sure Vierya was documented or not. However, nowadays people are assumed undocumented until proven to be legal residents - so he was taken in.

This post is not to make less of the Miller family's loss. It is about how immigrants are often targeted for supposedly committing atrocities - often without sufficient information.


p.s. It was almost impossible to find the Houston Chronicle article on the accident from February 23, 2008. The newspapers search engine did not show the article. The link to the article was posted on the net on several different web pages, but the links were no longer valid. I finally found it through a large library - not from "searching" for names other details, but from going into February 23, 2008 and checking each article one by one. It would be interesting to find out if the article was removed before or after it was found that Miller was heavily intoxicated at the time of the crash.

-----


February 23, 2008
(Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle)


U.S. Immigration officials could not determine Friday whether the driver of the truck that killed a Harris County Sheriff's deputy had a valid visa that would have allowed the Mexican national to live or work in the country.

Jose Jesus Vieyra, 56, is charged with criminally negligent homicide in a collision that killed Deputy Craig Miller Thursday night on a Katy Freeway access road.

Although ICE officials originally identified Vieyra as an illegal immigrant, the agency said late Friday that it could not confirm if his visa - issued at a border checkpoint - is still valid.

It is also unclear when or exactly where it was issued. Vieyra's case illustrates the federal government's difficulty tracking foreign visitors.

Vieyra is being held in the Harris County Jail in lieu of $35,000 bail, said Capt. John Martin, spokesman for the Sheriff's Department.

Miller, a 20-year veteran with the department, was working undercover when the fatal crash occurred about 7:20 p.m. Thursday, Martin said.

Family, friends and fellow officers mourned Miller's sudden death and remembered him Friday as a funny man and devoted father. Miller, 43, is survived by a wife, Michelle, and two young children.

"If he wasn't a police officer, he would have been a great comedian on Saturday Night Live," said Brenham resident Ross Martella, a friend of Miller's since they attended Stratford High School in the early 1980s. "He was a nice person."

Martella, who works in the oilfield services business, said Miller worked his way up through the ranks, starting as a jailer.

"And if someone called the law on you, you'd have been lucky if Craig was the officer involved," he said. "He was fair and he had common sense and he would listen to both sides."

No sign of drinking or drugs

Authorities said Miller was traveling east on the access road along Interstate 10 West near Mason Road when Vieyra pulled out of a driveway at the Don McGill Toyota dealership.

Vieyra drove across three lanes into the path of the sport utility vehicle Miller was driving, Martin said. The SUV ran into the truck, became airborne and landed on a raised concrete embankment separating the feeder road from the freeway, Martin said.

Firefighters had to cut through the wreckage to get the deputy out. He died before authorities could rush him to the hospital.

"The basis of the charge is that (Vieyra) failed to yield the right-of-way," Martin said.

He said there was no indication that Vieyra was drunk or under the influence of drugs.

Vieyra had a valid driver's license at the time of the crash, Martin said.

It's unclear, however, who owns the truck he was driving Thursday night.

Employees at the McGill Toyota dealership said Vieyra did not work for the company. Dozens of vendors drop off and pick up merchandise and supplies daily at the dealership, the workers said.

Immigration detainer filed

As the investigation continues, officials are working to determine Vieyra's immigration status.

Late Friday, ICE officials said they learned that Vieyra, a Mexican citizen, had entered the country on a visitor's visa.

"Initially I was told he was an `entry without inspection,' but in the last 15 minutes I've been told he does have a visa with multiple entries," John Gaudioso, deputy special agent in charge of the Houston ICE office, said Friday afternoon. "But we have not seen his passport, or the visa. So it's still under inquiry."

Gaudioso added that an immigration detainer has been filed against Vieyra allowing for his possible deportation.

"Depending on what happens with the county's investigation and prosecution, he could be subject to removal if he is convicted of a crime, and if the crime is considered an aggravated felony," Gaudioso said.

Driver's license clean

Deputy David Crain, spokesman for the Sheriff's Department, said Vieyra's Texas driver's license expires on his birthday in 2014. Crain said the license does not have any restrictions, and there were no traffic violations on his record. Vieyra apparently has no criminal record in Harris County.

There was no response at the home where the Sheriff's Department said Vieyra resides in northwest Harris County.

In Austin, Texas Department of Public Safety spokeswoman Tela Mange said a foreign citizen in the state legally can obtain a driver's license.

The DPS Web site listed more than 25 immigration documents that could be used to obtain a driver's license, including a B1 or B2 visitor's visa, also known as a border crossing card.

To obtain a border crossing card, applicants must submit biometric information including fingerprints and photos, and pass a State Department background check followed by a personal interview.

Late Friday a Harris County Sheriff's deputy sat in a parked squad car outside the Miller home on a quiet cul de sac of brick homes in Katy. He said the family did not want to speak to the media.

Miller, who joined the department in August 1987, was assigned to the Investigative Support Unit in April 2006, Martin said.

"I can't even imagine what the family must be going through," Martin said. "Our thoughts and prayers are with them."

It was the Sheriff's Department's first death in the line of duty since 2002.

Visitation for Miller will be from 4-9 p.m. Sunday, at Memorial Oaks Funeral Home, 13001 Katy Freeway.

The funeral is scheduled for 2 p.m. Monday at Second Baptist Church's West Campus, 19449 Katy Freeway.

100 Club taking donations

The 100 Club is accepting donations to its "Survivor's Fund" on behalf of the deputy's family. The Houston-based organization's fund supports the relatives of officers and firefighters killed in the line of duty.

Note: jennifer.leahy@chron; kevin.moran@chron.com; jim.pinkerton@chron.com Chronicle reporters Lindsay Wise, Dale Lezon and Susan Carroll contributed to this report.

article taken from Pro-Quest




image: http://www.forcounsel.com/products/0942.jpg

The Saga of Jose Jesus Vieyra Part II

continued:

Houston tv stations reported Vieyra's accident, the sheriff was considering the Deputy's death as criminally negligent homicide. The photos of the wreck were sensational - Deputy Miller's SUV was totally destroyed - since it could not be verified first that Vierya was undocumented - the whole story was about Miller's death and Vierya's guilt.

Reports increased the focus on Vieyra - making him look more guilty by the minute. Then Miller was found to have an extremely high alcohol count in his body. It was reported that Miller had a problem with alcohol. There were no skid marks from Miller's truck. I wonder how fast was he going?

Have you every been at an intersection, look both ways very carefully, see that it is clear, take off and before you know it someone almost hits you from behind? You wonder, how in the world did that happen. It could have been that Vieyra did not see Miller coming. Another possibility is that Miller was going so fast that he was very far away when Vieyra entered the feeder - far enough for Vieyra to feel safe enough to cross the three lanes. But if Miller was going 60-70 or 80, he might have come upon Vieyra so quickly, neither one of them had time to react.

As for the alcohol content in Miller's body - the EMT's that picked him up after the accident would have known immediately that he had been drinking. Especially if he had 3x the legal limit in his body. Perhaps it had to wait for an official report from the medical examiner. But interesting that Miller was innocent until proven intoxicated. Vieyra was guilty from the begining - even though officials did not have all the information to make an informed decision on the charges.

---

Fox News Houston
February 23, 2008

Right now a tragic accident claims the life of a 20 year veteran of the Harris County Sheriff's Office. The Deputy was working undercover when this accident occurred. Fox 2's Andrea Watkins joins us live from Harris County with details. Andrea, what can you tell us? Sibila and Jose [the tv news anchors] we learned this morning just a few minutes ago that the Harris County Sheriff's Deputy is investigating this case now as an accident criminally negligent homicide. The Sheriff's deputy who was driving east on the I-10 feeder road near Mason when a large box truck cut out in front of him. The deputy was in an unmarked SUV and could not avoid hitting the truck. The crash rolled the deputy's vehicle and hten it hit a concrete barrier. We still don't have the deputy's name, but he was a 20 year veteran to the department and he will be sadly missed. You can't say how big a loss it is, how big a loss it is for the Sheriff's Deputy, the Sheriff's deputy family and his personal family too. Hard to imagine, the driver of the box truck was not injured in the crash and he has not been charged with anything, but the nature of this investigation, criminally negligent homicide makes you think it's headed that way. Investigators say he was trying to pull directly across three lanes of traffic to get on this ramp on I-10. Very dangerous move, and as we've been saying this morning we have seen this before, its very scary and this time it claimed the life - it's a shame that he claimed the life of a deputy that he could not avoid hitting the truck. Reporting LIVE from West Harris County, Andrea Watkins, Fox 26 news.

March 1, 2008

Thanks Mike. A man involved in a traffic accident last week is facing very seroius charges today. He's the driver accused of hitting and killing a Harris County Deputy. Now his immigration status is part of the story. Fox 26 reporter Kristine Galvan has been following this story this morning. She's LIVE downtown. Kristine:

Good morning, guys. There's a lot of new developments in this story, the first though, we can see is the suspect has his first court date today. He is charged with criminally negligent homicide. Investigators say Jove Vierya failed to yielf the right of way while driving on the Katy Freeway and smashed into a Toyota Forerunner driven by a Harris County Sheriff's deputy. That deputy, Craig Miller died at the scene. His colleagues and neighbors had nothing but kind words when describing him. He's very knowledgable about electronics, and I think part of his expertise with electronics lended itself well in this investigative support. He was a loving father and definitely caring for what was in the best interest of the community, and we're going to miss him, and I'm so sorry. The funeral arrangements for Deputy Miller are set to take place at 2 o'clock today in Katy. In the meantime we are also learning that Vieyra entered this country legally with a work visa, but investigators tell us that work visa had expired at the time of the accident last week. We're LIVE downtown. Kristine Galvan, Fox 26 News

Friday, March 14, 2008

Ice Raids in Arkansas

March 10, 2008, 11:03AM
Immigrants Target of Ark. Police Raids

By JON GAMBRELL Associated Press Writer
© 2008 The Associated Press

ROGERS, Ark. — Hispanic immigrant workers who toil on red-clay construction sites and cut flesh from bone on poultry plant lines in northwest Arkansas, helping to fuel the region's economic growth, say they've become targets for local police who are conducting raids once left to a few federal agents stationed here.

After changes in state and federal law, local police, sheriff's deputies and state troopers throughout Arkansas can help enforce federal immigration laws. Recent raids in northwestern Arkansas rounded up a handful of illegal immigrants _ but even those with a legal right to be in the United States face questions.

"It feels like it is dangerous to be Hispanic," activist Jim Miranda said...


for link to complete AP/Houston Chronicle article click the title of this post

921 migrants die trying to reach Spain in 2007

















While immigration in Spain is nothing like the U.S. - Spain has been reacting strongly to it's new immigrants from Africa. Older, more conservative Spaniards I have spoken with say that it creates a clash between natives and Africans, with differences in religion, culture and skin color. Some younger Spaniards say that the reaction would not be as strong against white skinned immigrants.

As in the U.S. - Spain also has difficulties admitting it's racism.

The International Organization for Migration estimates that in 2006, 60-70 thousand people from Africa attempted to immigrate to Europe.
-----


El Pais - Madrid
921 inmigrantes murieron el pasado año en pateras que venían a España
Un informe de Derechos Humanos rechaza la política de control de fronteras

REYES RINCÓN - Sevilla - 14/03/2008


"Si ahora llegan menos inmigrantes es porque mueren más". Ésta es una de las dramáticas conclusiones que extrae Brigitte Espuche, miembro de Pro Derechos Humanos de Andalucía, tras colaborar en la redacción del informe sobre inmigración clandestina que cada año elabora la ONG.

"Las políticas de control de frontera, cada vez más represivas y crueles hace que las mafias buscan rutas más largas y peligrosas para esquivar la vigilancia", añade Espuche. Según el último estudio, presentado ayer en Sevilla, en 2007 fallecieron 921 personas en su intento de llegar por mar a España.

Ésta es la cifra oficial que recoge el informe Derechos Humanos en la Frontera Sur 2007 tras contrastar los datos de las autoridades españolas y los medios de comunicación. Pero según las estimaciones de los responsables del estudio, el número de fallecidos el año pasado ronda los 3.500 sólo en las costas andaluzas y canarias. "Las organizaciones de los países de origen o de tránsito nos aportan información de decenas de cayucos que se sabe que salieron pero a los que se perdió el rastro".

La estimación, según Espuche, está hecha "más bien es a la baja". "Y no contabilizamos, porque resulta imposible, a las víctimas que cayeron en la ruta que atraviesa el Sahel y se dirige hacia Argelia o Libia", advierte. De las 921 víctimas documentadas, 629 fueron de origen subsahariano, 287 magrebíes y 5 asiáticas. 189 fallecieron o desaparecieron en las costas españolas y el resto, 732, en las africanas. Según el informe, la zona del Estrecho se cobró el año pasado 131 vidas.

El informe de 2006 cifraba en 7.000 las personas que se habían dejado la vida intentando alcanzar las playas españolas. De ellas, 215 murieron a las puertas de Andalucía. La reducción del número de muertos y es sólo consecuencia, según la ONG, de que el número de pateras y cayucos que llegan a su destino también ha descendido, alrededor del 50%.

Pro Derechos Humanos criticó los datos "triunfalistas" aportados por el Gobierno en las semanas previas a las elecciones. "La inmigración no está cada vez más ordenada, sino más silenciada, más clandestina", sostiene la responsable del estudio, quien advirtió asimismo del peligro de que se extienda el "discurso demagogo" que presenta a los inmigrantes como una lacra. "Este enfoque es el que ha legitimado al PP para situar el debate migratorio con una falta absoluta de escrúpulos en la campaña electoral".



for link to EP click the title of this post


photo: http://data4.blog.de/media/782/1587782_8bd922ade7_m.jpg

Tilting UK immigration laws to help Scotland













Trevor Phillips, Chairman of the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission. Photo by Tom Stockill.

Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, is asking to "tilt" UK immigration policy -to help the Scottish pharmaceutical industry. This is so different from our Congress that is constantly fighting Bill Gates who wants to increase the number of HBI visas.

The U.S. continues to shoot itself in the foot regarding immigration - by limiting HB1 visas, forbiding driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants, keeping DREAMERS from working in their professions.

If only Trevor Phillips could speak to some of our lawmakers.

-----
Flexible immigration policy call
The UK's equality watchdog has suggested immigration policy should be "tilted" to help Scotland acquire the skills it needs.

Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, will tell a conference in St Andrews immigration should be handled flexibly.

He believes Scotland's biological and pharmaceutical industry has specific demands for skilled workers.

His views have been given a cautious welcome by the Scottish Government.

Under Home Office rules introduced last month, people wishing to work in the UK must satisfy various criteria before they are allowed in.

Migrant workers

Points are allocated to different employment sectors - but the Home Office view is for the UK as a whole.

Mr Phillips believes flexibility could be delivered through a work permit system which would allow suitable migrant workers to work only in Scotland.

"We're in the new position of having a managed migration system where basically everyone who comes into the UK has to have a job," Mr Phillips told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland.

"They will be admitted if they have enough points awarded for having jobs, speaking English, having a high level of education and so on.


So, in a sense coming to Scotland would mean that migrants would find it easier to fit in
Trevor Phillips

"What I'm suggesting here is a part of the UK - Scotland - which like the rest of Western Europe suffers from an ageing population and needs more people, particularly more skilled people to boost it's economy to keep its prosperity, could benefit if we tilt the points system in such a way that potential migrants perhaps get some extra points for coming to Scotland."

Mr Phillips said the move would "turn a number of people who might otherwise go elsewhere towards Scotland".

He said the expectation would then be that immigrants would then stay in Scotland to complete the work they came to do.

Mr Phillips also said that if there was to be more integration, then new arrivals must be made to feel integrated and "that they belong".

He added: "The work that we've done in previous years shows that oddly enough, immigrants find it much easier to essentially integrate with Scottish and Welsh identities, perhaps because they're strong civic and cultural identities, than they find with other kinds of identities within Britain.

"So, in a sense coming to Scotland would mean that migrants would find it easier to fit in and easier to feel loyal to the place where they are and that would give Scotland a particular attraction for migrants."

The Scottish Government said its existing Fresh Talent initiative is aimed at attracting suitably skilled workers.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/7295602.stm

Published: 2008/03/14 10:47:13 GMT

© BBC MMVIII


photo: www.telegraph.co.uk/.../2007/01/15/ngb15.xml



Accuracy in Campaigning - Is Hillary fudging?


Greg Craig, former director, Policy Planning Office, U.S. State Department. Photo by CNN



How do we know when people are telling the truth? Can we trust Hillary? Can we trust Obama? Actually, we really don't know either of them.

Hillary is older, so she has left more of a trail behind her. Greg Craig, former director, Policy Planning Office, U.S. State Department is saying in a recent memo that she has not been giving out the right information regarding her foreign policy experience.
----
Huffington Post | March 14, 2008 12:30 PM

Originally from The National Journal

Q: So you have written a provocative memo for the Obama campaign making the argument that Hillary Clinton's experience as first lady, in terms of its relevance to being commander in chief and an expert on foreign policy, may have been exaggerated. How so?

Craig: Well, that was the point of my memo. If you're running for president on the basis of your claims of experience, when you then cite examples, you should be careful to be accurate. The evidence should be accurate. And my point is that Senator Clinton and her supporters have in serious ways overstated, if not grossly exaggerated, the nature of her experience. Take the Irish peace process -- which was a lengthy and arduous and difficult negotiation. She said, initially, that "I helped bring peace to Northern Ireland." Well, if you took the many, many heroes who were responsible for achieving that agreement -- I could name 20 people in Ireland. Primarily, the Irish were responsible for doing this, and the Americans were strong supporters.

But it's a little bit presumptuous for the first lady, who would meet people and support people to take credit away from the Irish themselves who did it. Terry McAuliffe said, "We would not have peace today had it not been for Hillary's hard work in Northern Ireland." That's just not true. This morning, Senator Clinton said on NPR that the role that she played in the Irish peace process was "instrumental." Well, that's not accurate. That's an overstatement. And anybody who is really knowledgeable about what went on, including George Mitchell, who wrote a book about it -- he wrote a book about the peace process, and he never mentioned any role whatsoever that Senator Clinton, or the first lady at the time, played.
http://nationaljournal.com/onair/transcripts/080314_craig_greg.htm

----

From TIME/CNN

Obama Foreign Policy Memo

To: Interested Parties

From: Greg Craig, former director, Policy Planning Office, U.S. State Department

RE: Senator Clinton’s claim to be experienced in foreign policy: Just words?

DA: March 11, 2008

When your entire campaign is based upon a claim of experience, it is important that you have evidence to support that claim. Hillary Clinton’s argument that she has passed “the Commander- in-Chief test” is simply not supported by her record.

There is no doubt that Hillary Clinton played an important domestic policy role when she was First Lady. It is well known, for example, that she led the failed effort to pass universal health insurance. There is no reason to believe, however, that she was a key player in foreign policy at any time during the Clinton Administration. She did not sit in on National Security Council meetings. She did not have a security clearance. She did not attend meetings in the Situation Room. She did not manage any part of the national security bureaucracy, nor did she have her own national security staff. She did not do any heavy-lifting with foreign governments, whether they were friendly or not. She never managed a foreign policy crisis, and there is no evidence to suggest that she participated in the decision-making that occurred in connection with any such crisis. As far as the record shows, Senator Clinton never answered the phone either to make a decision on any pressing national security issue – not at 3 AM or at any other time of day.

When asked to describe her experience, Senator Clinton has cited a handful of international incidents where she says she played a central role. But any fair-minded and objective judge of these claims – i.e., by someone not affiliated with the Clinton campaign – would conclude that Senator Clinton’s claims of foreign policy experience are exaggerated.

Northern Ireland:

Senator Clinton has said, “I helped to bring peace to Northern Ireland.” It is a gross overstatement of the facts for her to claim even partial credit for bringing peace to Northern Ireland. She did travel to Northern Ireland, it is true. First Ladies often travel to places that are a focus of U.S. foreign policy. But at no time did she play any role in the critical negotiations that ultimately produced the peace. As the Associated Press recently reported, “[S]he was not directly involved in negotiating the Good Friday peace accord.” With regard to her main claim that she helped bring women together, she did participate in a meeting with women, but, according to those who know best, she did not play a pivotal role. The person in charge of the negotiations, former Senator George Mitchell, said that “[The First Lady] was one of many people who participated in encouraging women to get involved, not the only one.”

News of Senator Clinton’s claims has raised eyebrows across the ocean. Her reference to an important meeting at the Belfast town hall was debunked. Her only appearance at the Belfast City Hall was to see Christmas lights turned on. She also attended a 50-minute meeting which, according to the Belfast Daily Telegraph’s report at the time, “[was] a little bit stilted, a little prepared at times.” Brian Feeney, an Irish author and former politician, sums it up: “The road to peace was carefully documented, and she wasn’t on it.”

Bosnia:

Senator Clinton has pointed to a March 1996 trip to Bosnia as proof that her foreign travel involved a life-risking mission into a war zone. She has described dodging sniper fire. While she did travel to Bosnia in March 1996, the visit was not a high-stakes mission to a war zone. On March 26, 1996, the New York Times reported that “Hillary Rodham Clinton charmed American troops at a U.S.O. show here, but it didn’t hurt that the singer Sheryl Crow and the comedian Sinbad were also on the stage.”

Kosovo:

Senator Clinton has said, “I negotiated open borders to let fleeing refugees into safety from Kosovo.” It is true that, as First Lady, she traveled to Macedonia and visited a Kosovar refugee camp. It is also true that she met with government officials while she was there. First Ladies frequently meet with government officials. Her claim to have “negotiated open borders to let fleeing refugees into safety from Kosovo,” however, is not true. Her trip to Macedonia took place on May 14, 1999. The borders were opened the day before, on May 13, 1999.

The negotiations that led to the opening of the borders were accomplished by the people who ordinarily conduct negotiations with foreign governments – U.S. diplomats. President Clinton’s top envoy to the Balkans, former Ambassador Robert Gelbard, said, “I cannot recall any involvement by Senator Clinton in this issue.” Ivo Daalder worked on the Clinton Administration’s National Security Council and wrote a definitive history of the Kosovo conflict. He recalls that “she had absolutely no role in the dirty work of negotiations.”

Rwanda:

Last year, former President Clinton asserted that his wife pressed him to intervene with U.S. troops to stop the Rwandan genocide. When asked about this assertion, Hillary Clinton said it was true. There is no evidence, however, to suggest that this ever happened. Even those individuals who were advocating a much more robust U.S. effort to stop the genocide did not argue for the use of U.S. troops. No one recalls hearing that Hillary Clinton had any interest in this course of action. Based on a fair and thorough review of National Security Council deliberations during those tragic months, there is no evidence to suggest that U.S. military intervention was ever discussed. Prudence Bushnell, the Assistant Secretary of State with responsibility for Africa, has recalled that there was no consideration of U.S. military intervention.

At no time prior to her campaign for the presidency did Senator Clinton ever make the claim that she supported intervening militarily to stop the Rwandan genocide. It is noteworthy that she failed to mention this anecdote – urging President Clinton to intervene militarily in Rwanda – in her memoirs. President Clinton makes no mention of such a conversation with his wife in his memoirs. And Madeline Albright, who was Ambassador to the United Nations at the time, makes no mention of any such event in her memoirs.

Hillary Clinton did visit Rwanda in March 1998 and, during that visit, her husband apologized for America’s failure to do more to prevent the genocide.

China

Senator Clinton also points to a speech that she delivered in Beijing in 1995 as proof of her ability to answer a 3 AM crisis phone call. It is strange that Senator Clinton would base her own foreign policy experience on a speech that she gave over a decade ago, since she so frequently belittles Barack Obama’s speeches opposing the Iraq War six years ago. Let there be no doubt: she gave a good speech in Beijing, and she stood up for women’s rights. But Senator Obama’s opposition to the War in Iraq in 2002 is relevant to the question of whether he, as Commander-in-Chief, will make wise judgments about the use of military force. Senator Clinton’s speech in Beijing is not.

Senator Obama’s speech opposing the war in Iraq shows independence and courage as well as good judgment. In the speech that Senator Clinton says does not qualify him to be Commander in Chief, Obama criticized what he called “a rash war . . . a war based not on reason, but on passion, not on principle, but on politics.” In that speech, he said prophetically: “[E]ven a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.” He predicted that a U.S. invasion of Iraq would “fan the flames of the Middle East,” and “strengthen the recruitment arm of al Qaeda.” He urged the United States first to “finish the fight with Bin Laden and al Qaeda.”

If the U.S. government had followed Barack Obama’s advice in 2002, we would have avoided one of the greatest foreign policy catastrophes in our nation’s history. Some of the most “experienced” men in national security affairs – Vice President Cheney and Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and others – led this nation into that catastrophe. That lesson should teach us something about the value of judgment over experience. Longevity in Washington, D.C. does not guarantee either wisdom of judgment.

Conclusion:

The Clinton campaign’s argument is nothing more than mere assertion, dramatized in a scary television commercial with a telephone ringing in the middle of the night. There is no support for or substance in the claim that Senator Clinton has passed “the Commander-in-Chief test.” That claim – as the TV ad – consists of nothing more than making the assertion, repeating it frequently to the voters and hoping that they will believe it.

On the most critical foreign policy judgment of our generation – the War in Iraq – Senator Clinton voted in support of a resolution entitled “The Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of U.S. Military Force Against Iraq.” As she cast that vote, she said: “This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make — any vote that may lead to war should be hard — but I cast it with conviction.” In this campaign, Senator Clinton has argued – remarkably – that she wasn’t actually voting for war, she was voting for diplomacy. That claim is no more credible than her other claims of foreign policy experience. The real tragedy is that we are still living with the terrible consequences of her misjudgment. The Bush Administration continues to cite that resolution as its authorization – like a blank check – to fight on with no end in sight.

Barack Obama has a very simple case. On the most important commander in chief test of our generation, he got it right, and Senator Clinton got it wrong. In truth, Senator Obama has much more foreign policy experience than either Bill Clinton or Ronald Reagan had when they were elected. Senator Obama has worked to confront 21st century challenges like proliferation and genocide on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He possesses the personal attributes of a great leader – an even temperament, an open-minded approach to even the most challenging problems, a willingness to listen to all views, clarity of vision, the ability to inspire, conviction and courage.

And Barack Obama does not use false charges and exaggerated claims to play politics with national security.



for link to Craig memo click the title of this post

Hispanics and the U.S. Census

Here is the link to a very thorough demographic report on Hispanics and the U.S. Census.

Awful Indiana Senate Bill 335 is Dead!

One down... let's hope that 4088 becomes history as well.

No immigration bill this year in Indiana

Eric Bradner
Originally published 06:29 p.m., March 13, 2008
Updated 07:27 p.m., March 13, 2008


INDIANAPOLIS — UPDATE

Indiana will not pass a bill this year to crack down on businesses that employ undocumented aliens.

Sen. Tom Weatherwax, R-Logansport, who chaired a House-Senate conference committee tasked with finding a compromise version of the immigration bill, said that as all heads turn to property taxes in the waning hours of the legislative session, immigration goes on the back burner.

The best the legislature can do this year, he said, is to create a summer study committee that will present its recommendations to next year's General Assembly.

Weatherwax earlier Thursday had tasked the conference committee - which has one member from each party in both the House and the Senate - with finding out what their caucuses could agree to.

But half an hour after they were scheduled to reconvene Thursday night, the committee's members had not returned. That was when Weatherwax said he'd recommend a study committee instead of attempting to rush through an immigration bill before the legislative session ends Friday at midnight.

Lawmakers worked into the evening Thursday to hash out an agreement on a bill that would crack down on business that employ unauthorized immigrants.

A conference committee made up of Indiana House and Senate members has met twice today, and is scheduled to reconvene later tonight. The panel's chairman, Sen. Tom Weatherwax, R-Logansport, sent its members back to their caucuses with the instructions to find "some answers as far as what you think you could do."

The conference committee consists of one voting member from both parties in the House and Senate, and in order for the bill to proceed, it must gain unanimous approval from all four members.

Emotions are high on both sides of the debate over illegal immigration. It's drawn the attention of religious groups, which have held dueling press conferences -- some for the bill, others against it.

Opponents of the immigration bill included business leaders and advocates for the Hispanic community. They argued that illegal immigration is an issue that demands action from the federal government, not the state. They've called the bill unconstitutional. Religious leaders have also argued that the bill will cause racial profiling on the part of employers.

The bill's supporters have said that illegal immigration demands action because it places an unnecessary burden on the state's health care and education systems. They've said that while it's best for the federal government to act on the issue, its failure to do so means Indiana must pass its own bill.... (More)

The Way Obama Makes Me Feel


I know that many people don't consider Rolling Stone magazine a liable source of politics, but today i found this opinion article that made me agree to a lot of points. A lot of the thoughts written by the author were as if they were extracted from me.
I am not a US citizen, i am a DREAMER, but the hope that Obama has injected in me is like one i have not felt since mexican presidential candidate Luis Donaldo Colosio woke up among the masses and gave us hope. His way to infect hope and change was soon cut short when he was assassinated.

I can't fail to mention the many things I've been learning about American politics, I have yet to learn more. Yes, countries in Latinamerica are corrupt with its politics and many more things, but you know what... the United Stated does not fall short either... all you have to do is look at the Hillary Clinton campaign for instance.


*****

The Machinery of Hope
Inside the grass-roots field operation of Barack Obama, who is transforming the way political campaigns are run

By TIM DICKINSONPosted Mar 20, 2008 3:00 PM

It's Presidents day, two weeks before the Texas primary, and Adam Ukman has come to the small city of San Marcos to train precinct captains for Barack Obama. A soft-spoken native of Houston, Ukman has served on the campaign's front lines in Iowa and Utah, organizing grass-roots supporters to secure decisive victories in both states. This evening, more than eighty residents of San Marcos have crammed into a yellow clapboard recreation center on a street dotted with shacks that date from the Jim Crow era. "Our job is not to run in here to tell you how it's going to be," Ukman tells them. "This is your campaign. Not our campaign."

Anyone who has spent time around Democratic politics has heard this kind of rhetoric before. Most often, it's pure horseshit. But Ukman is not here to break in a batch of untrained organizers. He knows that there is literally hundreds of years of organizing experience in the room — all he needs to do is set it loose. There's Michael Collins, an old-school politico in a tan Stetson who chaired John F. Kennedy's campaign in West Texas in 1960. A few seats over is Sandra Tenorio, who oversaw immigration issues for Gov. Ann Richards in the 1990s. And there's "Big Bob" Barton, a fixture of local party races since he worked as a volunteer for Gene McCarthy in '68. "I first voted for a Democrat more than fifty years ago," he barks out in his dry baritone. "I try not to fall in love with too many men, but this is the best damn one we've had since John Kennedy."

What Ukman is doing here in the rec center in the Hill Country of Texas is something new in American politics. Over the past year, the Obama campaign has quietly worked to integrate the online technologies that fueled the rise of Howard Dean —as well as social-networking and video tools that didn't even exist in 2004 — with the kind of neighbor-to-neighbor movement-building that Obama learned as a young organizer on the streets of Chicago. "That's the magic of what they've done," says Simon Rosenberg, president of the Democratic think tank NDN. "They've married the incredibly powerful online community they built with real on-the-ground field operations. We've never seen anything like this before in American political history."

In the process, the Obama campaign has shattered the top-down, command-and-control, broadcast-TV model that has dominated American politics....(More)

Thursday, March 13, 2008

U.S. Citizens -children of undocumented parents are not considered state residents in VA.?

It was my understanding that a U.S. citizen who has lived in a certain state for a period of time (6 months) is automatically eligible for in-state tuition.

In VA. however, you not only have to be a citizen, your parents cannot be undocumented.

Isn't this against the U.S. Constitution?
---
The University of Uncertainty

Va. Children of Illegal Immigrants Lack In-State Status

By Susan Kinzie
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 14, 2008; B01

When Nelson Lopez applied to Virginia colleges this year, it never occurred to him that he might not be considered a state resident. After all, he has lived in the state since he was a baby, holds a voter registration card and will graduate this spring from an Alexandria high school.

Then last month, he got an e-mail from the University of Virginia: If he wanted to be considered an in-state student, he had to prove that his parents are in this country legally.

Lopez, 18, was born here -- he's a U.S. citizen. But his parents are illegal immigrants.

In the years since a huge wave of immigrants began pouring into the country, their U.S.-born children are graduating from high school and finding that citizenship may not be enough.

Last week, the Virginia state attorney general's office weighed in, saying that schools must look at parents' legal status, because students are considered dependent until they are 24 years old. That means the children of parents without legal residency must be considered for out-of-state admission and tuition.

The attorney general's memo emphasized that state law allows exceptions on a case-by-case basis, if students 18 or older can offer convincing evidence that they should be considered separately from their parents.

That gives students such as Lopez a chance -- and leaves them in limbo.

He says his family, five people squeezed into a two-bedroom apartment, could never afford out-of-state rates. That's why he applied only to state schools in Virginia. It's far more difficult for out-of-state students to get into public universities.

"This is an amazing kid," said Krishna Leyva, director of a mentoring program at T.C. Williams High School. His neighborhood has gangs and drugs, but he takes tough classes, copy-edits the school paper and spends many days volunteering after school, tutoring other students. "He does so many good things, yet he keeps his [grade-point average] so high. And he was born here -- his dad pays taxes. I was really shocked."

What to do about illegal immigration has flared up in the presidential campaign, in state legislative chambers, on street corners. It gets to the heart of how people define this country, its promise, its opportunities, its loyalties and its obligations.

"Let's take care of our own people," said Brad Botwin, who runs an advocacy group called Help Save Maryland and testified last week at a hearing on a Maryland bill that would extend in-state tuition rates to illegal immigrants who meet certain residency and tax requirements. It's more competitive than ever to get into state colleges, he said, and more expensive. "Why would you give priority to someone who should rightly be arrested and deported?"

But students have the right to a public education through 12th grade in this country, advocates argue.

"Why in the world would the community seek to prevent further education that's only going to result in further contribution back to the state, in terms of workforce capacity, productivity, increased revenue?" asked Dan Hurley of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities.

It's one of the most contentious issues in higher education, he said. It's been especially volatile in Virginia.

"It's something that the general public is very sensitive to right now, that they do not want to provide incentives for continued illegal immigration, and they don't want to reward illegal behavior," said Sen. Emmett W. Hanger Jr. (R-Augusta), sponsor of a bill that would ban in-state tuition for illegal immigrants but provide exceptions for students who meet a series of tax and residency criteria.

Immigration law is complex, he said, and often the debate gets hung up on black-and-white issues when there's a lot of gray in the middle.

That's the trouble, said Bob Templin, president of Northern Virginia Community College, where the staff deals daily with intricacies of immigration law and thorny, unexpected situations.

Case in point: What to do about children born in the United States?

This year, the school changed its policy to emphasize that students 18 and older can make a case to be considered state residents.

"This is an important issue that is only now emerging in the commonwealth, one that current policies did not anticipate," he said.

"People have children born here who are graduating from high school," he said. "One of my concerns is that many of these students tend to be reluctant to press this issue, because they're fearful it will jeopardize their parents. That's unfortunate, that any young person who has a legitimate claim" might just turn away.

That's what Luz Jamilla Penarete did. She started school at George Mason University after graduating from Annandale High School in 2006, but when she registered for classes, she was shocked to find that the tuition was almost three times what she had expected. She thought it was a simple mistake -- she was born in Fairfax and has lived in Virginia all her life. But when she asked people in the domicile office why she was classified as out-of-state, she said they told her it was because her mother, a housekeeper and babysitter, is an illegal immigrant.

Penarete borrowed money, but after a year of classes, she couldn't afford any more and dropped out to work two jobs. She hopes to re-enroll next fall with the money she has saved, and with a lot of loans. "I know I'm probably not the only kid going through this," she said.

School officials did not comment on the specific case, but a spokesman confirmed that if a U.S. citizen's parents are illegal immigrants, the student would not qualify for in-state tuition.

Nelson Lopez is worried. He doesn't want to get his father, who works in the warehouse of a carpet-and-blinds store, in trouble. And he's really scared that when his adviser challenges the colleges on this point, he might be hurting his chances of admission -- what applicant wants to pick a fight? He was just going to accept the situation, maybe get a job and take a bus from his dad's apartment to classes at a community college, but Leyva was furious.

U-Va. officials said they could not talk about his case specifically. A spokeswoman pointed out that the school offers generous need-based financial aid, so low-income students should not have to go to another school because of the cost.

And Andrea Leeds Armstrong, of the university's committee on Virginia status, said last week after reading the memo, "I'm glad this decision came down," clarifying that students could make their own case separate from their parents. "Let me just say, I'm really happy to get this advice."

This week, the university asked Lopez to reapply for in-state tuition.


for link to WP article click the title of this post

The Texas DREAM Summit....Austin, TX.

Dear DREAM Act leaders, beneficiaries, and supporters,
I would like to share with you the information forwarded to us by the University Leadership Initiative Organization in Austin, TX., who is organizing this event to serve as a venue to network, organize and create an agenda for TEXAS advocacy... Everyone is encouraged to partake in this unique gathering.
donajih-

University Leadership Initiative

Texas DREAM Summit

When: Saturday, March 22, 2008
Location: Please e-mail them for more information.

Time: 9:30am - 6:00pm
Registration Fee: $10
Attire: Business Casual

Dear DREAM Act Supporter:

The Texas DREAM Summit is less than 2 weeks away! I hope you are as excited about this event as we are. Haven't registered yet? No problem! The registration deadline has been extended to Monday, March 17, 2008. ULI is looking forward to working together with other DREAM Act advocacy groups in Texas!

Deadline for Registration Extended!
The DEADLINE for REGISTRATION has been extended to Monday, March 17 at 8:00 pm. Please remember to send your completed registration form to ourdream2005@gmail.com You may still register after the deadline but must pay an additional $5 LATE CHARGE to the current registration fee.

Paying Registration Fee
Please bring your payment to the summit. You will be allowed to pay the $10 fee as long as we receive your completed registration form by 8:00 pm on MARCH 17.

Getting to know your organization
If you are attending the summit on behalf of an organization, please fill out the "Getting to know you" document so that your organization's information may be included in the CD.

Disclosure of your information is OPTIONAL
We recommend you share your contact information so that other participants/supporters in your surrounding area may contact you during action days. If you decide you do NOT want your information disclosed, please make a note of this in your completed registration form.
About Texas DREAM Summit Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Texas DREAM Summit?
This summit will be the first ever event to unite all Texas DREAM Act supporters and advocates. This event will be a venue for participants to network, strategize and solidify our efforts within the state for the passage of this legislation.

Who is the event for?
This is the ideal venue for community leaders, college students, professors, and high school students across Texas who actively supports the DREAM Act.

Who is the guest speaker?
Texas Representative Rick Noriega is the honorable guest speaker for the Texas DREAM Summit.

University Leadership Initiative Team
Website: www.universityleadership.org

Censoring the media on HR4088














Looking around to find out who is sponsoring 4088 I found this commentary by OpenCongress.org:

"We [Open Congress] are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: writeus |at| opencongress *dot* org.

[writeus@opencongress.org] We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon."


This is very significant - if Open Congress cannot find information on this bill that means most of the American people are also uninformed. Perhaps this is happening because the sponsors of the bill are concerned about getting into the spotlight. This bill will cause heartache and misery to millions of people. This bill makes Eliot Spitzer's romp with the expensive call girl look like cheating at checkers.

If our Congress goes through with this, the Sponsors of the S.A.V.E. act will have created their spot in the burning great beyond (and I don't mean heaven).

photo: http://uk.gizmodo.com/2006/07/11/federal_judge_sanitizing_movie.html

Explaining the SAVE Act (HR4088)

From the immigrationpolicy.org.:

"Both Houses of Congress are currently debating immigration policy issues. In the House, members are focused on the creation of a mandatory electronic employment verification system that would put additional responsibilities on both the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration and could endanger the jobs of American workers. In the Senate, a small group of Republican senators has introduced a series of deportation-only bills -- including an employment verification bill -- aimed only at escalating the rhetoric, rather than searching for solutions.


from Open Congress.org

H.R.4088 SAVE Act of 2007

To provide immigration reform by securing America's borders, clarifying and enforcing existing laws, and enabling a practical employer verification program.

11/6/2007--Introduced.
Secure America Through Verification and Enforcement Act of 2007 or SAVE Act of 2007 - Sets forth border security and enforcement provisions, including provisions respecting: (1) increases in Border Patrol and investigative personnel; (2) recruitment of former military personnel; (3) use of Department of Defense (DOD) equipment; (4) infrastructure improvements; (5) aerial and other surveillance; (5) a national strategy to secure the borders; (6) emergency deployment of Border Patrol agents; and (7) expansion of the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism along the northern and southern borders. Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act and specified maritime law sections to revise alien smuggling provisions. Sets forth provisions respecting border security on certain federal lands under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture or the Secretary of the Interior. Border Law Enforcement Act - Authorizes a border relief grant program for a tribal, state, or local law enforcement agency in a county within 25 miles of the southern border of the United States. Amends the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 to make the basic employment eligibility confirmation pilot program permanent. Sets forth conditions for the mandatory use of the E-verify system. Requires: (1) employer/employee notification of social security number mismatches and multiple uses, and related information sharing with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS); and (2) establishment of electronic birth and death registration systems. Amends the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) penalize specified employers for failure to correct information returns; and (2) prohibit employers from deducting from gross income wages paid to unauthorized aliens, with an exception for an employer participating in the basic employment eligibility confirmation program. Increases criminal alien program (CAP) personnel. Establishes within DHS a rewards program to assist in the elimination of commercial operations to produce or sell fraudulent immigration-related documents and to assist in the investigation, prosecution, or disruption of commercial alien smuggling operations. Provides for: (1) increased alien detention facilities; (2) additional district court judgeships; and (3) a media campaign to inform the public of changes made by this Act including a multilingual media campaign explaining noncompliance penalties.

for link to this article click the title of this post

The Frightening Thought of Bill HR 4088

Finally someone noticed. The NYT ran an editorial this morning that says it directly:

"Senate Republicans last week offered more than a dozen bills to further enshrine mass deportation as the national immigration strategy"

It is of great concern that the U.S. population is not responding to this travesty. How can we sit back when there is a bill before the Senate that is pushing for mass deportation?

at the end of this post is the opinion piece from the NYT. We've listed a number of comments to the article.


--
NYT 3 13 2008

2008 7:12 am
This editorial is absolutely right. What makes it even more pathetic is the hypocrisy of Republican party, who want undocumented aliens in the US because that way, their constituents, the unethical farmers, business owners, factory managers and builders who use undocumented aliens, can exploit them even more. They use fear mongering and paranoia solely for the sake of profits. If they were truly concerned about undocumented aliens, they would confiscate any and all businesses hiring undocumented aliens, as well as all assets of the owners and jail the owners and managers. Undocumented workers would cease to exist in the US. This would be great, however, if you want to limit economic growth and pay through the roof for food, housing and services. So the sensible thing is to throw out the incompetents in Homeland Security, INS and reorganize the system in a sane manner that best benefits our economy, foreign relations and society as a whole. Legalese the underclass in hiding before they become a real problem, link immigration to demand for employees and graduate students in strategic professions. Work toward boosting wages in Mexico and Central America and toward gradually reworking NAFTA into an agreement that allows free flow of labor as well as capital.

— Rick Mc Callister, San Salvador


--
2008 8:35 am
Shame shame shame almost every group who immigrated to America has been demonizes by others before them. During the 30's Hitler blamed ethnic groups for the economic problem in Germany; We have ignorant and hateful racist politions along with right wing thugs on radio and TV telling people it is alright to kick other groups of peoplke to make yourself feel better; Where our leaders should be examples they are cowards

— Harvey, New York NY


--
2008 8:35 am

It seems to me that we are all illegal immigrants. We arrived uninvited a few centuries back. We took the land we wanted -- which was all of it -- from the people who lived here. If they objected, we killed them. If they survived, we sent them to a special kind of prison called a "reservation." We destroyed their cultures and their languages, and we took everything they had. And now that it's all ours, we want to be very careful not to share any more of it than we already have.


A proud history, indeed, and a strong foundation on which to be self-righteous.

— robrachlin, greensboro, nc



I believe illegal immigrants are being used as scapegoats by the Republican party to avert the angry of 2/3rds of Americans againt the waste and violent this administration has cause. It is a weak attempt to find a "different bad guy" to let them off the hook. The sad thing is , it will be effective with some voters.

----
March 13, 2008
New York Times
Editorial

The Road to Dystopia

The search for a silver bullet to slay illegal immigration continues. Hard-liners are turning the country upside down looking for it.

They are looking in Washington, where Senate Republicans last week offered more than a dozen bills to further enshrine mass deportation as the national immigration strategy. It is a grab bag of enforcement measures that will be useful for tough-talking campaign commercials, but will not actually solve anything.

Republicans and some Democrats in the House are trying to force a vote on a bad bill called the SAVE Act, which among other things would force all workers, including citizens, to prove they have a right to earn a living — a bad idea compounded by the notoriously bad state of federal government records.

The error rate in just one database, the Social Security Administration’s, is believed to be more than 4 percent, making it likely that many thousands of Americans would face unjust firings and discrimination, and waste a lot of time and effort trying to clear their names.

The harsh-enforcement virus has spread far beyond the Capitol. In states like Oklahoma, laws have been enacted to force illegal immigrants further underground, off official registries and into anonymity, by denying them identification like driver’s licenses. In a growing number of states and counties, politicians are offering up police officers to the federal government for immigration posses. From Prince William County, Va., to Maricopa County, Ariz., officers who pull people over for minor traffic infractions are checking immigration papers, too.

Many law-enforcement professionals say this is reckless and self-defeating, because it sends a deep, silencing chill into immigrant communities. Citizens and legal residents will inevitably be hassled for looking Latino. And it is expensive; Prince William’s new law is expected to cost $26 million over five years, plus a few million more to outfit police cars with cameras, as a hedge against lawsuits.

Maybe some people do not mind that immigration zealotry is sending the country down a path of far greater intrusion into citizens’ lives, into a world of ingrained suspicion, routine discrimination and economic disruption. Is that what we want — to make the immigration system tougher without fixing it? To make illegal immigrants suffer without any hope of ever becoming legal, because that is amnesty?

Could it be that tightening the screws relentlessly on illegal immigrants, even if some citizens suffer in the process, is all for the greater good?

Which is — what exactly? To drive a large cohort of workers out of a sputtering economy? To take more people off the books? To prop up the under-the-table businesses that inevitably evade such crackdowns? To worsen wages and working conditions for all Americans, since nobody works more cheaply and takes more abuse than a terrified, desperate immigrant?

This is a country that runs on routine amnesties. Where would the courts be without plea bargains, or state budgets without periodic tax forgiveness? Are illegal immigrants the one class of undesirables for whom common sense, proportionality, discernment, good judgment and compassion are unthinkable?

It is frightening to think that this country’s answer could be an emphatic yes.

DREAM Act Play...

A co-presentation of Colores Actors-Writers Workshop and ASU Gammage
“DREAM ACT”
A play in one-act by James E. Garcia

Directed by John Tang and Luis Avila

A SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT THE PERFORMANCES:
This play will be presented in English and in Spanish in individual
performances each evening and during matinees.

ABOUT THE PLAY:
Graduate student Victoria Nava came to the U.S. as a toddler. Her parents crossed illegally. She is undocumented, but dreams of practicing medicine in the United States (the only country she’s ever known). In the face of growing anti-immigrant sentiment she worries her dream may be slipping away.

WHEN:
April 11- April 20

WHERE:
Playhouse on the Park, 1850 N. Central Ave., Phoenix , AZ , 85004, (Palm and Central Ave. )

Info: Call 602-460-1374 or email jgarcia@americanlatino.net or visit www.americanlatino.net/caww

ADMISSION:
Standard ticket prices will range from $10 to $14 and will be available online in advance via americanlatino.net/caww or showup.com or at the door.

*APRIL 11 IS AN ‘AMERICAN DREAM FUND’ FUND-RAISER *

The opening night performances on April 11 at 7:30 (English) and 9 p.m. (Spanish) are fund-raisers for the American Dream Fund, operated by Chicanos Por La Causa and the Victoria Foundation. The fund provides scholarships for undocumented undergraduates attending Arizona State University . Admission to the fund-raiser is $100 per person or $150 per couple. Fund-raiser tickets go on sale Monday, March 10, 2008 at the headquarters of Chicanos Por La Causa, 1112 East Buckeye Road in Phoenix , AZ. Your ticket purchase for the fund-raiser is a tax deductible donation.

Special acknowledgements:
This production of “Dream Act” is being produced in alliance with Cultural Arts Coalition, ASU Center for Community Development and Civil Rights, CADENA, Hispanic Institute of Social Issues , Chicanos por la Causa/Victoria Foundation, American Dream Fund Coalition, Community Advocacy Symposium (ASU Downtown), Aguila Youth Leadership Institute, 2008 Border Justice Festival and Film Event.


About Colores Actors-Writers Workshop:
CAWW was founded in 2002 by James E. Garcia. It is an incorporated non-profit theater company dedicated to the presentation and development of Latino and multicultural theater. Recent productions include: American Pastorela: The Shepherds’ Odyssey (Playhouse on the Park, 2007), A Mother’s Will (SMCC Performing Arts Center, 2007); In a Glass House: The Life and Times of Raul Castro (Herberger Theater Center, 2007); Chuy (Herberger Theater Center, 2006); Voices of Valor (Gammage Auditorium, 2006); Don Juan: Love After Death (Mesa Fine Arts Center, 2006); Ghost Dance Messiah, (Heard Museum, 2006); Borderlines (Herberger Theater Center, 2005).


Una presentación en conjunto de Colores Actors-Writers Workshop y ASU Gammage
“DREAM ACT”
Una obra de un acto, de James E. García

Dirigida por John Tang y Luis Avila

NOTA:
Esta obra será presentada en ingles y español en cada presentación, los días de matinée y en presentaciones separadas.

LA OBRA:
La estudiante de postgrado Victoria Nava vino a los Estados Unidos desde pequeña. Sus padres cruzaron ilegalmente la frontera. Ella es indocumentada, pero sueña practicar medicina en los Estados Unidos (el único país que ella ha conocido). Ante el creciente sentimiento antiemigrante Victoria esta preocupada que su sueño se desvanezca.

CUANDO:
11 de Abril- 20 de Abril

DONDE:
Playhouse on the Park, en el 1850 al norte de la avenida Central., Phoenix, AZ, 85004

Para mas información llame al 602-460-1374 o por correo electrónico a jgarcia@americanlatino.net

BOLETAJE:
Los precios regulares de boletaje oscilaran entre los $10 y $14. Puede encontrarlos en taquilla, en americanlatino.net/caww o en showup.com desde el 10 de marzo

*LA NOCHE DE ESTRENO (APRIL 11) SERA UNA PRESENTACION ESPECIAL DE RECAUDACION DE FONDOS*

La noche de estreno del 11 de abril, desde las 7:30 y hasta las 9 de la noche, se llevará a cabo una presentación para el fondo American Dream dirigido por Chicanos por la Cusa y la Victoria Foundation. Los fondos serán destinados a becas para estudiantes universitarios indocumentados en Arizona . El costo de admisión para la recaudación de fondos será de $100 por persona y $150 por parejas. Los boletos saldrán a la venta en Chicanos por la Causa, 1112 E. Buckeye Road, Phoenix, el 10 de marzo del año en curso. Llame al 602-460-1374 para obtener mas detalles. La compra de su boleto párale evento de recaudación de fondos será deducible de impuestos.

Agradecimientos Especiales
La producción "Dream Act" ha sido producida en conjunto con la Coalición de Artes Culturales, el Centro de Desarrollo y Derechos Civiles de ASU, CADENA, el Instituto Hispano de Asuntos Sociales, Chicanos por la Causa/ Victoria Foundation, la Coalición American Dream Fund, el Simposio de Representación Comunitaria (ASU Downtown), El Instituto de Liderazgo Águila, y el Festival de Justicia Fronteriza y Cine 2008

Acerca de Colores Actors-Writers Workshop:
Esta agrupación fue fundada en el 2002 por James García. Es una compañía de teatro incorporada y sin fines de lucro dedicada a la presentación y desarrollo de puestas en escena latinas y multiculturales. Algunas de las producciones más recientes son: American Pastorela: The Shepherds’ Odyssey (Playhouse on the Park, 2007), A Mother’s Will (SMCC Performing Arts Center, 2007); In a Glass House: The Life and Times of Raul Castro (Herberger Theater Center, 2007); Chuy (Herberger Theater Center, 2006); Voices of Valor (Gammage Auditorium, 2006); Don Juan: Love After Death (Mesa Fine Arts Center, 2006); Ghost Dance Messiah, (Heard Museum, 2006).

Making it Clear on TAFSA- Financial Aid for DREAMERS in Texas


Ok, before minuteman out there get jumpy about us DREAMERS getting financial aid in Texas, please read the following response to a furic citizen. My friend and fellow DREAMER as well as her friend wrote a response to a letter that a person wrote complaining that we, Texas DREAMERS get financial aid. The letter written by an unknown person very much describes the general ignorant opinion of people who capitalize and generalize the case of one person they meet to the rest of us. Not only that, as you read, you can read the hate-mongering comments that are completely irrelevant to the issue of financial aid.

Please read and get the facts straight; we, DREAMERS do not get federal aid, loans, or PELL grants. If that was the case i would have finished with my degree a long time ago instead of taking breaks because of lack of money. We have something called the TEXAS grant and it is literally given on a first come fist serve basis, i have been left out of aid more than one time because the funds run out.

Please educate others, that is the only way to make progress.

****************

RESPONSE TO ANTI IMMIGRANT BULLETIN

OUR COMMENTS TO THE LETTER BELOW OUR RESPONSE:


1. I think its important to note that PELL grant (federal money) is not given to just any immigrant. In order for federal money to be given to an immigrant, that immigrant has to be an LPR (legal permanent resident) and had to have been an LPR for 5 years or more.

There is a PELLgrant that is not federal money, it comes from the state. Like here in Texas we have the TAFSA. (Texas Application for Federal Student Aid) and it does provide financial assistance to immigrants not LPR. There is thou, a extensive requisites to be able to qualify, including:
-Enlist in the arm forces
-Prove that parents pay taxes
-Sign a notorized letter stating that you will become a LPR as soon as you have an opportunity.
-Maintain a certain grade point average.

2. The CARIBE program is ONLY for asylum or refugees that are documented, "legal" or that have come from war torn countries or politically unstable situations. It’s important to mention that this CARIBE program is GRANT FUNDED & not funded by the Federal government. Again, only immigrants with refugee or asylum status can benefit from CARIBES’s services.

3. I don’t know much about the WAIT program. Honestly I did not find anything on WAIT when I tried to research it.

It is unfortunate that this girl "Dominican Republican" does not want to get a job or become a U.S. citizen. But this is a personal choice. Most young immigrants don’t choose to immigrate, it is usually their parents choice. Please lets not narrow and generalize all immigrants because of HER choice.

When you participate in discriminatory activities you are creating a new form of racism based on immigration status and it is also creating a 21st century holocaust based on xenophobia, hatred and ignorance.

When you are speaking about "subjects close to your heart" PLEASE be cautious of your wording and your research. We have statistics about how IMMIGRANTS do pay taxes, do learn the language, do contribute to society but are also abused and discriminated against simply because they were born in countries that lack economic opportunities.

This is for educational purposes. You do not have to distribute!

Saludos,
Betty & Zelene

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A teacher speaks

This is a subject close to my heart. Do you know that we have adult students at the school where I teach who are not US citizens and who get the PELLgrant, which is a federal grant (no pay back required) plus other federal grants to go to school?

One student from the Dominican Republic told me that she didn’t want me to find a job for her after she finished my program, because she was getting housing from our housing department and she was getting PELL grant which paid for her total tuition and books, plus money left over.

She was looking into WAIT which gives students a CREDIT CARD for gas to come to school, and into CARIBE which is a special program *(check it out- I did) for immigrants and it pays for child care and all sorts of needs while they go to school or training. The one student I just mentioned told me she was not going to be a US citizen because she plans to return to the Dominican Republic someday and that she ’loves HER country.’

I asked her if she felt guilty taking what the US is giving her and then not even bothering to become a citizen and she told me that it doesn’t bother her, because that is what the money is there for!

I asked the CARIBE administration about their program and if you ARE a US citizen, you don’t qualify for their program. And all the while, I am working a full day, my son-in-law works more than 60 hours a week,and everyone in my family works and pays for our education.

Something is wrong here. I am sorry but after hearing they want to sing the National Anthem in Spanish - enough is enough.

Nowhere did they sing it in Italian, Polish, Irish (Celtic), German or any other language because of immigration. It was written by Francis Scott Key and should be sung word for word the way it was written. The news broadcasts even gave the translation -- not even close. Sorry if this offends anyone but this is MY COUNTRY

IF IT IS YOUR COUNTRY SPEAK UP -- please pass this along.

I am not against immigration -- just come through like everyone else. Get a sponsor; have a place to lay your head; have a job; pay your taxes, live by the rules AND LEARN THE LANGUAGE as all other immigrants have in the past -- and GOD BLESS AMERICA!

PART OF THE PROBLEM

Think about this: If you don’t want to forward this for fear of offending someone -- YOU’RE PART OF THE PROBLEM!

It is Time for America to Speak up If you agree -- pass this along, if you don’t agree --- delete it!

Image obtained here

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

TAFSA Form lost in spiderwebs


It is definitely not a surprise for University of Houston students to deal with its unfriendly administration, and that is putting it nicely.
As a student there I know how bad the university screws students over and over again. Can you imagine what being a DREAMER student there is like? Well, being one... has being a great experience, but it becomes a challenge to survive the administratio